Rajankila

Welcome!

Hello, Rajankila, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Gp75motorsports ^{REV LIMITER} 12:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Great article!

Great article back there! All it needed was some section headers. Speaking of which, here's how to make them. The first thing you need to know is that there are three levels of header, each determined by how many "=" marks you put on each side of the header. Putting =text= would make the largest header, resulting in

text

That's the type you usually see at the top of pages. To make a level 2: ==text==

which results in

text

Now, the last one, the Level 3 header. This is the header you put up when you want to create a subsection. The syntax for this is ===text===

making

text

See? It's as easy as putting down some "=" signs. --Gp75motorsports ^{REV LIMITER} 12:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

New pages

Hello there, I see you've created four pages very quickly, with lots of content and some overlapping themes. There's a danger that these overlap so much, that one or more of them might need to be deleted or merged with the others. Can I suggest that, rather than adding lots of new pages - especially with no wikification, like this one, you work on one article to add links, catehories, images etc? There are some really helpful suggestions about drafting, improving and perfecting articles at the blue links shown. Making one article better like this will teach you much more about Wikipedia than simply pasting in text that you have prepared for other reasons. Good luck, Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 13:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Accountability mechanisms in local governments in Kerala

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Accountability mechanisms in local governments in Kerala, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Accountability mechanisms in local governments in Kerala. Gillyweed (talk) 23:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Spam in Kerala: A Fertile Land for Decentralisation

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Kerala: A Fertile Land for Decentralisation, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Kerala: A Fertile Land for Decentralisation is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Kerala: A Fertile Land for Decentralisation, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:01, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Decentralisation and Local Governance in Kerala

A tag has been placed on Decentralisation and Local Governance in Kerala requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dougie WII (talk) 18:57, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Accountability mechanisms in local governments in Kerala

I have nominated Accountability mechanisms in local governments in Kerala, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accountability mechanisms in local governments in Kerala. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Dougie WII (talk) 21:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Tribunal for Local Governance in Kerala : A Pioneering Initiative in Resolution of Disputes

I have nominated Tribunal for Local Governance in Kerala : A Pioneering Initiative in Resolution of Disputes, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribunal for Local Governance in Kerala : A Pioneering Initiative in Resolution of Disputes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Dougie WII (talk) 22:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Decentralisation in Kerala: Problems and Prospects

I have nominated Decentralisation in Kerala: Problems and Prospects, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decentralisation in Kerala: Problems and Prospects. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Dougie WII (talk) 22:45, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Decentralisation Initiatives and Local Governance in Kerala

I have nominated Decentralisation Initiatives and Local Governance in Kerala, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decentralisation Initiatives and Local Governance in Kerala. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Dougie WII (talk) 22:46, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Decentralization has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Cometstyles 13:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Types of decentralisation

I have nominated Types of decentralisation, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Types of decentralisation. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 10:08, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello there, I'm sorry to nominate yet another of your articles but you need to have a look at Decentralization and perhaps include this material there. When an article on a topic exists already, it is not helpful to add a new article which lagrely overlaps. I see from your contributions that you are making lots of article edits, particularly new articles, and almost no talk page edits. Talk pages are where editors discuss what they are doing and why, and resolve differences about articles and edits. I strongly suggest that you stop creating new articles, which appear to be from your own research or studies. Try editing some existing articles instead. There are some really helpful suggestions about drafting, improving and perfecting articles at the blue links shown. If you need help with working out how best to contribute, click on the bit after my signature that says (talk) Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 10:22, 23 January 2008 (UTC)|border=44CA35|icons=true|nosig=true}}

Response to email

Hello there, you sent me this email earlier today:

1 I am not a researcher, a librarian, in Kerala Institute of Local Administration. So remember that none of my write-ups are results of original research. But secondary literature, that can fit into a text book or reference book.As a librarian, my job is to gather, maintain and provide information.
2 I am a fan of Wikipedia and I wanted to create a Wikipedia for Decentralisation in India which is being decided by Ministry of Panhcayati Raj. As a much navigated site I wanted to have some pages here in Wikipedia too.

3 Meanwhile as suggested by Frederick N, a journalist of Goa, I started creating pages, probably with ignorance of editing properly.

4 I donot sign because I donot know how to sign and what to write. That is all

5 I write this mail when I got a link which I may not be able to retrieve later

6 So my need is to have a corner - a portal -for decentralisation and local governance in India /Kerala. Please help me for it
7 I am known in India as a promoter of Decentralisation particularly in the Decentralisation Community of UN Solution Exchange - an email group of 1400 persons and was the best participant in the group last year.
7 If you propose the deletion of the article Types of decentralisation, I think it is worth retaining.

8 I learn that the article must be shorter than my articles whereas m y articles are long. But they contain only points gathered from official reports such as Economic Review of Kerala government, Kerala Panchayat Raj Act and similar publication.

I want to tell you again that I am a positive person and not a manipulator

Regards,

K Rajsekharan

Librarian kerala Institute of Local Administration

I'm replying here as discussions like this are best kept public on Wikipedia: to respond, click the 'edit this page' tab at the top of this page, and place your edit under mine. If you start your paragraphs with a : symbol, they will be indented -

like this

which can make conversations easier to read.

To respond to your email: may I suggest that you start by looking through the links about drafting, improving and perfecting articles. Click on the blue link and each will take you to some very useful information. Then you could also look here at the help page for advice about how Wikipedia works, how to edit articles, source and provide references etc. As you are not familiar with Wikipedia, and I can see that English is not your first language, it might be best NOT to begin by creating large articles, but instead by making small additions to existing articles while you get the hang of how the editorial process works. There is also a tutorial here which may be helpful for the mechanics of how it all works here. Please do reply below if you need futrther help. Besyt wishes - Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 12:22, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

An offer of help

Hi there, thanks for your email this morning. I usually find it best to correspond via talk pages, so [please respond here by clicking the 'edit this page' tab at the top and placing your response under mine. That way everyone can see our conversation (and join in if necessary).

I have a suggestion and an offer to make: as you've discovered, writing an article is a lot more complicated than pasting in a large block of text! What I'd suggest is that we set up a test page in your own userspace, say at a page like User:Rajankila/drafts. You then paste in one of your articles and we work on it together to try and get it into a presentable format for the mainspace. Drafting it in your user space means it doesn't appear on the list of new pages or recent changes, so it won't get challenged for deletion - although other editors can see it if they know it's there.

I suggest trying just one article, ideally either the shortest, or the one with the fullest range of references (or just the one that interests you most). But it needs to be one with verifiable (and verified) facts, not opinions or theoretical material. Please reply below if you'd like to do this.

I have no doubt whatsoever that you're a sincere editor with a desire to edit constructively: vandals are very obvious by their editing behaviour and I can see you're not one. I realise it's disheartening to have your first contributions deleted, but I'd be very happy to help produce some articles which will stay - not least because I'm concerned about systemic bias against articles on subjects away from the English speaking world. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 12:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Reply by Rajankila

I am not matured enough to create full-fledged article right now. So please check the editing I had made today in Decentralisation and Empowerment and respond so that I can understand my imperfections. The first article I had posted contained only factual things like "Sun rises in the east and sets in the west"" which do not require even any citation. But it could have been provided with any number of citations too. No matter I am in the midst of the subject decentralisation and can post articles systematically later when I am more learned and technologically abled. Meantime, please watch my minor editing and advice me in case of errors. Only today I learned to use talk page and to sign. But why my sign doesn't appears as yours ? Rajankila (talk) 12:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi there, well done for figuring out the signature and also how to make wikilinks with the two square brackets. My signature look different to yours because I've customised it by clicking on the 'my preferences' link at the top of the page, then putting in an alternate signature. But until you're more experienced in Wiki markup, I suggest you don't try that right now, it can be a bit complicated! There is more information on signatures here.

As to your edits, a few immediate bits of feedback.

1. One is that you shouldmake more use of the preview button at the bottom of the edit screen (next to the save page button). This allows you to see the effect of changes without immediately posting them to the Wiki: you can then make one big edit when you're finally happy. The reason this is a good idea is because when people look in the History of an article, your edits appear as one single one, rather than a long list of small ones and it's much easier to see who has done what.
2. You need to make better use of the edit summaries if you can manage to: if you can summarise what changes you have made so that people can see from the History how the page has evolved, this is very helpful.
3. I suspect that the large chunks of text you pasted into Decentralisation may be reverted by other editors, because they lack any sources or wikilinks and because you didn't discuss them on the article talk page first. In future, try discussing your planned changes before you make them, and you might also prepare a big edit in your draft page first. Then you can add references and links before you paste into the main article.
4. The edit to Empowerment is easier to manage because it's smaller. You need to source the list that you've made, even if you think it's self-evident. Who came up with this list? Where is it from? What alternative ways are there of categorising these features? Can you insert a citation so other people can go to the source? Without these things this is just original research. I hope this makes sense: reply here if you want to discuss further. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 13:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Response and querie

Hi Kim, See my referencing in Decentralisation and comment. I saved twice today as I had to refer the placing of reference list during my editing. Empowerment referencing will be done later as I have to find out that particular document from where I had copied the list for one of my articles. Rajankila (talk) 06:23, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Deepening democracy.pdf listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Deepening democracy.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. • Anakin ^{(contribs • complaints)} 01:08, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Peoplesplanning.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Peoplesplanning.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:08, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Reply by Rajankila

When I added a new image, for the second time, I learned that the type of license need to be selected. Earlier I did not know about it. See my clarification on the image page.

Rajankila (talk) 07:47, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Kilaphoto.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kilaphoto.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:08, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Sfc first.pdf

I have deleted it. I you wish to have deleted a file you have uploaded, you can place {{db-g7}} on it. Then an administrator will notice it in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion and delete it. Cenarium (Talk) 11:00, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm not particularly familiar with pdf use on Wikipedia, but this search through the help desk archives returns for example this thread, so it looks like directly linking to pdfs as external links is preferable. Cenarium (Talk) 01:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Category:Local governance

How is this category distinguished from Category:Local government in India? I think the latter name more accurately reflects the scope of this category. - Stepheng3 (talk) 22:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

CommentThe term local government denotes a third tier government in a particular locality whereas the term local governance is broader term that refers to all the processes such as the mechanisms (like elections) for creation of a local government, the evolutionary political processes resulting in creation of governments and the whole lot of comparatively abstract aspects such as accountability, transparency, responsiveness etc in the process of government functioning. But the term local government denotes the structure, functions functionaries and such other concrete aspects. So I said local governance was a better term for including much more diverse aspects than what we include under Local governments.

But, I had created a Category:Local governance last day which includes Local governments in India as a sub-category. So there is not need to change Local governments in India to Local governance in India. Now everything on the third tier government can be placed under local governanceRajankila (talk) 06:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Is Category:Local governance intended to include processes and mechanisms outside of India? --Stepheng3 (talk) 07:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Comment It is better to consider it as the mother category from where the entire lower categories relating to the emerging discipline Local Governance should emerge. That means it can include category Local governance in Brazil, Local governance in Columbia etc. Local governance in Brazil can have further sub category Local governments in Brazil and below that page on each Municipality can be added.That was my concept.Rajankila (talk) 05:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

I note that there's already a Category:Local government with subcategories including Category:Local government by country. Category:Local governance seems redundant with this category. - Stepheng3 (talk) 07:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Comment Certainly there is some confusion.It seems better to merge Local government in Local governance as the latter is a better term for the evolving subject. My intention while creating the Category:Local governance was to bring together all pages relating to Local governance. Kindly decide yourself as I don't find an appropriate categorization.Rajankila (talk) 11:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Peoplesplanning.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Peoplesplanning.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:05, 1 May 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Radiant chains (talk) 05:05, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Comment I uploaded the file again as it is a Government owned emblem and is usable by us as Government Servants. I did not see the deletion tag in time to avert deletion done earlier. Rajankila (talk) 11:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

You tagged the image as "for Wikipedia use only". This license is not compatible with Wikipedia, as we permit the reuse of our content under the GFDL. Images with that licensing tag get a big red warning to their uploaders, and the images are deleted quickly. (ESkog)^(Talk) 12:24, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Chathukulam.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chathukulam.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 05:02, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Right to Information in local governments in Kerala

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Right to Information in local governments in Kerala requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cind.amuse 12:28, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:59, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Minor Barnstar
		For your hardwork naveenpf (talk) 04:59, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright problem: History of local governance in Kerala

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as History of local governance in Kerala, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.academia.edu/9096588/rom_Decentralisation_of_Planning_to_People_s_Planning_Experiences_of_the_Indian_States_of_West_Bengal_and_Kerala_Kerala_Research_Programme_on_Local_Level_Development_Centre_for_Development_Studies_Thiruvananthapuram, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:History of local governance in Kerala and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, History of local governance in Kerala, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:History of local governance in Kerala. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:History of local governance in Kerala with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:History of local governance in Kerala saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! MarioGom (talk) 14:54, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Kudumbashree.jpg

The file File:Kudumbashree.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Kerala

WikiProject Kerala

Namaskaram, Rajankila. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, Wikiproject Kerala hasn't a newsletter yet. A newsletter is always help to inform recent changes in the project to project members and help for effective coordination. Now we have launched a new newsletter for the Wikiproject. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Also do not forget to contribute to the newsletter. Thank you!

Subscribe

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Contribute
• Subscribe/Unsubscribe
• Archive

---

Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject Kerala. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:43, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tribunal for Local Governments in Kerala

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tribunal for Local Governments in Kerala requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20081204043349/http://www.kerala.gov.in/tribunal/index.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Doom Patrol (talk) 18:13, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ombudsman for Local Governments in Kerala

The article Ombudsman for Local Governments in Kerala has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. Largely based on primary self-published sources by the government, lacks secondary (WP:PST) or independent sources (WP:ORGIND).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Doom Patrol (talk) 08:26, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Citizens Charter in Local Governments in Kerala

The article Citizens Charter in Local Governments in Kerala has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. Largely based on primary self-published sources by the government, lacks secondary (WP:PST) or independent sources (WP:ORGIND).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Doom Patrol (talk) 08:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of State Finance Commission (Kerala)

The article State Finance Commission (Kerala) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. Largely based on primary self-published sources by the government, lacks secondary (WP:PST) or independent sources (WP:ORGIND).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Doom Patrol (talk) 08:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Local Government Finance in Kerala

The article Local Government Finance in Kerala has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. Largely based on primary self-published sources by the government, lacks secondary (WP:PST) or independent sources (WP:ORGIND).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Doom Patrol (talk) 08:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of District Rural Development Agency

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on District Rural Development Agency requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://publicadministrationtheone.blogspot.com/2012/09/rural-development-institutions-and.html and https://dhanbad.nic.in/drda/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Doom Patrol (talk) 08:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of District planning in Kerala

The article District planning in Kerala has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. Largely unsourced and based on primary self-published sources by the government, lacks secondary (WP:PST) or independent sources (WP:ORGIND).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Doom Patrol (talk) 08:42, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of District Planning Committee

The article District Planning Committee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. Largely unsourced and based on primary self-published sources by the government, lacks secondary (WP:PST) or independent sources (WP:ORGIND).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Doom Patrol (talk) 08:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of District Planning Committee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article District Planning Committee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/District Planning Committee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

The Doom Patrol (talk) 10:43, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Ombudsman.jpg

The file File:Ombudsman.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused image, no context to determine possible future use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 20:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC)