Hey Sorry that i damaged you Site im a new User

But i have read a Lot of your Comments and i think you Really know what you are Talking about and i ve got a question to you

Can you Tell me how you can call the Music style of skinny puppy After the Réunion ? Is it still Electro industrial ? Or is skinny puppy just a Electronica band which combined Several Elements of Differend Experimental Electronic Music styles knows as Electronica or IDM ? Thanks for your help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brosi90 (talkcontribs) 14:28, 13 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to WikiProject Industrial edit

File:WikiProjectIndustrial.png

You have been invited to join the Industrial WikiProject, a collaborative effort to build a more detailed guide on Wikipedia's coverage of industrial music. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or add some of your own.

Musicaindustrial (talk) 14:18, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Industrial Roll Call edit

Hi there! I'm trying to figure out how many active members are still interested in working on WikiProject Industrial. I've added a lot of new articles to our project space, and categorized every article already in the project. Please go to the project's talk page and indicate if you're still interested in working on the project, and feel free to add any other articles you want to the project scope. Hopefully we can get this project moving again! Thanks. Torchiest (talk | contribs) 15:20, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

I uploaded a new version of the logo. Let me know what you think! Torchiest (talk | contribs) 15:18, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I think it looks good on some things, like the main side bar, but it doesn't look as good in the invitation and notice templates. Feel free to download the image and mess around with it. I'm not the most artistic person in the world. Torchiest (talk | contribs) 15:48, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Corrosion EP edit

Dude, that is so hilarious. I was making the page at the same time as you! It said there was an edit conflict, and I was like, "WTF?? It's brand new!" Wow on the same wavelength, what are the chances. Torchiest (talk | contribs) 04:32, 30 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, your version was better than mine. I didn't have an image or anything yet. I've been trying to clean up the FLA back catalogue today, it was a mess. Torchiest (talk | contribs) 04:37, 30 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Corroded Disorder edit

Right back at you on all the hard work. I actually had to undo an edit by someone that had immediately wiped the page and sent a re-direct back to the discography just minutes after I first created it. Wikipedia can be a battlefield sometimes, but I think it's sourced enough, barely, to be notable on its own. Torchiest (talk | contribs) 07:10, 30 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Citation & WP:WikiProject Industrial edit

Thanks for the heads up. Yeah, that was definitely a copy and paste mistake that I didn't notice. Sorry to hear you've been sick, and I hope you're recovering. I got KMFDM and Xtort to good article status, but Mythmaker failed the review. I've since added some more material to it, but it will need even more work before its ready to be re-nominated. Still debating what to work on next, although I've added a scattering of info to a few FLA albums, as you of course know. Anyway, get well soon. Torchiest (talk | contribs) 02:26, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

WP:WikiProject Industrial edit

Hey, nice work on all the extra functionality you're adding. I was wondering what all the new headers are supposed to link to? Are you getting those sub-page ideas from another project? I'd like to help set up the pages if I can. Torchiest (talk | contribs) 13:30, 30 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

  The   Barnstar
For re-organizing the main page and doing the very helpful (and tedious) work of tagging up so many pages, I present you with this, the first barnstar of the project. Great work! Torchiest (talk | contribs) 15:04, 30 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I'm glad to be of service! Xe7al (talk) 15:13, 30 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

That alert functionality looks awesome. It will be a huge help to us, especially as we add more and more articles to the project. Torchiest (talk | contribs) 23:40, 30 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
It's nice knowing when there are issues instead of finding out five days down the line that one of our articles got deleted. So I'm looking forward to it as well. Xe7al (talk) 19:06, 1 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Arthur Machen edit

Religious fanaticism is an inappropriate target for disambiguating Puritanism in his context. "Puritanism" of the period was more about imposing a morality than a religious opinion or derivation. Whilst we do not have an appropriate better link to target here, it's better to leave the target at the disambig page, as it was.

Nor do I appreciate your repeated changes here, without any response to my comments against, or any attempt at discussion. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:51, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

The disambiguation page for Puritanism has been listed at WP:DPL. I have re-linked to the best of my ability. I would suggest either creating a new article explaining this definition or creating a header in an existing article to include this. The disambiguation page does not serve as a better link than religious fanaticism.
Furthermore, I apologize if you felt that I was ignoring you. I have been running down the Pages that link to Puritanism list so I have not been looking at discussion pages.
Regardless, I have finished the DPL for that disambiguation page. Xe7al (talk) 20:02, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Upon looking at the page in question, I noticed that I had reverted the change three times. This was pure accident. I assumed I had missed the link in question each time it did not disappear from the Pages that link to Puritanism list. You can feel safe knowing that this wasn't an intentional edit war; it was quite unintentional. Xe7al (talk) 20:07, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

your doing a great job on wikipedia edit

you seem to know what your doing. 65.0.15.120 (talk) 00:12, 17 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi! edit

I'm a new member of the Industrial project. I hope I'll be able to provide some helpful contributions. --Wiz-Pro3 (talk) 15:14, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Note To Self edit

Happy Festivus edit

  Happy Festivus!
Here's wishing you a happy Festivus!
May you emerge victorious from the Feats of Strength,
may your list of Grievances be short,
and may your days be filled with Festivus Miracles.
Torchiest talkedits 14:15, 24 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Industrial Annual Report 2012 edit

 
 

Torchiest talkedits 02:49, 1 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Skinny Puppy since the Reunion edit

Hey Sorry that i damaged you Site im a new User But i have read a Lot of your Comments and i think you Really know what you are Talking about and i ve got a question to you Can you Tell me how you can call the Music style of skinny puppy After the Réunion ? Is it still Electro industrial ? Or is skinny puppy just a Electronica band which combined Several Elements of Differend Experimental Electronic Music styles knows as Electronica or IDM ? Thanks for your help — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.222.17.23 (talk) 15:12, 14 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest edit

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:20, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:ShiftingThroughTheLens.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:ShiftingThroughTheLens.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:00, 15 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Xe7al. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply