User talk:Qiushufang/Archive 2
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
while you can blank your page -
- understand that this accomplishes nothing practically, as the history of the entire page remains.
- Huh? I cleared it because it was getting too long to read and was filled with clutter like disambiguation notices and stuff from years ago. I don't even know who you are. Qiushufang (talk) 03:12, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Qiu, just looking at Military history of the Song dynasty and wanted to leave a comment on your Talk Page and I noticed this comment. Since Wikipedia is a group effort, a user's Talk Page can often be a place for other voices in the community to weigh in (sometimes very helpfully, sometimes not so much!). You have a chance to leave your responses, leaving a record of the discussion that might be helpul in future discussions. So it's an indvidual choice, of course, how much to keep, but it's very easy to clean things up by archiving the page: WP:ARCHIVE. ch (talk) 18:45, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
Hello, I'm Ashleyyoursmile. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Battle of Sacheon (1598) have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Ashleyyoursmile! 08:01, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXII, June 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Blast furnace
Blast furnace, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 12:43, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIII, July 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:30, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIV, August 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:49, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
I reverted your edit today because it contained two grammatical errors and insinuated that Outer Mongolia is currently a Chinese province. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 19:37, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced
Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:00, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
September 2021
Your recent editing history at Meng Wanzhou shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Citobun (talk) 02:43, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
September 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Meng Wanzhou, you may be blocked from editing. SimonWan00 (talk) 01:51, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon
Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Tenplate for CHOC
Quickly, here's a refence template that comes in handy:
:{{The Cambridge History of China|volume=11 | last1 = Liu |first1 = Kwang-Ching | last2 = Smith | first2 = Richard J. | chapter = The Military Challenge: The North-west and the Coast | pages = 202–273 |url= |ref=none}}
which produces
- Liu, Kwang-Ching; Smith, Richard J. (1980). "The Military Challenge: The North-west and the Coast". In Fairbank, John K.; Liu, Kwang-Ching (eds.). The Cambridge History of China, Volume 11: Late Ch'ing 1800–1911, Part 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 202–273. ISBN 978-0-521-22029-3.
It might be easier to see in "Edit." Obviously, you can add more fields (author-link, etc.)
Cheers. ch (talk) 23:01, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Apologies -- I gave the wrong one. I should have tested it, because it only works for the Fairbank edited volumes. Here is a better one:
- {{encyclopedia|title=The Cambridge History of China|volume= 5.2 | editor1-last = Chaffee|editor1-first = John | editor2-last = Twitchett | editor2-first = Denis |author1-last=McDermott|author1-first=Joseph P. |author2-first= Shiba| author2-last= Yoshinobu | chapter = Economic change in China, 960-1279 |url=https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Cambridge_History_of_China_Volume_5/PpMSBwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1 | pages = |ref=none }}
- which produces:
- McDermott, Joseph P.; Yoshinobu, Shiba. "Economic change in China, 960-1279". In Chaffee, John; Twitchett, Denis (eds.). The Cambridge History of China. Vol. 5.2.
- You may be able to improve it. It should have the subtitle -- "Song China." Cheers, ch (talk) 15:04, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Apologies -- I gave the wrong one. I should have tested it, because it only works for the Fairbank edited volumes. Here is a better one:
Edit-warring
I have blocked you for 48h for edit-warring on Meng Wanzhou and Extradition case of Meng Wanzhou. See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, October 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red Turban Rebellions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naiman.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red Turban Rebellions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anfeng.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sangley Rebellion, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tondo and Lin Feng.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
War of edits Balhae
I very much ask you to stop attacking me and delete all my edits using the fact that I do not know where and how to complain about your behavior because I’m recently in the project. This behavior is not enceclopedic and simply not ethical. We must first discuss on the talk page and come to a conclusion. And you just delete everything that I wrote without explaining the reasons.Ulianurlanova (talk) 00:03, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry for the deletions. Please re-add them since I've improved on the grammar to your material as well as my own citations. Qiushufang (talk) 00:04, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Edit summaries
Hi, just a reminder to not forget to add edit summaries. I've noticed several of your recent edits have lacked them. ✨ Ed talk! ✨ 02:46, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ganzhou Uyghur Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orkhon.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, November 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (3rd request)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from History of the Song dynasty into Battle of Như Nguyệt River (1077). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 18:11, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your help in Artillery
Hi Quishufang,
I noticed you reverted my edit on Artillery, but added the source I couldn't find. Thank you! I did a quick search and came up with nothing, so I salute your superior research skills! Thank you for finding what I could not. Cheers! EducatedRedneck (talk) 22:46, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Vandalism
This user whose sale removes edits without a summary stating why. Also adds questionable content to various topics. Hayashihouyi (talk) 13:59, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Three Fundamental Bonds and Five Constant Virtues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mengzi.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, December 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:10, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
How white supremacists manipulate Wikipedia and other forums for anti Chinese and anti East Asian propaganda
Hello Qiushufang, please see the recent dispute at Genetic history of Europe. Large amount of well sourced content got removed because of personal reasons and revenge rather than constructive work. Users posing as "Asian" but working for a white supremacist narrative. See:[1]. This Eurocentric cabal must be stopped harming Asian people and nations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4BC9:924:F597:3CF5:7A5E:841B:71F9 (talk) 20:08, 5 January 2022 (UTC)