User talk:Lil-unique1/Archive 14

"Thirsty"

I think we have a Lovebird situation here. "Thirsty" is quite clearly the next single, Mariah's confirmed it. She is not concerned with putting singles onto iTunes etc and has said she isn't doing that. It may be the same day the album drops, but to me it just looks like an Impact day release, without the standalone digital release.  — ₳aron 19:46, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

I doubt it. With "Lovebird" there was coverage and announcements from the label. There was also a radio add to UK radio. "Thirsty" was premiered on radio so was "You Don't Know What To Do". "Thirsty" received a remix and single cover, "YDKWTD" received a live performance. The only thing that calls "Thirsty" a single is everyone else who reported on it. Did Mariah herself say it was a single? Did her label confirm it anywhere? I think it may well be a single but I have always said until there is official confirmation such as a press release or release date for download/airplay it nothing should be considered a single. IMO, streaming should now be considered a release because song's put out for streaming are now eligible to chart. Best thing to do is wait. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 19:52, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Carey is no longer featured on Island Records artists roster, in turn she is seen on the restructured Def Jam Recordings website.http://www.defjam.com/artists?legacy=0 There have been three POINTERS that Def Jam Recordings is releasing her fourteenth studio album which Billboard http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/6070090/no-beyonce-strategy-for-mariah-careys-new-album reported, In addition, Def Jam FULLY promotes Carey's fourteenth studio album http://www.defjam.com/mariah-carey-mariah-elusive-chanteuse-cover-tracklist/ Oh and I find it so crazy to find Def Jam's copyright message on "Thirsty" on Youtube in the description bar! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BYNma9wxxw I don't see Island anywhere, Oh and let me give you the Island Records website to see if she's a courtesy of the label. http://www.islanddefjam.com/artists/default.aspx?labelID=62 Do you see Mariah anywhere? Another thing, The Island Def Jam Music Group was shuttered by UMG Recordings, Inc. on April 1, 2014, some artists notably Iggy Azalea and Mariah Carey moved to Def Jam. User:Smarty9108 (talk) 10:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Yes, Mariah confirmed it. Yes, so has her label.  — ₳aron 09:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Bounce

Hey, thanks so much for the revert. I actually requested the article to be copy edited at the Guild of Copy Editors, but I didn't realize the copy editor would obliviously remove SO MUCH info! Also with regard to the genre, please see Talk:Bounce (Iggy Azalea song).—CoolMarc 21:07, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposal

You might be interested in giving input here. Snuggums (talk • contributions) 14:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Quick question

Where can I get a one that says the time for my page like the one you've got? LuvMe♥ ^{or Hate Me}☠ 18:31, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

There is a discussion regarding genres in the infobox for the article Unapologetic. You are welcome to weigh in. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 10:15, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Discographies/style goes dormant

Hi there, not sure if this really concerns you but you where involved in the process of reverting this dormant state on this project last time so I thought I'd notify you that it's became dormant again. I have no idea how to do this myself as I have never been through the process, so I was hoping either you could do so like last time or help guide me through the process, thank you for your time. SilentDan (talk) 11:54, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Let Me Love You (Until You Learn to Love Yourself).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Let Me Love You (Until You Learn to Love Yourself).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:21, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Hey

I think you could re-open "Come Alive (Leona Lewis song)". The debate had 8 Keeps and 4 merges. I think there is enough third party info and sources for it to standalone. Just an idea.  — ₳aron 18:46, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Andreharrell aka Romeo Miller

This Romeo Miller has been on facebook pretending to be a song writer for sony and has claimed to have produced Jeremih's song, Don't tell em. He also claims to have written a song by Kem called it's you. He constantly edits the wiki entries fro to add his name for the Jeremih song, Kem's page and many others. Just wanted to say, I noticed you have warned this fraud but he just never stops. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.166.165.28 (talk) 22:09, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Kelly Rowland - RCG Video Snaps.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kelly Rowland - RCG Video Snaps.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:23, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

WP:Missing Wikipedians

Since you retired in January 2014 before returning in March as "semi-retired" and have not edited since June, I've added you to this page. If you ever return, remove your name from the list. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:50, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

I've made a brief sweeping reappearance. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 10:00, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Policy discussion in progress

There is a policy discussion in progress at the Manual of Style which affects the capitalization of "Someone like You", a question in which you previously participated. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — LlywelynII 17:06, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lil-unique1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Lil-unique1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Level Up

Hello,

Hope this finds you well. The confusion is that Level Up didn't chart on the UK Singles Chart. (I wish it did as well). The main UK Singles Chart includes sales and streams. Level Up only charted at 79 on the UK Singles Sales component chart. (Like how the US has a Digital Songs chart vs the Hot 100). Level Up could have possibly charted below the top 100 in the UK Singles Top 200, but not sure where to find.

It also hasn't reached the top ten in New Zealand either. It peaked at 7 on the New Zealand Hot Singles Chart (which is the fastest growing songs of the week - i.e. it was the 7th fastest growing song that week), but hasn't made the top 40 chart. --108.6.192.87 (talk) 21:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Did You or Did You Not Protect California Gurls When It First Came Out?

Good evening Lil-Unique1.

Do you listen to Katy Perry during your spare time? After a two year absence when she dropped This Is How We Do a song from her fourth album Prism in 2014, she came back with not one not two but four new singles titled Rise Chained to the Rhythm Bon Appetit and Swish Swish.

The latter three were featured on her fifth long player Witness which was released on June 9 in the preceding year.

An interesting note of these songs had the guest features of Skip Marley Nicki Minaj and Migos.

Now on to the main subject, did you or did you not protect California Gurls when it was first released? That song is 8 years old.

But Teenage Dream didn't have a chance to get protected yet because it got declined with not enough disruptive actions. 

Does it have a chord sequence? The Composition section for the aforementioned song says it was set in the tonic of F and runs at a tempo of 125 BPM.

You already know that the music video took place in a Candy Land-style board game with her as a lilac haired game piece in the beginning when Snoop Dogg put her in the ground and lying in a cotton candy cloud in her belly while she was in the bare flesh. 

Anyways please respond to me about this quickly. Good night, 67.81.163.178 (talk) 00:41, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

I personally didn't protect them. I don't understand what you're issue is. If you want to make an edit to the article just post on the talk page. If you make constructive edits, then consider making an account so then it won't matter. I don't make the rules - if there has been a significant number of edits which were deemed vandalism or unconstructive then an admin will review a request to protect an article. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 11:11, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

About Listen (David Guetta album)

Don’t worry Was trying to make corrections Ronaldo3455 (talk) 18:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Template:Track listing

Hello, Lil-unique1. You have new messages at Template talk:Track listing#Album name + artist.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Which track listing The Notorious B.O.M.I (talk) 15:42, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

7 (David Guetta album)

Hi there. I've looked at this source but don't see either Albert Harvey or Glowinthedark. I must be missing it. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:55, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: iTunes isn't a source for producers etc. However check his website here. Guetta kindly posted the full album credits. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 11:57, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lil-unique1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Heartbeat (Enrique Iglesias song)

Can you please keep an eye on it? Dance music is not a genre. It just means that it is uptempo music whereby you can physically dance to it. 183.171.114.34 (talk) 09:45, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

In Polaroid (Jonas Blue, Liam Payne and Lennon Stella song), can you remove "dance" as I said above. 115.164.85.193 (talk) 13:58, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Million dollar bill.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Million dollar bill.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Spectrum_(Say_My_Name)#Confusing

Hi

There is something very wrong with the article, as per my comments.

Would appreciate input :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 11:56, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Question: Did Dua Lipa REALLY Had a Modeling Career Before Singing? Also Race In Leading.

You might be a little bit familiar with her work, but I had done this to MaranoFan's page back in April. Unfortunately s/he said that subject wasn't notable for that profession and ethnicity (Albanian born in Great Britain two days three years after Demi Lovato and five months before Hennessy Carolina Cardi B's younger sister mind you) should not be included in opening sentence.

And was she really a fashion model to the likes of the Hadid sisters before becoming a musician? Cause the contract was too short and ended on a sour note.

Additionally, opening sentence be something transposed to e.g. "English singer songwriter and retired model" even though she is just 23 years.

An interesting factoid: Coffee Talk a Season 3 episode of Disney's Nanny-style sitcom series Jessie aired on what could've been her 19 birthday. Last but not least if one researches her right now before 21 August 2015 a "did not match any documents" notice will pop up. Link to article: en.wikipedia.org/w/Dua_Lipa.

Ceasing transmissions,

67.81.163.178 (talk) 12:30, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/67.81.163.178 Opinions don't have a place on Wikipedia. Also, I'm not the right place to have this discussion. Take it to the article's talk page

Orphaned non-free image File:David Guetta - Where Them Girls At.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:David Guetta - Where Them Girls At.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Your edits to Phoenix (Rita Ora album)

Hi. Regarding your edits to Phoenix (Rita Ora album) and your edits to other articles that I have seen, I feel like you still edit according to what Wikipedia was like years ago and you are perhaps not familiar with more recent guidelines and changes. Firstly, recording locations are not supposed to be put in recorded= per Template:Infobox album#recorded. This is for numeric values only. Studio= is for locations, including countries. Per WP:OVERLINK, we should not be linking to well-known countries like Sweden and the UK anywhere on an article, but we also do not link well-known cities in the infobox per Template:Infobox album#studio. Furthermore, it appears you are still using semicolons to bold. I believe I have raised this with you before. Per WP:PSEUDOHEAD, it is no longer appropriate to use semicolons to bold, and either boldface (with three apostrophes) or third-level headings should be used. Also, an IP removed your excessive use of images and I agree—for a personnel section, that was excessive and debatably a misuse. We shouldn't flood an album article with headshots of artists who collaborated on it. Also, where appropriate, we should be spelling out state names and not assuming everybody outside of the US knows what "CA" and yes, even "NY", refers to, although in this case they did not need to be there anyway. There are multiple guidelines on this. Finally, please see MOS:ALBUM on how we link and format personnel sections. This has changed from several years ago when you were a regular editor and not "semi-retired". Thank you. Ss112 09:35, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

@Ss112:, thank you for these notes. I wasn't aware that you had mentioned PSUEDOHEAD before - apologies if you had I clearly hadn't remembered or been aware. I think you're right though and lots of things have changed a lot since I last properly was active (circa 2013). I shall bare these that in mind when I'm editing and if I get time, I'll go back through any articles and start updating. Thanks for the tips and assumption of WP:GOODFAITH. Merry Christmas → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - (Talk) - 16:22, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Regarding you citing WP:ALBUMSTYLE

Regarding you citing WP:ALBUMSTYLE in numerous edit summaries—ALBUMSTYLE is not a guideline nor a policy; it is an essay. We do not have to follow what it says. It's not even a "should attempt to follow". It's a mere recommendation. Any user can write an essay and recommend others follow it. I think you are confusing what should be done (guidelines, policies) with recommendations. Great, you agree with the essay. But there is no need to change headings to follow what it says. Also, you do not need to keep putting underscores in wikilinks, even when linking to a section. They are unnecessary. Ss112 02:49, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

'''[[User:Lil-unique1|<font color="#126180">→ Lil-</font><font color="#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</font><font color="#126180"> 1</font>]] <small><font color="#1CA9C9">- ([[User talk: Lil-unique1|<font color="#126180">Talk</font>]]) -</font></small>''' : → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - (Talk) -

to

'''[[User:Lil-unique1|<span style="color:#126180">→ Lil-</span><span style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</span><span style="color:#126180"> 1</span>]] <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ([[User talk:Lil-unique1|<span style="color:#126180">Talk</span>]]) -</small>''' : → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - (Talk) -

—Anomalocaris (talk) 18:29, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for updating your signature, but now the bold (''') markup is misnested. You are encouraged to change

[[User:Lil-unique1|<span style="color:#126180">→ '''Lil-</span><span style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</span><span style="color:#126180">1</span>]] <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ([[User talk:Lil-unique1|<span style="color:#126180">Talk</span>]]) -</small>''' : → Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) -

to

[[User:Lil-unique1|<span style="color:#126180">→ '''Lil-'''</span><b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b>]] <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ([[User talk:Lil-unique1|<span style="color:#126180">Talk</span>]]) -</small> : → Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) -

—Anomalocaris (talk) 07:59, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for updating your signature. All good now! —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/React (The Pussycat Dolls song) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 17:35, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Lil-unique1, if you wish to pursue this nomination, it will need to be transcluded. I realize it's been quite some time since you did a DYK nomination (July 2013!); if you're having trouble doing this step, I'm happy to do it for you. Note that as you have at least five prior DYK credits (six, actually), you will need to do a quid pro quo review, which involves giving a full DYK review of another's nomination. Let me know if you need any help with what's involved with that; the basic criteria are listed above the edit window of any DYK nomination template. Best of luck going forward! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:08, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of React (The Pussycat Dolls song)

Hello! Your submission of React (The Pussycat Dolls song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:25, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 22:01, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the alt. Still waiting for a QPQ. Yoninah (talk) 12:32, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

DYK for React (The Pussycat Dolls song)

On 10 March 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article React (The Pussycat Dolls song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the British regulator Ofcom received more than 400 complaints over the Pussycat Dolls' decision to wear sheer PVC outfits during their live performance of "React" on a family programme? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/React (The Pussycat Dolls song). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, React (The Pussycat Dolls song)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Hey!

I just wanted to say that it's great seeing you back! — Status (talk · contribs) 20:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Aww I'm glad you're still around too @Status:. I don't know how long for but I'm back for now → Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) - 12:06, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of React (The Pussycat Dolls song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article React (The Pussycat Dolls song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 17:42, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Accessibility and another user

Will you take a look at User_talk:Kyliex2008#Accessibility and see if you can add anything there? Thanks. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:33, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

@Koavf: we tried → Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) - 11:12, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Lil-unique1, Yeah, that escalated quickly. I don't know what to make of that. Thanks, tho. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:28, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the thanks!

Appreciate the thank you! Your page layout is amazing! Mine is so janky LOL JonathanLGardner (talk) 16:35, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Aww thank you. It took me ages to do this and I did it very much when I was an expert on HTML back in the day. Hope you're keeping well sir. → Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) - 20:30, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Girls (Jennifer Lopez song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Girls (Jennifer Lopez song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 12:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Girls (Jennifer Lopez song)

The article Girls (Jennifer Lopez song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Girls (Jennifer Lopez song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 14:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Girls (Jennifer Lopez song)

The article Girls (Jennifer Lopez song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Girls (Jennifer Lopez song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of React (The Pussycat Dolls song)

The article React (The Pussycat Dolls song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:React (The Pussycat Dolls song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 22:41, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of React (The Pussycat Dolls song)

The article React (The Pussycat Dolls song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:React (The Pussycat Dolls song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 16:41, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Romanian charts

Hi there! I noticed you recently removed the Romanian chart peak for "React". Please note that the chart is reliable, and that it reflects the most broadcast songs on various radio stations and television channels in the country. The ranking is compiled by Media Forest and published on Kiss FM. The Airplay 100 is the successor of the Romanian Top 100. Please see Romanian record charts for further clarification. Thank you; Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

And btw, there was even a note in the code, saying it shouldn't be removed since it was reliable. Surely not "not supported" :) Greets; Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:15, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Cartoon network freak I am aware that the Romanian Top 100 can be sourced however, when the article went through the GA review process, the reviewer couldn't validate the peak so it was removed. I've no doubt of the authenticity of the chart, just that it couldn't be verified from the source given. If it is sourced from the radio show, would be good to include the time during the show it was confirmed. → Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) - 22:34, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Ah, I see. I included a written alternative. Greets; Cartoon network freak (talk) 06:16, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Invite to discussion

Do not know if you would be interested, however, in knowing your experience in editing music-related articles, thought you would like to participate in the discussion here. Would appreciate a sound-minded, third person to come into discussion. livelikemusic (TALK!) 23:31, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

livelikemusic, very kind of you to describe me in that way! I've left my thoughts at the discussion page. While I do think reliable sources play a key role in the questions asked, I do also think it is important to apply some logic as record labels and artists always try to downgrade what they deem to be unsuccessful singles or include songs released a feature to boost album sales. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 11:27, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

That is more than fine; the intention of inviting other editors was to bring a more rounded viewpoint of things, and to evolve the discussion beyond what it was [unfortunately] becoming. livelikemusic (TALK!) 12:23, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Maroon 5 Articles

I apologize for the uncited edits on the Maroon 5 pages.I will no longer edit them in the future. 16:55, 2 June 2020 (UTC)user:Dark Lord Thomas Pie

@Dark Lord Thomas Pie: I appreciate the apology. You are allowed to edit them, we just discourage adding uncited material. Please see WP:RS about what counts as a reliable source and anytime you want to add a genre or any other information, please add a reliable source. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 16:57, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Problems with Chromatica Edits

Maybe it's the format, it depends where you at it. Sometimes if you view the post on desktop, it won't tell you the entire post. If you view it form your phone, it allows you to expand and see everything. At the bottom of this post it lists all the song that BURNS contributed to, including that of "Love Me Right", alongside BloodPop. User talk:Whippy7 20:00, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

@Whippy7: Yes, I apologise, I was not able to see this before. I've expanded the reference and formatted it so there are no doubts. It did however say BURNS produced it so added it to the producer bit but not the writer bit. Also, please don't copy my signature style - it looked like you were taking the mickey out of my username too so I've removed. To sign your own user name, please use ~~~~

Ga

Hello there, I saw your message saying that if the Finneas songs be quick failed because they received limited coverage. But, songs like VKTM and Sober also received limited coverage and are at ga class. Will the articles you’re reviewing be quick failed? DarklyShadows (talk) 14:38, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

DarklyShadows Hi, no I won't be quick failing them. I deleted the message on the talkpage because I had a quick look and saw lots of other songs that are short but have been passed too. :) ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 19:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Genius.com

I'm not sure which editors you're referring to. Only one comes to mind and said person had a habit of willfully disregarding Wikipedia policies/guidelines prior to our discussions and receiving instruction. All while either relying on user-generated content as sources and/or resorting to original research, particularly when it came to assigning genres. Also had a habit of reflexively resorting to somewhat juvenile personal attacks, illogical arguments and at least one instance of meatpuppetry during said discussion. I've come to notice this is often the case for people who almost exclusively edit hip-hop related articles. Anyway, has since eased and now writes better articles while staying within guidelines, but have their moments.

As for Genius.com, it’s almost entirely composed of anonymously user-submitted content. Meanwhile, when it comes to inclusion, its overseeing staff members don't appear to be concerned with information that is verifiable so much as information that is appealing. Perhaps why its a deluge for inaccurate or outright false claims and the occasional conspiracy theory. If a page features a link or two to a credible source, think its best to simply use that given source as a citation.

That all said and done, I leave citations taken from articles where the artist related to the song in question gave an exclusive Genius commentary interview. This is in accordance to previous discussion while being mindful of WP:BLPSELFPUB. While I haven't been provided anything specific, if I skipped a beat, my mistake. As said elsewhere, RapGenius.com has been cited as unreliable per discussion time and again, its simply a matter of someone getting around to adding it to the the list. --Ascribe4 (talk) 18:15, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

I was not merely referring to lyrics in regard to the accuracy of Genius.com. They've also been inaccurate regarding who wrote or produced what, where it a given song was made and in the case of derivative songs—have a strong tendency to get sample sources wrong or confuse the notion of a sample with an interpolation in the first place (much like WhoSampled). If a link to a credible source is cited on a given Genius page and/or if credit info matches that which can be found on a credible site, it's really best to go with the source. I will admit the site has improved over the years as it’s gotten more popular. However, that’s really only in regard to it being more willing to work more closely with content creators. (i.e. being more willing to cooperate with publishers, artists more frequently contributing to those interviews I do try to leave be here, etc) Nevertheless, there are some critically unreliable aspects about the site which I doubt will ever erode. Namely it’s unquestioning trust and steadfast reliance on WhoSampled and random, subjective material staffers come across on fan forums.

In my experience, citing WP:NOTRSMUSIC in the edit summary does effectively impart the message that Genius is not a reliable source and there is the discussion to support the designation. Truly is just a matter of someone adding Genius.com and its related two discussions to the unreliable section on the page. Please don't get me wrong, I do get what you’re saying. But this honestly has worked fine up until now. Except of course from random IPs and that aforementioned user who time and again deliberately ignored instruction and advice and really didn't want to move on from the site and let it as well as various other user-generated websites and certain blogs they’d come accustomed to go. Anyway, didn't come off as harsh at all. I hope that everything was clarified on my part and I hope did not come off as dismissive. --Ascribe4 (talk) 16:10, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

I'm in Love Without You

Has I'm in Love Without You passed GA? DarklyShadows (talk) 23:44, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

DarklyShadows I was going to pass it but Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums#Ones_to_Watch this discussion means the sources just don't meet GA standard. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 09:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC

I want to withdraw the nominations for New Girl and Break My Heart Again then. It’s to bad that my time was wasted like that.

DarklyShadows I apologise if you view it as your time wasted. The intention was not to do so however, after another editor has pointed our a very valid discussion that now renders the other articles ineligible too due to their over-reliance on Ones to Watch which has been highlighted as an inadequate source. You shouldn't view it as time wasted, because the partial process which has been initiated has improved the quality of the articles if nothing else. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 13:03, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

GA review formatting

Lil-unique1, thanks for doing GA reviews. There are just a couple of minor things you'll want to know about GA review formatting going forward. First, don't do any level-2 headers (with the "==" on both sides) in the review, only level-3 ("===") and beyond. It causes problems when the reviews are transcluded on the article talk pages to have any level-2 headers after the required "GA review" one at the very top.

Second, if you need to fail an article, please be sure to use five tildes (~~~~~) in the {{FailedGA}} template rather than the usual four tildes you use for signing your posts: the five tildes create the date/time string, as opposed to the four tildes that include both your sig and the date/time. I've just fixed the two FailedGA templates you created earlier today to remove those sigs; they should be fine now. I've also adjusted a couple of reviews to make the later level-2 headers into level-3 ones. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

My bad BlueMoonset, thanks for fixing those and the note about 5 tildes. I hadn't realised! ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 14:06, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

I’m sorry

I have to apologize for the way I’ve acted. It’s been a rough few days for me. I shouldn’t get mad at you like that. You are a good reviewer and tried to do all you can. And I promise i will never talk like that to you again. DarklyShadows (talk) 14:40, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

DarklyShadows I accept your apology. Perhaps take some time out and come back feeling refreshed? I'm sorry to hear you've been having a bad time. Your passion is great, don't lose that. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 14:44, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

GA review

I don't know if you take requests. But if you do, can you review Bitches Broken Hearts? DarklyShadows (talk) 23:20, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Us Against the World (Christina Milian song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Us Against the World (Christina Milian song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 16:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Us Against the World (Christina Milian song)

The article Us Against the World (Christina Milian song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Us Against the World (Christina Milian song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:41, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Article trimming

Hi there! I realised my mistake for trimming charts in the article for "Despacito" and restored them. Do you have any advice for trimming? I already trimmed around 65,000 bytes but the article is still too long for Wikipedia standards apparently. Brankestein (talk) 21:43, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Brankestein - think we just have to be careful with charts as some countries don't have an "official chart" in the sense that one chart is more important than another. I think you've done a great job trimming it. I think now the best thing to do is organise all of the info about the JB remix into one succinct like Say So (Doja Cat song) did with the Nicki Minaj remix of the song. This would improve navigation greatly, allowing people to navigate to the remix which is clearly more notable in the West and gained significant traction. Also having seperate charts in this way will just help massively (much less confusing). I'd be happy to remove the tags on that basis - I placed them! But it is an arbitrary decision - you can remove them if you think you've done enough. Genuinely, congrats. The article is in MUCH BETTER shape. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 10:14, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Us Against the World (Christina Milian song)

The article Us Against the World (Christina Milian song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Us Against the World (Christina Milian song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:21, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Kyle Peake thanks buddy. Always a pleasure to work with you. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 09:02, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Please fix your custom signature

Please fix your custom signature, as shown in this edit. The opening bold tag and the closing span tag need to be moved so that they are symmetrical and correctly nested. Thanks! – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:16, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Jonesey95, not sure I understood exactly what that meant but I've fixed it anyway. Thanks for the tip ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }-

Thanks! Yes, it's a bit confusing, but basically, formatting tags need to be nested correctly, like "A B foo B A" (A outside, B inside), not "A B foo A B". – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:15, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2Sides (Side 1)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2Sides (Side 1) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 17:21, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2Sides (Side 1)

The article 2Sides (Side 1) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2Sides (Side 1) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 18:01, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Doll Domination – The Mini Collection

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Doll Domination – The Mini Collection you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:41, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Doll Domination – The Mini Collection

The article Doll Domination – The Mini Collection you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Doll Domination – The Mini Collection for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 21:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Kyle Peake Just wanted to say that I am working through stuff, I'll chip away if that's okay. Might not be able to meet the 7 days... will that be okay? ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 09:19, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Yes that will be ok, as we all get busy with our lives and the article is very large anyway! --K. Peake 12:58, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Doll Domination – The Mini Collection

The article Doll Domination – The Mini Collection you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Doll Domination – The Mini Collection for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:21, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Confetti

The BPI website must be behind on the BPI's Twitter announcements, because I certainly did not introduce a "factual error" per this Tweet. – DarkGlow (✉) 16:07, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

DarkGlow technically the source you cited was the BPI website which did not show that information. Therefore technically you did introduce a factual inaccuracy. We shouldn't list certificates until they;re on the BPI website. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 19:48, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Zhmailik

Hey! I’d just like to let you know that there is another SPI against Zhmailik, you can find it here. If you could please help revert the suspected Sockpuppet's edits, I’d really appreciate that. The user is Den Zhmailik42812 (talk · contribs). They are *still* edit warring, removing redirects to not-notable songs, and editing similar/the same pages to the sockmaster + the other confirmed Sockpuppet. Just wanted to let you know! Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 16:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Album singles question

Hey Lil-unique1, I have a question regarding album singles, is there a reason why we are including random songs being played on the radio as singles without any announcement or really any promo from the artists themself? I’ve noticed a lot of random songs always are being played on some radio station in Italy called EarOne. Which to me it’s odd that we have to include them. But is there any rule stating this? If so do you know where? Pillowdelight (talk) 21:34, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Pillowdelight Hi Pillow. There's no single page to refer to as such. The key principle for a single is it should have an independent release from the parent album or body of work. There should be some alternativew mention too like support from the label or reliable news outlets etc. As for EarOne I've never heard of it but then I'm based in the UK and would not know about European radio stations. It might be worth raising EarOne at WP:RSN. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 10:04, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of First Access Entertainment

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article First Access Entertainment you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Archive 10

←

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

Compilation or Reissue?

Hey Lil Unique, there’s a discussion going on Mandy Moore on whether I Wanna Be with You should be a compilation album or a reissue, could you please, if you have time read the discussion and share your thoughts? [1] Thanks! Pillowdelight (talk) 03:43, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Pussycat Dolls Tour

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Pussycat Dolls Tour you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:41, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Pussycat Dolls Tour

The article The Pussycat Dolls Tour you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Pussycat Dolls Tour for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 16:41, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Your comments on me at ANI

I just want to say thanks for what you said about me at ANI. I do indeed have a lot of discographies watchlisted, but nowhere have I said nor would claim or try to imply I "own" discographies. I know it wasn't necessarily what your intention to speak for me but you said exactly what I would have said had I replied (and now I don't feel the need to), but it means more coming from someone else. ANI is just drama personified so I try to stay away from it, even if I'm mentioned there. All in all, I know it was only a couple of sentences, but thanks very much and it's deeply appreciated. Ss112 21:30, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

@Ss112: You are most welcome. I know in the past we've clashed occasionally but are clearly both passionate and approach things differently but ultimately both have the same goal to improve things. I've learnt a lot from you recently and appreciate your depth of knowledge and patience. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 10:28, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Pussycat Dolls Tour

The article The Pussycat Dolls Tour you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Pussycat Dolls Tour for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:21, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

It seems like you have requested a GAN for the Everything I Didn't Say album and I have recently listed a FAC for the popular music group BTS. If you could do the review comments for the BTS article at FAC, then I could offer to do the review for your album currently listed for GAN to try to move the articles forward. Any thoughts? ErnestKrause (talk) 14:16, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

@ErnestKrause: ooO! I'll have take a look tomorrow now as I'm about to log of for the day but thanks for the offer. I'll defo take a look. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 16:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

There's a draft for Draft:Words (Alesso song)

I see you've started working on a userspace draft for "Words" by Alesso. If your userspace draft was to be moved into mainspace, I kind of think it would be wrong for another user to have had their work moved into draftspace for what was clearly already a notable topic and then disregarded or made redundant. Is there any way you can combine your work with what User:Exemleer created and then move the draft back into mainspace? The track listing, charts and release history sections appear much the same anyway. If I'm not mistaken, it looks like you're already aware of the draft and worked on the pre-existing structure of what was there for your own draft. Things like the charts section and the characteristic align="Center" (with the capital C) and citation titles for New Zealand, for example, are the same with some modifications. There's nothing wrong with copying what someone else did and working on it yourself in theory, as it's only in a userspace draft for now, but because of this I think the attribution should be combined, so I'm asking if you're willing to do that. Obviously you're a native English speaker and have expanded on and worded things better than Exemleer initially did so I have no problem if you wish to replace the prose sections with yours (and I don't think Exemleer, if they were aware, would have a problem either). I've expanded the charts section on the draft. Ss112 13:54, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

How did you know I was working on a draft of "Words" by Alesso? That's a bit creepy! I'm genuinely curious to know. I wasn't aware that there was a draft of the song tbh - its a happy coincidence. But yes- sounds like a good idea. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 17:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

I clicked through to your contributions after seeing you revert Thomasamuse at Break My Soul earlier. I thought Thomasamuse might have done another unexplained pop music article edit spree (that they've done a few times in the past couple of years) that you had caught—but it appears it was just the one. Either way, thanks for expanding the draft. I think it's fine to be moved into mainspace already so I'll move it. Ss112 02:52, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

• Regarding this...you were the one who added the dates? Ss112 23:05, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

• Yes Ss112- it was supposed to read December-Jan as in the whole months in 2021 to 2022 not 21st Dec to 22nd Jan. We don't know the specific dates - just that Alesso said it was recorded somewhere between December last year and jan this year. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 23:11, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Everything I Didn't Say

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Everything I Didn't Say you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ErnestKrause -- ErnestKrause (talk) 23:41, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Google Me (Kim Zolciak song)

Hey!

I hope you haven't forgot about "Google Me", however if you don't have the time to fix the article, please let me know. I will try to recruit someone else, if no one offers, I will fail the article as the nominator hasn't been active in a month.

Cheers, MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 22:20, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

MarioSoulTruthFan, hey dude I picked this up today. Were you intending on providing more comments or was that it? >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 15:12, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

I noticed, I left comments there. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:32, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

AfC Review

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that you marked Draft:Medicine (Harry Styles song) as under review a while ago and haven't taken any action on it since then. PHANTOMTECH (talk) 04:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

PhantomTech I approved the draft but there's a redirect waiting to be deleted so that the draft can be moved into the mainspace. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 11:31, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Skyryse Feedback

Hi Lil-unique1. I was hoping to get more information on your feedback at Draft:Skyryse. I understand Wikipedia's notability criteria and thought the company qualified, based on multiple in-depth profile stories in national media like The New York Times.[2][3][4][5][6] If these sources are not good enough to qualify for a page, then there is nothing further for me to do, other than kindly request, if you are willing, that you educate me on how these articles fail the criteria, so I can be a better Wikipedia contributor in the future. In contrast, if the problem is just that the content of the draft I submitted is too promotional, I can give it a second try. Dtearse (talk) 17:27, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Category:Songs written by Hannah Wilson has been nominated for renaming

Category:Songs written by Hannah Wilson has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Richhoncho (talk) 10:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Ooh

I must say, your green signature re-brand looks really nice!

		Cookies!
		--VersaceSpace 🌃 has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

--VersaceSpace 🌃 19:42, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

VersaceSpace Many thanks. I've been "blue" for a long period of time so thought it was worthy of a change. Hope you are well.

Singles?

Hey @Lil-unique1:, I wanted to get your opinion on the Britney Jean singles — “Til It’s Gone” and It Should Be Easy as I don’t see any official announcement for them being released as singles other than sources for them being serviced to French and Italian radio only. And per Template:Infobox album states — “Do not add specialty- or limited-release singles, such as those supplied to radio stations and music publications, which are often marked as "Promo copy" or "Promotional".” As well as Promotional single refers to it as — a single that is made available to radio stations, nightclubs, music publications, and other media outlets by a record label to promote a commercial single or album. So I figured I’d try to get your opinion on what you think this should be labeled as? Single or promo? Or even just song? Thanks! Pillowdelight (talk) 18:59, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

@Pillowdelight: I would not classify them as singles. There needs to be supporting announcements other than "being played at Radio". "Nothing but Love" by Whitney Houston was played by AC radio in the UK to promote the Nothin But Love tour but nothing ever confirmed it was a source. I tend to apply WP:THREE and also some logic i.e. was there any confirmatory sources after the song's supposed radio add date which confirms its a single? It would be highly unlikely that songs are serviced to just Italian and French radio. The UK, US, Asia and Australia are generally the biggest markets for Spears. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 20:04, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Do you think it should be changed to song or promotional single? Pillowdelight (talk) 20:10, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Song. Promotional singles need to be in promotion of something e.g. countdown to the album etc. I would change it so it says "according to [source], "song" was made available to radio stations in X". >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 20:14, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Brian Krock

I added cites for the awards box. Draft: Brian Krock Hope this helps! Mistephake (talk) 20:22, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

RE: Draft: Brian Krock I added cites for career and removed un sourced content in early life. Mistephake (talk) 16:08, 8 July 2022 (UTC)