User talk:Sunnya343/Archive 3

The WikiEagle - March–April 2022

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 3–4
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Columns Announcements Content news Discussion report New articles
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

The WikiEagle - May 2022

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 5
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Columns Announcements On the Main Page Discussion report New articles
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

The WikiEagle - June 2022

⭠ Previous Issue ⭢ Following Issue

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 6
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Columns Announcements On the Main Page Discussion report New articles
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:33, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

BLR Airport

Hi, Hope you are doing good. Would like to know your opinion on this one [1] In this revision, a user called Random Haste added that a study was conducted for building a Hyperloop to KIA Airport. Do you think is this necessary now? I don't actually think so. I reverted this saying that it needs 10 more years for the concept of hyperloop to even become a reality, and a hyperloop in India may take too long. He is reverting my edits. What do you suggest?. Would like to know your thoughts Thanks.Wikieditor3453 (talk) 12:09, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

• @Wikieditor3453: Hello! I agree; I don't believe we should mention a feasibility study in the article. Once they announce that they will actually build it, then I think it will become notable. I will also ping @Random Haste so they can explain their position. Sunnya343 (talk) 02:34, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

  Under next few months, the feasibility study of connecting the city with airport using hyperloop will most probably be completed. The thing i am saying is the MoU has been signed indicating the possibility of such project to happen. No one wrote it is happening next year. It is in the planning stage is what mentioned. If even it doesn't happens, is it wrong to mention about the projects which was actually planned but was not executed due to some reasons??? Random Haste (talk) 04:19, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Sepehran Airlines.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Sepehran Airlines.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Abu Dhabi Airport logo-en.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Abu Dhabi Airport logo-en.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:05, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hi. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion going involving your recent editing activities at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a violation of Wikipedia's policies on edit warring. Shayan MB24 (talk) 02:52, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Warning about edit warring at Mehrabad International Airport

Please note that while I am not currently blocking either of you, you are both engaged in an edit war at Mehrabad International Airport; please take this as a warning to discontinue reverting in this manner, as further edit warring may lead to one of both editors being blocked. Use the article's talk page and come to a consensus before reverting each other further; dispute resolution options such as WP:3O and WP:DRN are available if outside input in needed to help reach a consensus on the material. Thank you. - Aoidh (talk) 19:47, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Mehrabad International Airport) for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Aoidh (talk) 20:31, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Sunnya343 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Today, I only edited the "Facilities" and "Accidents and incidents" sections of the article. In both cases, I cited a reference and/or provided an edit summary. The focus of the edit war was the "Airlines and destinations" table, which I have not modified since 9/13. I started a discussion on the article's talk page two days ago and have requested a WP:3O. Sunnya343 (talk) 21:24, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Accept reason:

It's rare for me to lift a partial block from one article, as you can sort out and request edits on the talk page, but I think in this case you should have a chance to show us you can act correctly with your edits, so I will remove the block. Pinging Aoidh. 331dot (talk) 23:40, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Providing an edit summary does not mean you can continue to revert to your preferred version. The Facilities section is part of the edit warring that the above warning is focused on, which was given per the reports filed at ANEW. You have been partially blocked and are only blocked from editing this one particular article; you may still use the article's talk page to reach a consensus and participate in any dispute resolution with the partial block in place. - Aoidh (talk) 22:13, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

@Aoidh: I don't mean to nitpick, but I ask that an admin other than the one who blocked me review my appeal per WP:GAB. Not that I expect a different result, just that I wanted someone else to review the issue as well. I thought that Aoidh's comment was the review of my appeal, but now I realize it wasn't. Sunnya343 (talk) 17:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

I accept that the edit war also involved the Facilities section. However, I wanted to add that before the edit war, that section contained no references at all (link). When I made my original edit to that section, I added a ref and gave an explanation (diff). In my view, the other editor never gave a solid reason for reverting my edit to that section:

• "You have no right to remove all that information without any sources just because you think it is not encyclopedic." (diff)
• "Instead of removing usual information because of the lame excuse, try to put in work and add proper referencing." (diff)

After their reverts, the ref I had added to the section remained, but the unreferenced info returned, making it look like my ref supported that info (link). The other editor then added a ref to the bullet point on Terminal 3 that did not actually support it (diff). That's why I undid those edits.

I am just frustrated because I feel that I was trying to improve referencing in the article, and I believe the other editor did not provide a solid reason for reverting those edits. I acknowledge, though, that it was an edit war and that we are not supposed to have discussions with other editors via edit summaries.

If my block were removed, I would undo my edit on 9/16 and replace "Mehrabad International Airport consists of 4 terminals" with "Mehrabad International Airport consists of four passenger terminals". Then I would discuss on the Talk page the inclusion of which airline uses which terminal. I started a discussion on the Talk. (Please note that I am not the IP who made the two edits on 9/14. I wish there were a way to prove this.) Sunnya343 (talk) 03:09, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Note that it's standard procedure for a different admin to review an appeal. 331dot (talk) 08:28, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

My advice is that you first sort out on the talk page the edits that need to be made before editing the article itself. 331dot (talk) 08:31, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

@331dot: OK, I understand and will do so. Is it possible for the block to be reduced, maybe to 24 hours? I do not have an extensive history of making disruptive edits and being blocked, and I had been making constructive edits to the article (eg 1, 2, 3). In light of that, I feel like a week is too long. I was hoping to add to the History section (will not be modifying Facilities or Airlines and Destinations). I have also shown that I am willing to stop the edit war (admittedly, I only stopped editing the table, but I recognize the mistake) and start a discussion on the Talk page. Sunnya343 (talk) 15:39, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Just for clarification, my comment below your unblock request was not a review of the block in any way, but context for both you and the reviewing admin as to why the block was made. - Aoidh (talk) 15:18, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

@Aoidh: OK, thank you for the clarification. Sunnya343 (talk) 15:40, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of MEX Airport.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of MEX Airport.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024

Your recent editing history at Harry Reid International Airport shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Packerfan386beer here 04:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)