User talk:Yeeno/Archive 5

Latest comment: 1 month ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

DYK for Professional Esports Association edit

On 17 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Professional Esports Association, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Professional Esports Association suspended its plans for a Counter-Strike: Global Offensive league four months after its announcement? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Professional Esports Association. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Professional Esports Association), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Gene Principe edit

On 25 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gene Principe, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that sports broadcaster Gene Principe had to choose between covering his hometown team at the 2006 NHL playoffs and fulfilling his dream of covering the Italian team at the 2006 FIFA World Cup? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gene Principe. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gene Principe), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 30 January 2022 edit

WP:AFC Helper News edit

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

  • AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
  • The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 27 February 2022 edit

ITN recognition for Kim Jung-ju edit

On 5 March 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kim Jung-ju, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 20:22, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 27 March 2022 edit

Orphaned non-free image File:Dotin logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Dotin logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 08:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 24 April 2022 edit

ITN recognition for Guy Lafleur edit

On 25 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Guy Lafleur, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:17, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

A pie for you! edit

  I just saw your Christmas message, & obviously it's a tad late for Christmas wishes so here's a pie! X-750 I've made a mistake, haven't I? 10:56, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orca whale of gratitude! edit

  Orca Whale of Gratitude
Thank you for helping to buff up the recently created article for Canadian figure Keltie Byrne, for keeping it respectful in light of the subject matter, and for linking her page back to other notable pages! 😊 PetSematary182 (talk) 21:26, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
@PetSematary182: Thank you! I certainly didn't expect to encounter such a tragic story during new pages patrol, but I'm glad you could tell her story! Happy editing, Yeeno (talk) 00:37, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022 edit

 
 
New Page Review queue March 2022

Hello Yeeno,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 819 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 859 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 May 2022 edit

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed edit

Hello, Yeeno

Thank you for creating Still Green (album).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Needs substantial development. There's plenty of material in the referenced sources to build that from. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 23:10, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022 edit

 
 
New Page Review queue June 2022

Hello Yeeno,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000[a] at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.[b]

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here.   Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 11134 articles, as of 08:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders
  • Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
  • If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
  • To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Notes
  1. ^ not including another ~6,000 redirects
  2. ^ The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 June 2022 edit

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on! edit

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

José Pacheco (Portuguese politician) redirect to José Pacheco (politician) edit

I created a redirect from José Pacheco (Portuguese politician) to José Pacheco (politician). Just to remind you WP:A10 should only be used if the title of the article is an implausible redirect to the duplicated page in question. BangJan1999 03:01, 11 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

@BangJan1999: I felt that a redirect would create unnecessary redundancy in searches, but I guess redirects are cheap. Thanks for handling this. Yeeno (talk) 03:04, 11 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Governorpet for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Governorpet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Governorpet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:51, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

A minor clarification edit

I recently thanked you for an edit detailing a current event. I meant to thank you for adding its background. They're both good edits, to be clear, but one, in my opinion, was the best. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

@InedibleHulk: Thanks for the thanks  . I agree that context is the most important in a developing article. Yeeno (talk) 05:06, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for Visit by Pope Francis to Canada edit

You did well in nominating and updating it for Ongoing. Then in adapting it to standalone blurbs. Ten supported a blurb, more than opposed either or both. That's a win. Anyone with basic reading skills will see how ten supporters were screwed by two cheating closers in the archives. Keep up the good work!

Step by step, outsiders are waking up to the significance of this journey. When it comes time for money to leave Rome, keepsakes to return home, old bulls to technically crumble or whatever else it takes for reality to finally sink in with naysayers, that blurb will have been built on your back just as surely as on many others'.

Merci beaucoup, miigwech and by any word sincerely, InedibleHulk (talk) 19:48, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

@InedibleHulk: Thank you for your support. I share your disappointment that this wasn't able to make it to ITN in one form or another, but help but think that me nominating it for ongoing instead of a blurb was a mistake in that it caused so much confusion and lost context (it also makes it look like I nominated it twice, but, like you said, anyone with basic reading skills should've figured out that wasn't the case).
Regardless, being able to bring attention to this important journey is a big win, and I'll continue the work to make this article the best that it can be. Perhaps we can bring it to DYK? Yeeno (talk) 00:03, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, it definitely got a bit blurry at the end. But this trip is an ongoing event, so Ongoing made sense. I think some people have grown so used to seeing indefinite pestilence and war in the spot, it's become more a game of Beat That With Famine than a place for scheduled public events. I don't exactly know how to drive a DYK, but if you start it, support should follow. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:27, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 August 2022 edit

NPP drive award edit

  The Reviewer Barnstar
This award is given to Yeeno for 54 reviews in the July NPP backlog reduction drive. Your contributions played a part in the 9895 reviews that took place during the drive. Thank you for your contributions. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 08:56, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022 edit

 
New Page Review queue August 2022

Hello Yeeno,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination
MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.
Open letter to the WMF
The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.
TIP - Reviewing by subject
Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.
 
New reviewers
The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.
Reminders
  • Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
  • If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
  • To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

NPP Award edit

 

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar

For over 100 article reviews during 2021. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:19, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

NPP message edit

 

Hi Yeeno,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Jack Michaels edit

On 27 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jack Michaels, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that ice hockey commentator Jack Michaels began his career announcing an ostrich race? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jack Michaels. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jack Michaels), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 August 2022 edit

Board of Trustees election edit

Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 04:12, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Impy's Island edit

I had noticed that the page was deleted out of plagiarism and I can see why, as that person didn't know what he was doing and never bothered to look at the rules. However, I was in the middle of trying to fix the page when it got deleted because of the guy's big mistake. So, if I could, maybe I can try to actually make the page better, as well as maybe changing the title to have a capitalized I. (I have most of what I written down in a document, so I am mostly prepared) If not, then that is fine by me, I was simply asking because I knew I could try and improve it.

Also, I know I'm new to this wiki and I haven't really done anything, but I was trying to right a wrong that that person did. 95.49.82.236 (talk) 11:07, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Queen's Road East (song) edit

On 19 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Queen's Road East (song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1991 song "Queen's Road East" by Lo Ta-yu describes Elizabeth II as "beautiful even when saying goodbye"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Queen's Road East (song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Queen's Road East (song)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Vanced and ReVanced edit

Hello. I've noticed that you significantly contributed to Vanced and I was wondering if would be interested in helping me out with a draft of a related subject: Draft:ReVanced (2). It's on a very early stage with parts copied from the Vanced article. If you're unable to help at this time there's no trouble at all. Thanks anyway –Daveout(talk) 22:54, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive edit

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
 
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Peer review for Larry Kwong edit

Hello,I left some comments at the peer review for Larry Kwong. Happy to leave more feedback (fine-tooth comb for each section) if you are interested. Zetana (talk) 03:47, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi again, I just wanted to check with you about the peer review. If you intend on continuing it soon, no problem. But, if you won't be editing it in the near term, do you mind me closing it for now? Whenever you wish to return to the article, just leave me a note on my talk page and I can take another look. Zetana (talk) 19:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Zetana: Thanks for the review! I probably won't work on it until at least next weekend. If that's too long, you can close it, and I'll let you know when I return to it. Cheers, Yeeno (talk) 🍁 19:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
That's totally fine, there's no rush. Zetana (talk) 21:33, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 30 September 2022 edit

September drive bling edit

  The Modest Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to Yeeno for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2022 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 19:18, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pokémon HeartGold and SoulSilver edit

Hi, I noticed your revert of my edits at Pokémon HeartGold and SoulSilver. I think my edits should be restored because what I did was unitalicize the words that are supposed to be italicized. This makes sense because the default formatting of the headers are italicized, so unitalicization indicates words that are normally italicized. My explanation is probably confusing, but I hope that makes sense. FunnyMath (talk) 06:37, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

See WP:ITHAT for a better explanation. FunnyMath (talk) 21:23, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
@FunnyMath: Thanks for the explanation; I get what you're trying to do, which is reasonable, but the edits you made didn't italicize the links the way you wanted to. Perhaps you could test it out in your sandbox? Yeeno (talk) 00:30, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
No, I did italicize the links correctly. I unitalicized the words that are italicized in a normal sentence per WP:ITHAT.
For example, for this hatnote:
See also: Pokémon Gold and Silver § Plot
I changed it to this:
See also: Pokémon Gold and Silver § Plot
where the words "Pokémon Gold" and "Silver" are unitalicized because they are italicized in the title Pokémon Gold and Silver FunnyMath (talk) 00:45, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
You can check my old revision here: [1] FunnyMath (talk) 00:48, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
@FunnyMath: My mistake, I see what you are trying to do now. I've restored the edits and linked to the WP:ITHAT in the summary to clarify what the edits accomplish. Yeeno (talk) 00:50, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. No worries, it is a bit confusing, and a lot of articles on Wikipedia don't unitalicize words properly in the hatnotes. I'm trying to fix some of them. FunnyMath (talk) 00:52, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Sounds good, I'd just suggest that you include WP:ITHAT in the summary next time so others know what you're doing. Thanks! Yeeno (talk) 00:54, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
You're right. I'll make sure to do that from now on. FunnyMath (talk) 00:58, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Recent vandalism on the Jim Allister wikipedia page. edit

Hello, I noticed that you recently removed some vandalism on this page by a user called Comerford1. Given the nature of the vandalism and the frequency of attacks on the page, is it possible to ban the perpetrators from Wikipedia? I know that they can probably just create another identity for themselves but, at least, this would allow data to be collected on such users and would inconvenience them slightly.

Regards

BrownBowler BrownBowler (talk) 10:13, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

@BrownBowler: In short, yes, users can be blocked from editing per the blocking policy by an administrator (not me). In the case of vandals, we usually give them four warnings before they are blocked; the mentioned user has already been warned and has not edited since, so a block wouldn't be necessary at this time.
If there are multiple users persistently vandalizing a page within a short period of time, you could also make a request for page protection, which would temporarily block all new accounts from editing a certain page. There is also sockpuppet investigations, which deals with users abusing multiple accounts (called "socks"). I hope this answers your question! Yeeno (talk) 02:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your Message Title edit

Hello, is there anyway that I can add the material that I added this evening from the news article about Max Trejo to his Wikipedia page. I believe the information may be a little long, but it really fills in his background and covers one of the major accomplishments of his playing career. Can I revert it back? I am fairly a novice at this, and I am trying to improve, but deleting the quotes and what I put together really damages the entry, I believe. Jmr012 (talk) 02:28, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Jmr012: You can find a page's previous versions by clicking the "View History" button, which is near the "Edit" button on the top right. You can then view a previous revision by clicking on the timestamp on your revision's entry. In your case, it'd be 02:01, 21 October 2022‎, which is before the quotes were removed. You can access this revision to see your edits and reinstate what you think is important.
With the regards to the content, including long and detailed quotes gives undue weight to certain viewpoints. In other words, while the praise Trejo got after his four-game start may be worth noting, including the long quotes that take up over a third of the page overemphasizes the point. Instead, you may want to consider summing up the of quotes in a sentence or two, so I would suggest taking a looking back at the quotes and describing the key points in your own words.
Hope this helps; if you need more assistance you can visit the Wikipedia:Teahouse, a friendly spot for beginners where you can ask questions about editing and get help from volunteers. Best, Yeeno (talk) 03:23, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the information.. I am trying to find new sources of information to make the entry and balanced and informational as possible. But that comes in dribs and drabs. But no matter what, you guys have my back to fix anything atrocious that inadvertently post so I appreciate that. Jmr012 (talk) 21:18, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Early end of the backlog drive edit

A few days ago, new page patrollers got the backlog to zero. Due to the unprecedented success of the backlog drive, it will be ending early—at the end of 24 October, or in approximately two hours.

Barnstars will be awarded as soon as the coords can tally the results. Streak awards will be allocated based on the first three weeks of the drive, with the last three days being counted as part of week three.

Great work everyone! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

NPP Backlog Drive Award edit

  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
This award is given to Yeeno for collecting more than 25 points doing reviews and re-reviews, in the October NPP backlog reduction drive. Thank you for your contributions. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 09:06, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 October 2022 edit

I am cptnwpd edit

thanks for the announcement mr yeeno Cptnwkpd (talk) 04:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

continued vandalism with which you previously assisted edit

In the fine tradition of Numennewman (talk · contribs), 176.83.47.202 (talk · contribs), and 83.61.37.251 (talk · contribs), 212.115.142.130 (talk · contribs) has again vandalized the article at Logan Yuzna. I'm unsure what the next step in this particular dispute-resolution is, but I'm inviting previously-involved editors to the talk-page discussion. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 13:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar of Diligence edit

  The Barnstar of Diligence
This Barnstar of Diligence goes to Yeeno for their determination in responding and correcting certain repetitive and erroneous edits. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 15:53, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Mr Serjeant Buzfuz: Thank you! You should definitely take some credit as well, for coming up with the sources that, while stating the obvious, will hopefully put this silly issue to rest. Yeeno (talk) 19:16, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Unfortunately the 1949 federal statute isn't online, as far as I can tell. I will keep hunting. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 21:10, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 28 November 2022 edit

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022 edit

Hello Yeeno,

 

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

 
NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

  • There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
  • Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
  • Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
  • This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

 

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Your GA nomination of Professional Esports Association edit

The article Professional Esports Association you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Professional Esports Association and Talk:Professional Esports Association/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 06:01, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Professional Esports Association edit

The article Professional Esports Association you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Professional Esports Association for comments about the article, and Talk:Professional Esports Association/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Authority Control redirect edit

The template links to MBA (identifier) which is a redirect to MusicBrainz. Sould that be fixed and, if so, where would I report it? —DaydreamBelizer (talk) 01:01, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

@DaydreamBelizer: I don't think this is an issue, because according to the redirect page, identifiers are intentionally linked to redirects to avoid clutter in "What links here" and for other uses. Yeeno (talk) 01:14, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
OK thanks!
In the meantime, you too have been through the GA process, so feel free to fix anything at Nandi Bushell that needs it. —DaydreamBelizer (talk) 01:31, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Librsvg edit

Hey! I think that "SVG rendering library" as a short description for Librsvg is a simplier and better description (as well as it properly capitalized). Do let me know if you disagree!   ~ Eejit43 (talk) 02:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Happy Holidays! edit

  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2023!

Hello Yeeno, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2023.
Happy editing,

X750. Spin a yarn? Articles I've screwed over? 00:42, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

X750. Spin a yarn? Articles I've screwed over? 00:42, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

@X750: Thanks, have a great holiday as well! Yeeno (talk) 01:27, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 January 2023 edit

Happy New Year! edit

  Happy New Year!
Hello Yeeno:


Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels?

Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters.

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:29, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:29, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nandi Bushell edit

IABot has piqued my curiosity: why add archive links to live sources? —DaydreamBelizer (chat) 16:28, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

@DaydreamBelizer: Running the bot protects the sources from link rot, so sources are still easily accessible if they go down. IABot automatically finds an archived version of that page, or creates an archived version if one doesn't exist. Though it's not required for GA, some reviewers will strongly suggest you archive your sources. You can run it yourself by using the Fix dead links link in the page history tab.
For live sources, there's not much effect as the bot automatically marks them with url-status=live, so the original link is still primarily used and the archive is provided as a secondary link. For dead sources, the bot (or an editor) would change the param to url-status=dead, which would cause the citation to primarily link to an archived version.
IABot actually just fixed yesterday after being down for three months, so I ran it on a couple pages to test it out. Glad to see it works! Yeeno (talk) 00:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! It's been a while since I went through the GA process and I'd never seen this before, so I was a bit taken aback. —DaydreamBelizer (chat) 04:35, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 16 January 2023 edit

ITN recognition for Ray Cordeiro edit

On 17 January 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ray Cordeiro, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 05:11, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 4 February 2023 edit

Amir Arison edit

I've declined the copyvio-revdel request (for the time being). Thefamouseople.com is a site notorious for reusing content with attribution, so I can't be certain that they haven't just copied the content from the article. Happy to take another look if you can establish the content was on that site before it was used on Wikipedia. Nthep (talk) 11:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Nthep: My bad for not doing this check earlier. The content added in the January 2023 edit was already on Thefamouspeople.com in November 2022 per this copyvio report of the archived version. Thanks! Yeeno (talk) 04:08, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
No problem, thanksfor checking. I'll go back and deal with it. And, of course, my original comment should have been "Thefamouseople.com is a site notorious for reusing content without attribution". Nthep (talk) 07:52, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 20 February 2023 edit

The Signpost: 9 March 2023 edit

The Signpost: 20 March 2023 edit

The Signpost: 03 April 2023 edit

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive edit

New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Article patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
  • There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 April 2023 edit

The Signpost: 8 May 2023 edit

Orphaned non-free image File:Dead by Daylight Steam header.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Dead by Daylight Steam header.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:08, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 22 May 2023 edit

Citing Rotten Tomatoes edit

@Yeeno

Hi. I actually did start a discussion on using Rotten Tomatoes as a source a month ago and most of the editors that responded agreed that since it's not a journalism site and it's main purpose is film reviews, it shouldn't be used to source bio info about people. Because we don't know where they got that kind of info from. For all we know it could have web scraped from other sites like IMDB. The reason I even asked that question there to begin with is because it has many DOBs for actors that are incorrect.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_403#Rotten_Tomatoes_reliabilty Kcj5062 (talk) 21:27, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Kcj5062: Thanks for bringing this up, I wasn't aware of this discussion. It seems like these errors do bring the site's feedback mechanisms into question; perhaps an RfC is required to clarify this issue once and for all. In the meantime, I've removed the RT source from James Arnold Taylor. Yeeno (talk) 21:37, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
How exactly do you start a RfC? Sorry I really haven't been a frequent Wikipedia editor until recently and I'm still trying to learn some stuff. Kcj5062 (talk) 21:41, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Kcj5062: I've never started one myself, but it would be similar to a regular noticeboard post, except there are some extra templates you need to include (see WP:RFCST for steps). RfCs for sources are usually posted on WP:RSN, and there's also some extra info on the top of that page regarding RfCs. In this case, you should probably introduce the issue again and link to the previous inconclusive discussions on this topic. Yeeno (talk) 22:00, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Don Shipley edit

I am Don Shipley and I know what I've done in my Navy career and not somebody who just makes up a page about me. My changes were accuate and subtle.

Don Shipley BUDS 131 SEAL Team One, SEAL Team Two. Don5326 (talk) 01:38, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Discontent Content Issue 7 edit

The Signpost: 5 June 2023 edit

The Signpost: 19 June 2023 edit

Ann Munday edit

Thank you for pushing this article to draft so I could improve it. I mostly edit existing articles, and don't often create new articles, and in the past, I'd create a skeleton article and add references, pictures, and more text later. I wasn't using a sandbox. As Wiki has gotten tighter with new articles, that approach is no longer an option. I think it's ready for publishing now. Please take a look. [[Draft: Ann Munday]] Ellis408 (talk) 08:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

New pages patrol needs your help! edit

 
New pages awaiting review as of June 30th, 2023.

Hello Yeeno,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 3 July 2023 edit

Akane Yamaguchi edit

Hello. Help copy edit. Thanks you. 2402:800:6344:29D0:8DE5:C07C:DACA:63E6 (talk) 22:38, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 17 July 2023 edit

Orphaned non-free image File:Actors Guild of Nigeria logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Actors Guild of Nigeria logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:03, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive edit

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
 
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 August 2023 edit

The Signpost: 15 August 2023 edit

how do i join wikiproject video games edit

i tried to join but couldn’t figure it out :) Flopybunny (talk) 01:05, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Flopybunny: I don't believe there is a formal list of participants anywhere (Wikipedia:WikiProject Directory/Description/WikiProject Video games is auto-generated), but you can indicate your membership by placing {{User WPVG}} on your userpage. Let me know if you have any other questions! Yeeno (talk) 03:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
ok Flopybunny (talk) 16:09, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
look i wanted to create an article about herobrine and i know you are in wikiproject video games so could you help me Flopybunny (talk) 03:17, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
yeah i am kind of newish but i thought herobrine deserved it's own article Flopybunny (talk) 03:20, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
also i gave you a trout for fun because i just found out about them Flopybunny (talk) 03:48, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Colombia Justa Libres logo.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Colombia Justa Libres logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 27 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 August 2023 edit

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive edit

New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 16 September 2023 edit

New pages patrol newsletter edit

Hello Yeeno,

 
New Page Review article queue, March to September 2023

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 3 October 2023 edit

The Signpost: 23 October 2023 edit

November Articles for creation backlog drive edit

 

Hello Yeeno:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2500 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 6 November 2023 edit

The Signpost: 20 November 2023 edit

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 4 December 2023 edit

CS1 error on Rick Beato edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rick Beato, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive edit

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 24 December 2023 edit

Talk:YouTube edit

The edit you just reverted may not have been very productive but it was not vandalism, which has a very narrow and specific meaning on Wikipedia. Please be careful not to use that term too loosely. Cullen328 (talk) 09:33, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Cullen328: My mistake, I was simply using the first option on Wikipedia:RedWarn. You are right, the more suitable option should have been "non-constructive edit"; I'll take note of this in the future. Yeeno (talk) .09:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. A learning experience for both of us. I know relatively little about RedWarn. Carry on into 2024. Cullen328 (talk) 09:57, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 10 January 2024 edit

Disambiguation link notification for January 25 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Streamer Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BotezLive. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 13:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Port of Oakland logo.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Port of Oakland logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 January 2024 edit

January 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award edit

  The Working Man's Barnstar
This award is given in recognition to Yeeno for collecting at least 10 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for Gregory Charles Rivers edit

On 10 February 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Gregory Charles Rivers, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 13 February 2024 edit

Kamloops logo design credit edit

Hello Yeeno,

My name is Vaughn Warren and I designed the Kamloops Tournament Capital logo for the City of Kamloops BC.

I am noticing that I am no longer credited with the design, pursuant to your upload of it in 2022. Previous to that time, I was credited for the design on Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamloops#/media/File:Kamloops_Logo.svg

I would like to be credited for my work, obviously. Can you help rectify this situation, please?

Thank you.

Vaughn vaughn@vaughnwarren.com vaughnwarrenartist@Gmail.com97 2001:569:FCFB:8000:810E:A2F7:1315:E3BC (talk) 01:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Vaughn,
Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I have added your name and linked your website in the description of File:Kamloops Logo.svg; please let me know if this works for you.
Best, Yeeno (talk) 04:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your prompt response; I very much appreciate it.
I can recommend the following wording, if its not too much trouble:
"Kamloops Tournament Capital of Canada logo, owned by the City of Kamloops, designed by Vaughn Warren (wwwvaughnwarren.com) in 2001."
THANK YOU so much, Yeeno - you have restored my faith in the internet.
Vaughn VWKami (talk) 19:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@VWKami:   Done, no trouble at all. Thanks for reaching out, I'm glad this could be resolved! Yeeno (talk) 20:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
Thank you, Yeeno, for your prompt and effective action. VWKami (talk) 22:08, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024 GAN backlog drive edit

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
 
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 2 March 2024 edit

Heyo! edit

I'm with artefacts studio, and the changes you rolled back on the Garfield Kart category were true. The domain service we used for garfield.page no-longer is supported (Google Domains) and we had to change it to the GarfieldKart.net domain, Also the reports about a new garfield kart game are also true. So i just wanted to inform you about it, and i could help provide you proof when you reply if you'd like and you don't believe me i can send it on discord! 2603:9001:5B00:452:6502:2BF7:B7:52DC (talk) 22:17, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Would you happen to have a news release or social media post from your studio's official channels or a reliable third-party publication that could confirm that information? All information on Wikipedia has to be verifiable and from a reliable source, so I would need something online that any reader could verify for themselves. Thanks, Yeeno (talk) 22:59, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I have full access to the original Garfield.Page website, On steamDB it shows this aswell https://files.catbox.moe/u8fevh.png . I will send further proof on discord, but i will continue to reapply these changes to the wiki until contacted for more info. @gamerboy80yt on discord, to see the full access to the garfield.page website. Thank you 2603:9001:5B00:452:6502:2BF7:B7:52DC (talk) 01:00, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
While I understand and appreciate your enthusiasm for this new project, these edits cannot be included on the page without a reliable source, and a private message on Discord is neither reliable nor verifiable. If non exist or can be created, then that information cannot be included on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability for more details. Thanks, Yeeno (talk) 04:52, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I cant send the proof on wikipedia, i am one of the head game designers at Artefacts? Atleast let me upload the real website, Look at garfield.page. It doesnt even go anywhere? I find it stupid you take the time out of your day to rollback my official changes and creating the page more misleading than "i am". Garfield.page redirects to nowhere and i have full access, at this point im just gonna setup a bot in python that keeps adding back the website and info and switching vpns, Thats how dumb i think what your saying is. If you want your stupid proof, Message me on discord or i will continue to save the changes. 97.104.226.67 (talk) 21:17, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 29 March 2024 edit

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024 edit

Hello Yeeno,

 
New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

 

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply