December 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Abce2. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Transformice because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions you suck Toby, go die and get off of Wikipedia you gay noob., you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Abce2 (talk) 18:22, 13 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Transformice with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:08, 13 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Go shut up. And die Toby -abce

December 2013 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Transformice has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, Tobyepic. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Vanjagenije (talk) 00:48, 17 December 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply
 

Your recent editing history at Transformice shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Theroadislong (talk) 14:51, 18 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Antoshi 17:51, 18 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring at Transformice edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Transformice. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Full report here. EdJohnston (talk) 20:30, 18 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2014 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Transformice has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Transformice, you may be blocked from editing. Antoshi 14:37, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

January 2014 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Poop has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Poop was changed by Tobyepic (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950909 on 2014-01-14T16:38:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:38, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

January 2014 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to China has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: China was changed by Tobyepic (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953447 on 2014-01-23T13:08:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:09, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  GB fan 13:18, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply