Vaultralph

Welcome and a suggestion

Firstly, welcome to Wikipedia, I do hope that you enjoy editing here on Wikipedia because with new people coming in to replace the old, it's people like you that is needed to keep this running. While I am here, may I suggest when your looking for pictures, try and have one which is mostly the player and not like the edit that you did with Andy Murray. Of course this is only minor thing just put that thing in mind ok. Not Homura (talk) 03:29, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Vaultralph, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Vaultralph! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Article on Shamanism

Welcome to Wikipedia Vaultralph (talk · contribs)! I am posting here as a result of your recent edits on the article Shamanism. I reverted your initial edit there as it fundamentally changed the meaning of the article, which I listed in edit note. I see you changed them back, though in Wikipedia editing, changes should be supported with verifiable sources. I will remove this change again as it alters the meaning and is done so without providing citations to reliable sources. Thank you. --- FULBERT (talk) 15:10, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shamanism, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You need to discuss this change on the talk page of the article. You altered content without providing any new sourcing. Do not revert other editors without first discussing this on the talk page, and telling us why you want to make this change, so we can all evaluate what new sourcing you have that merits changing the text. Thanks. - CorbieV ^☊ ☼ 23:20, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

January 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tatars, you may be blocked from editing. Your last two edits (edit 1) (edit 2) at Tatars have been reverted as they appear to be intentional and racist vandalism. The first of these edits was to change "Tatar" to "Tartar" (which is incorrect) and the second was to refer to them as comprising "a range of physical appearances ranging from Mongoloid to Caucasoid." The terms "Mongoloid race" and "Caucasoid race" are - as their individual articles detail - found exclusively in historic scientific racism. The talk page of the article shows that there have been multiple discussions from 2012 to 2018 with unanimous consensuses that this human taxonomy doesn't belong anywhere in the article. Brendon the Wizard ✉️ ✨ 00:37, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tatar, you may be blocked from editing. Calling the Tatar people a hybrid of Mongoloids and Caucasoids is not "anthropology", it's Scientific racism. These extinct classifications of humans are not "phenotypes." You've readded them two more times 12. It's not the 1800s anymore; we've known for centuries that humans are not divided into "Mongoloids", "Negroids", "Australoids", and "Caucasoids". Stop vandalizing articles about cultural groups to reinstate these terms. Brendon the Wizard ✉️ ✨ 17:08, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tatars. It is vandalism to say that the Tatar people are Mongoloids. You've readded it for the fourth time. This doesn't need to go on for any longer. The "source" you cited to claim that present-day Tatars are Mongoloids is literally from 1852 and says that the Astrakhan Tatars are poorly educated for biological reasons. Brendon the Wizard ✉️ ✨ 22:43, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Vaultralph, see the policy mentioned at {{uw-3rr}}. You continue to insert the item about physical appearance of the Tatars according to a source that some people believe is not credible. (Since 1 January you have now inserted this item six times). You may be blocked for violating the rules against edit warring. In case of disagreement, you are expected to try persuading the others, and not just keep on reverting. Edit wars are unfortunately common, but people who won't stop warring are usually blocked. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:00, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chuvash people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bulgar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:41, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tatars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shiwei (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:19, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit-warring, most recently on the article Tatars, but you also have a history of edit-warring on other articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 14:09, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nenets people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mansi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:31, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

February 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Siberian Tatars. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:01, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chuvash people, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages J2, I2 and I1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

ANI notice 2 April 2020

Hello, Vaultralph,

This message is to inform you that an an Administrators' noticeboard incident report has been filed in relation to your recent edits at Chuvash people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Chuvash_ethnic_gallery

- Hunan201p (talk) 15:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for edit warring, as you did at Chuvash people. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Unsourced edits on Tatars

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:59, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MelanieN (talk) 17:34, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

User:Vaultralph, you were warned by User:Ohnoitsjamie that you would be blocked if you continued to add unsourced information to the article Tatars. But you did it twice more, and you have also added unsourced information to many other articles regarding Tatars. You must NOT add material to articles that is not true or that is not supported by Reliable Sources. I have blocked you for a week, and if you resume this kind of disruption after the block expires, I may take steps to have you blocked indefinitely. -- MelanieN (talk) 17:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

@MelanieN: Now he's edit warring on unreliable websites such as Eupedia and Familytreedna, which isn't even a source, but a database. Also his edits are similar with the one of [1] Ismsgulp. Beshogur (talk) 23:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Edits

I would like to know what you are guided by, correcting articles about the Siberian Tatars and language. Correct all the time about this article. Where did you know that the self-name was 'Sibirtar'? Do you live in Tyumen, Tobolsk or Novosibirsk? You put links to information that is not a reflection of the present. The self-name of all groups of Siberian Tatars is 'Sybyrlar', or the common name 'Tatarlar', as well as for many Turkic peoples such as the Crimean Tatars, Volga Tatars, Khakasses, Shors, Chulyms, Teleuts, Altaians, Tuvans, Yakuts. The name 'Tatarlar' is the native language equivalent of the name 'Turk (Turkic)' for the Turkic peoples of Russia. At the same time knowing that they are 'Turks'. Tatars (as a common name) is like a large group of Turks (Turkic people). The self-name is focused on the personal name of the people - Sybyrlar, as well as the language of the people - Sybyrtsa, in the Siberian Tatar language. Magicasia (talk) 20:07, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Ruslan Provodnikov. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please see WP:OVERLINKING (a part of MoS) which clearly states that well-known languages and ethnicities should not be wikilinked. — Mike Novikoff 10:05, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Vasily Chapayev, you may be blocked from editing. You have already been warned about not using sources properly numerous times. TylerBurden (talk) 08:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Vasily Chapayev. TylerBurden (talk) 03:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

TylerBurden, is it possible to stop this user from the war of edits?--Ilnur efende (talk) 18:47, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Next block for unsourced/poorly-sourced edits or edit-warring over ethnicity will result in indef block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

@OhNoitsJamie: They are at it again, on Sámi. Edit warring to include that Euronymous was of this ethnicity, despite nothing indicating such. Bases their edits on their own WP:OR of "it is well known fact, his physiognomy only confirms that" seen here: Diff. At this point I think it is pretty clear that despite several blocks, this editor refuses to get the point that this edit warring and unsourced editing about peoples ethnicity and nationality is not doing the encyclopedia any good. TylerBurden (talk) 23:41, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Vandalism

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Numulunj pilgae (talk) 07:39, 19 May 2022 (UTC) to do so.

Hi

I added some new photos of Chuvash people, why did you replace them with very old ones? My photos were better looking and new. These photos are extremely old. Volgabulgari (talk) 04:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Ongoing unsourced edits/WP:SYNTH

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:44, 22 May 2022 (UTC)