Speedy deletion of Peter Treadaway edit

 

A tag has been placed on Peter Treadaway, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. -- ALLSTAR ECHO 14:36, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:MondoMonkeyWhiteHand.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MondoMonkeyWhiteHand.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:51, 25 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

February 2009 edit

  Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Champneys. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. – The Parting Glass 15:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi - you have recently reverted my addition to the Champneys page. My company is responsible for looking after the online presence of Champneys Health Resorts and generating content. As such we have full permission from the company to use website text or to generate new content. You will be able to confirm this by looking at our website at www.interdirect.co.uk. Please can you let me know if there is some other procedure I should follow to improve the Champneys listing. Thanks. Ptreadaway (talk) 16:04, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
If you have permission from the copyright owner to release text from www.champneys.com under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Champneys and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.The Parting Glass 16:14, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Further information edit

Given your statement regarding Champneys, I think you ought to take a look at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. – The Parting Glass 16:22, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

The following template is to provide a primer to this guideline:

  If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. – The Parting Glass 16:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Champneys edit

Because of your professional interest and conflict of interest in the Champneys article can I remind you that it would be appropriate if you did not edit the article yourself but you are welcome to bring up any points on the article talk page. Thank You. MilborneOne (talk) 19:00, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply