Theoneandonlydedwinhedon
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Miracle Whip. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
|
Please see WP:V for verifiabilty issues and your addition to Akron, Ohio Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:40, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Dedwin Hedon edit
A tag has been placed on Dedwin Hedon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TN‑X-Man 02:57, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Dedwin Hedon edit
A tag has been placed on Dedwin Hedon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TN‑X-Man 21:49, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
May 2008 edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Satan. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wisdom89 (T / C) 22:26, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Miracle Whip. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 22:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Pure fucking metal edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pure fucking metal, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? TN‑X-Man 19:33, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
June 2008 edit
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Albert Einstein. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 02:30, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Gwernol 02:56, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Your edit to Albert Einstein was at best worthless. And when you have a history of vandalism, a well intended edit can easily be mistaken for vandalism. In any case your defacing User:Gwernol’s user page was harrassment and vandalism; so you deserved the block. —teb728 t c 04:37, 21 June 2008 (UTC)