User talk:Tothebarricades.tk/Archive 2

Poser

Actually, I'm not sure that "poser" is a misspelling of "poseur." In Canada, a "poser" is slang for a particularly difficult question. I'm considering making this change, but I would end up listing the article to be deleted and sent to Wiktionary. Jtmichcock 01:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Looks like it's already been deleted. --Tothebarricades 04:22, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Anarchy?

Do you consider bands of tribes living together, off the land, anarchy? If so, I'm with you. Some people seem to advocate a reggressive state of anarchy, I take it that's not the idea you have. What say you?

You might be interested in primitivism, a recent theoretical branch of anarchism. I see this as a regressive idea, actually, since by their own admission upwards of 90% of Earth's population will have to somehow disappear for it to work on a global level. Oops. I see it as a product of idle philosophy, taking radicalism to its logical conclusion for its own sake: to tackle the problems of civilization, why not just destroy civilization? Problems solved. But its sheer silliness is why it is confined to theory journals (Green Anarchy, etc), although its proponents do work on pressing issues and are not confined to intellectual masturbation. If you're asking about cases of anarchist organization amongst actually existing tribes, it is a very interesting topic; see the book Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology by David Graeber. --Tothebarricades 01:00, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Yea, that basically sums up that IDEA, that I had. I realize it wouldn't work. You just said the perfect thing.

I think we've evolved so much, that yea, we can't go back, but we better speed the fuck up in our social evolution so we don't kill ourselves and inhibit our survivial with the extent of our technoligical evolution (stem cellls and more efficient killing machines) Cyprus 01:08, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject anti-war, Article improvement drive

February 15, 2003 anti-war protest an article from the WikiProject Anti-war, which you are listed as a member of, has been nominated for the Article Improvement Drive (by me ).

It is an article about a day of much importance both to the history of the anti-war movement and to general discussion of the Iraq war. With a little work from experienced editors it could gain FA status. If you would like to see it improved please vote for it at Make "February 15, 2003 anti-war protest" the subject of an Article Improvement Drive--JK the unwise 13:22, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Style guide

Please see the WP:STYLE. The article seems to be missing some major conformity to this. For example, your introduction does not conform to the standards of an introduction. --ScienceApologist 18:28, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Revert by Shaggorama

Hi, I would just like to notify you that your edit to Time Cube was reverted by User:Shaggorama. That is all. — Ambush Commander^(Talk) 21:42, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Good job

Well done highlighting Nietzsche's ambiguity towards Jews in the article. It's a pretty clear explanation of his strange and weird attitude. I hope some biased Nietzschean does not decide to revert it. --Knucmo2 00:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Individualist anarchism and anarcho-capitalism

Thank you for your comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Individualist anarchism and anarcho-capitalism. I have closed the debate as no consensus. Please note that this does not preclude further discussion of eventual disposition of the article, including keeping, merging, redirection, or a further nomination for deletion. Also, please remember to be civil to those with whom you disagree, even to those who might not be civil to you. Thanks again. -- Jonel | Speak 03:40, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Interpretation of Dreams

I posted an answer to your Freud question at the reference desk, but since you first left it a number of days ago I figured I should let you know on your talk page. According to a few different edited editions of Freud's book (I played around using Amazon's "search inside this book" feature), the most likely Lenau poem Freud was referencing was "Das tote Glück". --Fastfission 03:54, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Katie Holmes

Greetings! You commented on the article Katie Holmes when it was on WP:FAC. I've redone the article and hope to renominate it on FAC soon. But in the meantime, I'd be grateful for your comments on WP:PR at Wikipedia:Peer review/Katie Holmes/archive1. PedanticallySpeaking 21:04, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Please check your WP:NA entry

Greetings, editor! Your name appears on Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct:

1. If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
2. If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
3. Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.

Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BD2412 T 02:28, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Greetings

Greetings, fellow Wikipedian. I wonder if it might be wise to avoid edit summaries such as "read the friggin notice" and "unprofessional reference". It might be good to asusme good faith that your fellow editor has read the notice, and it might be considered uncivil to call a good faith edit an "unprofessional reference". Thank you for your consideration. Johntex\^talk 21:14, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

But I think it's unprofressional. I don't see a problem with speaking my mind. --Tothebarricades 22:21, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Chicago Democratic National Convention 1968 image 2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Chicago Democratic National Convention 1968 image 2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stan 14:38, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:DeutscherMichel.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:DeutscherMichel.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 17:14, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Summaries

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

--Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:01, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Ha, thanks for the tip. --Tothebarricades 15:51, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Ethel MacDonald

Ethel MacDonald bare bones are now up. Probably could do with a bit of extra category addittion (or at least a stub entry) cheers N

References

You removed an unreferenced tag on House party saying "this isnt the kind of article that needs references...". I disagree: Facts may only be included in articles if they have already been published by reliable and reputable sources. I don't think I'm missing anything here.. unless certain articles are excluded from official policy. Mrtea (talk) 03:42, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

This is just elaborating common knowledge; citation would be superfluous. --Tothebarricades 09:27, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Template:Anti-war topics up for deletion

Template:Anti-war topics is up for deletion. Please weigh in on the discussion. Thanks! SchuminWeb (Talk) 09:31, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

USHS

Hello. I saw that you recently labled USHS as a copyvio. As the creator of the article, I can gurantee you that it was not. I conducted hours of research, and did not copyright. I even have a link to the homepage. I am removing the template, but I will gladly put it up if you still believe it is a copyvio and have proof. Thetruthbelow 01:03, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

No apologies needed. Normally I would do the same as you to users, but this time the creator actually created and did no copy :D. Thanks, Thetruthbelow 01:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Long talk page

Greetings! Your talk page is getting a bit long in the tooth - please consider archiving your talk page (or ask me and I'll archive it for you). Cheers! BD2412 T 00:48, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

• Everything up to the end of 2005 is now on the archive page linked to the top of this page. If your page content builds up again, simply move a bunch of stuff (aim for about 33k) to User talk:Tothebarricades.tk/Archive 2, and put {{archive}} at the top of the page. Cheers! BD2412 T 03:30, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Scorpio (Astrology)

I'm afraid I don't have any valid comment to make regarding the content of the article, as I am extremely biased against what I consider to be psuedo scientific mysticism. Other people, some of whom I respect personally for all manner of other reasons, however believe in varying degrees in it. My only concern would be to put a comment in the opening paragraphs indicating that the entire subject is taken as a matter of faith by its adherents, and that there is very little scientific basis* for the claims made.

As there is no way to "disprove" the veracity of any statement that would satisfy an adherent, I feel that your course may be doomed to failure. A believer can point to any combination of "planetary intercections" to "prove" they are right. Best of luck anyway.

• As "birthsigns" are dependent on the month of birth it has been argued that historically people who survive into adulthood may be influenced by the degree of harshness period of the year they were born (on an European basis). It is likely that hardier individuals would have survived the first few months after being born in November/December, whilst less hardy babies would better survive the first months during harvest season. It is more likely that the availability of food in the year, rather than the alignment of planets, was a deciding factor in an pre-industrial society. (I only made my comments specifically in the Scorpio article, since it is my birth sign.)LessHeard vanU 21:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Poseur

Poseur has been created again. Not the same text as last time, but still unsourced. You nominated it for deletion last time, perhaps you could take a look at it again? Thanks, Punkmorten 13:34, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Editing a Very Naughty Word Beginning with "C"

Saw your edit. I don't oppose it. I never liked the material you removed, but it was in there for a long time. You marked the edit as minor, but IMHO it was reasonably substantive. "No one wants to be fooled into ignoring a significant change to an article simply because it was marked 'minor'. So remember to consider the opinions of other editors when choosing this option." Lou Sander 15:00, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm betting that nobody will put it back in. If they do, I, or somebody else, will ask for a source. I always suspected it might be some sort of cleverly concealed vandalism, but I'm doing a pretty thorough copy edit of the article, and so far I'm guarding against taking stuff out. Regards, Lou Sander 22:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Blanking

I just reverted you here, you accidently blanked a heap of the article. You wouldn't happen to be using Firefox and the Google Toolbar, would you? --james^(talk) 11:27, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Mazandaran Sea Sari City

Hi, I remove that url, So is it possible to add that picture again ? If it's Possible Please add it, Thank You! --Ali 04:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Nobody uses Greenwich Village

The only people who use Greenwich Village are the elderly. I don't see it used in Newspapers, magazines, on television, or by anyone else. People say "West Village" or "The Village". The only time I've heard someone say "Oh, do you live in Greenwich?" or "Take me to Greenwich" is when they are talking about Greenwich Avenue or Greenwich Street. "Remarkably untrue?" No way. I've lived in the East Village for six years, so I would have cause to hear people talk about the West Village, and how it is different from the East, the names, etc. --DavidShankBone 17:07, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I like your suggestion. Do you think it was b/c of gentrification that the name fell out, or more so because of the rise in use of East Village, giving the appearance that there *must* be a West Village? Or is it because it's not pleasant to say greenITCH villIDGE - kind of ugly when I think about it. Who knows. --DavidShankBone 21:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

I think Bush also uses your hypothesis, hence all those stupid nicknames everyone in Washington *begs* to have. More proof for your theory. --DavidShankBone 22:09, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Woman with CNTFAI flag.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Woman with CNTFAI flag.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lupo 13:14, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

The same applies to Image:Woman with cntfai flag.jpg. Chick Bowen 05:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

HeartattaCk

Would you be able to lend a hand on either contributing reliable sources for this article or providing your opinion on the corresponding AfD? PT ^(s-s-s-s) 00:46, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Catharsis (band)

Catharsis (band) has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this musician or group might not yet be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (music) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 06:43, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Diego Abad de Santillán

Hi - I've had a go at producing a longer article on the life of DA de S. It's mostly an adaptation of the Spanish article on him, plus some stuff from Daily Bleed and a Catalan source. It's still a bit raw - e.g. the list of his writings probably belongs at the end, separate to the body of the article, and I'll have a go at organising it better. Maybe you can see improvements needed? Ottershrew 17:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Somali Diabetics

You placed the current Categories for Discussion page into Category:Somali diabetics. I assume that this was a malformed nomination for deletion? I'll leave it up to you to fix. Robert A.West (Talk) 02:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Buenaventura_Durruti.jpeg

Thank you for uploading Image:Buenaventura_Durruti.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shyam ^(T/C) 10:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Matt Pond PA The Nature of Maps album cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Matt Pond PA The Nature of Maps album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:12, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Is Pierre Clastres an anarchist?

You have removed the book "Society against state" from the article "list of anarchist books", claiming that the author himself was not an anarchist, while he has been an influence for this political current. Indeed I do not have a quote in which Pierre Clastres proclaims to be an anarchist, but, nevertheless, this book "takes sides". I believe this book is anarchist and that therefore it is suitable for this article. Please read this quote from an excerpt taken from the book:

"When, in primitive society, the economic dynamic lends itself to definition as a distinct and autonomous domain, when the activity of production becomes alienated, accountable labor, 1evied by men who will enjoy the fruits of that labor, what has come to pass is that society has been divided into rulers and ruled, masters and subjects--it has ceased to exorcise the thing that will be its ruin: power and the respect for power. Society's major division, the division that is the basis for all the others, including no doubt the division of labor, is the new vertical ordering of things between a base and a summit; it is the great political cleavage between those who hold the force, be it military or religious, and those subject to that force. The political relation of power precedes and founds the economic relation of exploitation. Alienation is political before it is economic; power precedes labor; the economic derives from the political; the emergence of the State determines the advent of classes."

Not only he gives a scientific contribution to some concepts of primitivist anarchism, such as the view of division of labor as the source for State, but also he calls this process as a form of "alienation". This author considers the anarchist state as the “natural” state, in this book as in others. While the scientific analysis of the primitive societies cannot be in itself viewed as sympathetic, these two approaches are not mutually exclusive, neither. Not all “anarchist books” have to be books of propaganda written in the first person. Please consider revising your position.Maziotis 19:49, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Individualist (real) anarchism as a major historical school of thought.

Individualist anarchism never gained much traction on the Continent, but was influential here in the States. The writings of Benjamin Tucker or Lysander Spooner (who continues to be a major influence on the Rothbardian nutjob wing of the libertarian movement) are a good place to start. Tucker was especially critical of socialism and utopian communism.

That, at least since Nozick, anarchism has commonly meant the individualist sort and not a decentralized socialism, is also something to consider before you go about the Wikipedia wantonly antagonizing contributors questioning why an anarchist perspective is written without reference to individualist anarchist points of view. Bkalafut 07:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Conflict logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Conflict logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 17:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Conflict logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Conflict logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 17:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Conflict logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Conflict logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Sonic 3d blast

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sonic 3d blast, by 32X, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sonic 3d blast fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

There's no need for a lower case redirect, it's even unused. --32X 15:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sonic 3d blast, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Sonic 3d blast itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

List of anarchists

I saw your recent edit to recreate and redirect the list of anarchists. I had been working on recreating that article with more stringent criteria in my userspace, here, for eventual moving to mainspace. I haven't been able to work on it much recently due ot a lack of regular access to a computer, but might you be interested in helping? ~ Switch (✉✍☺) 02:38, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Why was the List of Anarchists page deleted? That makes no sense. Chuck0 18:56, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Chuck Munson

Chuck Munson, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Chuck Munson satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Munson (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Chuck Munson during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Freedomeagle 17:50, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

No Original Research

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on No Original Research, by Melsaran (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because No Original Research fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Housekeeping, no original research was deleted after this RfD debate.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting No Original Research, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:54, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Got time on your hands?

Hey, I figured I'd check and see if you were interested in helping out with the wikification of The Boatmen of Thessaloníki and Anarchism in Greece. I've done a bit, but there's plenty more that could be done. As well, I'm currently working on Anarchism in Cuba in my sandbox. If you felt like contributing anything, it would be much appreciated. Cheers! Murderbike 23:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Akpress.gif

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Akpress.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 15:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Anarchism books

I have nominated Category:Anarchism books (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Skomorokh ^incite 11:55, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

No Original Research

You have recently recreated or reposted material at No Original Research which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. Melsaran (talk) 19:22, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

sources to anarchism in spain

hi there. i translated much of the anarchism in spain article to the Hebrew wikipedia. i would like to know what were your main sources to the article. thanks, Odo. Odonian (talk) 20:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Biotic_Baking_Brigade_Logo.jpg

I have tagged Image:Biotic_Baking_Brigade_Logo.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 14:15, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

All Lights Fucked on the Hairy Amp Drooling.

On Godspeed's oldest recordings, you're the one that posted the "artwork" for it, and i was hoping that maybe you could end my extensive journey of finding these songs by somehow sending them to me via email? You don't understand how grateful i would be.

EDIT: i made it seem like you have it, i realize with only 33 copies globally available, the chances are slim that you would have it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eb!ysg (talk • contribs) 21:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

List of anarchists

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of anarchists, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of List of anarchists. скоморохъ 20:33, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jeff free luers.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jeff free luers.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:43, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

U2: Post-punk? = Yes!

I see you have removed U2 various times from the post-punk revival article, but U2 was post-punk and did admire many bands of the scene (PiL and especially Joy Division). They even used to gig extensively with contemporaries The Teardrop Explodes, Echo & The Bunnymen, The Sound, The Chameleons and even were at the post-punk Futurama Festival in 1980. The-15th (talk) 01:20, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:All lights fucked on the hairy amp drooling.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:All lights fucked on the hairy amp drooling.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:24, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

RE: nor me

I assume you were referencing to this? I refuse to get into content disputes over RC Patrol, however from my perspective changing an article from "... who suffers from Dwarfism" to "... who is a Dwarf" is inappropriate, much the same as changing an article from "... who suffers from leprosy" to "... who is a leper" would be inappropriate. To me it looks/looked like IP vandalism, you disagree; that's fine, I am sure editors who are more involved in the subject at hand will alter it if need-be. ~ Ameliorate _{U T C} @ 00:59, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

July 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Image:All lights fucked on the hairy amp drooling.jpg. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 23:41, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:David_graeber.png

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:David_graeber.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 14:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of List of wikipedians by number of edits

I have nominated List of wikipedians by number of edits (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:43, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Buenaventura Durruti.jpeg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Buenaventura Durruti.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:10, 3 January 2009 (UTC) --Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:10, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:FAI nosotros.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:FAI nosotros.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 14:05, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zegota (band)

A tag has been placed on Zegota (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Prezbo (talk) 09:48, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anarchia

The article Anarchia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for albums.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 00:46, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of General Cable

A tag has been placed on General Cable, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Codf1977 (talk) 11:17, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Spectrum Group International

A tag has been placed on Spectrum Group International requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Codf1977 (talk) 11:26, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Holly Corporation

A tag has been placed on Holly Corporation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Codf1977 (talk) 11:27, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Health Management Associates (Arkansas company)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Health Management Associates (Arkansas company), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Health Management Associates. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:17, 8 September 2010 (UTC)