User talk:Tide rolls/Archive 49

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thanks for sharing your big thoughts as an admin to the discussion in my talk page. Hope to respond and help me again in answering the user's questions regarding his issues. Have a nice day! :) Mediran talk to me! 10:10, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks, Mediran. I appreciate your efforts on Wikipedia as well. Tiderolls 03:01, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Complaint

AT LEAST EDIT IT TO HYPOCRISY!

1. YOLO — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.255.162.96 (talk) 01:02, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Zionist_youth_movement#United_Kingdom

Re my edit on this article, first edit was correct second edit was typo since your undo 3rd edit should be ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.179.250.207 (talk) 01:48, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You've probably gotten so many of these by now that your head will explode with this one, but I can't help it. Good work! AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 02:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks, AutomaticStrikeout. Some folks would opine that I could a bit of head-explosion. I don't agree but await consensus. See ya 'round Tiderolls 03:03, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

No problem. Could you take a look here? I think something is amiss, but I don't want to break 3RR. Thanks, AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 04:03, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

First, I would be very careful regarding continuously reverting an editor that is discussing their edits. The edits would have to be unquestionable vandalism, BLP vios or copyright problems. This IP's edits do not fit those categories. I think the IP is wrong, but being wrong is not vandalism. I'll leave them a message. Tiderolls 04:20, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Ok, but the IP actually did not start discussing the situation until after the reverts had stopped. I'd appreciate your help. AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 04:23, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

I understand, but being right in an edit war doesn't make the block easier to accept :^\ Tiderolls 04:28, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

That's why I stopped at two reverts. AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 04:31, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for blocking the IP. Would it still be a problem if I reverted again or should I let you restore the content? AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 05:25, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Actually, I'm off to bed. So, I'll leave it to you. AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 05:28, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

hhi

i love you from matt ' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkolpmkolp4 (talk • contribs) 20:52, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

• I love you too Tide rolls. Now quit screwing around and get us that touchdown. RFT. Drmies (talk) 00:16, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
  • You ready to have a heart attack too? Drmies (talk) 00:58, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.8.147.64 (talk) 02:01, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

• [1] Drmies (talk) 03:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Good stuff, right there. Roll tide. Tiderolls 03:47, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Need help with this IP

Hey, need help with this guy [2]. He is making some constructive edits, but he is also making edits that other editors have to keep cleaning up on such as removing the tags and links to pages that are completely fine. He has had warnings from last month but it is a new month and I can't really issue warning for the things he is doing. Obviously he doesn't really care about talking so it is going to be a pain to deal with him down the road. Any ideas on how to deal with this guy? Thanks.--iGeMiNix 17:54, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi, iGeminix. They don't need any more warnings; they either don't care or don't get it. I've left a message requesting that they start responding to the concerns of others. Maybe a non-templating approach will bring them into conversation. I'll watchlist their talk and check their contribs on and off. Unfortunately, I have zero knowledge of the subject that is is the focus of their interest, so a determination of disruption is difficut for me to draw. If you see some blatant or overt problems please raise the issue, either here or at an appropriate noticeboard if I seem absent. Regards Tiderolls 18:22, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Well, thanks for the help as usual man. Hopefully things can be resolved but if not then oh well.--iGeMiNix 04:27, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Seems like there is another one also. [3] Doing some constructive yet the genre changing is always a burden as they are unsourced and he never gets the message.--iGeMiNix 06:13, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

199.184.205.88

You are correct, I have no interest in the elevation (or much of anything) of Russellville, Arkansas. I did take issue when 199.184.205.88 replaced "Mayor" with "Reverend", mayor and a photograph of the town with a trailer park (of Miami): file:trailerpark.jpg trailer both After these messages on my talk page, 1 2, I suspect the IP was just being disruptive. I did add more information to AIV and the IP was blocked. Thanks for the message and sorry for the trouble. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the follow-up message, Jim. I kind of suspected there was more to the story. See ya Tiderolls 07:04, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Block error

Hello, Tide. I have found that user Dy824 was marked as blocked, even though the last block (which you placed) should have ended several days ago. It seems likely that this was because your block was dated to end on Thu, 30 Nov 2012, but in fact 30 November was not a Thursday. See block log. I have unblocked the account, but I thought I would warn you to watch out for similar mistakes in the future. (I don't know whether the block would eventually have expired or not.) JamesBWatson (talk) 12:12, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

I'll look at it in detail later, JBW. Thanks for the note and the clean up. Tiderolls 14:30, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Boundary 2

There are people using the wiki as a platform to promote the journal. Some important words from a journal-editor on what is a widely held opinion about b2's no submission policy have been deleted. I took it up on the talk page. There's no consensus on it and there's an editor who has a bully/ownership of articles issue (look in the archive of b2 talk). Over-active editors who know the ins and outs of the system don't (necessarily) a consensus make. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.199.210.227 (talk) 00:09, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Cultural depictions of elephants

Don't worry - the article is currently "under construction". Comments and suggestions are more than welcome! For now we're adding stuff, eventually we'll remove some of it. Of course, you're welcome to contribute to editing, or leave comments on the the talk page (or my talk page). ~Thanks, ~Eric F: 74.60.29.141 (talk) 01:46, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Apoligze from nikki

i apolgize ain advance please let me know if i did anything to hurt you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.68.219.249 (talk) 01:49, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Edit to Self Hypnosis

Hello,

You recently undid my edit as listed here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/69.152.40.98

What was not constructive about it? I believe my edit was correct.

69.152.40.98 (talk) 07:26, 12 December 2012 (UTC)69.152.40.98

Edits may be correct and nonconstructive simultaneously. However, my reversion of your edit was a bit hasty and was based on the garbled nature of the lede as a whole. I've made a change there that, hopefully, clears things up. I was not attempting to comment on your abilities as an editor and apologize if that was your perception of my post. Regards Tiderolls 13:37, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

No offenses taken - I was just genuinely confused. Thank you for the follow-up and fixes. :) 69.152.40.98 (talk) 13:41, 12 December 2012 (UTC)69.152.40.98

Premature archive

You archived a new discussion here. Please revert and address it. —Frungi (talk) 19:59, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Your messages posted here will continue to be archived at my discretion. Tiderolls 20:14, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Why do you refuse to discuss this? What do you have against me? —Frungi (talk) 20:17, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

I have repeatedly stated that I am finished commenting on the matter. That you read something sinister into that is your problem, not mine. Except for your constant badgering, I have nothing against you. Please do not post here again; there will be no reponse. Tiderolls 20:23, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

You still haven’t said one word about why you went silent from when I thanked you for your offer until I asked about it nearly a month later (this silence is what I’ve been questioning), and I still don’t know what you changed your mind from or to. I didn’t mean to badger you and I apologize for that, but I hope you can appreciate my frustration. —Frungi (talk) 20:33, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Speaking of (Honey) Badger

Did you see the latest from the NCAA? Drmies (talk) 15:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

ANI comment

No offense taken by your original edit, but thanks for your apology. In fact, I could see how you might have construed my comment as me wanting a response ASAP, when I was only expecting action at it's appropriate time.—Bagumba (talk) 03:05, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your patience with my blurt first, think about it afterwards version of a collaborative project. I've been to the ragged of frustration with process enough that I should have more empathy with someone simply wanting an answer. Regards Tiderolls 03:14, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

User:Mosalman

Thank you for recently blocking User:Rrodic as a sockpuppet of User:Mangoeater1000. Please keep an eye on User:Mosalman. The account was created shortly after the block of Rrodic and is welcoming users that have edited articles related to Polytechnic Institute of New York University. Thanks, 72Dino (talk) 04:57, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Requesting advice

You’re probably busy what with the holidays and the world ending tomorrow and all, but I would like your advice on my own conduct, specifically regarding incidents like this past one between us. Ignoring the details of this incident, the way I handled it was obviously problematic to you and unsatisfactory to me. So my question is: If a fellow editor does not give information that I believe is necessary in order to take action, and is unresponsive to requests for that information, what is the proper thing to do? In this case I took action anyway, partly out of frustration, but I’m fairly certain that’s not the right answer. What is?

If there is a more appropriate place to ask this type of question, please point me to it; I’m asking you because you unfortunately have first-hand experience with it. Thanks in advance for your answer, and I hope you’re having a merry December. —Frungi (talk) 02:45, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Where should I ask this?

Re this question on my conduct which you removed: again, if there is a more appropriate place to ask it, please tell me where, and I will do so there. It just seemed logical to ask you, as I said. I feel I should also note that I am not looking to continue a previous conversation; I’m asking you to help me become a better Wikipedian. —Frungi (talk) 03:13, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Confusion

I don’t understand. You said that you didn’t have anything against me, aside from the conduct that I’m asking you to help me fix. Why, then, are you deleting my requests for advice without even a “leave me alone and go ask here”? —Frungi (talk) 03:22, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Please stop

If you wish no interaction with me, that seems to contradict the last thing you said to me, but fine—just tell me where I should ask instead, because obviously I don’t know. Otherwise, I would have gone there already. Where should I seek advice on user conduct? —Frungi (talk) 03:31, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Posted on WP:Help desk

Just letting you know that I’ve posted on WP:Help desk to ask for advice. Not sure if that’s the right place to ask or if there’s somewhere preferable, since you refused to help in that regard. —Frungi (talk) 03:49, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Season's tidings!

To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:29, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

talk

what I am trying to do is put the page back on to the correct spelling after it was arbitrarily moved to incorrect CAP V by a vindictive editor — Preceding unsigned comment added by JGVR (talk • contribs) 00:15, 25 December 2012 (UTC) that talk was preserved at any rate JGVR (talk) 00:19, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

vindinctive

Apparently you have not looked at the histories of the pages I am griping about and I am certain there many that havenot been found yet where snyde comments are made with edits

HE is startnig the war by following every name I create with the correct spelling of van Rensselaer... he finds some insatiable need to redirect to a capitol V you are blaming the wrong person please look in the histories and actually read the post regarding all of the un-needed edits that are being vindictively madeJGVR (talk) 00:29, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Regardless of whether capitalization is appropriate or not, the issue is that you are participating in a edit war. Such wars always act to the detriment of the project, and as such are strictly prohibited by policy. When you find yourself in this kind of situation, you must attempt to find concensous for your changes (with input from impartial editors). That way, you can be sure that the changes you wish to make will be accepted as correct by the community. Regards, — Oli ^OR Pyfan! 01:35, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Yes he should have I agree 100% JGVR (talk) 01:40, 25 December 2012 (UTC) So far I have not re-edited anywhere near 3 of anyone's attempts per article but I am gonig through and putting back the arbitrarily removed things that I can find and so far there has been no reverting back from what I have done so far obviously there are ways for edits to be made and they are not revealed so a catch 22 like that should not be leld against me..JGVR (talk) 01:45, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

JGVR, if you edit war I will block you. If you require clarification on avoiding the block, please ask. Tiderolls 01:50, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

please i need you help

hello how are you, I want to report a person who insult me and he dont need do it ​​by rank in wikipedia, is doing and of course I'll saying nothing, he rudely replied ,

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Darkwarriorblake#VANDALISM.3F.3F
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Grapple_X#nobody_answer_me_in_the_consensus

I hope your help, thanks.MervinVillarreal (talk) 02:54, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi, MarvinVillarreal. Here's my help. Stop edit warring. Stop edtiting against consensus. Stop calling other editors names and telling them to shut up. Please let me know if you need clarification on any of these points. Regards Tiderolls 03:07, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

no sir, I told him to shut up because he was telling

"fucking, fucking" and i never did edit war, first research well what happens, also i never insult, I think not because it is your friend you should ignore it and help to him, but i go to ask for help from other administrators, do not worry. MervinVillarreal (talk) 03:13, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

You may seek help wherever you feel it necessary, but please read WP:ADMINSHOP first. You are edit warring and if you continue, you will be blocked. Tiderolls 03:19, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

the problem here are the insults, not consensus, He insulted me, you did not even give him a warning or something? wikipedia insults are left ignored? all administrators are ignoring the insults?MervinVillarreal (talk) 03:22, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

You were not insulted; the editor was exhibiting exasperation. I do believe you used the 'F' word as well, so it's a bit late to claim the high road. You are fighting against a consensus and that can be frustrating. Please attempt to listen and learn. Tiderolls 03:28, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

I ask you then please do not talk or tell me something that you dont know, i never ever insulted first and I never started an edit war. I get several warnings from them and I think just for obnoxiousness, but thanks for the help, u have good work, aunque no lo sepas usar. thanksMervinVillarreal (talk) 03:37, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Starting is not the problem we are discussing. I do know what I'm talking about and I'm trying to give you the benefit of that experience. You may take my advice or you may ignore it, the choice is yours. Tiderolls 03:42, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

thank u dude.MervinVillarreal (talk) 03:44, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MediaCorp Channel U, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channel 8 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Tide rolls. You have new messages at Malikussaid's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Next Great Baker

I just realized that I had an account on here, so I can edit for now, but you can do whatever you want, and you can watch me on the Next Great Baker page. I will make sure to keep the edits you put, because they make sense now. If there is another episode, it will be put, but for now, we can follow the source. The reason I continued to edit was because the messages AussieLegend and you sent me were hard to read because it showed the edits you made too, so I'm sorry. I'll make sure, if something doesn't make sense on the Next Great Baker page, to put an edit summary. Thanks! Kezollinger (talk) 22:38, 1 January 2013 (UTC)50.81.90.92 (Kezollinger)

Fyi

Saw one of these parked next to me in a very cold place with six inches of snow on the ground. NE Ent 17:20, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Someone didn't get the GPS they were expecting for Christmas :) Tiderolls 19:22, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

awards and nominations received by nicki minaj

the 2012 world music awards were cancelled so i believe i was correct in deleting the category. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.240.51.55 (talk) 20:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

If that's the case you sure could've helped me out with an edit summary. Loacate a source, got to the article talk page, make your case and reinstitute your edit. Easy fix; but, use the edit summary next time. Regards Tiderolls 20:31, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Tammy Baldwin IS the junior senator from Wisconsin

Please correct your error: [4]. -- Mesconsing (talk) 21:11, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Happy to obey your command. On a second look, there was a bit more work involved. Thanks for the opportunity to make a substantial edit to this project. Tiderolls 21:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

My edits to various articles, including "Trusted system," "Security engineering," and (to make sure that someone, at least, would see it) "Gun control"

I am most assuredly NOT a fan of ad hominem attacks and snark. How would you feel if, every time you endeavor to fix some woefully incorrect material (and, BTW, factual technical material is either correct or incorrect)—availing yourself of your considerable working and teaching experience to present the material in a refreshing, likely-never-seen-before manner—some joker accuses you of adding original research and/or vandalism?

A snark is a Carrollian beast. At any rate, Carroll wrote a poem about it, in which he borrowed from Jabberwock. I don't believe anyone catches a snark, as it is a fiendishly clever and robust beast that evades human efforts and can resist all known forms of torture. Opossums are rather less clever and robust and, in fact, are enchanted by Hostess(TM) Fruit Pies. They seem to prefer apple cinnamon flavour.

Thanks for the info. I would feel as frustrated as you, most likely, when confronted with opposition. Please forgive my chiding manner, I do appreciate your coming here to discuss/explain. Still, try to maintain calm...it's really counterproductive to gnash about and gripe. Tiderolls 22:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi

'What's up

What's your email address — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.228.201.146 (talk) 21:56, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

My e-mail address is not important. If you have something to discuss, loose the hounds. Tiderolls 22:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Tide rolls. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

• Responded. Tiderolls 23:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks. RashersTierney (talk) 23:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Roll tide

You ready, Tide? Better be. Drmies (talk) 01:16, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Concur. RMFT Tiderolls 01:18, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Alright, I'm ready for that shot (of Dickle). You know the yell on the strip? "Oh g****mn roll tide s**t!" They're coming. Talk to you later. Drmies (talk) 01:23, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Selah. Tiderolls 04:42, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

That's right. Well, Tide, you and I have been through a few seasons together now. This was a good one. Remember, I was in T-Town during the lean years, with Mike Price (ahem) and Francione and...dare I say it...Dubose. Time you and I sat down and chewed the fat--maybe next year. Roll tide--and take it easy. Drmies (talk) 04:54, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

No doubt, professor, I look forward to it. Not to put too fine a point on it, but I came into the world contemporaneously with momma's call to the Bear. So those lean years were difficult to endure for me as well. I do not claim to have the attachment of an alumnus; but you live here, you know what I mean. Crimson and white for life Tiderolls 05:14, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Through the good and the bad--and after last night's festivities, today is definitely bad. I blame the Dickel. Drmies (talk) 15:17, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

• I understand congratulations are in order for 'Bamans! Softlavender (talk) 05:19, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Too kind, Softlavender; thanks for stopping by :) Tiderolls 05:24, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

• Stop the press--somebody write Katherine Webb on Twitter, quickly: [5]. Drmies (talk) 20:10, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

I had a Twitter account for about 20 minutes. Probably should've hung in a bit longer... Tiderolls 20:19, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Unblock terms offered for User talk:50.81.90.92

Hey Tide rolls, just to let you know, I've offered unblocking terms for the above user. If you could take a look and approve them/recommend any changes, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 19:33, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Hersfold. I appreciate this note. Those conditions seem very fair to me. I trust your judgement in these matters to take any action that you think is in order. I feel that new perspectives are needed as my efforts were not helping the user move forward. You know where to find me if I'm needed. See ya 'round Tiderolls 20:04, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

I like Hersfold's conditions. Tide rolls, could you look at my comment and let me know what you think? Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Quick update; Tide, it looks like the IP guy is asking for you as his mentor. Is that something you'd be willing to do? Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 15:55, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

I'm willing, Hersfold, but my past with this individual has shown that my abilities may be insufficient. I'll post a message there. Tiderolls 18:54, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Hey, Tide. I see this problem has reared its head again, with the addition of a registered account. Lordy. I've suggested before, and after reading the Kezollinger account talk page, am thinking again that there are competence issues. She's clearly capable of appropriate writing, but just as clearly cannot seem to understand even the most basic policies. I've dropped a little note, and not for the first time, offering my help as well. But I'm not optimistic. --Drmargi (talk) 07:06, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

File:IrishPassportData.JPG

The deletion was fine. The uploading of a reduced version of a fair-use image does not constitute any sort of authorship. Sorry about taking a long time to respond, Maxim_(talk) 02:49, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

There was no rush; I knew it could be fixed if I had broken it :) Thanks for taking the time. See ya 'round Tiderolls 14:27, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Boone jenner

Boone jennernickname is the doomboom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.163.216.76 (talk) 19:16, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

• Yes, and there's more doomboom that you may be interested in at User_talk:Altairisfar#Roll_Tide. Your help is appreciated! Drmies (talk) 21:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

SMJ19791

Their are several case within the Major Soccer League expansion, which several future cities are mentioned but shouldn't be, they are pretenders, just a mention of intereset in building a stadium or getting a USL Pro doesn't put them on the MLS radar. The cities to be mention should be true contenders, these are the cities that are truly mentioned several times by league officals. Right now all you need to do say I want an MLS team and then your put on the list. This is wrong. I could say I want a team for Omaha and that I am putting a group together to built a stadium then that gets me on the list. This is wrong. Currently the only future cities recognized by the league are Orlando, New York City, South Florida/Miami, Atlanta and Minneapolis. Just because Sacramento and Pittsburgh are looking into building 4,000 seat stadium doesn't get them on the contenders list. Therefore this list needs to policed properly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smj91791 (talk • contribs) 21:55, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Smj91791. I've taken a quick look at the article and did not readily see where an administrator's tools were required. I do see where you have removed referenced content. I can see instances where this action would be necessary, but I would hope that you would agree that removal of referenced content is not a matter to be taken lightly. I would advise that you make an attempt to explain your position on the article's talk page. There may exist other viewpoints regarding the content's notability. Please let me know if I have not sufficiently addressed your concerns. Regards Tiderolls 04:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)