Hello Metalclaus! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! BlindEagletalk 20:34, 23 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

--BlindEagletalk 20:34, 23 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Correct the wrong

edit

I found that Gulfstream International Airlines are indeed one of Copa Airlines partners, second of all, Copa indeed will open destinations to port of spain, just put them as Future destinations that's all and finally, Copa features award-winning services just like it's partner mexicana, so please, if I cannot correct this wrong edits, please correct them, all is on Copa Airlines webpage in About Us.

Just wanna enlarge this article and add more detailed info. and about the banner, it was just too big and gustavo rojas pinilla flies to two or more destinations so that explains why it is a focus city, but I think there are more to cover.

I just want the article to look like this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexicana 201.224.24.102 19:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Edits

edit

Hey, I've noticed that you have also reverted some of the edits made by blocked user and sockpuppeteer Cpzphantom through his sockpuppets and anonymous IP's. Are you an admin? He is blocked and should not even be trying to edit.

I know. I have also tried to clean up the articles. His comments add no value to the site and they are not written in an appropiate level of English. When he created his sockpuppet accounts, I wrote to one of the admins and they blocked their accounts. However, he is using now anonymous IP's.--Schonbrunn 21:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

He insists!

edit

Man, I'm getting tired of this guy! I was holding back and not answering his posts, but I've had it with him. Here's what I wrote to him after he asked me to "literelly" explain him what I meant for unconstructive edits.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:72.46.129.154 --Schonbrunn 01:34, 19 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please help

edit

Hello Metalclaus. As you may have seen, I have tried to clean up certain articles from the disruptive (and in some cases incorrect or uncited) edits done by Cpzphantom either through anonymous IP's or through sockpuppet accounts. His new "target" is the Tocumen International Airport page. Do you know any administrator in order to raise a flag and get that page semiprotected and thus avoid edits by unregistered IP's? I appreciate the information.--Schonbrunn 02:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Can you believe this?

edit

He's back! His "modus operandi" is create new accounts and wait until they are active in order to inject his edits that add no value to the pages! His new name is "Langosto". Isn't that locust in Spanish? The name would be appropiate, considering that this guy is like a plague of locusts on Wikipedia.--Schonbrunn 01:17, 2 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

It seems like he's gone...

edit

...or at least that's what he said in a message he left on my user talk page. I'll believe it when I see it. Check it out, I'll bet you'll get a good chuckle out of it.--Schonbrunn 02:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

That guy thinks that we are fools

edit

Yes, he probably thinks that we are fools. He fails to understand that flag carriers are state owned companies. Copa is not state owned. That's only the tip of the iceberg: He continues to provide a copa airlines website in the UK as an official source. From my knowledge, the only OFFICIAL website is copaair.com and this is the website that they include in all their advertising, inflight entertainment, and even financial filings with the SEC.--Schonbrunn 01:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

If that's the case

edit

If that's the case then read this info from the "Flag Carrier" article in wikipedia, and see the list below.

  • A transportation company, such as a shipping or airline company, that is registered in a given state. Example: "American Airlines, while a private firm, is a U.S. flag carrier."
  • A state-run, state-owned or state-designated transport company or organization, specifically (though not universally required) showing the state flag apparent for public view (state in this context used to mean any principality or country). Example: "Air Canada is its namesake's flag carrier." 201.218.81.108 19:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

That, in effect, makes Copaair a PTY flag carrier. ah and describe what's in the pic again, don't write that there's a hub if the only things shown are aircraft and jetways.

here's an url for you, read until clause 12.

http://www.iaba.org/Law%20Review_Vol%204/LawReview_4_JPFabrega.htm

Check this out

edit

Hey Metalclaus, look at this. Cpzphantom left this message on my talk page. I noticed that he left the same link in your page:

"Schonbrunn, here is a link that will finally prove you and the admins are wrong, no matter what you do, here is the link, depsite the fact is in spanish, use babelfish translation or make metalclaus translate it. read carefully the entire ENTIRE article, its from the governement so you can't negate it.

http://www.iaba.org/Law%20Review_Vol%204/LawReview_4_JPFabrega.htm"

Apparently he wanted me to "make you translate it" but I already had my wife translate it for me. I read the link he posted here and it is nothing official. It is only an essay or article written by a Panamanian lawyer in some legal journal. This proves nothing! It is not from the government or any official authority officially designating Copa Airlines as the country's flag carrier!--Schonbrunn 23:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

He's back

edit

This time using the name Edgeweb and making ridiculous edits such as this one. Check it out if you have the chance.--Schonbrunn 18:44, 30 August 2007 (UTC)Reply