Luthar28

Welcome edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello Luthar28 and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.

Getting Started First steps • FAQ Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting help Community Portal • Help desk • Village Pump Where to ask questions or make comments • Request administrator attention Wikipedia: The Missing Manual Place {{helpme}} on your talk page and a small message explaining the problem The Commmunity Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists		Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Click here to reply to this message.

ukexpat (talk) 18:08, 4 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Women of the Apocalypse edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have nominated Women of the Apocalypse, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women of the Apocalypse. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ukexpat (talk) 14:54, 22 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Women-of-the-Apocalypse-Cover.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Women-of-the-Apocalypse-Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:46, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Women of the Apocalypse edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Thanks for the message. I don't think one review is going to be enough. Please take a look at WP:NBOOK. – ukexpat (talk) 01:36, 21 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

See point one of WP:NBOOK (my bold for emphasis): The book has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself...

Two reviews is not "multiple" IMHO. – ukexpat (talk) 01:58, 21 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic