Editor897

Your submission at Articles for creation: Callipsygma wilsonis (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NessieVL was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Callipsygma wilsonis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Callipsygma wilsonis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nessie (talk) 02:04, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello, EditerJoseph! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nessie (talk) 02:04, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!

		The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar A new editor on the right path
		Glad to see you here. Keep going and you'll do amazing. Nessie (talk) 03:07, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Great Copyediting

		Copy Editor's Barnstar
		I award you this Copy Editor's Barnstar for insisting on clear, comprehensible, and grammatically correct articles. Thanks. Good job. JMTU (talk) 12:37, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Hello, I'm Kpgjhpjm. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Archimedes' principle have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Kpgjhpjm 15:45, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at User talk:Kpgjhpjm, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Kpgjhpjm 15:58, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

@Kpgjhpjm OK. Thanks. --Editor897 (talk) 16:01, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Vandalism warnings

L235 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Hi Editor897. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for your work so far! Please refrain from leaving talk page messages indicating that you will block editors, even clear vandals. Please additionally see WP:DENY and WP:INSULT. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 06:20, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello Editor897

I'm new to Wikipedia and would greatly appreciate you guidance.

Upon completing my registration yesterday, I was suggested to edit the Armacell wiki. I spent a couple of hours on doing so and believe the updated version is significantly better that the original. I edited structure, spelling and grammar and added some recent information about the sale of the company in 2015 and updated financial information from the company annual report.

Consequently is discouraging that you reverted to the original version and I wanted to understand why. The source for the sale of the company is a press release issued by Blackstone and for remaining content it was the audited company annual report. Why isn't that sufficient? While Armacell is a relaively big company there is not that much 3rd party information about the company out there.

PLease take this in the spirit it was intended. I Just want to learn.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Williamkingpetersen (talk • contribs) 10:06, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)