User talk:V8rik/Archive 07

Alloxan edit

Please see edit-warring at alloxan, and if possible, please edit or comment on it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.5.17.170 (talk) 11:49, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Does that article really say that alloxan does not cause diabetes in humans? Where can I find that information?--211.5.15.232 (talk) 03:40, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference edit

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:33, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply


on hybridization of water edit

Could you add the references and rewrite the section appropriately so the article looks better? You have access to the sources, and wish to see the information in the article. The section would benefit from them. Thanks!!! --Jayron32 23:42, 12 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Jayron, our colleague Dirac66 has already intervened.V8rik (talk) 17:32, 16 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Definition of a secondary source? edit

To me, the definition seems clear based these excerpts from the Wikipedia policies and guidelines:

  • 1) From Secondary source: “In the sciences, a review article, book review, or meta-analysis are both examples of a secondary source. Some academic journals only publish reviews. Unlike in the humanities, scientific and medical peer reviewed sources are not generally considered secondary”
  • 2) From WP:SECONDARY: “Secondary sources are second-hand accounts … For example, a review article that analyzes research papers in a field is a secondary source for the research.”

The issue is somewhat significant because, from WP:SECONDARY: “Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources. Secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the topic's notability and to avoid novel interpretations …” We both know that a lot of primary sources will continue to be cited, but the implications of the definition is that reviews and texts are preferred. Looking forward to hearing your comments,--Smokefoot (talk) 01:17, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • The primary source article talks about paintings and diaries as primary sources and is inadequate. It does not deal with peer-reviewed scientific literature. Also from Secondary source: "primary sources that have been reliably published may be used in Wikipedia, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them." V8rik (talk) 21:01, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Reactive/reaction intermediate edit

Hi V8rik, I forgot get merge to/merge from out in Reactive intermediate/reaction intermediate. I've done yet. Thanks for remind me about it. --Armando-Martin (talk) 16:03, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

New Page Patrol survey edit

 

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello V8rik! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:46, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion edit

One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:27, 28 November 2011 (UTC).Reply

File:Burgessreagent.gif listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Burgessreagent.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:15, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Boroncaronitrides.gif listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Boroncaronitrides.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:16, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Borazine carbene.gif listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Borazine carbene.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:16, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Bisulfitereaction.gif listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bisulfitereaction.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:16, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Bisulfite adduct.gif listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bisulfite adduct.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:16, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:NMO example.gif listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NMO example.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:17, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:MolecularTweezerEmpl1.gif listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MolecularTweezerEmpl1.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:17, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:E1cB.gif listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:E1cB.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 07:04, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:ConjugatedAdditionofThiols.gif listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ConjugatedAdditionofThiols.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 12:50, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:EnantioselectiveOrganoCascadeCatalysis .gif listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EnantioselectiveOrganoCascadeCatalysis .gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 12:51, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Welcome back edit

I hope that you had a good visit to Aussie - that is where I am now. A lot going on around here as the school term comes to an end in many places. I was surprised that we did not have a dedicated hydroboration article, so that was spun off recently from a major contribution, probably a student. This area is huge and at the limits of my expertise. --Smokefoot (talk) 00:26, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Thanks. I hope your stay in Australia will be as good as the one I had. Yes, several articles exist related to hydroboration, I am trying to make some sense out of it. To be continued V8rik (talk) 22:25, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification edit

Hi. When you recently edited Circulene, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carbon sulfide (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply