Image tagging for Image:10px-Redshirt.png edit

Thanks for uploading Image:10px-Redshirt.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:05, 14 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:10px-Redshirt.png) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:10px-Redshirt.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:57, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:800px-Dpp.gif edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:800px-Dpp.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

nice work! edit

nice work on the colorization in List of 2008 United States Democratic Party Superdelegates! Cheers, Kingturtle (talk) 21:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image preview problem edit

I've no idea why that happens, but it has to do with the 800px thumbnail preview not updating after the image has been changed. Sometimes when I update it it changes straight away, sometimes it takes a few refreshes, and sometimes it just seems to get stuck! In the latter case I go into the wikipage that it's used on and change the width by 5px, that seems to fix it... I don't think it has anything to do with the image size - that's probably because I'm using GIMP to edit and other people are using something else. Umeeksk (talk) 00:21, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

February 2008 edit

 

Hi, the recent edit you made to Statewide opinion polling for the Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2008 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. · AndonicO Hail! 19:02, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Alpha Superdelegates, nice addition but maybe too much? edit

First, Tjliles, kudos on your hard work with this page. Super work! I've been plinking away trying to get it more or less up-to-date. Right now, the Obama delegates are pretty solid and there are probably 25-30 Clintons still to be accounted for. Also, I ran through and re-worked the edits that were over-written by your recent update. FYI.

Anyhoo -- I think your recent addition of the alpha list may be too much for this page. I LIKE the alpha list. I also like the by-group list. But having dualing formats on the same page seems too much. I'd almost rather go with all one or the other -- either all alpha or all by category. I see maintaining clean parallel lists to be a problem. IMHO.

Again, great getting this page up and running. Regards! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scantron2 (talkcontribs) 22:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tjliles -- a question... edit

So - your plan is to roll over into the alpha list and ditch the other once the conversion is complete? That sounds good.

A question: will you want the names to be in "last, first" format so they'll sort properly? If so, I'd be happy to reformat those. Let me know.

Regards, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scantron2 (talkcontribs) 23:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

One last thing edit

Thanks for the reply.

FYI - the sorting doesn't work out so well for me. I'm using firefox, though I don't think that should matter. Anyway, when I click on the sort buttons, it sorts the delegates by first name, not last. And if I re-sort (by name, by group, then by endorsement, for example) it preserves the prior sort. The result of this is that once I leave alpha I never can get back. Not a big deal, but I thought I'd mention it.

I noticed that there are about a dozen more delegates in the group list versus alpha. I'll track those down and insert them (using the current formatting this time!) and then clean up the colors.

Thanks again for all your help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scantron2 (talkcontribs) 23:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Status of the list edit

Hey Tjliles,

I did a count and here's what I show for numbers:

Alpha list - Clinton 200 Obama 170 Uncommitted 387 Total 757

Group list - Clinton 202 Obama 172 Uncommitted 379 Total 753

This is a rough count. So - there are a few loose ends to clean up -- transferring over at least 2 Obama and Clinton citations plus doing a rough match to make sure we didn't drop any uncommitted delegates.

I just copied the current page to a standalone HTML file. If you want to drop section 3 out, I can finish the reconciliation tonight and won't need that history. I guess I'd be in favor of that doing that cut sooner rather than later, even though I won't be able to get to this until late PM (MDT).

Your call. Cheers!

--Scantron2 (talk) 22:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi, the recent edit you made to List of 2008 United States Democratic Party superdelegates has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Alexfusco5 17:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Edit edit

edit you reverted was a bad one, but you shouldn't revert it now as I was removing the invalid poll as discussed in talk. Rodrigue (talk) 18:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal edit

Please see Talk:United States presidential election in Massachusetts, 2008#Merger proposal.—Markles 00:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:800px-Dpp.gif edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:800px-Dpp.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:58, 27 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Undeath (talk) 02:58, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Superdelegates edit

I've seen your rv in the superdelegates page, and I agree with your edit. However, It might be a good idea to check on the names if there is an endorsement or two we could add to the list. I'll give it a try. --Bouchecl (talk) 04:08, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of Image:Monroe levy.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Monroe levy.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:08, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:Gwatney.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Gwatney.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 22:02, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image source problem with Image:Gwatney.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Gwatney.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 22:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Gwatney.jpg edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gwatney.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 23:17, 13 August 2008 (UTC) --J Milburn (talk) 23:17, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I don't use Wikinews- I don't know what their copyright policies are or how strictly they are enforced. I am seeing no evidence at all that that image is under a free license- the website you've taken it from has a clear copyright notice stating that all rights are reserved. Why do you believe the image is free? J Milburn (talk) 23:39, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Not at all the way it works- consensus and practice vary massively between projects, not to mention the fact that even if it's their on Wikinews, doesn't mean it is allowed. However, that's irrelevant- here, evidence is required that images are under a free license. If you cannot provide the evidence, the image will be deleted. J Milburn (talk) 23:50, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting edit

 
New England Wikimedia General Meeting

The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future!
Potential topics:
Sunday, April 22
1:30 PM – 4:30 PM
Conference Room C06, Johnson Building,
Boston Public Library—Central Library
700 Boylston St., Boston MA 02116
Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England!

Message delivered by Dominic at 09:01, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.Reply

You're invited: Ada Lovelace, STEM women edit-a-thon at Harvard edit

U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited!
Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields.
Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either.
00:47, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting edit

You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18 edit

NE Meetup #4: January 18 at MIT Building 5
 

Dear Fellow Wikimedian,

You have been invited to the New England Wikimedians 2014 kick-off party and Wikipedia Day Celebration at Building Five on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology campus on Saturday, January 18th, from 3-5 PM. Afterwards, we will be holding an informal dinner at a local restaurant. If you are curious to join us, please do so, as we are always looking for people to come and give their opinion! Finally, be sure to RSVP here if you're interested.

I hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

You're invited: Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March edit

Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March - You are invited!
New England Wikimedians is excited to announce a series of Wikipedia edit-a-thons that will be taking place at colleges and universities throughout Massachusetts as part of Wikiwomen's History Month from March 1 - March 31. We encourage you to join in an edit-a-thon near you, or to participate remotely if you are unable to attend in person (for the full list of articles, click here). Events are currently planned for the cities/towns of Boston, Northampton, South Hadley, and Cambridge. Further information on dates and locations can be found on our user group page.
Questions? Contact Girona7 (talk)

You're invited! edit

NE Meetup #5: April 19th at Clover Food Lab in Kendall Square
 

Dear Fellow Wikimedian,

New England Wikimedians would like to invite you to the April 2014 meeting, which will be a small-scale meetup of all interested Wikimedians from the New England area. We will socialize, review regional events from the beginning of the year, look ahead to regional events of 2014, and discuss other things of interest to the group. Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested.

Also, if you haven't done so already, please consider signing up for our mailing list and connect with us on Facebook and Twitter.

We hope to see you there!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) and Maia Weinstock (talk)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Edit-a-thon invite edit

Adrianne Wadewitz Memorial edit-a-thons edit

Adrianne Wadewitz edit-a-thons in Southern New England
 

As you may have already heard, the Wikipedia community lost an invaluable member of the community last month. Adrianne Wadewitz was a feminist scholar of 18th-Century British literature, and a prolific editor of the site. As part of a worldwide series of tributes, New England Wikimedians, in conjunction with local institutions of higher learning, have created three edit-a-thons that will be occurring in May and June. The events are as follows:

We hope that you will be able to join us, whether you are an experienced editor or are using Wikipedia for the first time.

If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

New England Wikimedians summer events! edit

Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians!

After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested:

Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August:

If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

New England Wikimedians summer events! edit

Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians!

After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested:

Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August:

If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA edit

You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sunday July 16: New England Wiknic @ Cambridge, MA edit

Sunday July 16, 1-5pm: New England Wiknic
 
 

You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" at John F. Kennedy Park, near Harvard Square, Cambridge, as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck.

1–5pm - come by any time!
Look for us by the Wikipedia / Wikimedia banner!

We hope to see you there! --Phoebe (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)