User talk:Mgasparin/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 7 |
Returning in February
Hi Mgasparin, I have returned back to finally get started to fight vandalism and further contribute and interact with wonderful people like you here on Wikipedia. I have already messaged two out of three recommended mentors and one of them was retired so I didn't message them. Hope you are doing well, have a wonderful weekend. Take care. <3 Angus1986 (talk) 01:21, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- Great!! I do know that Danny is quite busy with other things here on enwiki, so he might not accept, but hopefully Rosguill does. If no one accepts, feel free to contact anyone who is significantly active on AfC. The three I suggested for you were prominent AfC reviewers who have been doing great work for a long time (they are all in the top 10 for most active reviewers), but I think anyone with a good track record in the AfC department would be just fine. As always, good luck and have fun this weekend. Mgasparin (talk) 02:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Paywalls
Read your comment about WaPo, thus you may find archive.org and archive.ph helpful - perhaps for NYT and WSJ too. starship.paint (talk) 13:30, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
April 2020
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:John B123. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. ~Swarm~ {sting} 19:52, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 March 2020
- From the editors: The bad and the good
- News and notes: 2018 Wikipedian of the year blocked
- WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19: A WikiProject Report
- Special report: Wikipedia on COVID-19: what we publish and why it matters
- In the media: Blocked in Iran but still covering the big story
- Discussion report: Rethinking draft space
- Arbitration report: Unfinished business
- In focus: "I have been asked by Jeffrey Epstein …"
- Community view: Wikimedia community responds to COVID-19
- From the archives: Text from Wikipedia good enough for Oxford University Press to claim as own
- Traffic report: The only thing that matters in the world
- Gallery: Visible Women on Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Amid COVID-19, Wikimedia Foundation offers full pay for reduced hours, mobilizes all staff to work remote, and waives sick time
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
Timeline of the Donald Trump presidency (2020 Q2) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Timeline of the Donald Trump presidency (2020 Q2), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 16:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- John B123, I think you misunderstand. This article will grow over time, as time passes. The only reason it doesn't have any citations yet as nothing has happened in the months of April, May or June yet. Moving the article to draft space just complicates things unnecessarily. Mgasparin (talk) 20:19, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- An article needs content to be in mainspace, in fact, at present it probably meets the A3 criteria for speedy deletion. It should be in draft until there are events included to make the "timeline" that is the purpose of the article. --John B123 (talk) 20:32, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Sir, it will have content in about 2 days. Can you live with that until then? Mgasparin (talk) 20:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- An article needs content to be in mainspace, in fact, at present it probably meets the A3 criteria for speedy deletion. It should be in draft until there are events included to make the "timeline" that is the purpose of the article. --John B123 (talk) 20:32, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
No it's not, but 3 days ago you told me it would have content in two day and on that basis I tagged it as under review rather than speedy deletion. --John B123 (talk) 21:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- John B123 Hey, give it a rest will you? Sure, the page was created a little early, but that is no reason to delete it. Per IAR, I ask you to leave the page alone. April 1 starts tomorrow. Mgasparin (talk) 00:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- What other option do I have. I originally moved it to draft, where it should have been until it had some content, but you moved it back into main space. I assumed good faith on your part when you said it would have content in 2 days and even tagged it as under review so it wasn't tagged for speedy deletion by other editors. Articles without content can't be in mainspace, iy either needs to go back into draft or be deleted. --John B123 (talk) 01:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Trump Timeline
Just touching base with you. I get my numbers for the Wednesday report from worldometersinfo. I don't mind that you change my figures to the ones you provide (with a source). If you go to that site you will see that a source is provided for each state count and they provide sources that are quite specific to the state. I find worldometers much more reliable and up to date than the CDC page or even the Johns Hopkins page. Again, no problem at all...we work well together. I just thought you should know what my source is. ―Buster7 ☎ 15:49, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Buster7 Hey, thanks for reaching out to me. I completely understand. However, you might not know that there are some discussions going on at RSN over the reliability of worldometers. The thread is WP:RSN#worldometers.info coronavirus statistics. I do know that they publish their sources, so I will for the time being use them. If the consensus develops that they aren't reliable, they we will have to find another source. Just thought you should know what's going through the pipes. Mgasparin (talk) 22:14, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- I've been considering discontinuing the state by state part of the Wednesday report. It's a bit disheartening for me to have to deal with the escalating numbers. Plus, with each state entering the hundreds (and eventually the thousands) it may seem a bit overbearing and leaning toward a biased kind of mention which we of course should always resist. ―Buster7 ☎ 22:27, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- Buster7, I completely understand the sense of stress you are feeling. Honestly, I really wish the media would report less on the number of deaths and new cases and more on the number of recoveries. Can we not celebrate the fact that many people are getting better? In BC where I live, around 60% of all cases are recovered, yet that gets little attention in my local TV news channel. I suppose it has a lot to do with writing stories that sell. Do you still want to mention the pandemic (perhaps in a different way), or omit it entirely? Mgasparin (talk) 22:38, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- I've been considering discontinuing the state by state part of the Wednesday report. It's a bit disheartening for me to have to deal with the escalating numbers. Plus, with each state entering the hundreds (and eventually the thousands) it may seem a bit overbearing and leaning toward a biased kind of mention which we of course should always resist. ―Buster7 ☎ 22:27, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 April 2020
- News and notes: Unbiased information from Ukraine's government?
- In the media: Coronavirus, again and again
- Discussion report: Redesigning Wikipedia, bit by bit
- Featured content: Featured content returns
- Arbitration report: Two difficult cases
- Traffic report: Disease the Rhythm of the Night
- Recent research: Trending topics across languages; auto-detecting bias
- Opinion: Trusting Everybody to Work Together
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- In focus: Multilingual Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: The Guild of Copy Editors
Trump closure
Thanks for the closure support. I would dispute your apparent reasoning that the continuous stream of complaints about article bias is a reason they should be dismissed. The main argument is not that they are so many, but that they are so unarmed with policy. Also we should bear in mind that, as I said there, NPOV is not what the everyday person on the street calls "neutral". I think you and I might do the same in their place, so I experience no nausea (about that, anyway). Perhaps there should be a rule, "No neutrality complaints accepted until you have 5,000 edits." ―Mandruss ☎ 08:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Mandruss, that's an excellent idea. So many readers, and even some long-time editors, still think NPOV means "No Point Of View". No, WP:NPOV is explicit that neither sources nor content must be "neutral". It is editors that must be neutral in their editing. -- Valjean (talk) 01:12, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
What is a peer review? ―Mandruss ☎ 08:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Mandruss See WP:PR (peer review). If you want some feedback from editors not regularly involved at the Trump talk-page, I might suggest that you nominate it for PR. Yes, that point that I was trying to make is that there are so many unsupported claims that the article is biased. True, complaints should not just be turned away, just the ones that don't have a leg to stand on.
Mgasparin (talk) 09:33, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Well maybe we could turn them away without the nausea comments?Wild, I never heard of PR, maybe because it's mainly used for GA and FA and I don't participate in either. No, I don't care to use it, but it might have been pointed out to the OP, more prominently than in passing mention in the closure. ―Mandruss ☎ 09:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Mandruss. I know that you aren't interested in using PR, but do you honestly think that it would result in beneficial change for the article, or just more stalemate and endless discussion? I ask because I am seriously thinking of nominating it for PR. It might be good to get a new pair of eyes to look at the article besides Mark, Scjessey, Melanie, JFG, you, etc. Mgasparin (talk) 22:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Well maybe we could turn them away without the nausea comments?Wild, I never heard of PR, maybe because it's mainly used for GA and FA and I don't participate in either. No, I don't care to use it, but it might have been pointed out to the OP, more prominently than in passing mention in the closure. ―Mandruss ☎ 09:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Content, not editors
Regarding this unnecessary comment. Remember to talk about content, not other editors. It takes two to tangle, and the second comment (yours) is the one that is best left out. Others can silently judge that editor on their own. Now they can also judge you, and you don't need that. Oh, BTW, I have done exactly what you did many times, but it's not a good thing to do. A piece of fuel only burns when someone comes along and ignites it. -- Valjean (talk) 01:05, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversight changes
Guideline and policy news
- Discretionary sanctions have been authorized for all pages and edits related to COVID-19, to be logged at WP:GS/COVID19.
- Following a recent discussion on Meta-Wiki, the edit filter maintainer global group has been created.
- A request for comment has been proposed to create a new main page editor usergroup.
- A request for comment has been proposed to make the bureaucrat activity requirements more strict.
Technical news
- The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. You can review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page.
- Enterprisey created a script that will show a link to the proper Special:Undelete page when viewing a since-deleted revision, see User:Enterprisey/link-deleted-revs.
Miscellaneous
- A request for comment closed with consensus to create a Village Pump-style page for communication with the Wikimedia Foundation.
It appears there are responses to your comments
It appears there are responses to your comments at Talk:Veracity of statements by Donald Trump. X1\ (talk) 04:15, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Trouted
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: asked to be trouted Idan (talk) 11:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 May 2020
- From the editor: Meltdown May?
- News and notes: 2019 Picture of the Year, 200 French paid editing accounts blocked, 10 years of Guild Copyediting
- Discussion report: WMF's Universal Code of Conduct
- Featured content: Weathering the storm
- Arbitration report: Board member likely to receive editing restriction
- Traffic report: Come on and slam, and welcome to the jam
- Gallery: Wildlife photos by the book
- News from the WMF: WMF Board announces Community Culture Statement
- Recent research: Automatic detection of covert paid editing; Wiki Workshop 2020
- Community view: Transit routes and mapping during stay-at-home order downtime
- WikiProject report: Revitalizing good articles
- On the bright side: 500,000 articles in the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia
#13
Hi. Just for my information, are you forgetting about #13, or deliberately ignoring it? ―Mandruss ☎ 02:01, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Updating statistics
Hi... I've noticed the BC covid 19 stats haven't been updated since your last update for June 11. I know everyone gets busy etc and have to take a break from volunteer work, so I would like to step up and do the updates myself, if you are not able. Is there a specific website the data is collected from. I have seen all the commonly accessed websites but if there is a specific site where the data is from I would like to keep the data source consistent. Thank you Grant Gussie
gtgussie@hotmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.67.173.134 (talk) 16:31, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hey Grant, that's fine. just do it! Mgasparin (talk) 21:10, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
- News and notes: Progress at Wikipedia Library and Wikijournal of Medicine
- Community view: Community open letter on renaming
- Gallery: After the killing of George Floyd
- In the media: Part collaboration and part combat
- Discussion report: Community reacts to WMF rebranding proposals
- Featured content: Sports are returning, with a rainbow
- Arbitration report: Anti-harassment RfC and a checkuser revocation
- Traffic report: The pandemic, alleged murder, a massacre, and other deaths
- News from the WMF: We stand for racial justice
- Recent research: Wikipedia and COVID-19; automated Wikipedia-based fact-checking
- Humour: Cherchez une femme
- On the bright side: For what are you grateful this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Black Lives Matter
Administrators' newsletter – July 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment is in progress to remove the T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) speedy deletion criterion.
Technical news
- Protection templates on mainspace pages are now automatically added by User:MusikBot II (BRFA).
Arbitration
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community. - The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles
.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Genetic Literacy Project on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Jim Nussle on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Trump Timeline
Thanks for always backing me up with refs. I always wanna get the thing into the timeline and then add the refbut my arthritis fingers dont always co-operate.―Buster7 ☎ 13:36, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).
Administrator changes
Oversight changes
Guideline and policy news
- There is an open request for comment to decide whether to increase the minimum duration a sanction discussion has to remain open (currently 24 hours).
- Speedy deletion criterion T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) has been repealed following a request for comment.
- Speedy deletion criterion X2 (pages created by the content translation tool) has been repealed following a discussion.
- There is a proposal to restrict proposed deletion to confirmed users.
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
- Special report: Wikipedia and the End of Open Collaboration?
- COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Wikipedia for money
- News and notes: Abstract Wikipedia, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin
- In the media: Dog days gone bad
- Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
- Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom
- Traffic report: Now for something completely different
- News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Wikipedia users
- Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Novak Djokovic on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:31, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics/Political parties on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
New Article:Timeline of the Joe Biden presidency (2021)
When do you think it would be a good time to start The Biden article? Tomorrow?
- @Buster7: Depends if he wins the election or not. WP:CRYSTAL applies here. Mgasparin (talk) 04:53, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Just planning Ahead like a good scout. I think WP:SURETHING fits better... but I can wait. Be Safe!―Buster7 ☎ 09:54, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Frank Sinatra on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of leaders of the Soviet Union on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2020
- News and notes: The high road and the low road
- In the media: Storytelling large and small
- Featured content: Going for the goal
- Special report: Wikipedia's not so little sister is finding its own way
- Op-Ed: The longest-running hoax
- Traffic report: Heart, soul, umbrellas, and politics
- News from the WMF: Fourteen things we’ve learned by moving Polish Wikimedia conference online
- Recent research: Detecting spam, and pages to protect; non-anonymous editors signal their intelligence with high-quality articles
- Arbitration report: A slow couple of months
- From the archives: Wikipedia for promotional purposes?
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
- A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors
must
orshould
use the articles for creation process. - A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2020 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
- An open request for comment asks whether active Arbitrators may serve on the Trust and Safety Case Review Committee or Ombudsman commission.
Need help!
Dear Mgasparin, Hope you are doing well! After a long time. ^_^ I messed up with my preferences and cannot sign, I tried seeking help with one user who had a good looking template and on teahouse to fix, could you help if they are either busy or don't want to help? Thank you! - Angus1986
- Hi, Angus1986 good to hear from you after a long time. Unfortunately, I'm not very knowledgeable in HTML code. However, I have found the help page Signatures to be of great use to me, as it has several paragraphs on how to customize and play with your signature. One way to fix your preferences (as a last resort) if you cannot figure it out is to restore the default settings. It's in bold red lettering at the bottom of the page in the "Preferences" tab. I hope this helps. Mgasparin (talk) 22:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- If you still cannot figure it out, I might suggest speaking to Oshwah, a prominent wikipedian and admin who is an expert in HTML code. Mgasparin (talk) 22:19, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- I tried navigating with Signatures but I am not so knowledgable in HTML as well, if Oshwah could help I will be glad to seek help from him. What is their username? Just "Oshwah"? - Angus1986
Dear Mgasparin, I hope you are doing well. :) I have changed my username to AngusMEOW, and the archived talk page is missing which was listen in the Archive Box by CluebotIII. Do you know someone who can help me with this? Thank you so much for your time. ^_^ AngusMEOW (chatter • paw trail) 13:38, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- AngusMEOW Hello, I looked at your page, and actually, it looks fine. I made some small changes to the archiver, which may help in the future (limiting the maximum size of an archive page). You may have to wait for the bot to archive your talk page again for the pages to show up in the archive box. If they don't appear even after Cluebot archives again, I would suggest asking a question here. That is the talk page for ClueBot III, the bot that is currently archiving your talk page. Good luck! Mgasparin (talk) 03:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Katrina Karkazis on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).
Administrator changes
Ajpolino • LuK3
Jackmcbarn
Ad Orientem • Harej • Lid • Lomn • Mentoz86 • Oliver Pereira • XJaM
There'sNoTime → TheresNoTime
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created
.
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
Technical news
- The filter log now provides links to view diffs of deleted revisions (phab:T261630).
Arbitration
- The 2020 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place from September 27th to October 7th.
- Following a request for comment, sitting Committee members may not serve on either the Ombuds Commission or the WMF Case Review Committee. The Arbitration Committee passed a motion implementing those results into their procedures.
Miscellaneous
- The Universal Code of Conduct draft is open for community review and comment until October 6th, 2020.
- Office actions may now be appealed to the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee.
Author:Office of Deputy Press Secretary Judd Deere
I just changed the caption to one of the images at the Timeline. While in the process I noticed that the Author was someone from the White House .jpg)
. I made the change because it said Trump was just sending a message to his supporters. I thought the edit came from a neutral source but I was wrong. It seems the Deputy press Secretary for the Trump Administration is editing THE Timeline. What to do??? Definitely this against ALL the rules of paid editing or something should be done right away. Should we contact an Administrator? The Media? Not sure what to do but I will pursue this discovery. ―Buster7 ☎ 19:39, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Dinesh D'Souza on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:32, 15 October 2020 (UTC)