With goodness in mind
|
- Thank you for the information! Surely I may have a look into it. With goodness in mind (talk) 14:41, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi goodness! Thanks for your recent addition to the Bald Eagle article. I just wanted to let you know that I've moved the link into a "See also" section, which is where you should always put links to other related Wikipedia articles—unless, of course, they've already been directly accessed with a wikilink somewhere in the article! Please let me know if you have any questions—and welcome to Wikipedia! : ) By the way, WP:BIRD, a bird-related project, is always on the lookout for new members, if you're interested... MeegsC | Talk 10:23, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the information! I may have a visit to that project as well. With goodness in mind (talk) 18:12, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Ponetivity edit
I have nominated Ponetivity, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ponetivity. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 11:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Negativity edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Negativity, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? L'Aquatique[talk] 22:29, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Positivity edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Positivity, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? L'Aquatique[talk] 22:31, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
As a contributor to this article, you may be interested to know I have nominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ietsism. Robofish (talk) 00:36, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
The article Maximization (ethics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable neologism not recognized in the field
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pointillist (talk) 23:30, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
"Timely moment" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
The redirect Timely moment has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 27 § Timely moment until a consensus is reached. J947 † edits 05:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
"Time location" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
The redirect Time location has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 27 § Time location until a consensus is reached. J947 † edits 06:00, 27 March 2023 (UTC)