User talk:Mzajac/2013

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Thewolfchild in topic LNN


Non-free rationale for File:Clamato can.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Clamato can.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 06:18, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Added it. Michael Z. 2013-03-05 06:38 z

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Clamato can.jpg

 

Thank you for uploading File:Clamato can.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 07:38, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

 
Hello, Mzajac. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Message added 16:46, 6 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ukexpat (talk) 16:46, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Romanization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digraphs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Help needed

Hi. Do you have time to help in taking WP:Naming conventions (Cyrillic) from current draft to RfC for adoption as a guideline? In ictu oculi (talk) 06:31, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

I’d be happy to participate, but I am not spending much time in Wikipedia lately. And you have reminded me to update the Ukrainian guideline. Michael Z. 2013-06-21 15:37 z
That's okay we can go slowly. To be honest it looks complete to me already. Maybe similar articles to Putin, Andric should be selected for the other major languages? In ictu oculi (talk) 04:32, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Category:Heavy armoured personnel carriers

Category:Heavy armoured personnel carriers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 06:11, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Category:Cavalry tanks

Category:Cavalry tanks, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 06:46, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

GAR

Ukraine, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 02:39, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Georgia (country) to Georgia move suggestion

Please comment here. Thanks. georgianJORJADZE 18:16, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

LNN

Hi Michael, you created a re-direct for LNN to caliber (artillery), back in 2007. Nobody seems to know why. I can't find any reference for "Lnn" in relation to that subject. It was suggested to me that I ask you for an explanation. Would you mind enlightening us? Thanks. - thewolfchild 20:50, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Lnn is shorthand for “length-numeral-numeral,” as in L70, or L/70. A better link to redirect it to might be the section Caliber (artillery)#Barrel length.
I think the exact term Lnn must have been in use somewhere for me to have created the redirect, but I have no memory of the details. Michael Z. 2013-09-07 23:24 z
If it is real, it is exceedingly obscure. I don’t mind if the redirect is changed or deleted. Michael Z. 2013-09-07 23:26 z
Thanks for the reply. Perhaps, you would like to add that shorthand reference to the LNN disambiguation page? As for the re-direct, since you created it, perhaps it would be best for you to determine it's status? - thewolfchild 00:15, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
No link on the disambig page, since I don’t have a single reference. A redirect is harmless, but a link implies there is a real thing, which I can’t confirm. Thanks. I will leave it as is, but if someone wants to delete it, that’s fine. Michael Z. 2013-09-08 01:14 z