Welcome edit

Hello, Tom Sandow! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!   — Jess· Δ 20:51, 6 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Tom Sandow edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Tom Sandow, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- GB fan 21:01, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Promotion edit

You are very welcome here as an editor if your purpose is to improve the encyclopaedia, but you are in the wrong place if your only reason is self-promotion. Wikipedia doesn't do that, so it was accidental that your user page appeared in Google. There are strict rules about Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, and you have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest if you write your own autobiography. You are warmly invited to contribute to other articles. Dbfirs 21:00, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

To reply. I can only apologise for this to happen. I was not clear precisely what my personal data page would be for except to place personal data? I did not purposely use duplicate names - I changed my title from Tommy Sandow to Tom Sandow and made clear that the latter name was the one to state is me. I could not delete the first account. But did not leave it there on purpose. You have only deleated me because I contacted you! I do not think this if fair. Wikipedia had only to explain to me my ignorance concerning the page rules to self promotion and I would have deleated my page myself. You make it sound that I am devious - I can assure you, as a successful business, I am not! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom Sandow (talkcontribs) 10:43, 12 January 2016‎ (UTC)Reply

I have unblocked your account, I do not see any reason for the account to be blocked and the blocking administrator has not responded to my concerns. -- GB fan 11:24, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

!sock edit

Your other accounts are Tom 'Slapstick' Sandow (talk · contribs) and Tommy Sandow (talk · contribs). GB fan asks me to believe that this is not sock puppetry. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:54, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Well it would be if they were being used at the same time, and without disclosing the fact, but I would have thought we could assume good faith here? I'd be happier if Tom had done more to improve articles, but there is evidence of good faith. Dbfirs 18:00, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Glove puppet logo.jpg listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Glove puppet logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Puppet 3.JPG listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Puppet 3.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Reply