Timsdad

I just wanted to thank you for the cookies.

Thank you. --Perryparkhistory (talk) 00:11, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome... And enjoy them! --timsdad ^(talk) 00:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Burj kalifa sudden height increase on opening day

How did the height go from 818 to 828 over night; the same night as the name changed. Did they stick a 10 meter spire out at the last minute like they thought the Chrysler Building people were gonna do to end the height record of the Empire State Building in their competition? Remember how the Empire was gonna be just a tiny bit taller than the Chrysler Building at first, then they added the dirigible/hat thing at the top. But at first they feared that there was gonna be some last minute trickery of height increases. Daniel Christensen (talk) 21:30, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

My guess is that it was probably 828 m all along (they never intended to release the height, but it was, as 818 m). Then they decided to reveal its height as ten metres taller than everyone thought, making it marginally more exciting. --timsdad ^(talk) 23:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Hahaha "marginally more exciting" I LOL'ed at that. Thanks. So do you think they purposely "accidently" realeased the height as 818 to surprise us with the 828? 74.44.130.237 (talk) 04:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Nah, if I was going to release a height I would say at least 50 metres lower than the actual height, then people would probably be more excited. The 818 could have been leaked by someone who caught a snippet of conversation from the developers or something... --timsdad ^(talk) 05:08, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

WHY was the Taipei 101 not in this list?

List of largest buildings in the world I added it; and not only does it clearly rank, it is the LAST thing I would expect to be left out as it is a huge record holding skyscraper not just some random dumb huge warehouse. Daniel Christensen (talk) 06:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Ya know what I mean, like who's gonna take the time to find the floor area of every gigantic warehouse to see how they rank? It would be feasable for a mistake to be in the article such as a building being left out; but not one such as the Taipei 101. The fact that a tall and relatively narrow skyscraper even ranks is amazing; I can't believe it was left out. Daniel Christensen (talk) 06:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

PS it's number 25, the Willis Tower ranks at 23, that's the coolest skyscraper I think; cause it's in America and so huge and boxey not just a giant triangle like the Burj Dubai. Daniel Christensen (talk) 06:14, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Lists like those are generally incomplete because buildings are only added by people who know them and feel like editing Wikipedia. Maybe it just never occurred to anyone to add it to the list... I mean, it's not one of the highest ranked buildings there. --timsdad ^(talk) 06:15, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, but for what it is, how could you miss it? Daniel Christensen (talk) 06:28, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

I wonder if maybe there is some stipulation, something I missed. I found nothing in the discusssion about it. Daniel Christensen (talk) 06:29, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Mile-High Tower

Sounds like this one is actually feasible, unlike the Nakheel Tower. Or is it; is there anything that suggests or had it even been brought up the issue of load bearing walls; is the Burj Dubai near that point? Or a 2000 foot steel lattice broadcast tower: Near the crushing point? Daniel Christensen (talk) 06:41, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

This problem was already met with that triangle shaped stone building in NYC from years ago; one of the first skyscrapers; it got to the point that stone or wood or whatever had to be so thick to support the weight it was impractical. How about steel and concrete; can it be a mile you think, or even a kilometer. Daniel Christensen (talk) 06:44, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

You probably don't know the answers to these random questions and I hope not to annoy you, but I thought maybe you might know of an article perhaps or something that you could point out to me. Daniel Christensen (talk) 06:44, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry I can't help with any of that, I'm afraid. With the triangle-shaped building from NYC, do you speak of the Flatiron Building? --timsdad ^(talk) 06:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Yes I do speak of the flatiron. Remember the 1950's proposed Illinois Tower to be like a mile high and it was somewhat considered structuraly unfeasible. Mostly it was financial, though. Daniel Christensen (talk) 06:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I very much doubt they would have had the technology to construct the thing anyway. --timsdad ^(talk) 07:01, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

The tallest building has appear on 2010. What's next (in 10 years later)?

We all now in Dubai, Jan 1st 2010, there is the tallest building in the world, isn't it? We are grateful that its building named by the Burj Khalifa. The prince has worked so hard and successfully create this building with a lot of effort in his territory. By the stand of Burj Khalifa, we hope not only the greatest of its architecture that's famous but also open-minded of anyone who think that Middle-East region has no opportunity to grow. The prediction if the biggest development wouldn't come from Middle-East has no strength anymore. Nowadays, world has been opened his eyes that Middle-East is prepare to blow up the greatest. We consider by the broken down record of the tallest building in the beginning of 2010, what would it be in ten years later (2020). The phenomena create to be predicted. We see if the superior country could be frightened by the growth of Arabic countries. They are focusing on Iran nuclear development but no ideas about creativity and innovation in Middle-East region. We hope that the new brightest world in Middle-East inspiring many countries to make the most effort so we can see there are several amazing creature in 2020. Who knows?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sannyeka369 (talk • contribs) 03:29, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Uh huh. --timsdad ^(talk) 08:22, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

new diagram

Hello, Timsdad. You have new messages at Astronaut's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Burj Khalifa

I think I know what happened to the tower. I think it's possible that Abu Dhabi may now own a large portion of the "dubai experiment", and this is being done in a none-too-subtle way to embarass Emir Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum. Thoughts?

Enjoy the muffin. =) --PlatoCantRepent (talk) 04:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

That is possible, but I don't think we can include any of this speculation in articles unless it is backed up by reliable sources. --timsdad ^(talk) 04:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

I agree completely, which is why I put it out there on the talk page. If it gets deleted, it gets deleted. There is however a large debt that was just paid off, so one way or another, Khalifa owns Dubai. I think there may be a leak soon. For the record, Sydney's Northern Beaches.--PlatoCantRepent (talk) 05:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the welcome, though ...

Thank you for the welcome, though I should probably point out that I've been here at least several years now. :)

Cheers,

Kubrickrules (talk) 02:04, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

You have, too. It disappointed me to see that nobody had welcomed you in that time, so I took the liberty to do it myself. --timsdad ^(talk) 02:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Goethe

Any chance we are being trolled in this discussion? Wikipedia has a policy to deal with this. Astronaut (talk) 18:06, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

My question

It's simply: if I stood at the base of the Burj Dubai, what would my elevation be? Daniel Christensen (talk) 21:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Put simply, I don't know. I know my other answer was only referring to Burj Khalifa's proximity to the beach, but I gathered this would suggest the base of the building was not much much higher than sea level. Probably less than 10 metres. --timsdad ^(talk) 02:40, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

PING AN

Well construction has actually started on the ground for Ping An. Do me a favour and update the article when you come across an article. Merci —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.65.20.102 (talk) 02:47, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

My references

Hi, I noticed you edited my references on the Adelaide United season 2010–11 page. What was the reason behind changing the format of all the dates by the way? And each individual A-League club website is still owned by the A-League, thus the 'publisher' and 'work' fields were filled out accordingly, so I don't understand why you removed them either. - RedsUnited (talk) 09:14, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

My reason for changing the dates is that the British format of dates is preferred in Australian articles to the US date format. I thought that because all of the articles on the Adelaide United website were written by Adelaide United and not the A-League, (although the A-League does run all of the teams' websites) the publisher should be Adelaide United although I'm willing to change that back. As for the rest of the empty fields, they are unneeded and only increase the load time so it was obvious why I removed those. --timsdad ^(talk) 09:37, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

No worries. I've just been using that dating system by default for all my references, but am willing to change them to suit that logic. As for the 'publisher' field, it'd make more sense to include it as it will help with articles referenced in other A-League club websites too. And cheers for removing the redundant fields. - RedsUnited (talk) 10:03, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Again, I suggest getting refTools. It's very easy to use, and uses the correct dating system. --timsdad ^(talk) 10:13, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

SVG

Hello, Timsdad. You have new messages at Astronaut's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your drawing

Hello timsdad. I have improved one of your skyscraper drawings. One World Trade Center looks now better, I hope you like it ;). Jerchel (talk) 18:59, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

New Adelaide Crows Logo

The reason i changed the logo is becuase the one that you added is not the right logo. This logo is an adaption made on paint. The one that i added is the official logo that the Adelaide Football Club created. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hdecure (talk • contribs) 00:43, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

You uploaded this 'official logo' as a new version on File:Adelaide Crows logo.png as well as uploading File:Crowslogo350.jpg afterwards. As the second one is now unused and unfree, I have tagged it for speedy deletion. --timsdad ^(talk) 13:40, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Busan Lotte World Tower and Incheon Towers.

Hello Timsdad. I write to you, because I know you have knowldges about skyscrapers. Recently I disussed with a few guys of skyscraperpage.com. The Busan Lotte World Tower is after my knowledge not U/C. Those construction site you see at the image taken by Softjuice is not the tower, it´s the sourrounding shopping-center. Here an intersting link: [1]. Those images are taken on January 4th of this year. There is no construction going on. The 151 Incheon Towers are as well not U/C. Some photos from the fourth quarter of last year show this: [2]. Several more sources: [3] and [4]. We should delete them in the U/C list of the List of tallest buildings in the world. But I don´t want to begin an editwar or an argument with Softjuice again. Jerchel (talk) 14:28, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

I know first-hand evidence from these images should be enough to prove that the buildings aren't under construction, and I do trust you and the images, but I'm afraid it is what classifies as original research and we can only use reliable sources to confirm the buildings' statuses. --timsdad ^(talk) 07:41, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Are skyscraperpage.com and CTBUH and Emporis not reliable sources? Jerchel (talk) 08:27, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

In the press

You might be interested to hear that you are mentioned by your Wikipedia username in this article in The National. Astronaut (talk) 19:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I did look into that when the edit was made on the talk page. I'm not sure what take the article has on the discussion, although it looks as if the writer might believe there is a connection between Goethe's birthday and the height of the building, unlike the rest of us. I guess we have to watch what we say around here... --timsdad ^(talk) 00:39, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

burj khalifa

I wanted to update the burj khalifa page in keeping with the interesting side-facts already on the page, perhaps you can add, or let me know how since the page is locked.

Burj Khalifa park

Burj Khalifa is surrounded by an 11 ha (1,200,000 sq ft) park [insert here...]

designed by SWA Group of Sausalito, California which has created landscaped urban plans for other skyscrapers including the Shanghai Grand Tower, Shanghai, and the Zero Energy Tower in Guangzhou.[cite here article in Emirates Business, see below...is basically the cite for all the new text] The Tower Park echoes the core design concepts of Burj Khalifa and the symmetries of the desert flower, Hymenocallis.[67] [delete here the sentence "The park has six water features, gardens, palm lined walkways, and flowering trees" which is redundant to other text]

Befitting the harsh climate, which is not desert given the proximity to the coast, the Tower Park includes not only Hymenocallis but also Ficuses, Pseuderanthemum and similar flora. Palm trees identify the main circulation paths of travel and frame the edge of the landscape along the lake. Olive trees also populate the landscape to enhance pedestrian walkways and provide shade.

The landscape plan was expanded to include 3.5 km of Emaar Boulevard, which connects all major Dubai destinations including the main vehicular access to the Burj Khalifa. The wide boulevard’s double-row date palms and pedestrian-friendly commercial areas are intended to establish a world-class avenue as recognized as the Champs-Elysees, Park Avenue or the Ramblas.

[pick up the following existing text, though you may want to delete the ending mention of water features since it's a redundancy to text in the prior paragraph headed "Dubai Fountain"...] At the centre of the park and the base of Burj Khalifa is the water room, which is a series of pools and water jet fountains. In addition the railing, benches and signs incorporate images of Burj Khalifa and the Hymenocallis flower. [68]WET designers, who also developed the Dubai Fountain, developed the park's six water features.

New reference/cite (there are others but this is 'all in one']: Emirates Business, “An Interative Pattern”, 2 Feb 2010 http://www.business24-7.ae/Articles/2010/1/Pages/03012010/01042010_083bdb53b058446fb3704f6a2683d25d.aspx

1rheckmann (talk) 10:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppet Help

Hi. I've been having trouble with two editors, Alohahell and Softjuice. I believe they are sockpuppets and I also believe they are related to a former editor (Tnaniua) who was banned for sockpuppetry. They all seem to share similar editing patterns with Korean buildings, Samsung, and accusing anything they don't agree with as vandalism. Also looking at their contribution histories, I see some patterns that may be evidence of this. I saw that you had issue with them before, and I was wondering if you have any evidence to help support a SPI case. At the very least there is some meat puppetry going on, and it's very frustrating for me as an editor. Anawrahta (talk) 05:22, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Miapolis

Just thought I'd let you know about this; in case you didn't already know. Here is their promotional video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U738MYMkk_I Daniel Christensen (talk) 04:38, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

I was considering creating an article on it a while back when I first watched the video. I decided against it because I couldn't find any evidence supporting its official proposal. I'm glad to see it's been created now though, and I do like the video - even though I can't see it being built anytime soon. Thanks, timsdad ^(talk) 07:31, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Astronaut#Miapolis; he said that if it wasn't for the Miami Herald article, he would move to have it deleted as a hoax that will never happen, I sort of agree with that it is in Miami near the sea where Hurricanes are and near an airport supossedly. Daniel Christensen (talk) 19:29, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

File:SAFE!.mid listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SAFE!.mid, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:30, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

List of tallest residential buildings in the world

I had nominated this article for FL but it doesnt passed this time, the artile has been peer reviwed twice, i have made alot of improvements to this article but still i want to improve it more, so i need your help regarding general copy editing and to check this article for gramatical mistakes and errors.Suggest some more useful content for this article, because in a disscussion of FL, they said that this article needs some more content.And also can you add Alttext to the images of this article, as english is not my first language so i have a little problem regarding alttext. Regards.

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 12:45, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Pingan International Finance Centre

Hello Timsdad. Good news: Now I know that Pingan IFC will be 588m tall, says CTBUH [5]. Marshall Gerometta, CTBUH database editor, cotacted Kohn Pedersein Fox, they told him it is 588m, with no spire. Jerchel (talk) 14:08, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Still accurate?

Is the "U.S. cities containing buildings 700 feet (213 m) or more in height" template on List of tallest buildings in the united States still accurate? That page used to be way to long and took in some cases minutes to load so I split it up wih Raime's help a few months ago. Daniel Christensen (talk) 15:21, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

I very much doubt it... you'd have to look into it. I'm afraid I just don't have the time to do it myself, sorry. --timsdad ^(talk) 10:53, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Emporis is terrible

First I noticed a few mistakes but now there is a bunch more. The top 25 here (http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/ci/bu/?id=100280) is different than if you click view more. Some are left out. Also it's not updated for many cities. US cities. It's actually really bad, in fact, and it makes it so almost all list of tallest articles here, the majority of which rely solely on emporis, incorrect. I added the little criticism thing to the emporis article. Daniel Christensen (talk) 18:28, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles 05:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CF Pachuca logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CF Pachuca logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:38, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ALeague AIS b

Template:ALeague AIS b has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 01:31, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:W-League 2009-10 Position Ladder

Template:W-League 2009-10 Position Ladder has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:43, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Your diagram "The 6 tallest buildings in Australia diagram" is inaccurate

The actual roof of Q1 is 240m.(where you can walk around) it has a plantroom which is 246m. The glazing stops at 265m and fin frame at 275m.

Your diagram has Q1 with a 270m roof height and the fin frame at 290m! This is incorrect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.130.12.22 (talk) 10:30, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ALeague AIS colour

Template:ALeague AIS colour has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 06:08, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sturt Lions logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sturt Lions logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:24, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Meetup 12 June 2011

Hi! I just wanted to let you know that Liam Wyatt is in town, so we were thinking of doing a quick meetup at Brunelli's cafe in Rundle Street (at the Rundle Mall end, near the car park) at 6pm on Sunday, with a possibility of drinks afterwards. So if you're interested we hope to see you there. :) - Bilby (talk) 03:31, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Future of WikiProject Association Football in Australia

There is a discussion on the future direction of WikiProject Association Football in Australia. To view the discussion see here. You have received this message because you are listed as a member of the WikiProject. Hack (talk) 06:35, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

List of Tallest Residnetial Buildings in the World

There is an ongoing discussion on the talk page of this article between me and User:Longwayround. And there is a need of third party opinion, the discussion is over the following subjects:

• Reliable sources, the user User:Longwayround, claims the sources (CTBUH, Skyscraperpage, and Emporis) are not reliable and he says that there is a need of more secondary and tertiary sources.
• Topped out status of Princess tower. (As per Emporis the toweris topped out, but elsewhere it is mentioned as under construction)
• Grammar of the article.
• Ranking of the buildings.

Your opinion over the discussion at the talk page of List of Tallest Residential Buildings in the World will be highly appreciated.

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 13:09, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:West Coast Eagles.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:West Coast Eagles.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:21, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Files listed for deletion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 March 10 if you are interested in preserving them.

• File:BHP Tower.jpg

Thank you. kelapstick^(bainuu) 02:45, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AUFC logo transparent.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AUFC logo transparent.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Malpass⁹₃! (what I've been ^up to/_drop me a ^___) 14:58, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Sky city

Hello,

I noticed that you were one of the prime contributers to the Burj Khalifa article, and I thought you could help me. I am trying to take Skycity to DYK, considering what an interesting hook it will make. For which, I intend to expand the article as much as I can (to meet DYK expansion standards). For this I request your help to expanding the article and making it a truly great hook.

I am trying to keep all edits at User:TheOriginalSoni/Sky city so that we have more than the traditional 7 days to finish this hook. Hope you shall help!!!

Thanks and cheers!! TheOriginalSoni (talk) 18:05, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:AdelaideAirportLogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:AdelaideAirportLogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Michelle Carney, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Michelle Carney" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 13:12, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WLeague BR

Template:WLeague BR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mentoz86 (talk) 10:35, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

List of tallest residential buildings in the world

Hi Hope you will be fine. I have nominated List of tallest residential buildings in the world for featured list status. I have really worked hard and improved this article enabling it to achieve FL status, however i want your help to make some copy edits in order to improve its grammatical mistake, if any, as English is not my first language.

Your cooperation in this regard will be highly appreciated.Nabil rais2008 (talk) 15:17, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

FYI - Adelaide meetup on Wednesday next week

Adelaide Meetup Next: TBA Last: 6 March 2020

More info here. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:40, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Invitation to Adelaide Wikipedia Users Group meetings

Hi, in case you're not already aware of it, a group of Adelaide Wikipedians has been meeting on a monthly basis since April, with the aim of improving the scope and quality of articles on South Australian topics. We meet at UniSA's City West campus, and our 23 July meeting will have a guest speaker from the National Trust of SA.

This coming Sunday, 6 July, we will be holding our first Edit-a-thon. This will be an opportunity for new editors to come and learn either basic or more advanced editing from very experienced wikipedians, so if you know anyone who would like to get some practice, please let them know - and beginners will be very welcome. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 06:43, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Monnique Hansen Kofoed

The article Monnique Hansen Kofoed has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Hasn't played in a fully professional league or at national level. Hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hack (talk) 12:32, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Holiday4

Template:Holiday4 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:31, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Al-Ahly logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Al-Ahly logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Sky Tower in Auckland

Thanks for your response. However the proper place to discuss edits is in the article talk page. In the table where the Sky Tower is listed the last column states it is in Auckland. There is no reason to have 'Auckland' in brackets in the title column for the tower. Mousing over the 'Sky Tower' link shows it is Auckland and the last column confirms this. The actual title of the article for the Sky Tower doesn't have to be replicated in the list table. However I am happy for you to provide evidence in Wikipedia guidelines to demonstrate this otherwise. I have copied this text into the article talk page. Please reply there Robynthehode (talk) 09:30, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, replied here. --timsdad ^(talk) 10:07, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ruth Wallace

The article Ruth Wallace has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this footballer meets WP:GNG or has played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C679 21:07, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ruth Blackburn

The article Ruth Blackburn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this footballer meets WP:GNG or has played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C679 21:08, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:W-League Ladder

Template:W-League Ladder has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:29, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:A-League NYL Ladder

Template:A-League NYL Ladder has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Could you join my new forum?

Hi Timsdad or whatever I should call you. (Started off with that so I don't sound like a spambot roaming around.)

Sorry to sound like a walking advert, which I am, but I don't know how else to get popularity to my new website. Anyway, I recently started a forum about developments in Adelaide and I found that it seems to be one of your interests. It would be great if you could make an account on the forum I recently created to help boost it's popularity and overall active feel of the site.

You don't have to stay and be an active poster on the forum but it would just be great if you could make an account.

Website URL: http://highriseadelaide.createaforum.com/index.php

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Timsdad. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Steigenberger Hotel Group Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Steigenberger Hotel Group Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Timsdad! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 20:46, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thomai Kezios

The article Thomai Kezios has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG - hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hack (talk) 03:47, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Thomai Kezios for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomai Kezios is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomai Kezios until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hack (talk) 01:39, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Adelaide Crows logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Adelaide Crows logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Timsdad. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ALeague BR colour

Template:ALeague BR colour has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:36, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ALeague MH

Template:ALeague MH has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 11:35, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ALeague BR

Template:ALeague BR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 11:38, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Timsdad. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:St Martins.jpg

The file File:St Martins.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 02:22, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Glory-logo-2009.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Glory-logo-2009.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

"Template:Holiday4" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:Holiday4. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 4#Template:Holiday4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pam Bignold

The article Pam Bignold has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG; no reliable secondary sources covering her

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 20:56, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tenneille Boaler

The article Tenneille Boaler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not seem to pass WP:GNG; this [6] source is the only one that mentions her but it's barely more than a passing mention, in my humble opinion. Google news returns zero hits on 'Tenneille Boaler' and 'Teneille Boaler'

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 11:19, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Georgia Chapman

The article Georgia Chapman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of WP:GNG; sourcing is very thin from a WP:BEFORE search; The Women's Game search, passing mentions and one article here. The last article is the only one demonstrating any amount of significant coverage. Ideally, we need more.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 14:24, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Ashlee Faul for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashlee Faul is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashlee Faul until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 08:56, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Rochelle Kuhar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rochelle Kuhar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rochelle Kuhar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 18:32, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Katerina Bexis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katerina Bexis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katerina Bexis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 10:59, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Leah Curtis (soccer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leah Curtis (soccer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leah Curtis (soccer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 17:45, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Georgia Chapman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Georgia Chapman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia Chapman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 21:05, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Christina Papageorgiou for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christina Papageorgiou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Papageorgiou until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ellie Raymond for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ellie Raymond is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellie Raymond until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

The WikiEagle - January 2022

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged. On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue. Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion. The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7. The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed. The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125. The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members New Members KingAviationKid (Joined on 17 December) PatrickChiao (Joined on 22 December) Wp9097 (Joined on 16 December) Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921. Closed Discussions Featured Article assessment Jim Lovell (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Good Article assessment HAL Tejas (discussion) – Closed as not promoted on 30 December 2021 William Hodgson (RAF officer) (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Supermarine Sea King (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 22 December 2021 Raymond Hesselyn (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 4 December 2021 Deletion Timeline of Berlin Brandenburg Airport's construction (discussion) – Closed as delete and redirect on 30 December 2021 Evergreen International Airlines Flight 17 (discussion) – Closed as keep on 25 December 2021 Requested moves Akbarpur (Ambedkar Nagar) Airstrip → Akbarpur Airstrip (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 1983 Avensa Douglas DC-9 crash → Avensa Flight 007 (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 035 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 035 (discussion) – Withdrawn on 28 December 2021	Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY. Aviation pages by quality Quality Total FA 142 FL 15 A 56 GA 505 B 4,573 C 11,878 Start 15,082 Stub 18,754 List 2,539 Category 11,638 Disambig 653 File 2,713 Portal 629 Project 89 Redirect 1,518 Template 2,489 NA 66 Assessed 73,339 Unassessed 1 Total 73,340 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 250,758 Ω = 4.93
New/Ongoing Discussions Featured Article review D. B. Cooper (discussion) – Since 14 December 2021 A-class Article assessment Granville Gee Bee Model A (discussion) – Since 21 April 2020 List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War (discussion) – Since 22 February 2010 Good Article assessment Romanian Air Corps (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Jean Batten (discussion) – Since 2 October 2021 Merger proposals List of astronauts by name → List of astronauts by year of selection (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of cosmonauts → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of space travelers by name → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 Holidays Czech Airlines → Czech Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 June 2021 Bendix Aviation → Bendix Corporation (discussion) – Since 30 May 2021 Airport Movement Area Safety System → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 29 May 2021 ASDE-X → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 28 May 2021 Splitting proposals Family Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 November 2021 2021 Kabul airport attack (discussion) – Since 24 September 2021 List of military aircraft of the United States (discussion) – Since 16 August 2021 Braniff International Airways (discussion) – Since 8 September 2019 Deletion List of maiden voyages (discussion) – Since 29 December 2021 Requested moves Hot-air balloon → Hot air balloon (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 108 → Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 109 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 150 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 150 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 206 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 206 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 708 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 708 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 892 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 892 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 TWA Flight 800 → TWA Flight 800 (1996) (discussion) – Since 27 December 2021 Dynamic Airways Flight 405 → Dynamic International Airways Flight 405 (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 CommutAir Flight 4281 → CommutAir Flight 4821 (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Thai Airways → Thai Airways International (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Thai Airways fleet → Thai Airways International fleet (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 List of Thai Airways destinations → List of Thai Airways International destinations (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Did you know Ravish Malhotra (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Alexander Tahy (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 Veronica Volkersz (discussion) – Since 6 December 2021 Rudolf Szepessy-Sokoll (discussion) – Since 3 December 2021 On The Main Page Did you know... ... that the aerobatic demonstration aircraft used by SoloTürk is also used in military operations of the Turkish Air Force? (24 December)
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Nissan Cube side.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nissan Cube side.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:22, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Nissan Cube side2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nissan Cube side2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:22, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Nissan Cube front.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nissan Cube front.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:23, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Nissan Cube Grand Canyon.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nissan Cube Grand Canyon.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:23, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Timsdad2.PNG

The file File:Timsdad2.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal file. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:23, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Timsdad.GIF

The file File:Timsdad.GIF has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal file. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:23, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Empire State Building timsdad.jpg

The file File:Empire State Building timsdad.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Replaceable with files at c:Category:Exterior of the Chrysler Building.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:25, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Empire State Building top.jpg

The file File:Empire State Building top.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Low quality. Superseded by File:Empire State Building in red (4586132615).jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:30, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

File:St Martins2.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:St Martins2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:31, 14 August 2022 (UTC)