May 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm GSK. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nintendo 3DS, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GSK 22:45, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

CM Punk edit

Here is a list of sources that are considered reliable for professional wrestling related articles. I noticed you have made two edits to the CM Punk page using Bleacher Report as a source, but that source is highly unreliable. Unless you can find an article from a reliable source claiming the same thing please do not restore. Also be cautious about reverting the user who reverted you because you may be in violation of WP:3RR. Thanks -LM2000 (talk) 05:03, 3 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at CM Punk shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Richard BB 16:49, 3 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

June 2013 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Taylor Swift, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 20:18, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

July 2013 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at CM Punk, you may be blocked from editing. — Richard BB 20:26, 21 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

August 2013 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at CM Punk, you may be blocked from editing. — Richard BB 14:04, 12 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mamadou Sakho, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JMHamo (talk) 12:02, 31 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Casual-jeans-taylor-swift-casual-styles.jpg edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:Casual-jeans-taylor-swift-casual-styles.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blurred Lines 17:56, 16 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

CM Punk's love interests edit

In addition to reverting everything, you should provide some insight into why everything should be restored to the way it was before. There's a discussion going on about this topic here.LM2000 (talk) 20:19, 31 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2013 edit

  This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Daniel Sturridge, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:50, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of football stadiums in England, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:05, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2014 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Marco Reus. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Mattythewhite (talk) 19:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at CM Punk. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. STATic message me! 20:33, 31 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at CM Punk. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. STATic message me! 23:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

About this, even if he legitimately left as reported, he'd still be under contract. He'd likely be breaching it, but unless it's a fundamental breach, the contract doesn't terminate (till July, I recall). If there was a termination, there should be a source. InedibleHulk (talk) 01:32, February 1, 2014 (UTC)

February 2014 edit

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at CM Punk, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me! 19:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing, as per the last block. Please consider changing your behaviour as if this continues, your next block is likely to be indefinite.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  – Connormah (talk) 00:25, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
I have extended your block to two weeks from today because of your attempts to evade this block with Special:Contributions/Wrestlingdude123. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

CM Punk redux edit

You've made this edit before and you need to understand that Punk is still under contract with WWE, but he is not appearing on their shows. That means that he is still employed with the company. He's not gone - he hasn't quit, because he can't since he's still under contract. Antoshi 20:08, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

March 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm Katieh5584. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Paige (wrestler), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Katieh5584 (talk) 17:36, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at CM Punk, you may be blocked from editing.
Enough already. Antoshi 18:29, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2014 edit

  This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at WrestleMania XXX, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me! 17:20, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

May 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Sam & Cat because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 11:27, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

July 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm MrScorch6200. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sabki Laadli Bebo seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 16:43, 27 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:CM Punk speaking at a UFC Q and A.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:CM Punk speaking at a UFC Q and A.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:38, 15 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:CM Punk speaking at a UFC Q and A.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:CM Punk speaking at a UFC Q and A.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:19, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Warning edit

In this edit, you added a quote by Bryan, which said, ... but because of fan support and someone leaving, all of the sudden now I’m doing 2 matches... I double-checked the source, which said, ... but because of fan support, all of the sudden now I’m doing 2 matches ... You added falsified information and misquoted Bryan with the and someone leaving, probably to suit the purposes of your narrative. Do not do this again. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 00:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

use edit summary and sources when you edit edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

I see you also never use an edit summary. That's poor wrestling form.--Wuerzele (talk) 22:34, 28 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

May 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm This is Paul. An edit that you recently made to Ed Miliband seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! This is Paul (talk) 18:10, 7 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

September 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Wikiisawesome. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to WWE Divas Championship— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. /wia /talk 20:10, 17 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Wrestlingfan129. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:CM Punk UFC 203.jpg edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:CM Punk UFC 203.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 23:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

UFC 209 edit

Dude, are you serious? The next minimum vandalism you do, I'll report you. For a registered user for a while, that behavior of yours is not acceptable. Consider this my only warning. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 21:03, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Jon Jones edit

  Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. MX () 15:46, 28 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • Just noticed you also made changes at Daniel Cormier's page without providing a source. You made this change 4 days ago. Please refrain from making such changes or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. There is high visibility in these articles and you are introducing information that ignores presumption of innocence. MX () 15:53, 28 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. MX () 12:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Naby Keita edit

Hi, please do not keep readding Liverpool to his infobox, the move is not complete until next summer and his spell with Leipzig remains ongoing until then. As per WP:CRYSTAL, Wikipedia does not predict what will happen in the future. Thanks. Kosack (talk) 19:44, 2 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

UFC 219 edit

Hi Wrestlingfan129, I have removed your recent edits for UFC 219 as the info is not indicated in UFC web site as per today. Please refrain yourself from such edits for you might be block from Wikipedia fro vandalism.CASSIOPEIA (talk) 16:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Wrestlingfan129. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

January 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Khabib Nurmagomedov have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA (talk) 21:16, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at David de Gea. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you recent edits on Khabib Nurmagomedov and Tony Ferguson have been reverted as per Wiki MMA project guideline 'never add future bouts. The purpose of the record table is to provide a quick account of a fighter's past career, not to speculate about his/her future" - Please see WP:MMABOX for further details. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA (talk) 20:33, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Max Holloway have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 19:21, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Conor McGregor. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IrisKawling (talk) 02:40, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:UFC 223 Poster Official.jpg edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:UFC 223 Poster Official.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 00:38, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

June 2018 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at CM Punk. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Prefall 14:42, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Khabib Nurmagomedov, you may be blocked from editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:58, 20 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Pettis v Ferguson edit

You have vandalised tonys page Smiggles94 (talk) 19:44, 2 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

September 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Tony Ferguson— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 01:01, 3 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Wrestlingfan129. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2019 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at UFC 238. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 01:06, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply