Seazzy

We met at the Wiki-a-Thon on Sunday

Hi, Seazzy: I see that your Mary Anne Barkhouse article is up. I will attempt to edit it and add some other material this coming weekend, so that it meets the "References" requirement (though I see that it has one, and don't quite understand why it has been flagged as having none).

I have submitted my article on Lois Etherington Betteridge to the AfC process, which may take a week or more. I am curious as to how your article just went straight online -- can you fill me in? Mary K McIntyre (talk) 14:31, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Laura Kikauka was accepted

Laura Kikauka, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

JacobiJonesJr (talk) 11:05, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Under construction page

Thanks for the heads up on this. I obviously missed it. I was using Huggle last night and I either missed the tag or Huggle did not show it. As you probably know, Huggle shows the changes, not the entire page, so occasionally something in an unchanged part of the page, or an earlier edit, might not be seen. No excuse, of course, but it may be what happened. Either way, I will pay more attention to this possibility in an effort to avoid this problem in the future. Donner60 (talk) 21:39, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Actually, now that I have gone back through the history of the page, I see why I did not see the template on Huggle. It was not added to the article until after my one and only reversion of the additions. It was a later editor who reverted the content after the template was added. Nonetheless, I will take your message as a reminder to be vigilant when editing with Huggle. Donner60 (talk) 21:47, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Donner60. I have also left a message with Dismas, who had unfortunately sent a very discouraging form message to the new user. I am not familiar with Huggle, but it may be worthwhile for the developers to consider a time-stamp read and delay function on pages marked with under construction templates.

Seazzy (talk) 21:55, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Yes. That would be a good idea. It would not have helped me, however, since the template was placed later. Huggle does send those form messages automatically unless a user specifically chooses another "button" which reverts the edit but does not send a message. Huggle escalates the severity of the message at four levels. For some reason that I do not understand, it sometimes skips one or more levels or picks up at a higher level even if there has been a time interval where starting over at a lower level would seem appropriate. Unless an editor chooses to report the user who made the edit to AIV or goes off Huggle to look at the edit history of the page, the editor using Huggle does not see the message that is left on the user's page. Huggle's slimmed down view of the page changes and the speed of using it occasionally causes unintended results. There is a trade-off but fortunately these things do not happen very often. In any event, your idea is a good one and your messages to me are taken in the spirit of appropriate vigilance. Donner60 (talk) 22:25, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Full disclosure: I left a message for Anne DeLong mentioning my role, or non-role as I see it, in the mistake. This is not by way of criticism, only to clear my record, so to speak. Feel free to read it and I think you will have no reason for concern. Donner60 (talk) 22:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks!

So glad to be working on Art+Fem with you! Thanks for all the energy and passion you bring to the events.

Artchivist1 (talk) 17:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

cookies!

		Cookies!
		Mduvekot has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks for your work on the preparation for the March meetup! See you there. To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

crunch, crunch

Artchivist1 has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

Love! Thanks! -- Artchivist1 (talk) 18:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you

test message from the tutorial -- hope you're having fun! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artchivist1 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

WIR A+F

	Hoping you enjoyed the recently-held in-person Art+Feminism meetup, we cordially invite you continue your participation by joining the virtual worldwide online event hosted by Women in Red. March 2016 (Women's History Month)

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 19:48, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for joining us

Great to see you here! Artchivist1 (talk) 22:14, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for coming! Bygul (talk) 23:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Seazzy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello

Hello, Seazzy. This is Warmgold.Warmgold (talk) 19:25, 4 March 2017 (UTC) Thank you for the session on Wiki at edit-a-thon at the AGO, 4-Mar-2017 Warmgold (talk) 19:26, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Rater

Hi Seazzy, Rater is at User:Kephir/gadgets/rater Mduvekot (talk) 19:53, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi Seazzy! I met you today at the Edit-a-Thon. Thanks for your help. Just wanted to flag Claire Prieto's page for you to watch. Cheers :) Albertine1 (talk) 22:50, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Christina Battle page

Hi Seazzy, great to see you yesterday in all my bleary-eyed, sleep deprived glory. Here's the draft of the Christina Battle page I got started at the Wiki-edit-a-thon, would love your input. <Christina Battle draft> Narrowrooms (talk) 18:45, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

I've made a few suggested edits, and put some other suggestions in the talk page. She seems like a really cool filmmaker, Narrowrooms, I'm excited to see more! Seazzy (talk) 14:53, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Seazzy! I'm pretty psyched about it too! Narrowrooms (talk) 14:58, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

invitation to editathon at UT

Hi! I am coming to Toronto to host one editathon focused on visual artists of the African Diaspora and another for Art+Feminism and wanted to invite you. It would be great to have more experienced editors attend. One is March 17 and the other is March 18

Hope to meet you! --Heathart (talk) 00:08, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the invite, Heathart. These both look like really exciting events. I'm at another edit-a-thon on Sunday, was planning to chill out on Saturday. Would be in to helping with some post-event clean-up and assistance. Keep me posted! Seazzy (talk) 15:06, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Seazzy Fantastic, would appreciate the clean up help! We will be editing Friday and Saturday in case you know anyone who might want to join IRL. Otherwise, thank you really! Best,--Heathart (talk) 19:51, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi!

Looking forward to having you and Amy come to Edit with us at Squeaky Wheel on Saturday! Mjtbird (talk) 15:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

We're always learning, Mjtbird. Seazzy (talk) 15:17, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Making it easy

Thank you for the orientation Punos81 (talk) 15:16, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your username is cool, Punos81. Seazzy (talk) 15:19, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

hello!

hiya!! just testing this thing out before we start editin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clovebuds (talk • contribs) 17:27, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Sign your messages, secret codemaster. Seazzy (talk) 17:30, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

dang... u got me,,,,,, ive been....,,, mccaught --Clovebuds (talk) 17:31, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

So happy to know you

hi again!

happy to have you here! Finally! Mjtbird (talk) 19:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Edit-a-thon Buffalo

Happy to be here! Rchlltrmn (talk) 19:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi there!

Thank you for teaching us the basics of Wikipedia! Lizzy Lawyer (talk) 19:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Happy to be here, Lizzy Lawyer :-) Seazzy (talk) 19:59, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

art+feminism

you rock! Caitcoder (talk) 19:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

buffalo editathon

hi there :) thanks for helping us! Stirpicult (talk) 19:57, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Ready for your knowledge Helen Moon DoGood (talk) 19:58, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Shé:kon!

Nia:wen for being at Squeaky!

Lasauvagesse (talk) 21:31, 11 March 2017 (UTC)lasauvagesse

A beer for you!

Way to teach!!! the artchivist (talk) 23:02, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi nice to meet you!

I didn't know there was so much to learn about wikipedia!Theschoolyard (talk) 23:04, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Nice to meet you, I'm excited to see your article, Theschoolyard :-) Seazzy (talk) 23:09, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

editathon thanks

Thanks for your help at Squeaky! Ml910915 (talk) 23:07, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jody Lafond (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jody Lafond and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 22:33, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Seazzy, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 22:33, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for all your help in Buffalo on Saturday! It was great to meet you! -Rachelle — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rchlltrmn (talk • contribs) 14:32, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

A+F 2017 @ the Gardiner: Ceramics & Art

Hi Seazzy! Thanks for your help at the Wikipedia Edit-a-thon today. Today I am interested in adding content about Ruth Gowdy McKinley.

(I also attended the A+F event at the AGO, helping out with Denyse Thomasos's page.)

Cheers! - Cayennepepa (talk) 16:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you!

Hi Seazzy! Thank you for taking the time to teach us how to edit Wikipedia entries at today's Art+Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-thon at the Gardiner Museum of Ceramic Art. Very exciting! Rweiner16 (talk) 16:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

So happy you came to the event. I am happy to learn from you, Rweiner16. - Seazzy (talk) 16:50, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

link to women artists stub article

This might be useful for your lecture: Category:Stub-Class_Women_artists_articles. Compare that to Category:FA-Class_Women_artists_articles Mduvekot (talk) 17:02, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

things to do

The Cleanup listing for WikiProject Women artists as of March 14, 2017 might be of interest to you. Mduvekot (talk) 17:25, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

A+F 2017, Gardiner Edition

Hi Seazzy! Thanks for teaching us about Wiki editing. I hope to contribute more by myself as well as with you and others at future Art + Feminism events! - JayfryKay (talk) 17:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for doing this!Mmrgart (talk) 16:47, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

speedy deletion

Hi Seazzy, this is Ambrose at the back of the room. Actually, speedy deletion is really speedy (less than an hour). It happens so fast you can’t really discuss or stop it.—al12si (talk) 17:37, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for all the joy you're bringing

WikiLove

An improvised award to recognize the amazing and infectious enthusiasm you bring to your wiki teaching. Keep spreading the word! - the artchivist (talk) 22:50, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Virtual reality in fiction) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Virtual reality in fiction, Seazzy!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mduvekot (talk) 14:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jody Lafond has been accepted

Jody Lafond, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 18:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Indigenous Storytellers Wikithon

Hi! Thanks for offering to help us out on this Wikithon! There has been a bunch of editing already started (and some not approved). Our main concern is that on this topic (Indigenous filmmakers for example) there are not always sources like physical books to use as references. Is there any way to flag that? Notability is more sparse to find for reasons that are political more than about actual notibility. Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shannondawnwalsh (talk • contribs) 22:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Shannondawnwalsh online sources are absolutely good sources. News websites like CBC, or a major newspaper are always good. As important Indigenous figures may not get extensive coverage outside of the community, Indigenous and local online and print news sources are also valuable. - Seazzy (talk) 03:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Seazzy! This is ezra from the FMST 620 class in Montreal and I'm wondering how we can let our students add images from Cinema Politica's Flickr and website? I'm one of the co-founders of Cinema Politica and all our images are Creative Commons. Thanks! :ezra — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drezrawinton (talk • contribs) 00:00, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

ezra, That's so cool! The best way to get the images online is to upload them to Wikimedia Commons and then link them to your page through there. Extra bonus is that other people will be able to find and use your CC images through commons - nice. - Seazzy (talk) 03:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks! Just uploaded a bunch! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drezrawinton (talk • contribs) 11:07, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Seazzy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi Seazzy, Thanks for all the help! Megknowles (talk) 19:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

@ squeaky wheel 2day

Hi, I am really not sure if I understand how to do this, but we will see. Aprilxx (talk) 19:49, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for teaching this workshop! Best, BegoniaZeke (talk) 19:49, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for running the Edit-a-Thon

Looking forward to learning! Jgmgn (talk) 19:53, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

oops, sorry

So much fun, thanks.Megknowles (talk) 19:50, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the Training

I'll be dangerous now. Cblanski (talk) 19:52, 3 March 2018 (UTC)cblanski

HELLLLOOOO!

Welcome back to Buffalo, you're the best!

---

No! You're the best! Seazzy (talk) 19:52, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Missing everyone at Squeaky

Hope the event is going great! Big hello to all! I am going to join virtually for a little while - any easy topics needing a copy edit? the artchivist (talk) 20:31, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

There's been a request - Linda Goode Bryan could use a good copy edit. Thanks, Artchivist1! Seazzy (talk) 22:33, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

— xaosflux ^Talk 17:23, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Women in Red's April+Further with Art+Feminism 2018

		Please join us as Women in Red and Art+Feminism continue our collaboration in April 2018. Continue the work you've done in March and pledge to help close the gender gap in April! All you need to do is sign up on the Meet-Up page below and list any articles you create in the month of April. April+Further with Art+Feminism
		To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred

A thanks

@Seazzy: thanks for working so well with my student @Dcr1076: who was working with the Virtual Reality article and the branch article she made. I'm curious about that work that you're doing with wiki education stuff. More info floating around somewhere?

Learning

Thanks for teaching us today! --Kkarwas (talk) 19:02, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for coming to Buffalo to teach us about Wikipedia! If I can, I'd love to learn from you tomorrow so that I can show others how to do this. --Sarasaurus.rex (talk) 19:03, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello

This is Allison at Art + Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-thon. Thanks for taking the time to train us --Amfische2 (talk) 19:03, 23 June 2018 (UTC)Amfische2

Thanks for coming back to Buffalo

Drinkin coffee, livin it up!

Thank you.

Hi. Thank you for teaching this workshop. I have learned a lot in this short time. --Worthmp1 (talk) 19:04, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello

Thanks for sharing your knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khishala (talk • contribs) 19:04, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Quick Question

Do I move my Millie Chen draft to the mainpage or does it happen automatically? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caitcoder (talk • contribs) 01:21, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Caitcoder, finish the article first, then submit it for review. Once it's reviewed and approved, it will be sent to the mainspace - or returned to draftspace purgatory for further enhancement >:) --Seazzy (talk) 16:16, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

August and New Achievements at Women in Red

Meetups #87, #88, #89, #90

		An exciting new month for Women in Red! August 2018 worldwide online editathons: New: Indigenous women Women of marginalized populations Women writers Geofocus: Bottom 10 Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative Notable women, broadly-construed! For the first time, this month we are trying out our Monthly achievement initiative All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards. It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in August. Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.
		Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): Call for members for the Gender Diversity Visibility Community User Group (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:33, 19 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A Barnstar for you!

		The Real-Life Barnstar
		Awesome meeting up with you the other day. Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 03:59, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for all the deep-Wikipedia info, Insertcleverphrasehere ! Excited to EDIT MORE. Seazzy (talk) 16:17, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

• Included in last month's New Page Reviewer's newsletter, we had the message "Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.". When we were chatting last week, I didn't bring it up because I couldn't remember if it had been included in the last newsletter or not ( there were some revisions for length that were done right at the end and I had removed and then re-added it). But it was sent out (Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Coordination#Newsletter_12). I just thought I'd let you know given that it was something that I remembered thinking about when we were chatting and has some relevance to the work that you do. Keep on top of your editors adding sources and it won't be relevant for you though! Keep up the good work. Cheers, — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 00:24, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

• 👍👍 Glad to see that this made it to the newsletter. Thanks for all your hard work in NPP Insertcleverphrasehere! - Seazzy (talk) 18:43, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Phạm Thận Duật

Hello! Your submission of Phạm Thận Duật at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:38, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

hello!

I'm very excited to be learning how to edit Wikipedia today. Thanks for teaching us!--Nwaddington (talk) 18:04, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for coming! --Seazzy (talk) 18:06, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Phạm Thận Duật

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

@Alex Shih: Yay! Thanks!

@Amyclam:

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Seazzy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Kay Mehren

Hello, Seazzy,

Thanks for creating Kay Mehren! I edit here too, under the username Rosguill and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Be advised that IMDb is not considered a reliable source, and citations to it should be replaced with citations to better sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 03:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Marc Emery into Draft:Hemp BC. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:59, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Edit summary added. There seems to be some circular redirects here. The Hemp BC page may not ultimately meet standards for it's own page. Seazzy (talk) 16:00, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi Seazzy-I'm back

Hi Seazzy, You probably don't remember but we met at an Art and Feminism Wikipedia edit-a-thon this past June. Well a lot happened since then and I didn't manage to get the article I was working on about Monica Angle published. I don't think I have the skill level yet to create it so if there is anyone who you're working with who is more experienced with Wikipediing (is that a word?) and wants to take a crack at publishing a page of this artist let me know. I still have all the resources. For now I'm going to stick to copyediting and adding sources for now. Hope you're doing well Cheers Allison — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amfische2 (talk • contribs) 17:05, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Amfische2:, do you have a link to your Draft that you could post here for me? There are several edit-a-thons happening this March. If you are able to attend it would be a great opportunity to work with a partner or group to apply your knowledge to the page. Seazzy (talk) 19:21, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Art+Fem Edit-A-Thon!

Excited to learn to make and edit articles here and also with: @Jimikicks: --TooMindyBee (talk) 23:16, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Art + Fem Edits

We love having you at TAG :) @Seazzy:

Alorab (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello : )

Message test.

--Mamiouch (talk) 19:07, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi @@Mamiouch:, looking forward to editing articles with you! - Seazzy (talk) 19:11, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Aliceinwin (talk) 19:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)hey SeazzyAliceinwin (talk) 19:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

what's up? this is Alison I'm in the back wearing sunglasses because I forgot my reading glasses :/ Aliceinwin (talk) 19:15, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi Seazzy! Thank you

Hi Seazzy, thanks for coming to Squeaky Wheel! your red velvet jumpsuit is everything!!

--Gordonkmg (talk) 19:09, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Talk Pages

Hi Seazzy, thanks for explaining talk pages to us. --1f380.2615 (talk) 19:09, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello did you receive my last correspondence, please confirm

Hello Seazzy. Seazzy is snazzy! It doesn't rhyme but it looks like it should. "seazzy" and "snazzy"

--Gordonkmg (talk) 19:10, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Hey Seazzy

Hey Seazzy, thanks for walking me through wiki things!--Annechellego (talk) 19:13, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Cecilia Vicuña's Wikipedia Page

Hi Seazzy,

I completed the edits you had suggested on Cecilia Vicuña's page. A few notes:

1. The only outside verification I could find on the details of her early life was from her personal site. (After reading the timeline there I'm pretty sure whoever wrote that section actually just took the info directly from there). I decided to cite that page after reading Wikipedia's policy on self-published sources.

2. Added a link to the Museum of Fine Art Boston's website for citation on the Installations section.

3. Updated the Recent section by making the first paragraph more concise and putting it in the past tense.

UPDATE: Noticed there were actually a few citations to her personal website already, but they had an old address. Updated them all with the newer address.

Anything I'm missing here?

Hope you're well, and talk soon!

--1f380.2615 (talk) 05:19, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

This is great, @1f380.2615:! I'll take a look and send you a note once I've done the rating. Yay research! - Seazzy (talk) 14:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Awesome, glad we were able to get the page to a higher rating! :) 👍 --1f380.2615 (talk) 04:05, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Women in Red April Events

April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117 Hello and welcome to the April events of Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual events: New topics: Gender studies / United Nations / Dance Geofocus: Portuguese-speakers Continuing initiatives: Suffrage / #1day1woman Other ways you can participate: Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred Subscription options: Opt-in (EN-WP) / Opt-in (international) / Unsubscribe

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

#ArtAndFeminism

Hi there, thanks for the Wikipedia tutorial! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muse211 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for facilitating

Hi Seazzy, Thanks for walking us through how to edit Wikipedia for the Art + Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-thon agotoronto I'm looking forward to reading on Dutch Golden Age Artists by fellow contributors like @Ellie1984: Remedios v 123 (talk) 17:29, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Seazzy. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Jimmyfizz (talk) 15:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Concept video

Hello, Seazzy,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username SportingFlyer and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Concept video, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SportingFlyer}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SportingFlyer T·C 21:36, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

I appreciate that you are working to improve the quality of Wikipedia, but the article fails only one of the criteria and is in fact a useful article to people researching marketing and business. Most Wikipedia articles start as stubs, and speedy deletion in this case is unwarranted as there is no promotional content or controversial statements. - Seazzy (talk) 21:39, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

my dance input

Dancepluswords is super cool--SaraPorter (talk) 16:10, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

I forgot to show you how to respond inside a talk page topic. @Smc44: -Seazzy (talk) 16:23, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Page to review

Whenever you get a chance: Tanya Mars is in need of re-review. Thanks! the artchivist (talk) 18:36, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

@Artchivist1: Gave it a Start rating. Great candidate for expansion focus at the next edit-a-thon! -Seazzy (talk) 12:35, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello!

Hi! Thanks for teaching us today! Am I doing this right? -Ctinemc (talk) 23:13, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Public–private partnership into Public-private partnerships in specific countries. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hemp BC

Hello, Seazzy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hemp BC".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 22:40, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the wikipedia info! --Drewberry15 (talk) 17:25, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

checking in

hello--Selma Odom (talk) 17:26, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Regarding Template:Wikidata Infobox

So it turns out that by default any claims which lack a reference on Wikidata do not get shown using the Wikidata Infobox template. I suspect this is by design for certain properties--anything which gets you into BLP issues probably shouldn't be put in if we can't verify it with a source. mahir256 (talk) 21:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

@Mahir256: Thank you! This is so helpful. I'll make sure that new contributors know this as we begin moving infobox templates to WikiData. -Seazzy (talk) 15:33, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

@Mahir256: - spoke too soon. References in the wikidata item (eg. Lil Miquela wikidata, Lil Miquela article) still aren't showing up. Some kind of backend issue? Or a user issue? -Seazzy (talk) 16:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Ok so having looked at the Lua module again it turns out that P571 does not show up for humans or fictional humans, but P569 does (still subject to it being sourced): {{Wikidata Infobox}} As a matter of fact, the only properties which are shown for either humans or fictional humans are as follows:

ancestral home, award received, birth, cause of death, chesstitle, child, country of citizenship, death, doctoral advisor, doctoral student, educated at, employer, family, father, field of work, floruit, has pet, killed by, manner of death, member of, mother, movement, native language, native name, noble title, notable work, occupation, partner, place of burial, political party, position held, present in work, pseudonym, residence, sibling, signature, sport discipline, sport nationality, sport team, spouse, victory, website, work location, work period end, work period start

At the moment the template does not offer the ability to force the display of other properties that may not be typical of humans or fictional humans, though I suspect @Mike Peel: might be better to approach regarding implementing this capability. mahir256 (talk) 02:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Product development partnerships concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Product development partnerships, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Product development partnerships

Hello, Seazzy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Product development partnerships".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Maura Doyle

The article Maura Doyle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:ARTIST fail

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:37, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)