Sammyrayy

Your submission at Articles for creation: Everybody Wants to be Poppy (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Everybody Wants to be Poppy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Everybody Wants to be Poppy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Notsammyray! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 16:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Notsammyray, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! S0091 (talk) 16:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Hello, I'm Snackmurat. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Titanic Sinclair have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Snackmurat (talk) 05:10, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Titanic Sinclair. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 23:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Titanic Sinclair while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:10, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jazmin Bean have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jazmin Bean was changed by Notsammyray (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2021-12-14T15:57:59+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Anti-icon.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anti-icon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

i was working on an article with this image, but did not finish. please, when i reupload, allow it. Notsammyray (talk) 02:39, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Ctrlwiki (talk) 22:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to R.E.M. (song). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

The article LG Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCOMPANY, lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. Instagram is not an acceptable independent source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 00:43, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Notsammyray,

I have removed the PROD tag due to your objections on the article talk page. PRODs are supposed to be uncontroversial deletions and any editor can remove a PROD tag from a tagged article or file. Please realize that this might result in a nomination at AFD for this article so it is worth your time trying to respond to criticism of the article and work on improving the article.

If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:40, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kate Bush (album)

The article Kate Bush (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the requirements of WP:NALBUM. MusicBrainz and Discogs are not acceptable or reliable sources. KateBush collectables is a primary source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 23:15, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of LG Records for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LG Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LG Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:23, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

LG records

I did in fact give multiple reasons, the first of which is that your changes are unsourced and totally unsupported by any reliable sources. PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:03, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at LG Rblx, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do not move this article or restore the content again - it is straight up vandalism at this point as it appears to be nothing more than a hoax given that there are absolutely no sources anywhere to be found, reliable or otherwise about "LG Rblx" PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:07, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at LG Records. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Kinu ^t/_c 21:14, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Given the evidence of self-promotion, I have extended this block to an indefinite one. --Kinu ^t/_c 15:49, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

This is not self-promotion??? I am not associated with this label at all, I am just a fan. I really like editing Wikipedia and I have some really helpful edits I'm waiting to make on notable subjects. In the future, I will provide much more reliable sources. LG does exist, however I see now how it's not notable. Here is a link to prove that it was real and I didn't make it up: https://www.qobuz.com/us-en/label/lg-records-8/download-streaming-albums/2997877 Notsammyray (talk) 19:55, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Please I understand why I am being blocked, but I'm just trying to help please please don't make it indefinite. Notsammyray (talk) 19:56, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

A good place to start would be to explain this edit summary in more detail. --Kinu ^t/_c 21:20, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

They announced this change in an in-game Roblox event. Here is the message they posted on Discord: https://imgur.com/a/4uE4Pmr

If you don't believe me you can join it here https://discord.gg/SaVDVpJm

They also announced it via Instagram on the tenth slide of this post https://www.instagram.com/p/Cg0KKyyoEg5/

I'm really not trying to vandalize anything, i was only trying to help Notsammyray (talk) 23:24, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Notsammyray,

I noticed that I earlier posted a message to your talk page when your article was PROD'd so I thought I'd respond to your comments. To be unblocked, you'll need to file an unblock request as stated in the block message. But before doing so, you must move on from LG Records and accept that the community has decided that they don't want an article on this subject. If you persist and try to create it again, you will just be reblocked.

Think about those other article subjects you want to contribute to and mention a fwe in your unblock request. Most of all, the admin reviewing your unblock request wants to see that you will not create similar articles and you are commited to being a productive contributor who will learn more about Wikipedia's guidelines, policies and standards and abide by them. They want to be convinced that they will not have to monitor you or reblock you.

If this is too much work for you, well, there are plenty of other websites online that you can contribute to and hang out at besides this project. If you want to edit Wikipedia though, you need to make a persuasive unblock request that convinces the reviewer that any problems you have are in the past. Good luck. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:54, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

My concern stems from the fact that one of the sources provided at the now-deleted article was an Instagram account that is presumably yours. That, coupled with your claim that you are in direct contact with the alleged founder of this company (real or not), suggests a conflict of interest. I feel that taking Liz's advice above would be the best approach here. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of LG Records

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page LG Records has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 07:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sammyrayy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My account was blocked because I added a subject that was not notable with little sources and evidence that it existed. From now on, I will provide several reliable sources on all edits I make and I will NOT add any content in which there could be a possible conflict of interest. I understand my mistake and it will not happen again moving forward. I have made some valuable edits in the past, especially on music subjects and I will continue to do so if I regain access to Wikipedia. I would be very grateful to continue being a user here, as I truly respect the project and have never intended harm on it. Notsammyray (talk) 07:57, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not address the exact, specific nature of your conflict of interest, does not convince me you'll leave LG Records alone, and does not generally come across as convincing. Yamla (talk) 10:22, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Question

Hey, how did you know Angry was released through DistroKid may I ask? Is there a possible way of seeing that for every song? 213.238.185.46 (talk) 12:23, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

hey there! i found it on jaxsta. unfortunately they recently put it behind an account lock, but it's free to sign up.

https://jaxsta.com/release/2df6ac13-079e-55c7-86c0-8b73ac2b27e6/bf79f65f-0231-5c04-bc80-c91099044d00/overview Notsammyray (talk) 15:27, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

February 2023

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Sammyrayy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

About 6 months ago, my account was blocked from editing due to evidence of self-promotion when I wrote an article about a record label called LG Records, a label which I had a personal association with, as I had performed at one of their events. I understand how this is a conflict of interest, as receiving information directly from the source could result in exaggerated or entirely incorrect information, and how I could personally benefit from being associated with a company that has an article. I never had ill intent and I have spent time reviewing the Wikipedia guidelines, especially the notability guidelines. I now truly understand why my article was inappropriate. I've learned about what kinds of things are notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia, and I am truly embarrassed that I ever wrote that article. If I get access to edit again, I will absolutely leave the LG Records article alone, and will not participate in edit warring. Additionally, I will take the time to look at my sources and make sure they are reliable (not from social media, not directly from the article's subject, etc.) I've participated in editing other similar sites, including other Wikimedia projects, and I believe I will make very valuable edits for Wikipedia as I have done elsewhere. I respect Wikipedia a lot and I would love to have the ability to edit. I have already begun research on music-related stub articles, and I have a lot of information I can add in order to expand upon them and turn them into full articles. Thank you very much and I hope I will be considered for a second chance. Notsammyray (talk) 22:00, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Per the below, you have been unblocked. Please hold to your agreement to avoid editing under a conflict of interest. Otherwise, carry on, and enjoy your time as an editor at Wikipedia. Jayron32 12:11, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

@Kinu: for additional input; I'm inclined to accept the above so long as you agree to stay away from areas you have a conflict of interest. --Jayron32 14:24, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

I agree. I will never again edit anything on Wikipedia that I have a conflict of interest. Notsammyray (talk) 16:10, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

@Jayron32: Given all of the above, I have no objection to an unblock. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

The Eras Tour

The United States isn't the only country Taylor Swift is visiting during the Eras Tour. She literally said international dates would be announced later. 96.227.141.216 (talk) 01:36, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

I understand. I never said it was the only country. However, right now it is the only country that has been announced, so I believe we should just list the states. Once there are other countries to show, I agree it should be the country and not the state, but leave it as states for now. Notsammyray (talk) 01:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Never Find My Place Tour.webp

You're very welcome :) - FlightTime (open channel) 17:22, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Eras Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glendale. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PTV SWS World Tour.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PTV SWS World Tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Conan Gray World Tour 2022.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Conan Gray World Tour 2022.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:08, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Stylisation notes and DEATH redirect

As I just stated in my edit summary, there is no way that we can know that readers typing death in all caps would want to be pointed to or mean Martinez's song. This is a very common English-language word and should not redirect there so has been repointed. Also, as stylisations are disregarded across Wikipedia per MOS:CAPS, and MOS:CAPS does not talk about the importance of stating said stylisations in parentheses anywhere—and more importantly, said stylisation notes have been removed from Martinez's articles multiple times previously—please do not add or restore them. Thanks. Ss112 03:21, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

We also do not italicise song titles on Wikipedia, so please don't make edits like this. Ss112 03:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

I understand the part about the redirect, but I still believe the "stylized in all caps" note should be kept, as it is important information and very common across other, more developed, articles. I'm unsure why you believe it's a problem with Portals/Death, because it seems to be used on most articles like this.

For example: Beyoncé (album), When We All Fall Asleep, Where Do We Go?, Damn (Kendrick Lamar album), Sawayama, Folklore (Taylor Swift album), Evermore (Taylor Swift album), Reputation (album), Don't Smile at Me, Eat (NXT Soundtrack), Bury Me at Makeout Creek, Magdalene (album), Blackpink, Sour (album), and likely hundreds of others.

Some of those articles are even tagged as "good articles", so I'm sure it would've been removed by someone at some point if it were wrong. Notsammyray (talk) 03:43, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

@Notsammyray: You are using a whataboutism argument. I'm well aware how common it is on pop music articles—it's a pointless trend that started in the 2010s here, but it shouldn't be on any of them. I (and a couple other editors) are actively trying to remove it from new articles to stop it because it's trivial. It's a simple difference of letter case. Nobody's world is changed if they learn Ariana Grande wants Thank U, Next typed as thank u, next—what difference does it make to learn a case-difference stylisation from a parenthesised note in one place when everywhere else on the website it is and should be typed Thank U, Next? It's really not important at the end of the day how an artist wants to typeset their work. We've disregarded it all the times artists have sworn how important it is (Lady Gaga told everybody they should capitalise Artpop in all caps and multiple other artists like the Pet Shop Boys have expressed how distinctive they think their song titles look in sentence case). It's never consistently rendered in sources reporting on their works, and at the end of the day Wikipedia and its readers know we standardize such spellings anyway per our guidelines. It would be best if you and other editors endeavoured to work with our guidelines, not find excuses and examples as to why we shouldn't. Ss112 04:43, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

I agree, nobody's world would change if they found out an artist likes an album stylized a certain way, but it's the same for most of the other information in the article. Knowing the day Melanie released the album, for example, doesn't effect anybody's life, but it's still one of the most important bits of information in the article. The point of Wikipedia is to be an encyclopedia, and the article should tell us anything someone would want to know about the subject. Maybe you don't care to know the stylization information, but others, including myself, clearly do. Even if nobody's "world is changed", the artist's intent is still significant information and should be included in the article. Notsammyray (talk) 14:13, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Category:Rina Sawayama concert tours has been nominated for deletion

Category:Rina Sawayama concert tours has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 00:56, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in The Eras Tour. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. livelikemusic (TALK!) 02:15, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but the style that I used for The Eras Tour is not nonstandard at all. I was following the way the majority of concert tour articles are written on Wikipedia, at least from those that I have seen. Notsammyray (talk) 02:30, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on LA to the Moon Tour

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page LA to the Moon Tour, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:52, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Everybody Wants to Be Poppy

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Everybody Wants to Be Poppy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Yas (slang)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Yas (slang), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for moving American Teenager to mainspace!

I never wrote a music article before, so I was unsure of when to do it, but I'm glad that my little article was good enough to be published. Nice to see you are into Kate Bush and Rina Sawayama as well! HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 18:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Images

I reverted your edits adding photos to songs Infoboxes, as in the cases of e.g. Illicit Affairs, Vigilante Shit etc. Per Template:Infobox song#cover the field is for an official cover or a picture sleeve and is not for live performances photos. Also please consider WP:IRELEV that photos in Wikipedia are not merely for decoration but need to compliment the prose/demonstrate a point. Best, Ippantekina (talk) 03:54, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

thank you, but it seems you are missing the part on the template which says "or other image appropriate for the song". it also does not state that live performance photos cannot be used, nor does it appear to be at all implied. these images are definitely appropriate for the song, being actual images of the live set. with no music video or official cover art, they are also the primary means of visual identification, illustrating the theme of the song and helping people better understand it. i see no reason why they cannot be added.

you've also linked Wikipedia:IRELEV, which states "Images must be significant and relevant in the topic's context, not primarily decorative. They are often an important illustrative aid to understanding." i believe these images are significant and relevant to the topic, rather than decorative. the images serve the purpose of visually identifying the songs, which is clearly important on wikipedia, considering it is why we allow copyrighted cover art.

Wikipedia:IRELEV also states "When possible, find better images and improve captions instead of simply removing poor or inappropriate ones, especially on pages with few visuals." Notsammyray (talk) 04:09, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

"other image appropriate for the song" could mean photos in the liner notes where appropriate. I doubt a photo of a live performance is appropriate as the main visual identification of a particular song or for its value in aiding the reader's understanding of the subject (I mean think about it, a song can be performed on various tours and occasions). Such photos are appropriate for a "Live performances" section though. Ippantekina (talk) 05:02, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

"PTV/SWS World Tour" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect PTV/SWS World Tour has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 21 § PTV/SWS World Tour until a consensus is reached. 2600:1700:9BF3:220:F5FA:A7D7:9AA4:E005 (talk) 05:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lover Fest.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lover Fest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Taylor Swift as an opening act

Hello, Sammyrayy

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username EytanMelech, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Taylor Swift as an opening act, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|EytanMelech}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

EytanMelech (talk) 12:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Taylor Swift as an opening act for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taylor Swift as an opening act is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Swift as an opening act until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ippantekina (talk) 06:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Just Wanna Rock, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 19:46, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Collaborative albums do not count if they are supported by sources. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 20:01, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bloodmoney music video.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bloodmoney music video.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of Melanie Martinez live performances

Hello, Sammyrayy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Melanie Martinez live performances".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:41, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Jazmin Bean logo.webp listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jazmin Bean logo.webp, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 03:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Album_article_style_advice#"Release history" tables

Hi @Sammyrayy. Take a look for which one you prefer at the "Release history" table: "Distributor", "Licensee", "Marketer" or "Promoter". 2001:D08:2910:4C95:17C3:914F:D77C:7595 (talk) 03:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)