User talk:Praxidicae/Archive 28

Archive 25

Archive 26

Archive 27

Archive 28

Archive 29

Removed edit

Heyy, why are you removing my edits on Sumedh Mudgalkar page? I edit that with complete source mentioned on that then why? Hellohiiiii (talk) 19:17, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Note, in this case the copyright problems were present already long before this editor got involved, peep Earwig. |Madeline. 20:16, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

This has nothing to do with text copyright. PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:17, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Please explain why you keep deleting the articles I publish.

Please explain why you keep deleting articles I publish. CultureConnoisseur (talk) 21:30, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

I didn't delete anything, however the tags should make it obvious. It's non-notable spam. PICKLEDICAE🥒 21:31, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Picture

Is that a picture of you, on your userpage? Respect! (Per a thread above at #Winston Sterzel I want to call you "Respected Dude Sir", but I won't.) 71.228.112.175 (talk) 09:28, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

It is not me but thanks. PICKLEDICAE🥒 12:31, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

You're welcome. 71.228.112.175 (talk) 06:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'd like to know why my edits have been reverted. Thanks

I think they added some value to the article. Kindly explain the reasons for you reverting them. Thank you Four-leaves-Clover1973 (talk) 15:32, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Because they're disruptive and spam. PICKLEDICAE🥒 15:33, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

How are they disruptive? I included sources and copyedited articles Wikipedia recommends users to copyedit :/ Four-leaves-Clover1973 (talk) 15:36, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Also, I cite articles I find on Google lol I thought that was the point of Wikipedia Four-leaves-Clover1973 (talk) 15:37, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

For what it's worth, the reference is perfectly fine, I believe it was the "growing popularity" that was the main issue. Personally I think the wholesale revert was a touch heavy-handed, so I've re-added the reference you provided. Primefac (talk) 16:29, 26 August 2022 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

Thank you, I appreciate that. I acknowledge I was at fault for adding "growing popularity" without looking for sources. I based it on what was already in the article. Will avoid this in the future. Thank you again, @Primefac Four-leaves-Clover1973 (talk) 07:33, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

A recent edit of yours

I consider this edit [1] to be a violation of Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy. (which you will note applies everywhere on Wikipedia, not just in article space). I suggest you redact it, before I am compelled to take action elsewhere. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

@AndyTheGrump I don’t agree. Doug Weller talk 18:35, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

It's literally discussed and sourced in the article. Vice, People. Perhaps I should've said alleged, but I'm not sure how repeating what is literally sourced in the article is a BLP vio. PICKLEDICAE🥒 18:36, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Yes, at absolute minimum you should have said 'alleged'. And maybe actually addressed the substantive issues in the AfD nomination - which seem undisputed. The individual was a minor at the time, and the charges were dropped. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:43, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

There, I added alleged. So it's been dealt with. If you take issue with my actual non-vote because I didn't vote delete like everyone else, I don't really know what to tell you. There is a substantial amount of coverage on him though I'm not sure it's enough to keep. I also don't see where the charges were dropped. PICKLEDICAE🥒 18:47, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

I don't think we actually need a source to reach a reasonable conclusion that the charges weren't followed through on. If they had been, it would surely have been reported. Anyway, you've revised your comment, so I'll leave it at that. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:55, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Are you off your ass? You come here complaining about a comment that Prax made that is actually supported by sources, and then you suggest that we can reach a conclusion that is completely outsourced? ––FormalDude talk 18:59, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

The comment made, before the addition of 'alleged' which resulted from my post here, was absolutely not sourced. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:05, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

It is sourced, literally, in the article at the time I said it. The only thing I neglected to do was say that it was alleged. But this is moot, I've adjusted it to reflect what the sources say which is alleged, so no need for anyone to continue this discussion here. PICKLEDICAE🥒 19:07, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

You seem to have standards of your own, and that is fantastic, but you appear to be a bit too harsh on content surrounding bios and companies. I get it, Wikipedia is not meant for promotion, but active suppression of objective content is another issue as well. Stupac88 (talk) 21:10, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

@Stupac88 Wikipedia has standards, just because you're upset that the company you wish to promote here doesn't meet them, doesn't mean I'm being harsh. I'm being realistic and straight forward because like everyone else I'm a volunteer here and do not wish to waste my time by beating around the bush. PICKLEDICAE🥒 21:13, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Christos Kythraiotis

Can you please clarify what your "not an rs per this https://cqranking.com/men/asp/gen/links.asp and also seriously linking to wp for a source for a bday?" means? Paulpat99 (talk) 23:26, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

It's user generated, from a forum. PICKLEDICAE🥒 23:27, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Oh I was unaware as it seems like a stat website rather than forum. cheers for clarification. Paulpat99 (talk) 23:31, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Prof. A.C. Kuma

I thought that this looked familiar and was about to research it when you tagged it for G4. I see that that AFD was closed less than 24 hours before this article was created back in article space anyway. I have reported the editor, who seems from the names to be a family member, to WP:ANI. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:53, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Ahem

WP:SIGPROB. Uricdivine^TalkToMe 22:57, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Uricdivine What exactly is your issue? PICKLEDICAE🥒 22:58, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Uricdivine, you might have a look at #Your signature above. The first part, not the subsequent pickle-related fun. GherkinNotability (brine some more) 23:01, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Uricdivine I would kindly invite you to scroll up to where this conversation was just had and then mind your own business before trying to lecture people on things about which you haven't got a clue. PICKLEDICAE🥒 23:02, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Your signature will be problematic for new users. I know your not a vandal and can never be, but when warning new users as usual the will find it hard to ping you or know who the message came from. Uricdivine^TalkToMe 23:02, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Well, I'm going to say it again, I suggest you scroll up and save the lecture. You don't have a clue what you're talking about, as usual. PICKLEDICAE🥒 23:03, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

PS, Uricdivine since we're on the subject, please read WP:SIGIMAGE, given you're so keen on signature compliance. PICKLEDICAE🥒 23:34, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

But that isnt an image is an emoji. When going to WP:EMOTICONS (or something like that) you would see that image and emojis are grouped differently. Uricdivine^TalkToMe 01:28, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Please learn to indent properly, @Uricdivine and your signature IS an image, not an emoji. The pickle in mine is an emoji, yours is in fact an image, hence why it's [[File:Face-smile.svg]], which is not permitted. PICKLEDICAE🥒 01:30, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Karma. — Uricdivine^TalkToMe 01:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

@Uricdivine Why does your signature continue to contain an image once you've been made aware of the issue? -- ferret (talk) 01:55, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Ferret, cause is not an image . — Uricdivine^TalkToMe 02:07, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

It's literally a file. PICKLEDICAE🥒 02:09, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

@Uricdivine I'm seriously pondering if you need a WP:CIR block. There's some serious issues with your patrol efforts as well. Prove me wrong? Fix your signature? -- ferret (talk) 02:10, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

^{Strong support on that front.} PICKLEDICAE🥒 02:11, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Ferret, happy?. What are the "some serious" issues?. @Praxidicae I know that has always been your prayer since the day I logged in. — Uricdivine^TalkToMe 02:17, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

@Uricdivine Not really. A sysop shouldn't have to threaten you with a block to get you to follow policy. I suggest you ponder how you want to edit on Wikipedia going forward. Your talk page is one long stream of warnings and issues, and in your last 20-30 edits I found multiple reverts and patrol efforts that were invalid. -- ferret (talk) 02:19, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Ferret, politely speaking, you have no right to block me because of my signature. I only did as I was told because i wanted us to leave the signature issue and enter into the patrolling own(although I stand firmly that nothing is wrong with my signature). As for my talk page having so many warnings: in every single warning concerning article content, my edits were allowed to stand!. I know seeing my talk and all those warning people will think am a persistent vandal but am not, all those warning every single one of them I would send you link to the current article for you to see my edits were allowed to stand. They only mistake I admit is draftifying. — Uricdivine^TalkToMe 02:27, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

@Uricdivine I'm still pondering a block based on your responses thus far. If you can't understand that your signature was a violation of WP:SIGIMAGE, a policy, then I have little belief you understand other guidelines and policies. -- ferret (talk) 02:29, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Ferret, in WP:SIGIMAGE does it say that editors with images or EMOJI'S in there signature be blocked?. — Uricdivine^TalkToMe 02:39, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

CIR blocked. -- ferret (talk) 02:43, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

What are you talking about? My signature is just fine!

Uricdivine, it is indeed an image - if you look at the source of the page after signing, you will see that you are embedding File:Face-smile.svg, which (as the namespace suggests) is a file. If you want to use an emoji, you'll want to copy-paste one (such as 🙂) into your signature. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:32, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

They've been blocked for CIR. Doug Weller talk 07:03, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Trying to keep the peace

"A hard warning should deescalate things."

Hey, Praxidicae. Look: I think you've engaged in behavior that is less than ideal. I'm quite frustrated with the fact I have to continue interacting with you on that article. I have no interest with going any further down that spiral. Let me know if you have insights, comments, or questions, but please consider saying things politely. If you want, consider this the softest of soft warnings; I really want literally anything else but being on your bad side but also want to find this project enjoyable. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help you achieve your aims on this topic or anywhere else. Also, man, I'm sorry how cluttered your talk page is by constant inflow of messages; love the note at the top directing "certain" comments. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:28, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

You are the only one causing problems here. I've responded calmly and civilly to you, despite your utterly degrading and dismissive "calm down" equivalent . Repeatedly. You have no place telling me where I do and do not belong. If you do not wish to engage with me, you can refrain from doing so by you know, not coming to my talk page. But I will not avoid articles you edit when I'm patrolling simply because you disagree with me nor will I refrain from commenting when you make incorrect edits to a BLP that I was already engaged in editing. I appreciate your message here, however, but it doesn't seem genuine when combined with your previous accusations and continued insistence that I'm being uncivil. PICKLEDICAE🥒 23:32, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

PS: consider this the softest of soft warnings I don't appreciate threats. PICKLEDICAE🥒 23:37, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Hey Pbritti. Look: I think it would be best if you left this user alone and found something more constructive to do. Consider this a soft warning — TheresNoTime (talk • she/her) 23:42, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

@TheresNoTime, Praxidicae AFD'd a plausible article that Pbritti had just created today. So not leaving the user alone wasn't really his choice here.--Jahaza (talk) 00:49, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

It's my only interaction with them and it was a result of WP:NPP, so no. Them harassing me repeatedly isn't an appropriate response, @Jahaza. PICKLEDICAE🥒 00:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

I'm not sure what relevance you think there is that it was NPP. You simply don't have to immediately nominate (or redirect) plausible article candidates from long term editors for deletion the day they're created.--Jahaza (talk) 00:56, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

It's a standard procedure, it should not result in someone repeatedly harassing me. That's why it's a discussion. Also, I did in fact wait some time, there is no rule that says we must wait a day for "long term editors." Now, I'm not interested in discussing this further with you or any of Pbritti's defenders since it's clear you all seem to think repeated harassment is ok. Stay off my talk page. PS: per their own suggestion I afd'd it. PICKLEDICAE🥒 00:57, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

• Without comment on any specific article, to suggest we favor long time editors is a slap to new editors. In fact, the opposite should be true. A long time editor should KNOW they need at least a few bulletproof reliable sources / sigcov demonstrating notability. They should know to create the article in user or draft space and flesh it out properly before pushing it into main space. We shouldn't need to hold the hand of experienced users. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 02:07, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

  Absolutely. We've erred in the past giving long term editors more leeway than new ones. That shouldn't happen. Doug Weller talk 07:05, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Advice needed

If you have a spare moment, I would welcome some advice. I initiated an Afd here which is looking like a snowball Keep.... Next we will be having articles on the tallest umpire in the Fiji Darts Leaugue but I digress. My concern is that we appear to want to host an article about a 16 year old woman who has done nothing more than being an excellent umpire. Being on Wikipedia has its downsides, amongst which are unintended attention through social media, not all of which is always welcome. I have been involved in safeguarding of young people for many years, but I can find no guidelines here on the creation and maintenance of articles about young people who may be at risk because of the presence of an article on Wikipedia. I have much less sympathy for young people who put themselves up as celebrities, but this seems different. I would have expected a stronger test for notability for articles about young people, but I can't find anything in the guidance. I would welcome your views, but I am not canvassing a vote! at the AfD. Regards  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   14:45, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Let me take a look. PICKLEDICAE🥒 14:46, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hello, I'm Swatjester. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to NAFO (group) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Please stop removing sourced, cited material. The policies you are citing are not applicable. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 19:57, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Are you kidding me @Swatjester? I'm not a newbie here, and you're an administrator. Before leaving me templated messages it would help if you actually bothered to read the sources being used - which are BLP violations, unreliable, WP:SYNTH and WP:NOR. The onus is on the person trying to include BLP content, not the one removing it. PICKLEDICAE🥒 19:59, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

• (edit conflict) Swatjester, she removed an unreliable source, anchor.fm and two spam links to buy, saintjavelin.com and legionoffellas.com. That, and you just templated a regular. Maybe you should revert yourself. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:00, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Literally none of those policies applied. And yes, you aren't a newbie, so you should know better, Praxidiciae.⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 20:03, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

• (edit conflict) You're not an admin in this case, Swatjester, as you're involved in an edit war to reinstate unreliable sources and spam links. And honest to fuck, why am I having to explain this to you, Swatjester - you know far better than to engage in shit like this. Get a grip, revert yourself, apologise to Prax and move along to something more useful. Nick (talk) 20:04, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

And you know better than to violate WP:CIVIL like this. FAFO, Nick. Try me. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 20:05, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

What are you talking about? I've literally made one edit, reverting this. How is that an edit war, and how am I involved? ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 20:04, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

@Swatjester: Dan, do you need help in counting ? You've made two +664 byte edits reverting Praxidicae. This isn't like you at all. Nick (talk) 20:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Curious, I didn't realize we were on a real first name basis, Nick. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 20:19, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Yes, my first edits to the article. Do you need help in learning to read an edit log history? Do you struggle with dates? One was reverting, upon which I issued the warning, and one reverting again. That's not an "Edit war" and that's not making myself an "involved user." You're better than this, Nick. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 20:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

FAFO, Nick. Try me threatening another editor (and admin, to boot!) on my talk page, coming from an administrator who doesn't have a clue about WP:BLP is really peak WP:CIR. PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:10, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Imagine trying to make a point about competency, when your literally first response was to accuse me of not having read, then cited inapplicable policies, then condescendingly telling me that I "know better". I'll return the same energy y'all are throwing back out. If y'all can't be civil, I'm not gonna waste my time on pleasantries either. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 20:15, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

I'll return the same energy y'all are throwing back out. Go for it because as far as I can see, your level of competence is non-existent and you're completely unaware of core policies despite your sealioning which is doubly concerning for someone who has tools. PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:19, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

@Swatjester: You'll need to indulge me, I'm not entirely certain what FAFO means. I can't imagine it's the definition "Fuck Around and Find Out" which is what Urban Dictionary claims, as that would obviously be some sort of threat, but you wouldn't be threatening me as you're clearly concerned that Dennis is threatening you and saying FAFO would breach your own interpretation of the civility policy, wouldn't it ? In any case, do please indulge me. Nick (talk) 20:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Nah, I think you've been indulged long enough. I'm done talking to you, as well. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 20:22, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

WP:ADMINACCT applies to you @Swatjester. PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:23, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Inactivity rules are too lax. -- ferret (talk) 20:26, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Wow, how poignant of you. Read the policy and then get back to me. I know it's been awhile since you've been around but WP:BLP is a non-negotiable policy too. But by all means, keep giving me bullshit warnings and saying you're right without proving it. WP:CIR applies doubly to admins. PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:05, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

NAFO is a group, not a living person. Try using an applicable policy. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 20:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Jester, you are about to bark up the wrong tree. Please revert yourself so we don't have to get ugly about this. Go look at the actual domains listed in those "cites", then tell me I'm wrong. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:07, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

What do you imply by "getting ugly." Please, be specific with your threats. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 20:09, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Ugly is what is happening now, for starters. Don't play stupid. She made a valid edit, removing three inappropriate domains. Someone has already removed two of them, and you are doubling down instead of simply looking at the domains, which I've already asked you to do. Are you saying links to buy products are ok on Wikipedia? Are you saying anchor.fm is a reliable source? Are you saying leaving a message for disruptive editing is a valid message to leave here? Two admins are here disagreeing with your handling and judgement. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:14, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

So now I'm playing stupid? We're done here, Dennis. I'm not speaking to someone who can't speak to me respectfully. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 20:18, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Yes, links to websites that sell products *can* be OK on Wikipedia when they're self-referential, as they are in this case. It's literally pointing out that the group have their own meme w/ physical merchandising on what is one of the largest fundraising charities for Ukraine, one that has resulted in the President and Defense Minister of the country wearing those products prominently. That's wildly different than spam, and you know this. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 20:18, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Let's make that three admins. -- ferret (talk) 20:18, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

It's talking about living people. Did you read? WP:BLP? The entire section you sourced to Twitter is garbage and the opposite of what BLP allows. Fandom is more appropriate for the garbage you're trying to push. And yes, the other two apply as well. PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:08, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

What living person? NAFO is not a living person. The fella dog is not a living person. So be specific -- since you've never actually made it clear, and I've asked several times, what is the specific BLP violation here, on whom, and where at? ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 20:10, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Enlighten me, what sources are being used to include NAFO_(group)#Notable_members that meet WP:RS? And then explain to me how either of these sources are at all relevant and not complete and utter trash? PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

How about you answer my question first. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 20:20, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

I have answered your question - is your account compromised? How about this, we take this to AN to discuss your behavior as an editor and administrator because I have serious concerns about your ability to edit, much less be an administrator at this point. PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:22, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

You haven't answered anything that I can see. But I can repeat it if you'd like: what is the specific BLP violation here, on whom, and where at? ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 20:23, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

I literally linked it above, are you unable to see my edit at 20:13, which I'll note you responded to. PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:25, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

@Swatjester the biographies of living people policy applies anywhere that living people are being written about. Including living people as “members” of some organisation is definitely in scope of BLP. It is rather concerning that you seem to be unaware of this. firefly ( t · c ) 20:23, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

And there are sources to verify that inclusion. So what's the violation? For instance, here's Kinizinger self-identifying as a member. [2] ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 20:25, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

An award for your talk page

	It's never a dull moment here
	Personally I think an edit filter which just blocks anyone who edits your talk page would cut down 90% of the drama... — TheresNoTime (talk • she/her) 20:37, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

• Praxidicae created Wikipedia:ANI2 and redirected it to User:Praxidicae. PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:39, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

  Primefac has to WP:G4 thanks to past events. Maybe try 3.0 for a better experience? Primefac (talk) 20:47, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

  How about WP:Administrators Noticeboard/Boomerangs? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:50, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Storm in a teacup This delicious cup of Rosy Lee is to remind you not to take things too seriously around here. - RichT|C|E-Mail 20:49, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Bo Burnham Edits

I saw your reversion, and I had already removed all student and self published sources and addressed my edits with the person who previously flagged it. I was trying to undo a previous edit to address the controversy around Bo Burnham but include more credible references and detail and I left in their sources (including student sources). Hopefully this puts it up to standard, there are NO self published or student sources anymore in here. The only YouTube link is to an interview from credible source (that has its own wiki page). Crycrywolf (talk) 22:23, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your signature

Your signature misrepresents you and is misleading. Signatures should contain your username. Please fix it. FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 19:31, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

No. PICKLEDICAE🥒 19:32, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Please explain in more detail why your signature is valid. How many times have you changed your signature? FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 19:36, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

You're welcome to file a complaint at ANI then, and while you're at it, go warn every single editor here based on your interpretation of policy. Beyond that, I'm not going to continue this discussion with you. PICKLEDICAE🥒 19:39, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

@FAdesdae378: who appointed you the signature police ? Nick (talk) 19:41, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

@Nick I mean it's not like we just did this checks calendar in May 2021 at ANI. PICKLEDICAE🥒 19:44, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

I am not an administrator on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:Signatures#Signature forgery. FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 19:46, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

It's not forgery, and you'd know that if you bothered to read what you just linked. But for clarity, please enlighten us all as to which part of signature forgery it is that you think I've violated, @FAdesdae378. PICKLEDICAE🥒 19:48, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

I have read carefully Wikipedia:Signatures. I understand that signatures are not required to display someone's username in its entirety. I hereby retract my complaint. FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 19:52, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

This still doesn't address your previous comment about signature forgery, @FAdesdae378. PICKLEDICAE🥒 19:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

@FAdesdae378: There's basically two outcomes right now and I think both are going to get you blocked. The first option is that you lack the necessary competence to be editing - obviously we can't have users going around accusing people of breaching guidelines and policies without reading or understanding those guidelines and policies, or you're deliberately trolling and being provocative. What game are you playing tonight, FAdesdae378 and how should I proceed, do you think. Maybe refer to the blocking policy in your answer (and hopefully you've read it, eh) Nick (talk) 20:04, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

I have read carefully Wikipedia:Blocking policy. I am here to improve the encyclopedia. I have the competence required to edit Wikipedia. I have retracted my complaints about signatures. I am neither trolling nor being provocative. I am not playing any games. It is just that I sometimes make mistakes. FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 20:17, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) It is common practice for a signature to resemble to some degree the username it represents (emphasis mine), per WP:CUSTOMSIG/P; 2021 RfC closure quote: there is a consensus that signatures are not required to display someone's username in its entirety, without changes. There is no requirement for a signature to be, or contain, an exact display of one's username; "Praxidicae" and "Pickledicae" absolutely do "to some degree" resemble one another. AddWittyNameHere 19:45, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

I can't think of a sig she's used that didn't have the suffix "dicae", which is what, half the syllables of her actual name? :-p Primefac (talk) 20:03, 24 August 2022 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

Yup. Same starting letter in this case, too, for additional resemblance bonus. :p AddWittyNameHere 02:48, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

• In the old days, a bunch of people would have started a Pickle Cabal by now. --Picklebeam (talk) 20:10, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
  • There isn't? I thought we got together at our weekly game. PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:15, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
    • I don't know, Praxi. I think you're just causing trouble again. Drpickle. 20:19, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

      Well, I certainly wasn't nominated for my City's best troublemaker for my charm. PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

I have to assume that pickleball is the national sport of the pickle cabal. Be forewarned, however, your troublemaker status will extend to my neck of the woods if you try to play it here (Oh! the! humanity!). This is all a Very Big Deal around here. I pretty much live in The Shire. @Drmies: these are the issues you'd have to deal with if you ever make your way here. Is it worth the aggro?-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:17, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

• Please page me if the pickle cabal is forming. I miss the cabal. An🐟re🥒 20:37, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Is there room for more? --Dylpickle620 (he/him · talk · edits) 22:20, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

No. Farmer Pickle 2¢ 00:05, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Shame. Picklekingthree.00:40, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

I feel so left out. PickledNotability (brine) 00:45, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

@GeneralNotability: Nice. Now it seems like everyone's changing their signatures to have the word 'pickle' in it somewhere. Weeklyd3 (talk) 00:46, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

— TheresNoPickle (talk • she/her) 00:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

I have joined the bandwagon. Picklesandotherthings (talk) 01:00, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Is this where the cabalgang hangs out? —Thanks for the pickle! ^{talk•contribs} 01:08, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Yup! And don't worry, we have milk and cookies pickles for everyone! Pickleswipe (talk) 01:42, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

And a picklejar for your user page. Pickleswipe (talk) 01:52, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Pickleswipe, I don't know how to get that pickly box to display properly on my user page. Can you help? Drpickle 17:28, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia users, cucumbers, dill, water, white vinegar, kosher salt, spices, and a little bit of magic… — 3PPYB6 — HAS — BEEN PICKLED! — 02:31, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Don't forget the sugar! — 3PPYB6 — HAS — BEEN PICKLED! — 02:34, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

I turned myself into a pickle too. Funniest thing I've seen. Pickle Liliana ^(UwU) 02:44, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

No pickles (with the hamburger). And be sure it was made from real meat. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:52, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

YOU FORGOT THE PICKLES! — Pickled hawk 06:09, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

OK, it was funny to begin with but per WP:ADMINSAREHUMORLESSBUREAUCRATS, I'm going to start handing out WP:BLOCKs to editors who change their sigs to include "pickle" just so they can hang out here with the cool people. --Pickle58 talk 10:25, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

They'd be in a real pickle then... -- Pickled Frost talk 10:36, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Why am I now tempted to start editing the MediaWiki namespace to change every instance of the word "block" to "pickle"? The pickle button, the pickle log, etc. stpicklester (talk) 11:12, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

I'll prep a patch. Pickleddon ^Pickletalk 22:55, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Given that "pickle" is slang in the military for releasing a bomb from a plane (reference to the Norden bombsight's supposed ability to "drop a bomb in a pickle barrel"), I'm all for this. GeneralPickleability (what's your dill) 23:06, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

@Seddon and GeneralNotability: I would support that. I really want a mediawiki instance that is a clone of enwiki (or something like that) with this change and its logo being a pickle hehe. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 16:23, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

You have been pickle blocked from pickling for persistently encouraging pickle puns. This has been done to stop this silliness.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Pickle Brown\2¢

Seriously, Pickle Brown? What is your dill? GeneralNotability (talk) 13:54, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

• This is an outrage! This is a serious breach of WP:PICKLEDACCT and has shaken the whole entire pickled Wikipedian community! Retract this pickle block immediately, or we will file a request for a brine bath! — 3PPYB6 — HAS — BEEN PICKLED! — 14:39, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, it's not that big a dill. I know, serious edits are the bread and butter of our editing work, but we relish the opportunity to have a little levity. There's no need to get all sour. —Cucumber.Fred (add to brine) 23:27, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

	The Pickle Barnstar
	Hi Praxidicae, you have been awarded the Pickle Barnstar for inspiring a revolution! Picklezone (talk) 16:09, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

• This discussion has given me so much joy. In honour of this event (and learning Ponyo is Canadian too!), you may get a custom signature for this occasion. ThePickleDoctor ^Talk 22:08, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

  Do pickle doctors rescue pickles from the abysses of the stomach? 🥒 EpicPickle ^{(they/them | talk)} 22:14, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

  Uhhh, I hope they would for me too? In any case they'd need long arms like Mr. Pickle. And maybe a ladder. Or three. No-one said it was easy being my vet. Pickled giraffe ^{(brine at me · contribs)} 23:38, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

  I want a pickle barnstar too! Oaktree b (talk) 00:55, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

  No pickles for you! PICKLEDICAE🥒 00:56, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Praxidicae (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I think unblocking PICKLEDICAE is the best coarse Stephanie921 (talk) 03:35, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Accept reason:

This user's unban request for eggalomania has been approved, as has their pickle puns, which have left me brining with joy StephanieBrine21 (talk) 03:35, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Hope this joke is okay. I thought it was fine since the nature makes it obvious I'm not an administrator but I'm sorry if it's not. I'll take it down if it is Stephanie921 (talk) 03:39, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

• Why do galaxies start out as cosmic pickles?[3] The Hubble Space Telescope detects unexpected pickle shaped galaxies that evolve into round shaped galaxies.[4][5] Pickle cosmology is a thing! Picklezone (talk) 03:59, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

  oh my god, you guys are still going? i just put you lot on WP:TPH! lettherebedarklight, 晚安, おやすみなさい, ping me when replying 04:13, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

• Someone please help, my signature has been pickled and I am unable to revert it. I was told to come here for help, so is this the right place to report vandal-like signature-pickling? ARandomPickle (talk • contribs) 14:45, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Job.com

I see you twice reverted my edits to the draft submission of Draft:Job.com and it was not paid. I really want to create this for Job.com since Indeed.com has already a page. I saw the G13 and I request to undelete the draft at it was abandoned. Taratagaytayo (talk) 23:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Seems totally accurate since this was just awarded to a new freelancer, but do go on. PICKLEDICAE🥒 23:19, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello Praxidicae, What do you mean awarded to a freelancer I'm not a freelancer I'm just a simple editor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taratagaytayo (talk • contribs) 01:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Fells Point

What, Tupac and Mama Cass weren't residents? (/s) Hey does being an amazing Wikipedia admin get me on the list of residents? RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:30, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

IDK, I think you gotta be apart of the cabal they whine about on Twitter, with our deep, deep, deep-state influence (no adminship necessary!) :) PICKLEDICAE🥒 13:35, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

On a side note Mama Cass is pretty well known in the music scene here outside of her being, you know, famous but I'm pretty sure Tupac never even came to Fells Point. :') PICKLEDICAE🥒 13:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

I was disappointed, what no Zappa? RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:42, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

For $20 you can get a "news company" in India like todaynews24.top or newslivetv.com to write an article saying anything you want. Then you too can be a resident of Fells Point. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:43, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Why bother when you have the Baltimore Examiner, which is also run by the same people who run the sites you just mentioned. :P PICKLEDICAE🥒 13:48, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

That exists? RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:48, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

I mean, in the same way The Los Angeles Tribune exists, in that it's a website. ;) PICKLEDICAE🥒 13:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Don't forget New Jersey Times!! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Or Canada Times, giving the CBC a run for their money.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:42, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

You marked Criclink as spam

Hello, recently all edits made through www.criclink.com marked as spam. Despite they are adding some value to the already published content on wikipedia. Can you please assist how can we get www.criclink.com out of spam list. 124.29.246.58 (talk) 07:41, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

No. PICKLEDICAE🥒 09:46, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

You can see check [6] there is Spam written infront of criclnk and it was edited by you.

Anyhow can you assist me how to remove website from spam list on wikipedia. 124.29.246.58 (talk) 05:06, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Perhaps I was unclear. I wasn’t denying that I called it spam or requested it’s removal. My “no” response was to tell you “no” I will not assist you and to go away. PICKLEDICAE🥒 12:19, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Southern League Results

Why did you delete the results grid I created for the 2022-23 Southern Football League? It is a record of results and all leagues have them; it is not racist, transphobic or hateful in any way. I am now going to have to re-do them from scratch; please do not delete them again. Drogba11CFC (talk) 20:06, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Look on the bright side

At least now he's talking... And digging. Salvio 22:35, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

All he had to do was say "Sorry, I won't insert prose and images of myself into articles anymore" and that would have been the end of it. Instead he's on his way to an indef block. I genuinely hoped just a stern warning would be sufficient when I filed the ANI thread. Clearly I was mistaken. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:37, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

You'd think someone who wrote an entire article on Preparation (principle) would, you know, prepare a better, more reasoned response to said concerns when facing a block. 🙃 PICKLEDICAE🥒 22:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Hey why you revert my edits

Because i think you are a good man who try remove my good sentences right. Okay i am mature person let me introduce you im arryo from indonesia You are not alone but i will help you about this mistake. In my teahouse why revert my last edit because of one previous editor? 125.164.23.167 (talk) 15:35, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

First of all, I'm not a man and I'd appreciate if you would keep your incompetent screed to yourself. PICKLEDICAE🥒 15:36, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Pickle, you saw there's a story, right--it's User:Cyberllamamusic, who admittedly is not good at English but insists on editing here. Please see this and this... Also, I blocked that range. Take care, Drmies (talk) 15:39, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Removing good sentences-- it's an adventure and not a job. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:42, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

I know, I just wanted to let them know that no one can read their indiscernible screed. :) PICKLEDICAE🥒 15:57, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Newer Super Mario Bros Wii

Hey, i remade the article Newer Super Mario Bros Wii and it had many sources and i was wondering why it got reverted? TheSecondComing10 (talk) 18:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Irrelevant now, CU blocked. -- ferret (talk) 22:29, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

HGC Apparel

I would prefer that the AFD run for 7 days. The problem with a G11 is that it doesn't justify a subsequent G4. So the spammer resubmits the same thing, and it gets a G11 again. The third time, it is locked, but there is no record available to non-admins of exactly what it was, other than G11 crud. An AFD, on the other hand, is available with all of its comments.

The problem with G5 on this is timing. The spammer hadn't been blocked when they wrote it.

Sometimes I just like to get a real AFD on the record with all of the negative comments. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:00, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

I understand but there's really no point in keeping this open - it's not even debatable whether it's notable or not and should be deleted as G5. PICKLEDICAE🥒 18:01, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Maybe what you want is a snow close. This isn't a G5 because the spammer hadn't yet been blocked. Time travel to get the G5 introduces paradoxes. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:27, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Those who fail to learn from the mistakes of past UPEers are destined to repeat them. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:33, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

What they are failing to learn is that the Wikipedia community identifies and removes UPE and spam. One conclusion is about low-level and mid-level corporate marketing officers, who continue to think that they can hire someone to write a Wikipedia article for them. It demonstrates that, in the corporate marketing business, optimism (about one's own marketing) results in failure to learn from failure. If they were more pragmatic (and they think that they are pragmatic), they would conclude that they would be better off to improve their own web sites, or to rely on paid Internet advertising, rather than trying to sneak into the side door of Wikipedia. Yes. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

But has Jax421 been tied to anyone who was already blocked? If so, they are G5. Otherwise they are just a spammer. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Ali Akbarpour

Dear , Valid links have been added to the page (Ali Akbarpour ) , please check and let me know if there is a problem. Thank you in advance Ebrahimi9898 (talk) 18:15, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Esther Cooper Jackson

On 8 September 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Esther Cooper Jackson, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 02:15, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Deleting data

Hello, May I know the reason why are you deleting TPL insurance ? Hussam Shadab (talk) 12:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Because it's spam. PICKLEDICAE🥒 12:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks at Disposable email address

It's interesting (but not surprising) how much of a spam-magnet that page is. Thanks for all your work keeping it clean and useful! Skynxnex (talk) 13:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ill behavior, grouping to revert, threats. Thank you. Mvtqui (talk) 13:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

@Mvtqui what are you hoping to accomplish here? Because the only outcome at this point is you getting blocked. PICKLEDICAE🥒 13:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Convert draft to article

Dear user I maked the page that may help to all google users. So I wanna to publish it. If it has any problem please tell me I will make it best as possible. Waheed-Challa-786 (talk) 15:27, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

No one cares about your spam and if you keep it up, you're going to wind up globally locked considering you're already evading your first block. PICKLEDICAE🥒 15:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Your recent editing history at Hershel Walker shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Morbidthoughts (talk) 17:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

This was discussed on the talk page and at ANEW a week ago, maybe read the discussions before jumping to conclusions and giving ridiculous templated warnings. PICKLEDICAE🥒 17:30, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

::It doesn't change that you are at your third revert. Morbidthoughts (talk) 17:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

It doesn't change that you clearly didn't bother to read any of the relevant discussion, so I don't really think you're in a place to be giving me warnings about anything, @Morbidthoughts. PICKLEDICAE🥒 17:33, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

My apologies for the 3RR warning when I misread the dates of the edits. Morbidthoughts (talk) 17:36, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

@Morbidthoughts you may also want to read WP:DTTR. Thanks! Blanchey (talk) 17:59, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Farnborough Hall

I see you deleted Kenyon2005's recent contribution to Talk:Farnborough Hall. I have my doubts about Kenyon's contributions, but I don't know why you would delete a polite and coherent talk page statement. Maproom (talk) 14:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Because something such as a police report that hasn't been published in a reliable source or vetted by reliable sources is problematic under both WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:V. PICKLEDICAE🥒 14:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Sure, it's problematic. A statement referenced to a police report should be deleted. But a talk page explanation? It clarified that he's claiming, not that Farnborough Hall contains a stolen artwork, but that an artwork has been stolen from Farnborough Hall. Maproom (talk) 15:49, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

I'm aware of the statement they're trying to make but it doesn't change what I'm saying. PICKLEDICAE🥒 15:50, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

In view of what's happened since at Farnborough Hall, I accept that your decision was right. Maproom (talk) 21:14, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

removed Kia Rouhi

Hi you removed wrong about kia Rouhi , He is iranian singer and i make articles for Iranian Celebrity and i put sources with translate please recover and i can solve everything has problem , Sorry to bother you Kiava (talk) 09:53, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Deletion 2 Undeletion 2. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:42, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Is there a tool?

Good day Praxidicae, I hope you having a good time? is there a tool I can use in submitting article for review? Or I have to do that manually? Gabriel^t@lk 15:34, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

hello

Hi Praxidicae, how are you ? I don't understand why you think that DriveNets, which I created merit speedy deletion. I'm 16 years in wikipdia, I familiar with the rules and wrote it according to the guidelines after a thorough reading and the org. deserve a stand-alone entry according to GNG. Tzahy (talk) 19:03, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

The StoryGraph

Hi, @Praxidicae! Last month, I proposed the article The StoryGraph, which you contributed to, for the Meta-Wiki project Translation of the week. Therefore, I would like to ask you to vote for it here so that other Wikipedias are encouraged to translate it into their language. Of course, you're more than welcome to take a look at other proposals and assess them if you feel like it. Thanks in advance and keep up the good work! --Brunnaiz (talk) 15:43, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

I have not had anything to do with this article. PICKLEDICAE🥒 15:45, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

It seems like you do (1, 2, 3). Anyways, I'm not sure why you would argue against it given the copyvio when you were the one who cleaned the article off of it. Have a nice day. --Brunnaiz (talk) 20:13, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Removing spam and copyvio isn’t indicative of an interest. Don’t canvas me again about this. PICKLEDICAE🥒 22:49, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Signature

How'd you do that with your signature, it looks sick. I've tried from the editor but idk how. FishandChipper 🐟🍟 04:35, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Conspiracy theories

You are a lot faster to revert and leave mean warnings than to respond on talk Praxidicae~ Sorry that I forgot to ping you, though. I explained why I was making changes in an edit summary. I don't understand from your response if you are objecting to the reason for making the changes or the specific form of the changes. Can you help me to understand why you are reverting? On the talk page [Talk:Conspiracy_theory#Revisions] I can show you RS and continue a discussion. I think there was problems with my changes that could be made better but I'd like to hear from you first how this can be done. There is some problem of mixing justifications propaganda from this "post-Truth" propagandas, then the AIDS denialism and GMOS are government actors but they are not justifications like Nazi Germany, are they?. It probably will need more work than my lazy man rewrite. I do not think you will want to talk about it here so I am waiting your reply. I'd like your help for how to organize it. Gwynhaas (talk) 15:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Question regarding "PreZero" page.

@Praxidicae:

Hi there, can I know why having a "PreZero" voice will be uninteresting??

- We're talking about a 30,000 employees company by itself, that has its own business and is a european leader in its business area and has also sponsored a football stadium!

- And we're talking about RECYCLING, a theme that is so much of importance nowadays! I was going to create also some inclusion of this voice in more general ones, in order to make some example of some BIG company that was "saving our planet"!

- AND... last but not least... this is the english wikipedia, the most international one!

With over 5 million voices on this language-site, I think that PreZero definitevely deserves a little place here.

What do you have to say to all this? LucaLindholm (talk) 16:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

WP:NCORP. PICKLEDICAE🥒 16:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @LucaLindholm: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. No one deserves an encyclopedia article. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:38, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks

I wanted to thank you for your vote of confidence. I don't know if you recall, but we actually had a fairly decent disagreement when I started editing, and support from those who've disagreed with me means a lot. Thanks for that. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Disagreement is the spice of life. I think you'd make a great admin and we need more admins like you. PICKLEDICAE🥒 16:23, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

No, it's not - ginger is.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:46, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

And I'm no redhead :( ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:48, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Also PS I saw your question on the talk page so take this for what it's worth - I don't think responding to the bulk of opposition in an RFA is generally useful, especially the silly opposes but I also have no RFA experience so... PICKLEDICAE🥒 16:24, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

What irks me more than the sockpuppet stuff is that there's a supporter who created an account partially at my urging after I implemented a shitload of their edit requests. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Balletopedia

Why is it not a reliable source?--Bbb23 (talk) 22:14, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) It probably should be reclassified as one, given that they are no longer user-generated and seem to have decent editorial staff. Elli (talk | contribs) 22:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, that's what I was thinking. I don't normally even look at political articles, so I'm not all that knowledgeable, but I did look at our article for the organization. Is the source actually formally "classified" somewhere?--Bbb23 (talk) 00:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

It's listed on WP:RSP as "no consensus". Elli (talk | contribs) 00:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Well, that's helpful. :-) What the hell are editors supposed to do with that? Anarchy?--Bbb23 (talk) 00:44, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) My understanding is that they switched from accepting user-generated content to not doing so at some point during the Trump presidency (not sure if that had anything to do with it). So I can understand why someone would revert it on sight. Vanamonde (Talk) 05:28, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

@Vanamonde93: So I can understand why someone would revert it on sight. Forgive me for being dense, but I don't follow your reasoning. Generally, websites that accept user content are considered unreliable. Why does not accepting such content mean it's okay to revert, or did you mean something else?--Bbb23 (talk) 13:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

@Bbb23: Some people remember from when it was less reliable and still have that impression of it (so they'll quickly revert it being used as a source), despite the fact that they now have pretty decent editorial standards. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, Elli has it right; if you were familiar with the site from its earlier days, you'd assume it accepts user-generated content. Vanamonde (Talk) 13:58, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

roma in serbia

you changend also the sources about hungarian roma in vojvodina, why ist that? you changend also the link to other pages like Turkish Roma, why that? Nalanidil (talk) 14:56, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

@Praxidicae, Now I understand what your intentions are...I should have known... Nalanidil (talk) 15:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

What are my intentions, @Nalanidil? I'd encourage you to revert yourself otherwise you're going to wind up blocked for edit warring. PICKLEDICAE🥒 15:29, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

hm...yes, You know that better than I doY

1. You do not explain why the sources I have given are not enough for you.

2. You don't allow it, for example, to make links to other wikipedia pages. Without explanation. Strange in my eyes, and then you threaten me? that's insulting. Nalanidil (talk) 15:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Perhaps you should take a moment to read why you've been blocked to begin with and you'd understand why your citations aren't an actual reliable source. No one is threatening you. Informing you of the potential consequences of your actions isn't a threat. PICKLEDICAE🥒 15:41, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Clozee

Hi she already has a wikipedia in french https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clozee

~~~~ Artedm (talk) 10:21, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)Considering you've just provided a redlink, no she doesn't. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 10:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

@Trainsandotherthings: see w:fr:Clozee -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 12:12, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

@Artedm: Having an article on FRWIKI by no means ensures subject meets inclusion requirements on ENWIKI. Beast -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:09, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Are you saying French Wikipedia has different guidelines? Artedm (talk) 06:36, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

@Artedm: Yes, different language Wikipedias have different guidelines. Just because one has an article on a given subject does not mean the English language must as well. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:28, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Yes she does check the link https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clozee Artedm (talk) 05:48, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Andre Soares (Brazilian-American writer, actor)

Hi there,

This article was deleted although I have no affiliation with the figure I covered. I didn't get a chance to contest the speedy deletion. The article followed editorial guidelines to the T and was extremely thorough. Could I please at least get the source data with the template I developed and the tags? It was investigation work and it took me weeks to find that information and format it to Wikipedia's guidelines. Thank you for your assistance. A1ProtocolX (talk) 10:33, 15 September 2022 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by A1ProtocolX (talk • contribs) 10:29, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @A1ProtocolX For undeletion you should contact the administrator who deleted it (Athaenara) or ask at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Madeline (part of me) 12:13, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your response Madeline. I contacted the administrator who deleted it to discuss the deletion and retrieve the source data and I did not receive any answer in regard to the latter. Will check the requests for undeletion. This is a very counter-intuitive process. I appreciate your help. A1ProtocolX (talk) 13:01, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Re: "counter-intuitive ". I've been sayin' that for years. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:02, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Eh, in this case not really since it was spam. PICKLEDICAE🥒 13:04, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Request on 15:02:08, 14 September 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Alphac

• Alphac (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Aldo Carotenuto (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, I need some help cause I don't understand what's happening around Draft:Aldo_Carotenuto you decided the article wasn't fit for publishing, ok. But why deleting the draft? Do you even talk between you people before taking decisions?

Alphac (talk) 15:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Because it's nothing but an obvious attempt to promote him. PICKLEDICAE🥒 15:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

What? How comes? It's no different from many other articles on the same topic, life, career, publications. However why removing the draft? I could improve it. Alphac (talk) 15:09, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

"He has published numerous essays on topics dear to his studies and research" so "dear" to his studies? Fluff word, and unsubstantiated. Did a source say it was "dear" to his studies? Also, you link to his home page, but that is dubious. It's a cloud server, with no indication of who manages it. Whoever does hasn't updated it in almost two decades. So there is a real question as to the validity of that website. Also, the key facts in the article are simply unsourced. Most importantly, while it looks like he did some good work, good work doesn't make you notable. What is the one thing that makes him "notable", by Wikipedia standards? Meaning, makes him pass WP:GNG. What is he most notable for? Also, the way you linked Psychology of personality and individual differences is totally invalid. You have it pointing to Psychology, yet you are claiming it is a chair, or position, so that's an improper link. In short, it seems more of an memorial than an article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:01, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

What should be done?

I would like to draw your attention here [7]. In your opinion what should be done? Satrar (talk) 20:47, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Unless there is a reliable source reporting this, it should not be there. PICKLEDICAE🥒 21:17, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Then please do as per WP:V as I'm trying to avoid a conflict. Satrar (talk) 21:24, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

It’s your own edit. Undo it yourself. PICKLEDICAE🥒 22:44, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Check again, it was yours. (: Satrar (talk) 06:31, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Maybe you should check again, given that you restored someone else's diff entirely. Prax has never done anything except remove or tag it. Primefac (talk) 11:02, 18 September 2022 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

You know they're serious

... because Truth has a Capital T. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:28, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

I was about to tell them to get bent but Cullen did that in block form. :) Ain't no one got time for this nonsense. PICKLEDICAE🥒 16:29, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Oh good. I left him a talk page message about it. Almost as fast as doing it myself would have been. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:30, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

'Struth™! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:12, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Revert

Hello, may I ask why you reverted my edits on Healthcare in the United Kingdom? What is nonsense about it? Thank you. 1deangreenie (talk) 22:53, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

(by talk reader) @1deangreenie: You removed more cited content than you added, you added spelling errors, removed cited content without sufficient reason, and added uncited content. As you've already had multiple warnings, further editing will likely result in a block. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:57, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

I see, I'll go over that. Thank you for the feedback.1deangreenie (talk) 22:58, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Finally, you've learned to use talk pages. As Chris Troutman said your edits introduced errors and removed content. I suggest you start using article talk pages because short of 1 or 2 edits, everything you've done has been disruptive. PICKLEDICAE🥒 22:59, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

I do see my talk page messages but I don't reply, sorry about that. I'll reply from now on. What you be willing to accept my edit if I go over it and add back some sourced content I removed? Thank you. 1deangreenie (talk) 23:01, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

No because it's still disruptive and useless. PICKLEDICAE🥒 23:02, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Hmmm, one section certainly needs to be changed because there is some outdated info there, which I tried to remove myself. But thank you for the advice. 1deangreenie (talk) 23:02, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Bb223 got this one and another, and I swept up another. These are all Lam312321321 socks. -- ferret (talk) 01:01, 20 September 2022 (UTC)