User talk:Tiger Marc/Archive/Archive 01

Latest comment: 16 years ago by SatyrBot in topic LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Proposed WikiProject: Leather History edit

I propose to start a new WikiProject that documents Leather History as outlined by the Leather History Timeline created for the Leather Archives and Museum.

First, we would copy the timeline (with the LA&M's permission) to Wikipedia. Second, we would create articles to support the timeline. Thirdly, we would add articles to fill in gaps in the timeline.

BDSM stubs

Leather History & Timeline edit

Description: This project proposes to increase and improve the coverage in Wikipedia of the history of leather culture such as BDSM organizations, motorcycle clubs, and related events.

Temporary project page: Leather history

User: Tiger MarcROAR!

Interested Wikipedians (please add your name):

Welcome! edit

Hello, Tiger Marc/Archive/Archive 01, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

Now, the above was a template, and I myself know (from experience) that nothing gets the job done better than a real human, so feel free to drop me a line right there :) I hope you have fun on Wikipedia! --Master of Puppets 05:10, 12 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Awesome :) edit

I noticed that you adopted one of my userboxes; mainly, the Vandalism one. Would you know how to create and contribute a template to the userbox area? I'm rubbish with code, I only know how to fix vandalism and the like. Thanks, mate :) --Master of Puppets(MASTER!MASTER!) 05:22, 14 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

leather edit

I would like to delete this page and replace it with a redirect for International Mr Leather (upper case) which would cover more of the redirects. Please note: a) you did not need to delete the article - you should have simply changed it; b) the correct redirect was already there to International Mister Leather. There is no International Mr Leather article and International Mr. Leather is also a redirect. -- RHaworth 07:54, 19 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

You win! edit

 Tiger Marc has earned a Cernen's Plusbox for for beating me to the punch and reverting apparent template vandalism!

Cernen 14:46, 19 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hello edit

I am glad you like the BDSM/leather flag and userbox, I drew it myself from a copy of a little picture :)

I think it would be a better idea to have a "BDSM wikiproject" or "fetish wikiproject" (fetish wikiproject could be better but then we could also get unwanted people as well as being an easier target for prudes

Hope you think about it

Category:Kinky Wikipedians also has some relevant information if you've seen it: I just put up a notice about the possibility of a wikiproject (btw have you checked out wipipedia? it's quite good) --Mistress Selina Kyle (Α⇔Ω ¦ ⇒✉) 12:56, 14 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Happy Easter! edit

Happy Easter! :D _-M o P-_ 04:40, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia's LGBT Community edit

 

Hi, Tiger Marc/Archive!
You've indicated through various means (a userbox, membership in a category, etc) that you are part of the Wikipedia LGBT community, or are interested in Wikipedia's LGBT related pages. Welcome!

You may not know that Wikipedia has both an LGBT Notice Board and an LGBT Studies WikiProject. If you haven't yet done so, take a look at both of them. They sorely need attention and participation!

Some things on the "To-Do List" that merit particular attention include:

  1. Identifying topics/pages that need attention
  2. Identifying problems that need addressing
  1. Adding the LGBT template to appropriate pages
  2. Categorizing LGBT pages

Please feel free to participate in any or all of these activities! And if you feel like it, add yourself to either the Noticeboard Members or the WikiProject Participants - or both!

Glad you're a part of Wikipedia - and Thanks! This invitation posted here by SatyrTN -- talk
Please remove it if you so desire.

Cornell edit

I have just started WikiProject Cornell University, an attempt to thoroughly cover topics related to Cornell. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Thanks! —mercuryboardtalk 05:25, 15 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject LGBT studies edit

Hello! I noticed that your userpage mentions that you are interested in LGBT issues. Would you be interested in joining WikiProject LGBT studies? The WikiProject's been a bit inactive recently and some of us are trying to get it going again. We'd love to have you on board! Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 21:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC) Reply

Whups! edit

I didn't realize the LGBTProject template was supposed to go on the talk page, not the article page, until I looked it up after I noticed your moving them. I stand corrected.  :-) --Textorus 23:51, 28 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm glad you moved them. I'm making it one of my little projects, to add LGBTProject tags to all the untagged articles I find. Not sure what the Project will do with all of them, but I figure it's good to have all possible links in place. :-) --Textorus 23:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Welcome edit

 

Hi, Tiger Marc/Archive, welcome to WikiProject LGBT Studies!

We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles regarding lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) and intersex people. LGBT Studies covers people, culture, history, and related subjects concerning sexual identity and gender identity - this covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated! Some points that may be helpful:

  • Our main aim is to help improve articles, so if someone seeks help, please try to assist if you are able. Likewise feel free to ask for help, advice or clarification.
  • Many important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
  • If you have another language besides English, please consider adding yourself to our translation section, to help us improve our foreign LGBT topics.
  • The project has several ongoing and developing activities, such as article quality assessment, peer review and a project-wide article collaboration, all of which you are welcome to take part in. We also have a unique program to improve our lower quality articles, Jumpaclass, so please consider signing up there.
  • If you're going to stay awhile, please create a square in our project quilt! You can put anything you want in it.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you.

And once again - Welcome!

Glad you signed up. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 13:57, 30 December 2006 (UTC) Reply

User:SatyrBot and LGBTProject edit

Do you mean in the comments? Because I've only used it to add {{LGBTProject | class=Stub}} so far. I'm in the process of getting it to be a bit more functional so I can use it for more than just stubs, but that's what it does now. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 03:09, 31 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

LGBT Template edit

If you don't mind too much, I'd rather stick to just replacing the various older Gay & LGBT boxes with the new "Bisexuality series" boxes on all the Bi articles I can locate and then also making sure each article also has the "LGBT Project" box on each discussion page. That's a more than overwhelming task in and of itself. CyntWorkStuff 03:14, 31 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Florida Legislative Investigation Committee edit

Hey Marc, thanks for the "B" on this article--that's the first letter grade I've ever gotten! <grin> Appreciate ya! --Textorus 03:25, 31 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Glad you like. It is an interesting subject, and ought to be more widely known about. I've actually known some people who were subjected to those interrogations, and they are still shook up about it, all these years later. Scary stuff, and right here in the good ol' "land of the free," too.  :-( --Textorus 06:00, 31 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

changes to gay games site edit

Tiger --

I see your changes and appreciate your rationale for them. From my perspective, removing the substance of the speeches denies readers any sense of substance and story arc that took place on the field; leaving simply an index. This is, imho, not "encyclopedic." I guess you are in control or something, so I'm not going to battle you; although I think you are depriving people of some powerful words.

I trust your leaving my name out of the article was an oversight, and have replaced it. Having given up an entire year of my life to make this happen, and it being my concept in the first place, I don't think such acknowledgment of that is out of place, yes?

Thanks,

Kile Ozier

KO 17:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kile,
Did you see the messages I left for you on your talk page and in the article's Discussion/talk page? As I wrote there, I removed the content because it appeared to be copyrighted. (Copyrighted material cannot be included in Wikipedia unless it is cleared.)
Also, full text of speeches is not encyclopedic. Encyclopedias do not document primary source material. Instead, they summarize it. See WP:NOT. However, there is an appropriate place for speeches (if they are not copyrighted or are "fair use") -- our sister project, Wikisource.org. Why don't you put it there and link to the speeches from Wikipedia? I think that would be a great addition.
In any case, I hope you're not disheartened and continue to contribute. --Tiger MarcROAR! 22:01, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

further corrections to Gay Games Page edit

Marc,

I have clarified another inaccuracy. The ceremonies were not a tribute to Tom Waddell (any more than the fact of the Games, themselves, are in a way such a tribute); though, there is always a segment of Tribute to Tom as proscribed in the Federation's Guidelines for Protocol and Ceremony (which I wrote) and is a part of the contracts with successive Host Committees. This year, that tribute was in the form of a film that featured the words of Dr. Waddell, spoken by about twenty out, gay and lesbian athletes -- some olympians -- immediately prior to the presentation of the Tom Waddell Cup on the field by Greg Louganis. As far as that goes, I directed that film, as well.

As to your assertion that the fact of my directing these ceremonies is "irrelevant," I begin to get the sense that this resistance to my inclusion in this segment is more personal than professional. Throughout wikipedia, authors and directors of theatrical presentations are cited. This is no different. If it is relevant to cite the choreographers, performers and speakers -- most of whom accepted the invitation to work on these ceremonies in response to direct invitation from me, the Director -- it would be equally relevant to cite the man who developed the concept, wrote and directed the experience. Just as Andrew Lloyd Webber is cited as the author of the musical "Phantom of the Opera," this is entirely relevant.

I take your point of referencing copy of the speeches and lyrics through wikipedia's "sister" site, and will investigate the facilitation of that when I can get the time. My concern is that some very powerful words were spoken on that field, and I would hate to see them lost or unavailable to those not present. My original motivation for adding this segment to wikipedia was so that those powerful and moving speeches might not be forgotten.

Oh, and btw, Keith Boykin did not "read from" Exhortation to a Weary Army," he delivered it. "Exhortation..." was, again, a concept of mine that I asked Keith to write within parameters and with the purposes I shared with him. He took this project on, and through our collaboration came the copy he delivered on July 15. This was the same process that yielded the words of Kate Clinton, David Cornell and Suzanne Westenhoeffer -- all this is certainly verifiable. To that, I have the successive copies of these speeches as we developed them.

Rather than do all of this through interminable emails and "chats," please feel free to contact me by phone (all that info is on my website), and I can offer you anything you need for verification. I am open to and would be happy to speak with you, so that any confusion can be cleared up and any miscommunication or misunderstanding can be avoided. Please do avail yourself of this.

Best KO 13:29, 2 January 2007 (UTC) Reply

Same-sex marriage in Spain edit

Hey there, Just saw you had rated the article Same-sex marriage in Spain as B-Class. Seeing as we're aiming to get it to GA status, I'd like to know what you thought about it and why the low mark. A great effort was done to make it as NPOV as possible (by both supporters and non-supporters of the law) and make it well-sourced and referenced. Obviously you detected some flaws, so I'd be grateful for some feedback on them, to correct them asap. :) Cheers Raystorm 11:57, 29 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

*Grin* Ah okay, I'm sorry, I guess I just skimmed the rates, and I saw that a B meant that it was okay but possibly POV or badly sourced and in need of great work, so I got somewhat concerned! :) I should have read that only articles granted GA status can reflect a GA rating. Sorry, my bad. I'm trying to get it to GA status right now, but I'm afraid there's a massive backlog at the candidates page (it's been there waiting for 15 days now...). Anyway, thanks for saying it has the stuff to become a GA. And of course, any ideas you'd like to contribute so that this may happen would be greatly appreciated (obviously, the final goal would be to make it a FA, so any and all ideas to develop the article towards this end are most welcome!). Cheers Raystorm 11:58, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
PS:I do have a weak spot for userboxes, how did you guess? :) Haha Raystorm 12:00, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
PS2: Hi, sorry to bother you again. :) Would like your opinion on something. Do you think the article, as it stands, could merit an A-rating? (I just noticed that it doesn't have to be a GA for that, and in fact several of the articles in the GA candidates' page are A-rated) Cheers Raystorm 15:01, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi again Tiger Marc. :) Listen, the article Same-sex marriage in Spain has undergone a major revamp. I'd very much appreciate any feedback you could provide about it. I need a third party to give me an objective appraisal (as I'm the only person editing this article). I'm especially worried about redundancy issues at the beginning. Would you terribly mind? :) Cheers Raystorm 14:49, 9 January 2007 (UTC) Reply

LGBT WikiProject newsletter edit

SatyrBot 05:21, 3 April 2007 (UTC) Reply

LGBT WikiProject newsletter edit

This month's project newsletter (hand delivered as SatyrTN and Dev920 are away). Best wishes, WjBscribe 03:18, 2 May 2007 (UTC) Reply

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter edit

Delivered on 16:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 16:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Reply

Delivered on 16:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC).

Delivered on 16:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC).

Delivered on 17:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC).

Delivered on 12:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC).

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter edit

Delivered on 20:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 21:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply