Pat Long

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Pat Long, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- ReyBrujo 01:50, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Glenn Herrin

A tag has been placed on Glenn Herrin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted under Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. If you can indicate how Glenn Herrin is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}}, and also put a note on Talk:Glenn Herrin saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions. -- ReyBrujo 01:50, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:71ECP.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:71ECP.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Untitled5.pdf

Thanks for uploading Image:Untitled5.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:28, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: can you help with this?

Regarding this Perception of Wealth Theory, I think the more information you give, the better. Is this going to be a new article? Do you need me to give feedback about it, or anything else? -- ReyBrujo 05:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Note that you need to demonstrate the notability of the theory. The article about ?? was deleted multiple times because it is considered not notable according to our notability standards for people. It is possible his theories are also considered non notable if you can't give reliable sources for them. -- ReyBrujo 05:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:BeerECP3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BeerECP3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EmeraldCoastPilsner3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:EmeraldCoastPilsner3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:46, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ecbc.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ecbc.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:24, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ecbc2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ecbc2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EmeraldCoastPilsner3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:EmeraldCoastPilsner3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:EmeraldCoastPilsner3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:EmeraldCoastPilsner3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:53, 15 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih (talk) 03:53, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ecbc.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ecbc.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:41, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ecbc1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ecbc1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:41, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EmeraldCoastPilsner3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:EmeraldCoastPilsner3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:EmeraldCoastPilsner3.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:EmeraldCoastPilsner3.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Carlosguitar ^{(ready and willing)} 17:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:ECBCPaleAle.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:ECBCPaleAle.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:19, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Vulcan.1mix.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Vulcan.1mix.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Vulcan Energy Drink has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ➪HiDrNick! 08:14, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ➪HiDrNick! 08:16, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: beer company

Hey Pat. I didn't mark those articles for deletion, another editor did. I just restored the notice to the page. If you'd like to discuss the deletion, you can participate in the debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emerald Coast Beer Company and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vulcan Energy Drink. Cheers, ➪HiDrNick! 08:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Pat Long! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ➪HiDrNick! 08:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 08:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: DEL

Deletion discussions usually run for about a week and are decided upon by an experienced user called an administrator. You are allowed to improve the articles while the discussion is going on, but please don't remove the notice from the top of the pages that tell other editors about the discussion. The easiest way to show that this article should stay in Wikipedia is to find news stories about the company or the product and show us where they can be found online. If no news sources have written about the company yet, there's no way for us to tell if everything in the article is just made up or not, so we will probably delete it. On the other hand, if you can find several articles about the company or it's product, the article may be kept. One way or the other, I will not make the decision. Good luck. ➪HiDrNick! 08:59, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Vulcan Energy Drink deletion discussion

Hi Pat Long,

Although I was the one that nominated this article, if you can come up with some sources that show that the drink complies with our notability guidelines, I'd be happy to help you integrate them into the article and change my position to "Keep" in the discussion. Any questions, please ask on my talk page. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC).

AfD nomination of Vulcan Energy Drink

An editor has nominated Vulcan Energy Drink, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vulcan Energy Drink and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:02, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Emerald Coast Beer Company

An editor has nominated Emerald Coast Beer Company, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emerald Coast Beer Company and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:02, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Notability

Hi Pat, I really think you should read and consider WP:CORP. It's a good starting place to understand what Wikipedia requires of an organization, like the Emerald Coast company. Your arguments about the government really don't come in to play because these are the guidelines of what Wikipedia needs to include an article. You have to understand that when you're contributing to a project you have to make sure you understand what the project's rules are. If you think that press coverage is silly compared to government authority that is a perfectly valid personal belief, but it's not Wikipedia policy and it won't help you in an AFD proceeding. I'm urging you to try what I've suggested in the AFD to improve the article and if you can't you can always write it again after WP:RS reliable sources become available. --Torchwood Who? (talk) 20:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

You should also take a look at this guide to making arguments in deletion discussions. [1]--Torchwood Who? (talk) 21:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Language Barrier?

Hey Pat, please don't take this as out of line, I really don't intend it to be, but are you not a native English speaker or maybe a minor? The reason I'm asking is that I noticed you have some odd sentence structures and I want to make sure that in the AFD for Emerald Coast you're fully understanding what we're saying. If there's a language barrier maybe we can find a way to help bridge it. If there isn't a language barrier I hope you understand where I was coming from and that I didn't mean any harm by asking.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 21:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, you're hardly a dummy. It takes a lot to get the hang of editing articles here, so that's proof enough that you shouldn't think int hose terms. I'm sorry if my question upset you. I was really just trying to help.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 21:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I would suggest doing this. In case the AFD closes with delete you should go in to the "edit" box for the articles you've created and copy all the text. You can then paste that text in a text file and save it for later when more sources become available.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 22:08, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

NPA/Civil

With regard to your comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emerald Coast Beer Company: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Perhaps you're a little too close to the subject and need to step away. Please note there are policies in place on civility and personal attacks. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 00:25, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

It's common practice for people to look at other articles. It just happens to be that both articles are up for AfD at the same time. It's not about you as a person, but the article subjects. If you're taking it so personally, you may be too close. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 01:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

at the same time is a relative term, I meant within the same day. Not necessarily at the exact moment. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 01:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

You have made your points quite clear on the AfD page. Continuing responding to each comment is disruptive and may earn you a temporary loss of your editing privileges. Let the AfD run its course without any further comments. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 01:12, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. Persisting to be disruptive and mentioning possible future incidents of pointed edits will result in a block. seicer | talk | contribs 01:34, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

_{...and the user was engaging in bad faith AfD nominations. seicer | talk | contribs 01:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)}

You have been blocked for a period of 31h from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. seicer | talk | contribs 01:36, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

... are you nuts each one of the name i was making had no REF if ECBC should be DEL they should to I was doing what I learnd from my work you should give me a pay raise--Pat Long (talk) 01:51, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

How about a 10% raise from what you're making now for editing Wikipedia, which is zero. 10% of zero is zero. Enjoy! JuJube (talk) 07:58, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't find your statement (more specifically, your WP:POINT rationale) supportable, Pat. You are comparing historic, well-noted companies (some going back to the 1800s, possibly earlier) with one(s) that have been existence only about a year. If one Googles the names, page after page of memorabilia, pics and mentions will come up, for the elder companies. This translates out to some notability. Is this the case for the AfDd items you're upset about? Zephyrad (talk) 21:20, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

... can a nerd help me I have a news clip in print not on the intetnet how did i get it on the site?--Pat Long (talk) 16:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vulcan.1mix.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Vulcan.1mix.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ecbc2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ecbc2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EmeraldCoastPilsner3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:EmeraldCoastPilsner3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Edits to User:Anthony Appleyard

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from User:Anthony Appleyard. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Eastmain (talk) 04:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

re: ECBC

Hello, Pat Long. You have new messages at HiDrNick's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.