Hi Williamkingpetersen

This is in regard to the message that you recently left on my talk page. In your message you stated that I had reverted your edits. I in fact did not reverted your edits, I simplify performed some more copyediting after you. I did not remove any of your additions to the article in question (Armacell). Your edits were not reverted.

I just looked at your edits and it seems that you have contributed very nicely to the article. Your additions followed all the wikipedia guidelines.

I hope that you continue to contribute on wikipedia.

Kind regards --Editor897 (talk) 10:20, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Logpoint moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Logpoint, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 15:56, 25 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Logpoint concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Logpoint, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:42, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Logpoint (March 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam-2727 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sam-2727 (talk) 00:48, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Williamkingpetersen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sam-2727 (talk) 00:48, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Logpoint (June 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 04:46, 13 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Logpoint edit

  Hello, Williamkingpetersen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Logpoint, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:04, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Logpoint moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Logpoint, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 15:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Logpoint edit

 

Hello, Williamkingpetersen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Logpoint".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:28, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply