Speedy deletion of Youngy Johnson edit

 

A tag has been placed on Youngy Johnson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wtfdontkill (talk) 01:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Kwekwe SC Ground edit

 

A tag has been placed on Kwekwe SC Ground, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Marlith T/C 02:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Welcome edit

Hello, PaysonSmithHall! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Zagalejo^^^ 04:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Zighinkor edit

  Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Zighinkor, you will be blocked from editing. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 04:36, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Blackie Towery edit

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Blackie Towery, you will be blocked from editing. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 04:37, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wait, people! edit

I don't think this user is here to vandalize; he just seems inexperienced. Blackie Towery is a real basketball player, and Zinghinkor is a real city. Zagalejo^^^ 04:42, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you zagalejo --PaysonSmithHall (talk) 04:45, 9 January 2008 (UTC) I try to write three good sentences. --PaysonSmithHall (talk) 04:45, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Three sentences makes a good stub. And make sure you have at least one reference included in every article. If there are no references, someone will probably come around and delete it. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions; if you want to experiment with Wiki markup and such, try the "sandbox". Zagalejo^^^ 05:01, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
It's OK. Just make sure your article makes sense and contains enough context. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 05:08, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Some other advice: make sure you put everything into your own words! Don't just copy-and-paste the content from other websites; that would be considered plagiarism and a copyright violation. Thanks! Zagalejo^^^ 19:15, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cuban Night Anole edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cuban Night Anole, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.lizards.com/learn/cubanNightAnole.jsp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Billy Urbanski edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Billy Urbanski, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.baseball-reference.com/bullpen/Billy_Urbanski. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Anal Destruction edit

 

A tag has been placed on Anal Destruction, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Where next Columbus? (talk) 03:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


The Boogie Man Will Get You edit

 

A tag has been placed on The Boogie Man Will Get You, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Icestorm815 (talk) 01:11, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cumberland County Jail edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cumberland County Jail, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Cumberland County Jail. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:05, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Cumberland County Jail edit

 

An editor has nominated Cumberland County Jail, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cumberland County Jail and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of USS Antolak edit

 

A tag has been placed on USS Antolak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. L. Pistachio (talk) 03:44, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Fast anal sex edit

 

A tag has been placed on Fast anal sex requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wisdom89 (talk) 06:00, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Are they really necessary? edit

Are the anal sex "redirect" articles really and truly necessary? Isn't there something better to do today? Cheers. Noah 06:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Tiger Bomb edit

 

An editor has nominated Tiger Bomb, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger Bomb and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bull Ice edit

 

A tag has been placed on Bull Ice, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 17:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Advice on writing articles that won't get deleted= edit

Your articles are getting deleted because they are very short - an encyclopedia article needs to be more than just one or two sentences - and they don't cite any references. To find out more about creating articles, read the Introduction, the Tutorial, and the Guide to creating your first article. JohnCD (talk) 17:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC) ty--PaysonSmithHall (talk) 18:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of YouJizz edit

 

A tag has been placed on YouJizz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. contribsSTYROFOAM☭1994TALK 01:35, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Poochenya edit

 

A tag has been placed on Poochenya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vivio TestarossaTalk Who 05:54, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Forest Avenue Plaza edit

 

A tag has been placed on Forest Avenue Plaza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KurtRaschke (talk) 01:46, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Rockafella records edit

 

A tag has been placed on Rockafella records, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Undeath (talk) 05:44, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Typo redirect Deep anal sex edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Deep anal sex, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Deep anal sex is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Deep anal sex, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your article editing edit

Hi there, there is a discussion going on here about some of your edits; you may want to join in. Meanwhile, can I suggest that you wait a little while before creating any new articles? Thanks. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 16:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply