Neptuniandroid

Thank you for making a report about 71.123.76.91 (talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Additionally, IP addresses cannot be declared a vandalism-only account because they may be reused by more than one person —dgies^t_c 21:32, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Please don't report IPs or users that haven't been issued warnings please. --  Netsnipe  ►  13:31, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Timbaland Presents Shock Value

Nice job correcting my mistakes and adding producers! wikisoul 17:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Timbaland

Thank you so much for cleaning up the Scott Storch rivalry section in Timbaland... I was going to do it but I was really hoping someone like you would do it for me ;). Also, I saw that you removed the OneRepublic song from his list of productions -- is there a reason for that? I was under the impression that he had produced that song... :) Rockstar915 07:26, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Okay, awesome. That does sound right -- thanks for clarifying! Rockstar915 00:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

One more thing...

I saw that you removed the {{expand}} template from the 2007 Timbaland plagiarism controversy section. The reason why the template was placed there is because the section must be expanded on Timbaland's main page in order to get the article promoted to "Good Article" status. See the article's talk page and initial review for clarification, with the admin saying that two sentences on Timbaland's main page is not enough. For the record, I re-added the tag. :) Rockstar915 01:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Jazzmatazz

Hi there, I saw that you made some edits to the Jazzmatazz article. Given that, apart from the Guru albums, the only content is an external link, is this disambiguation page really neccessary in your opinion? --sparkl_!sm ^talk 21:36, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Infobox format

Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums for how to format a template; note especially how producers are treated. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 19:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Excuse me..

i can write whatever i want about bubba sparxxx. obviously you have absolutely no life and no sense of humor. thanks for being mean, thank you.

Crowd Control

It is not a hoax, and those are 2 different songs.

Who is this?

Why are you leaving slander on my talk page?

False Accusations

There was a comment from this user on User talk:137.240.136.81 saying that the user from the IP address had vandalized User talk:Neptuniandroid. No such deed has been done. Please refrain the personal attacks and threats against this IP address. I have already had such vulgarities removed. Thank You.

This is your last warning. The next time you,NeptunianDroid, uses vulgarities toward a fellow wikipedian you will be blocked from editing.

• I saw the note you left me on my talk page about this warning. Personally, I wouldn't worry about it at all... looks like an anonymous edit just trolling, etc. S/he actually posted a notice on WP:ANI, but it was duly ignored, since most administrators realize this person is just looking to cause trouble. So, like I said, just ignore all of it, and don't feed the trolls. :) As for the changing IP addresses... it's probably the same person either with a dynamic IP or on a nearby computer. If you see one anonymous editor removing warnings from another's talk page, feel free to revert. If there appears to be continued vandalism, feel free to report the IP(s) to WP:AIV... if it happens a lot, this might call for a long-term block or even a ban, so administrators will definitely keep an eye on it. Thanks again for your help and for letting me know about this; it is appreciated! --Kinu ^t/_c 21:13, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Her Name Is Nicole

We need a materialized source, not your word that you saw it. See WP:BALL. --Ayoleftyz 02:49, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Curtis credits

Good job on finding those credits but do you actually have a picture for a materialized source? I mean I believe them but something materialized helps. If not, tomorrow when I buy the album I will take a picture of the booklet for reference. --Ayoleftyz 14:22, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

That's all I needed, great work! --Ayoleftyz 15:01, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Elle me controle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Elle me controle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:17, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Elle me controle2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Elle me controle2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rickypokoraalright.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rickypokoraalright.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Sweetypokovideo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Sweetypokovideo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:34, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Elle me controle2.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Elle me controle2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:35, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Neptuniandroid! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 942 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Craig Brockman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Attitude (rapper)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Attitude (rapper) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. STATic message me! 15:42, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Attitude (rapper) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Attitude (rapper) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attitude (rapper) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. STATic message me! 05:49, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

I noticed you program in JavaScript...

The JavaScript WikiProject is now up and running. We organize and develop JavaScript articles, navigation aids, and user scripts.

Scripts undergoing development, and the state of JavaScript on Wikipedia, are discussed on the talk page.

For an overview of JavaScript coverage on Wikipedia, see Draft:Outline of JavaScript and Index of JavaScript-related articles. For everything on user scripts, see User:The Transhumanist/Outline of scripts.

The WikiProject also organizes every resource it can find about JavaScript out there, such as articles, books, tutorials, etc. See our growing Reference library.

If you would like to join the JavaScript WikiProject, feel free to add your name to the participants list.

Hope to see you there! The Transhumanist 15:23, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Small quip

Going forward, please be aware that Mellotron is supposed to be capitalized, unlike other instruments. Thanks. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 00:50, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Neptuniandroid. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Camp Flog Gnaw Carnival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SZA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Neptuniandroid. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)