User talk:ScottDavis/Archive 2

Latest comment: 18 years ago by ScottDavis in topic Copyright Issues/Photos
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

Humanbot

I saw that you left a comment on the Humanbot talk page saying that it worked for you. It doesn't seem to for me. I was just wondering if I was missing a step out, as I have not had a reply to the question I left there. Here is what the message I left said:

I have installed the User script and it shows up in the "manage user scripts" window. The problem is that the little box on the left hand side of the screen (between "toolbox" and "other languages"). Its nowhere to be found. I've tried a restart and reinstalling and purge but it won't appear.

Can you help? --Celestianpower hablamé 12:39, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Fixed the southern degrees

Thanks for the error report. -- Egil 18:10, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

West Coast Range

Wow, thanks for what you could do with crotty and mount read - what's the chance for help for all my red entries in the West Coast Range article?vcxlor 03:11, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

I am impressed by the fact that you can get co-ordinates, and along with co-ords and a stub and category, it makes it more likely that some people are likely to add, and or edit - as opposed to starting new arts. But maybe I should take the share, seing I started the range article. There's also the issue of cross-referencing some of the other west coast items, as some edit persons don't always know about the parallels that well. enough! should get back to work!vcxlor 04:09, 3 October 2005 (UTC)


Geosciences page info - thanks, brilliant! Oh well bacl to work anywayvcxlor

Maybe one a week the way things are - too many tangents too many projects, thanks at least for your in principle support, it is very encouraging in this vandal prone domain!!!!vcxlor 12:17, 3 October 2005 (UTC)


Yeah my problem is that I have central java, parts of wa, west coast tas, and things in between, along with concern about messy disambig pages, and unreferenced wa arts - my friends who are academics have deep fear that some of their students think that all known info is on g-----! so if g--- directly connects with w--- then there are some very strange forms of knowledge in this particular universe. So keep up the good fight, sa needs it!vcxlor 12:33, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your co-ord work. By the Way have you seen the box someone has put with Mount Wellington? wow, if we could get a handle on that we'd have a rather spectacular west coast range array don't you thinkvcxlor 14:23, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

OK if its not easy (Mt Wellington bit) I wont touch it! I have tried in some my stubs, just to put names in a sort of unformatted thing like North of the location, South of the location etc before I get around to loading more info. I dont know what happened tonight but I lost at least what I though were about 3 or so new stubs, cant see what happened to them. oh well keep up the good work!!!vcxlor 15:18, 20 October 2005 (UTC)


Great work on Australian towns

I just wanted to mention that I think you're doing a great job on Australian towns. I found your Plain Town Names page very useful, and it's inspired to to get cracking on filling in some of those red links. Cnwb 04:46, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Motor racing circuits category renaming

The CFD vote was closed as Rename subs to "Motor racing venues in country", but the edits seem to be getting made to articles such as Adelaide Street Circuit changing to Category:Car race tracks in Australia. What did which of us miss? --Scott Davis Talk 14:14, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Yes, again this was my mistake, I clicked on the links on the category after I closed the CFD, thinking that it was closed as that. As you may or may not know CFD has been backed a great deal, and I have been working frantically to catch up. I have made a few typo mistakes, but I will correct this one. Thanks for pointing it out. Who?¿? 14:47, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Re:RFA

Wow, I suppose I am. Thanks for your support! --Cyberjunkie | Talk 09:52, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

Whoa!!!

Hi Scott - please hold fire on adding stub templates to any stub articles relating to Adelaide for the next half hour or so - I'm busy swapping the templates and categories over to the new ones, so any made during that time may get lost in the transition. I'll let you know when the Adelaide ones are done (it shouldn't take too long). Cheers, Grutness...wha? 10:51, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

All done - thanks. please use {{Adelaide-stub}} and {{Adelaide-geo-stub}} from now on - the old ones have gone. Thanks again! Grutness...wha? 12:01, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
No worries :) I just happened to notice that I cleared 10 of the 35 articles, and there were still 27 left afterwards. It could have been a problem if you'd saved one just as I was editing the template, but as far as I know that didn't happen. Better safe than sorry is all. That's Adelaide and Hobart done - tomorrow, Canberra! Grutness...wha? 12:09, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

Disambiguation

Thanks a lot - it's a nice project to just chip away at every few days. Have you had a chance to do much lately? Ambi 14:47, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

What I've been doing with the disambiguation pages is just to run the suburb name through the search function and incorporating what comes up into the new page - takes a bit longer, but the results are more helpful. Creating the initial stubs is a pretty good idea, though - I think that's done wonders for the Canberra project. Ambi 11:04, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Dapto

Re Dapto, New South Wales: No probs, thanks for the feedback. Apologies if I overreacted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dapto@mailinator.com (talkcontribs)

Queer Cadet

Firstly I am a gay man, or a homosexual, or a poofter, or a bitter old queen, but I am not an LGBT, or any other horrid po-mo acronym. Second, I have never heard the expression queer cadet and I have no idea what it might mean. In certain gay circles "space cadet" means a young queen who has taken too many party drugs - possibly it's a muddled version of that. Adam 11:47, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Don't worry, I've been offended by experts. Speaking of queer topics and since you're a South Australian, I'm sure you will agree we should have an article on the Dr Duncan murder of 1972. I will see if I can find some source material. Adam 12:11, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

CopyEdit Mount Owen etc

I was reading the previous message. Duncan's murder is an important one, I do hope someone does that, its up with Juanita Nelson and Shirley Finn (here in wa) as important ones that have had ramifications beyond the actual murder...

II have apologised to grutness in advance, and I must eat humble pie. you are indeed gracious in your correcting my copy edit, and you deserve credit for your civility to my idiocy. Thank you. In future I shall tread more carefully. vcxlor 15:10, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Don't apologise, I've come across so much aggressive and nasty stuff betweens others just cruising through wikipedia, that to have a gentle reminder of better ways to do things from yourself and others is a relief! Thanks 60.230.199.118 01:01, 25 October 2005 (UTC) er, doh, that shd hve been vcxlor 01:02, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

RfA

Hiya Scott. I've nominated you for adminship. You RfA sub-page is located at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ScottDavis. Good luck,  --Cyberjunkie | Talk 10:02, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

I've accepted. Thanks for the enthusiastic nomination. --Scott Davis Talk 14:38, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

Australian Football articles

Hey Scott, I'm reasonably new to the site, and I know you're not an admin, but where could I start an Australian football project? You might laugh at this, but I think we could turn Wikipedia into a database of Australian rules footballers. I mean, it's been done with Formula One drivers, so why not with AFL? I know there are plenty of Aussies out there, so if you could get back to me with your response, that would be great. Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rogerthat (talkcontribs)

Roger(?), Welcome. I suggest you ask at the Australian Wikipedian's noticeboard whether there are many others interested in a WikiProject for Australian rules football. I expect you'll get a couple of people, and User:J L C Leung from Canada is likely to also be interested as he voted for the Australian footy finals at Australian collaboration of the fortnight (it didn't get up as a collaboration, but the articles were written anyway). If you get some experienced editors offering to help, they'll be able to help set up a wikiproject. I think it sounds like a good idea, but I'm not a footy fan, so wouldn't help (but might occasionally copyedit an article). Good luck. --Scott Davis Talk 13:01, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

My RfA

Hi Scott

Thank you indeed for you vote and your kind words, although I don't think the situation will change there; one of the sad things about this nasty, unexpected turn of events is that I won't have the opportunity of interacting with people such as yourself and Peta.

I'll be leaving Wikipedia feeling angry, distressed and depressed. It will not be easy to resist the temptation to bag the project long, wide and hard on the Internet.

On the Australia article and page, I appreciated your even-handedness and authority. It must be one of the best articles on WP, and you've played a significant part in that. I wish you well.

I haven't heard back from Peta, who I asked as a final favour to trash my user page and image when the time comes. I do hope that she responds. Tony 23:38, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks again, Scott; you speak so much sense. Tony 03:33, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Re: Stress/RfA

It was to Kookyman, yes. The stress is only partly influenced by Wikipedia. The majority is "real life" circumstance. Thanks, --Cyberjunkie | Talk 03:14, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Your support vote on my RFA

Thank you. I doubt you can realize how much this meant to to me. - Haukur Þorgeirsson 09:18, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Congratulations

Because I might not be around later today to congratulate you on your obvious success, I thought I'd so now. With the overwhelming support you have recieved, by this evening you'll be our newest and most deserved administrator. Good to have another South Aussie in the broom closet! Sincerely, :-)--Cyberjunkie | Talk 01:34, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Strahan Talk

G'day. I think the unsigned was me, I feel frustrated by such a waste of time and space of this which in the end has nothing whatsoever to do with strahan! Any ideas? vcxlor 04:56, 3 November 2005 (UTC) Oh, congrats as well!!vcxlor 04:56, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

I doubt it was you (either of them). If it was, I'm almost certain you don't want to admit it. --Scott Davis Talk 05:52, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

I am referring to a {test} message unsigned!vcxlor 09:12, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

I see it now (on the IP's talk page) - Hall Monitor has attributed it for you. If you put subst: inside the opening braces, the edit history doesn't show that you used a template - it substitutes the current text of the template into the edit history. --Scott Davis Talk 11:04, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
In the endless rubbish that's trying (in every sense of the word) on Strahan talk, is it better to ignore, or is it possible to block?vcxlor 14:00, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
Ta muchly (as Vin Garbutt used to say all those years ago),

I see your point. Thanks. Seeyaagain soon!vcxlor 14:29, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Congratulations!

I'm pleased to inform you that you are now an administrator. Please consider reading all the material on the administrators' reading list before testing out your new privileges. Though everything you do, excluding image deletions and page history merges, is reversible, you should nevertheless be very careful with your sysop capabilities. For instructions, please see the administrators' how-to guide. Good luck! — Dan | Talk 19:30, 3 November 2005 (UTC)


    • Congrats on adminship. Dlyons493 Talk 21:14, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

seconds mark

Thanks for attending to Western Tyers page. Is it possible to also put in 'seconds' as well as 'degrees' and 'minutes'? I spend a lot of my free time down at WT and have such data. Eric A. Warbuton 05:21, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Yes. Use {{coor dms}} instead of {{coor dm}} and put in the two extra numbers in the obvious places. I normally just use degrees and minutes from the Geoscience Australia gazetteer. --Scott Davis Talk 05:25, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for that.Eric A. Warbuton 05:34, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Davido

Dear Mr. Scott Peterson, In response to your queries about the town of Davido I suggest you look it up in 'The Colonial Experience: The Port Phillip District, 1834 - 1850', La Trobe University Studies in History —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.51.162.131 (talkcontribs)

Davido

Dear Mr. Davis, I apologise for the communication break down, you will notice that I have included the publication date on the reference part of the page, With love... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.51.162.131 (talkcontribs)

Reply

No Worries sorry about the mistake I am just getting used to the awsome Wikipedia, keep up the good work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.51.162.131 (talkcontribs)

Davido, Victoria

Thanks for the information on the Frost & Broome book. It's on the shelf in the La Trobe Reading Room (aka domed reading room) at the State Library, so I'll check it out today. --Cnwb 23:13, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

But if I end up spending the whole day doing wiki research instead of studying, I'm holding you responsible! ;-) --Cnwb 23:16, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for persevering with this Scott. Althought it turned out to be a hoax, I'm glad that we researched it rather than dismissed it outright. For a little while there I thought it might have had legs. -oh well. -- Adz 13:19, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Davido

Congratulations guys on a wonderful effort at researching this. I am the one responsible for the page and I apologise for the dissruption but I needed to test how reliable Wikipedia is for true information. Obviously now I understand that false information is very hard to come across at this awsome site so thankyou very much. P.S you have to admit it was pretty funny. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.51.162.131 (talkcontribs)

Gippsland phantom cat

Sorry. I wasn't aware of the policy, and should have checked. At the time I made the redirect I thought I was the only author of the original, but now I remember that others had contributed also (I was lazy, and I should have checked the history). There was also discussion on the Australian Noticeboard about moving the article to a more appropriately named one. But besides that, I was ignorant of the policy, so thanks for pointing it out and fixing the holes I left. --Cnwb 21:03, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Ben Aveling and Monivae College...

Dear Mr. Davis, I created a page about a local school named Monivae College and Ben Aveling described it as 'seriously not noteable'. What does this mean, and how is this so? Kind Regards... (preceding unsigned comment by 203.51.162.131 (talk • contribs) )

"Not notable", sometimes abbreviated to NN is a quick way of saying that he thinks the school is not important enough to have an article about it in the Wikipedia. The usual solution to that would be to put the information on the article for the town (in this case Hamilton, Victoria). There has been quite a bit of discussion over the last year or so about what the standard is for a high school to be notable enough to have its own article. Guidelines on how to write good school articles may be at Wikiproject Schools. --Scott Davis Talk 11:08, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks Scott I appreciate the information you have given me. It is my, as well as many others oppinon that it is indeed notable. It is one of the most well known schools in country Victoria. I believe that Mr. Ben Aveling is only saying it is a 'NN' as a personal attack on me for my past mistakes. Well you know what, Peter denied Jesus, which was a big mistake but Jesus forgave him. You guys have been awsome in offering me a second chance at Wikipedia which I am really grateful for but Ben Aveling is being a ignoramus about the issue and personally attacking my valid and legitimate article. I was only trying to expand Wikipedia...What is your view on the issue? (preceding unsigned comment by 203.51.162.131 (talk • contribs) )

I don't think Ben is trying a personal attack as such, but you must admit you've started off on the wrong foot with a rather public hoax article. Ben probably has not heard of the school, and may in fact say that about most high schools (I don't know). There are a number of arguments for all sides at Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments. I have previously voted to merge a school article to its town, and voted to keep a different school's article, allowing the creator to become a useful contributor to other articles. My reasoning was based on the quality of the article, not the quality of the school. I suggest you make the Monivae College article so compelling that we can no longer doubt either your seriousness or the notability of the school. --Scott Davis Talk 11:33, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Once again thankyou for your advice. I shall create the greatest article you have seen in your life tomorrow. I appreciate you taking me serious now. I do admit that I got off on the wrong foot, but I am hoping that as you said, by showing my seriousness I will soon reverse the popular belief of me being a trouble maker. With Kind Regards, Matthew. P.S can you check out the changes I made to the Hamilton page and make sure they are alright? Thanks.

I already did, and it looks fine. --Scott Davis Talk 11:58, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Wonderful, thanks Scotty! I hope we are back on the path towards friendship! Kind Regards...

Sorell

Hi Scott - no, the anon wasn't me - in fact it was that edit that prompted me to check and see that it was false, and then remove it from the Sorell, Tasmania article. I think Sorell Bakery can be safely AFD'ed. I hadn't done it yet because I was still considering speedy deleting it! -- Chuq 11:53, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Help to fix page move

Hi Scott. User:Rogerthat has done a copy and paste move from Lewis Roberts-Thompson to the correct spelling Lewis Roberts-Thomson, losing the page history. Now that you are an admin, I understand you should be able to delete the new article, and move the old one there instead. Could you do that please? JPD (talk) 13:09, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Can do. --Scott Davis Talk 13:15, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Done. --Scott Davis Talk 13:26, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Thanks. JPD (talk) 14:54, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Re: Gregory Charles Rivers

I'm not too sure if people looking for Australian people would be interested in him, and that's why I kept a Australia-related stub type (as well as the Australian people category) there. — Instantnood 14:56, 8 November 2005 (UTC)


ACOTF

I might be able to do ACOTF then, but Im not sure what Ill be doing then so if I remember.. but er I cant promise anything at the moment. I hope the template thing works well, its nice for people who arrive at the talk page to see it was a ACOTF Astrokey44 22:43, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Thankyou

Many thanks for the unblock, the blocks are really getting on my nerves and I do wish wikipedia would do something about both them and vandalism in one quick sweep. Again, thanks. Cheers, -   >>michaelg | talk 11:04, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks again! Cheers, -   >>michaelg | talk 08:55, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

How do I contact you?

I am new to wiki, live in Sydney and find there are things I don't know how to do or might not be allowed to do (as I just have a user logon).

Would like a 'mentor' to assist.

Can you give me an email address to which I can email you things I think need to be done so you can tell me where to find out how to do them or so you can do them.

Examples: - Phalanx_CIWS and CIWS articls probably need to be combined. - I would say the page "Australian constitutional crisis of 1975" should have an 'in dispute' label.

AndrewF. andrewf8@yahoo.com 0411 700 439

I have replied at User talk:165.228.129.12. --Scott Davis Talk 02:29, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Anon assistance

Thanks Scott for your help with User:211.30.231.153. I had to leave the PC just after the anon and I came into contact, and once I'd returned found you'd already helped smooth over the recent reverting I'd performed on their edits. Thanks for your proactivity. -- Longhair | [[User talk:Longhair|Talk]] 19:38, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

RE: cheapholidayaccommodation.com

Hi Scott, I'm a semi-regular user of Wikipedia and was surprised to visit the site this afternoon and find a reference to my IP address and someone who has been adding links to cheapholidayaccommodation.com - it's certainly not me! My knowledge of IP addresses is limited, but I didn't realise that someone in the same town would have the same IP as me, if this is the case, and someone else is abusing the system, does this harm my ability to be a part of Wikipedia? I've signed up for a username now, so does that solve the problem?

Forgive my ignorance, I've been around the web for quite a while, but I'm new to Wikipedia..

Cheers, Matt

Regarding Fukitol

If Fukitol is deleted for "self-promotional" purposes because it is a commercial entity, then entries like Microsoft should also be deleted. What is the purpose of this Public Encyclopedia? Fukitol has been a spoof that has been around since 1974; and it's here to stay.

Entry: "Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT) (HKSE: 4338) is the world's largest software company, with 2005 global annual sales of 40 billion US dollars and more than 55,000 employees in 85 countries and regions."

The information posted is written as an information source; if you believe that objective has been misguided, please advise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.232.219.163 (talkcontribs)

Answered at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fukitol since the question was asked in three places. --Scott Davis Talk 10:26, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
Just snooping during my wikibreak, and noticed this - when I go into Random search, to try trawl out the junk, so many entries read like 'ads' rather than encyc entries, the non signing person has a point in a sort of way.I dunno, its enough to make me not want to pry during the break, but....vcxlor 08:22, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Ianblair23's RfA

 

G'day Scott,

I would like to thank you for supporting me on my RfA. It closed with the final tally of 57/0/0. I can only hope I can live up to the expectations that this wonderful community of ours demands from each of its administrators. If you ever need anything, please just let me know. Cheers! -- Ianblair23 (talk) 02:39, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for checking up. I've got uni out of the way, but still have plenty to do, so I'll be contributing haphazardly. I'm about to write an article for South Para Reservoir, if you wanted to upload your photographs for it. :)--cj | talk 09:53, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Gregory Wright

I actually have no idea about the tragic banana accident, but it does seem like wiki-spam. I'll ask Greg whether he knows about it. :)

Cheers,

Chris

Dryandra

Hi Scott,

Thanks for your support. Yeah, it doesn't look good, does it? When I found it, Dryandra was a redirect to the unrelated genus Vernicia. That was unacceptable to me. In hindsight I should have spent five minutes turning into a substub, but my mind was on other matters and it didn't occur to me. Instead I blanked it and left a brief explanation on the talk page. Shortly afterwards someone speedied it.

Snottygobble | Talk 12:29, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Copyright Issues/Photos

G'day mate, just asking you a question on copyright issues. Just say I wanted to post an image of a cricket or Australian rules player that I had taken of them while attending a match, could I legally upload it? Or would you have to ask the actual person's permission? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rogerthat (talkcontribs)

If you took the photograph, you hold the copyright in that photograph (unless someone else hired you to take it, then you may find the employment contract means they own it). There may also be moral rights. Even if your employer owns the copyright, you may have a right to be acknowledged as the actual photgrapher. I had a feeling there was something somewhere in moral rights about the subject giving permission if they were identifiable, but I can't find a reference now, and I don't think it applies to "public figures" anyway. Maybe that's just politeness, not law, or maybe it's in the privacy laws instead. In short, you own copyright, and are allowed photos of adult sportspeople performing in their chosen sport. Various other laws may apply to photos of individual people going about their private business or to photographs of children. --Scott Davis Talk 11:59, 28 November 2005 (UTC)