User talk:Legobot/2013

Task 22

Do you mind running the bot for Task # 22 over Category:Non-free images for NFUR review? The backlog has gone quite huge. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Will start it in a few minutes. I've been having issues with the server I'm running most of Legobot on, so for now I need to start this task manually. Legoktm (talk) 22:33, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Still waiting for the bot run. The backlog is 0 now. --Sreejith K (talk) 06:24, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

That's odd. I was sure that I had ran the bot. Starting now...(will post again when its running). Legoktm (talk) 06:26, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Alright its running now. If for some reason it's just not tagging files properly, It'll have to wait until later this week when I can take a better look at it. Legoktm (talk) 06:32, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

There is some issue I think. The backlog has not reduced. Take your time, but as you know its quite difficult to do this task manually and we need a help from a bot. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:12, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Any updates? --Sreejith K (talk) 05:15, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

School just started up this week so I'm rather busy right now, but I took a crack at it last night, it's something to do with how I'm reading template names. I should have a fix for that ready tonight. Legoktm (talk) 17:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Update #2: It's running! Lets see how many it clears out. :D Legoktm (talk) 08:34, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

It tagged a few from the category, but not a lot. May be they do not have FUR. Also see this edit. --Sreejith K (talk) 22:13, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Hm. I'll do a more in-depth check in a few minutes. As for that edit, my template redirect list was out of date (User:Legoktm/AWB/TR) and I need to regenerate it. Legoktm (talk) 11:29, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

FYI, files like File:2009 Rally Scotland Logo.png were not tagged by the bot. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:39, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Task 20, merging, and undeletion

Please see the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G8_vs._redirected_material. How technically challenging would it be to keep track of redirect destinations in the log file? Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 01:21, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I've been busy lately. I'll try and take a look and comment there tomorrow. It would be extremely easy to keep track of the target, however if that were a feature wanted, I would rather design it as a toolserver tool (similar to how CommonsDelinker works). Legoktm (talk) 06:57, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Archive Indexing

Just a quick question about the archive indexing part of the bot. How often is it meant to edit? per [1] it hasn't edited my index since November. ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 14:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Oops. Turns out the database got corrupted a while back, and the bot has just been throwing random error messages. I'm regenerating it now (usually takes ~1 day) and then the bot should update your index. Sorry about that. Legoktm (talk) 17:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Thought something might have gone wrong, good to see it will be coming back! ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 19:05, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Still not working :/ ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 09:26, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

I moved it to a more stable server, should run at 0:00 and 12:00 UTC now. Legoktm (talk) 07:48, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Syntax error(s) in Syed Mustafa Kamal

The Wikipedia article on Syed Mustafa Kamal STARTS with a syntax error. After clicking 'Edit', it seemed to me that some text had been removed. I decided to report it to someone who might do a much better job of repairing the damage than I could. DavidMCEddy (talk) 21:05, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

I've fixed it. Legoktm (talk) 07:50, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Ambassadors/Courses/Theater History from 1642 (Amy E Hughes)/Timeline

Hi, Legobot continues to tag Wikipedia:Ambassadors/Courses/Theater History from 1642 (Amy E Hughes)/Timeline as a broken redirect, but the redirect target is in fact a blue link. It might have something to do with the Education Program: bit. Can this be looked in to? — ξ^xplicit 01:08, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Yeah...Education Program pages aren't actually real pages so the bot doesn't think they exist. I don't have time to fix the code right now so I just tagged it with {{nobots}} which will hold off the bot for now. If it happens with another page, tagging it with that will be the best solution for now, and I'll try and get a fix together by the end of the week. Legoktm (talk) 01:42, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Ok so I believe this will be fixed when gerrit:46778 goes live. Legoktm (talk) 07:53, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

link migration reverted move

Thank you for helping with the migration to Wikidata. It is a most welcome relief to cease manual interwiki link maintenance.

This slightly confusing edit appears to have reverted the article's move from James P. Hogan to James P. Hogan (writer). Perhaps that error was contributed by the recent move of the article and the bot not checking its snapshot against the current article state? —EncMstr (talk) 17:57, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Seems like it. I was fairly sure I had prevented against this, but apparently not. The bot has been stopped until I can figure out a solution for this... Legoktm (talk) 03:56, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

And  fixed. Legoktm (talk) 11:23, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Alas, this occurred 65 minutes after you marked it fixed. (As an engineer, I appreciate the frustration of thinking something is fixed only to be proved wrong. My sympathies.) —EncMstr (talk) 17:39, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Aaaargh. Killed, looking into it. Legoktm (talk) 17:42, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Ok, think I got it this time. The issue was that the pageid stays the same after a page move (I tested by moving a sandbox around), where I thought it stayed with the original page. My bot now doesn't even use the title, and just uses pageid everywhere. Legoktm (talk) 17:52, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll keep an eye out. —EncMstr (talk) 18:56, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

So far, all looks well: I looked at its last 250 edits where were a little more than an hour's worth. There is this mystery edit where it added five newlines where the interwiki section would normally be. Other than that, I have not seen any bad edits. —EncMstr (talk) 22:51, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Section interwikis

Hi. Legobot keeps flagging Phase velocity for interwiki link removal but both of the interwikis it has an issue with are sections, so there is no problem with them staying. Is there a way of Legobot skipping links that have a "#" in the title, or would that be too much work for little gained? Cheers for all the work you've been doing removing interwikis by the way! Del_♉sion23 (talk) 20:01, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Umm, maybe in the future. I think addbot takes care of this for now so between both bots this situation should get covered. It would require me using less-efficient regexes which I don't want to right now. Legoktm (talk) 00:02, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Numbers are off

I'm not sure what base Legobot is counting in, but for most people, it didn't migrate 48 links... :) --Izno (talk) 03:26, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Oops. It was counting total links locally+wikidata rather than just locally. Fixed now. Thanks :) Legoktm (talk) 22:09, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

User:Legobot/Wikidata/General

Please use [[:File: notation instead of [[File: it prevents them from being displayed. Werieth (talk) 13:57, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Erp, sorry about that. I didn't realize files had interwikis... Legoktm (talk) 13:58, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Question regarding talk page Pope Francis

Hello :-). I was reading at the archives made by your bot on Pope Francis Talk page, and a question occurs. Is it possible that the bot may have archived and deleted some comments from users. I know of one i was looking in particular and can not find it on any of the Archives done... (I have copied the page of this particular one if i need to provide it for you - pdf so not sure how to do upload it). Thanks for your enlightening me. — Ludopedia^(Talk) 08:51, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Legobot accidentally reverting

Just a heads up that a bot edit of "Migrating 2 langlinks to WP:Wikidata" here also reverted the previous edit, which was made almost an hour previously. --McGeddon (talk) 09:29, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I fixed this a while back after receiving similar notes on meta. Legoktm (talk) 03:34, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

GA articlehistory

Hello. It looks like Task 18 has not run since 17 March. Could you give it a kick in the pants, please? Many thanks. Maralia (talk) 03:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

WP:PUF holding cell task

Hello, the task Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Legobot 10 has not run since March 25. I was wondering if this can be reactivated please? Thanks. -- Dianna (talk) 06:13, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

anomie poked this about me on IRC, and I've got it going on tools.wmflabs right now. Sorry about the downtime :( Legoktm (talk) 03:33, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for getting it running again! Regards, -- Dianna (talk) 03:53, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Indexer task

Hello, the Indexer task does not appear to have run since 25 March. Could you please re-activate it? Thanks. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 06:16, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Same issue as above, I'm going to have to rebuild the database, and if I have to do that, I'm considering moving it to MySQL which should be faster. I'll try and have it up in a few days. Legoktm (talk) 03:35, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 04:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Seems like the indexer still isn't working - I don't see any runs since March 24.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 15:20, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

...and still isn't :( PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 04:08, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I'll try and put in some effort to get it back by this weekend. Legoktm (talk) 05:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Bot Flag

Hi there. This bot(Legobot III) is blocked and inactive, as a result its bot flag will soon be removed to try and tidy up our list of accounts with bot flags. If you have any problems get in touch with me on my talk page! ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 10:44, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

RIP. I requested it on WP:BN. Legoktm (talk) 05:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

I spotted :) ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 16:40, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Invitation to a Wicnic in Gainesville on Saturday, June 22nd

Greetings!

Seeing that you've edited the article on Gainesville on Wikipedia, I'm inviting to the North Central Florida 2013 Great American Wiknic that will be on Saturday June 22, 2013, commencing at 1:00 pm, ten blocks north of UF campus in Gainesville,.

If you're able and inclined to come, please RSVP at at this URL.

Type to you later, Vincent J. Lipsio (talk) 20:17, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Legobot and his master send his regrets that unfortunately they will not be able to attend. Legoktm (talk) 01:21, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Image redirects

When you tag an unneeded image redirect for deletion, for example File:Stpauls4.JPG, please use a more precise deletion reason. At present you are saying it is a "redirect to a deleted or non-existent page" which is patently false. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:33, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

You tagged File:November 2006 - 2 021.jpg and a number of other images from the same source for deletion even though they are still linked to from the article namespace. Please check first. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:30, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Archive Indexing

I set up archive indexing at Talk:Printed circuit board on 14 June but so far it does not seem to have run. Can you help? SpinningSpark 11:32, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

The last talk page archive indexing seems to have been on 25 March 2013, per #Indexer task above. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:57, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Legobot task 15

Is task 15 still functional? My archive index hasn't been updated in a while. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 07:24, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

User talk:Legobot/2013#Indexer task: last archive index action happened on 25 March. We really do need it up again... Double sharp (talk) 11:45, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Wikipedia:School of Open course/Round 2

Hello Legobot. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Wikipedia:School of Open course/Round 2, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Does not rely on a page that does not exist. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 09:06, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Bots create edit conflicts

It appears that this bot does not know when another user is in process of editing a page. It just does its task, and then forces the other editor to resolve conflicts. This happened to me when editing the Pinwale page. I had placed a citation needed template, on an edit i had made. and then returned a few minutes later, with the proper cite. In the meantime, Legobot had dated the citation needed template. --Paulmd199 (talk) 06:22, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

No bot "knows" that somebody is editing a page, in the same way that you as a non-bot user have no means for knowing that somebody else is editing a page, which is why user/user edit conflicts are possible. --Redrose64 (talk) 08:26, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Task 13

Hi Legoktm,

is Task 13 (updating Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Wrongly moved submissions) still working? The page wasn't updated since April. This is very unlikely! mabdul 05:45, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

EngvarB

Hello. This robot changed an {{EngvarB}} template to a {{Use British English}} template here. My understanding is that this template is still in use and serves an important function. It should stay as it is and not be changed. Please share your thoughts on this. Thanks. Inglok (talk) 23:35, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

RFCs not getting listed

I've noticed a few newer RFC tags around that aren't getting listed. Here's one example from 9 September: Wikipedia talk:SEVERE#RfC. I'm not sure if I'm missing something but in case this is a real issue I just wanted to let you know. Thanks! equazcion ^(talk) 12:39, 14 Sep 2013 (UTC)

It looks like any RFC tags placed after early 9 September haven't gotten listed. equazcion ^(talk) 18:51, 14 Sep 2013 (UTC)

Ugh. I'll look into this...

PHP Fatal error:  Uncaught exception 'mysqli_sql_exception' with message 'Duplicate entry 'C6F6059' for key 'PRIMARY'' in /data/project/legobot/harej/rfcbot.php:279
Stack trace:
#0 /data/project/legobot/harej/rfcbot.php(279): mysqli_stmt->execute()
#1 {main}
  thrown in /data/project/legobot/harej/rfcbot.php on line 279

Legoktm (talk) 22:09, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Looks like it's working again. Thanks :) equazcion ^(talk) 00:05, 15 Sep 2013 (UTC)

• Hi Legoktm. Thanks again for taking on RFC Bot's tasks. I just wanted to confirm that legobot is also running noticeboards.php, which is the part that updates the WP:DASHBOARD. Just wanted to make sure it didn't get overlooked. Thanks again for all your help. 64.40.54.143 (talk) 02:52, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Oh crap, I didn't realize that was in a separate script. I'll set that up to run hourly. Let me check through Chris's code again to make sure I haven't missed anything else. Legoktm (talk) 00:19, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Yea, it's working again. Thank you so much. I can't tell you how much I appreciate your help. It's very generous of you to keep this running. Thanks again. 64.40.54.128 (talk) 00:54, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

No problem, and thanks :) Legoktm (talk) 01:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

For the record, here's what I'm running right now:

• goodarticles.php - every 10 minutes
• rfcbot.php - hourly
• mfdarchiver.php - daily
• noticeboards.php - hourly
• afdrelist.php - hourly
• frsbot.php - daily

There is also a proposedmergers.php, but I believe that is being handled by User:Wbm1058. Legoktm (talk) 01:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Taking out a note on GA nominations

Hi, could you articulate why you took down my note about Colin Farrell's nomination? Cirt has promised numerous times he will finish working on it but hasn't gotten around to it. thanks!--Aichik (talk) 15:14, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) The WP:GAN page is bot-maintained, based on the content of {{GA nominee}} templates on article talk pages. The bot doesn't expect human edits to WP:GAN and usually reverts them. I suspect that you will have more success if you follow the procedure at WP:GAN/I#Asking for a second opinion. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:00, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you that was very helpful.--Aichik (talk) 22:43, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Task 22

Hello. I just wanted to ask if Task 22 is still functional? Thanks! TeamGale 11:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello again. I wanted to ask again the same because I didn't get any answer or maybe somehow I missed it... Is Task 22 still functional? I am just asking because I uploaded some pictures (screenshots) since August and are still waiting for "approval". Previous pictures that I uploaded and used the same way, were approved the same day. On the table the task seems to be active. I am just wondering if "older" pictures can't be found"...? Thanks! TeamGale 04:20, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Problem on Wikipedia:Good article nominations

All the entries toward the end have Template:GANentry instead of the article name. Leaving a note here in case it's bot-related. I can't see how to fix it. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 23:20, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

@SlimVirgin: the page is currently 134k bytes, and it's too big to display the templates. If you look in the HTML page source, you'll see "Post‐expand include size: 2048000/2048000 bytes" and <!-- WARNING: template omitted, post-expand include size too large -->. So the problem is that there are too many open nominations :P It should automatically fix itself once some pages are removed. Legoktm (talk) 00:52, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the reply. Someone has suggested a solution on WT:GAN, though it's more complicated than I'm able to understand. It is a difficult page to load, so I wonder whether a better solution would be to have the different subject areas on their own pages. Hopefully the people with technical knowledge will be able to work something out. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 17:36, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

It's not bot-related. It was a template change yesterday, see WP:VPT#Good article nominations have crashed. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:30, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Questions about bot's function.

Hello,

Regarding this.

I had knowingly placed both {{rfc}} & {{rfc|sci}} template links as it was my intent to invite comment from both the general community and specifically those with tech interests. The linked discussion has now been resolved, but for future reference is there a way to do this without it being reduced by the Legobot?

(Would it have been allowed if I'd entered the template links on separate lines? Would entering the template links in separate sub-sections be an effective/necessary work-around?)

Thanks for your time and attention,
--Kevjonesin (talk) 00:25, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

If you do {{rfc|sci}}, that should be good enough to get input from both the general community and people with tech interests due to WP:FRS. You could probably use separate sections as a work around, but I don't think that's a good idea. Legoktm (talk) 20:50, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Query about Legobot's capabilities

G'day, I am wondering if Legobot would be able to run a report on which editors have completed GA reviews in a set period? At Military history we hand out awards to editors based on the number of FA, A-Class and Peer reviews they do in each quarter, and some have suggested we should include GA reviews. There doesn't seem to be an automated way to do it at present. Thoughts? Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 12:12, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Unfortunately I don't think this information is stored in the database once the review ends. You could probably find someone at WP:BOTR who is willing to generate a report though. Legoktm (talk) 20:54, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I will ask there. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 23:20, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Task 13 Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Wrongly moved submissions hasn't run since April

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Wrongly moved submissions hasn't been updated since April. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:54, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Why archiving

Dear Wikipedian. I notice that you and your colleague MiszaBot II archive ‘threads with no replies in 30 days’, on some Talk pages. Why is that? Was this line of action ever democratically decided? I would think archiving is only good in situations where the Talk page gets rather full, rather big. If that is not the case, I would recommend to let all 'older' discussions stand. They don't automatically stand in anyone's way if the page doesn’t get very long. That a certain discussion does not get a new reaction within one month does not automatically mean that some (perceived) problem is solved, or that it cannot be fruitfully discussed further at a (much) later moment. Even if a problem for the moment seems totally solved, it can still sometimes be worthwile at a later stage to re-read that discussion – which would be made needlessly difficult if one first has to go to some archive-page to search for it. Corriebertus (talk) 18:55, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Whether or not to archive a talk page is not a decision made by the bot or its operator -- there is an opt-in template somewhere on the talk page (usually at the top) that instructs the bot on which threads to archive and where to put them. If you don't want a particular page archived, start a thread on that talk page and see if there's consensus to remove the archiving opt-in template. —Darkwind (talk) 06:59, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

See also replies at User talk:Misza13#Why archiving. --Redrose64 (talk) 09:10, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Isn't archiving for Miszabot on my talk

Legobot isn't archiving for me in place of Miszabot. Is my syntax okay on user talk:Ross Hill? Ross Hill (talk) 17:23, 19 Oct 2013 (UTC) 17:23, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Legobot only does MiszaBot III's archiving when fired off as a special task, see #How nice to meet a new bot above. Other than that, the {{User:MiszaBot/config}} seems fine as amended here. Just as a matter of interest, why did you switch from ClueBot III (which still works) to MiszaBot III (which hasn't run for over two weeks)? --Redrose64 (talk) 20:07, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Because I found the ClueBot III syntax more difficult, and I thought Miszabot was still active. Ross Hill (talk) 20:42, 19 Oct 2013 (UTC) 20:42, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Beyonce, Archive 11

Could you tell me why these two short discussions were archived. The current Talk page is short and could easily contain them. thanks--Aichik (talk) 22:27, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) If you edit Talk:Beyoncé Knowles, near the top of the page (after the WikiProject banners but before the first section heading} you should find the {{User:MiszaBot/config}} template. Whether threads are archived or not depends upon some of the parameters in there. Not all are relevant; the ones that are relevant are:

|minthreadsleft=4

|minthreadstoarchive=1

|algo=old(31d)

This means that when archiving takes place, a minimum of four threads are to remain on the original page; that no fewer than one thread is to be archived; and that any threads that are archived should not have been posted to for at least 31 days.

At the time of the last archive, there were five threads on the page, so a maximum of one could be archived to leave a four-thread minimum; and the first thread on the page, 'The "Legacy" of an active artist', was last posted to on 8 September 2013 - 35 days before the bot run, so outside the 31-day cutoff. The bot operated as designed. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:45, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

CHU clerk

Seems to be running on some older code; Chris had fixed a few key errors before the bot went down. Any chance to get the latest build? –xeno^talk 22:03, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Chris kinda disappeared so I'm running the latest code in his SVN repo. Do you know what errors the bot is making? I can try and fix them... Legoktm (talk) 22:05, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

• Hmm what I saw in the last pass was : Lower case input leads bot to think username not exist. Let me check my recent req's to Chris. +Also move time to mark reqs done by crats up to 10-15 mins (cuz lazy). I think User:Anomie had also provisioned AnomieBOT for CHU/S clerking so depending on the amount of effort it will take you and how many cycles Anomie has, you might want to co-ordinate with them. Thanks both =) –xeno^talk 22:29, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
• I guess there was some unspecific error with auto-signing : User_talk:Chris_G/Archives/2013/July#CHUS_auto_signing. –xeno^talk 22:35, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Is there a way to trigger Legobot to archive a page (WP:CHU/S), something like {{User:KingpinBot/archivenow}} ? Not a big issue just wondering. Thanx. Mlpearc (powwow) 20:04, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

User talk:Andrzejbanas - Too many threads

Can you put User talk:Andrzejbanas threads into archive, I think it was too many threads. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.176.160 (talk) 07:32, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) First of all, User:Andrzejbanas would have to request this action. Mlpearc (powwow) 20:07, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

How nice to meet a new bot

I thought my talk page was being archived by Miszabot III and today I meet you. So well mannered, but we have not been introduced! I don't mind, coz a bot is a bot, kind of, but it would be cute to let folk know somehow. Fiddle Faddle 22:33, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

I believe it was a one-off, see WP:BON#MiszaBots down. --Redrose64 (talk) 09:03, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

It was supposed to be a one-off...hopefully I don't end up responsible for these bots. Legoktm (talk) 20:54, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Yeah; I just got a bit surprised as well... since when did Legobot do my archiving? :P -- ^t numbermaniac ^c 11:26, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for performing the archiving for Miszabot (which I use on my talk page) using Legobot. Much appreciated. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:55, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Also appreciated here. Any chance of archiving WT:DYK in the near future? It's been over a week. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:24, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Sigma is working on taking over the bot tasks (Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Lowercase sigmabot III 2) so hopefully he'll get to it soon. Legoktm (talk) 03:37, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Legoktm. Soon would be nice. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:53, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Legoktm, it won't be soon. Sigma just finished testing for the weekend (both our talk pages were archived more than once), and according to S's talk page the next major test won't be until Friday (November 1). It would really help a lot if you could do a single run to reduce the major Wikipedia talk pages (WT:DYK is one that's getting quite long in the tooth, as it's been three weeks since you ran Legobot there) that used to be covered by Miszabot II. Thanks for your consideration. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:34, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

I poked Sigma to archive WT:DYK, which his bot did. I've set up one more run in Talk:, User talk:, Wikipedia:, and Wikipedia talk:, and hopefully it's the last one I ever do :) Legoktm (talk) 03:08, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

CHU false positives

The bot is jumping to the wrong conclusions at a renaming request by User:Andys'edtits. It keeps claiming that "The request was made by [[User:Andys'edtits|]]", while the page history (and Andy's contributions) clearly shows that's not true. See bottom of the page here[2]. Yintan  12:25, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) - Perm link for above Mlpearc (powwow) 12:32, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi, sorry if inappropriate for me to comment here. It's my account, I thought I'd requested incorrectly, (still learning) but it was from me, I typed the username not 'signed' it first time - in case that was cause? Thanks in advance, --Andys'edtits (talk) 13:33, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

As far as I can see it's not your fault. Your edit shows up in the page history, so the bot should have noticed that. Yintan  16:06, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Found the bug. For some reason the ' in the signature is urlencoded, so it doesnt exactly match the raw ' in the template. Weird. I'll add a check for this once I'm back at my own computer. Legosock2 (talk) 18:33, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Great, thanks. Yintan  20:33, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you both, seems I have to learn everything the long way. I appreciate the help and your time.--Andys'edtits (talk) 06:38, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

hello again, Andrea here. do you think the problem will be able to be fixed, or would it be less hassle for me to start new account?thanks for your time on this, I don't want to create a hassle job.--Andys'edtits (talk) 04:10, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

You can ignore the bot, a crat will look at your rename request and process it as soon as they can. Legoktm (talk) 04:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Adding oldid when present

In addition to correctly adding oldid when missing, the bot is also adding oldid when present [3][4]! DrKiernan (talk) 08:52, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Ah, I think I've managed to solve why it was doing that: there was a second incomplete GA template transcluded further down. I've removed it[5]. DrKiernan (talk) 08:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Invitation to comment on closed RFC

It appears that this bot has invited users to comment on an RFC hours after it has closed, which is not helpful. —sroc 💬 06:53, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

The closing editor didn't remove the {{rfc}} template, so the bot thinks its still an active RfC. Legoktm (talk) 07:05, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Right, just realised that. Thanks! —sroc 💬 09:11, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Legobot at MfD

{{Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Reward board (2nd nomination)}} was listed at MfD on 27 October 2013 and closed on 9 November 2013. Instead of archiving {{Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Reward board (2nd nomination)}}, Legobot relisted under the 9 November 2013 subsection heading.[6] I removed the listing from the MfD page.[7] Legobot's relisting may have had something to do with how that MfD was closed. Instead of using the archival templates listed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Administrator instructions, close of that MfD used the archival templates Discussion top and bottom. Legobot then relisted under the 9 November 2013 subsection heading. (I then fixed that MfD close[8] and removed the MfD post by Legobot.) Perhaps Legobot can be programmed to change MfD closes that use the archival templates Discussion top and bottom to using those listed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Administrator instructions. -- Jreferee (talk) 14:16, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Invitation to comment on own RFC

The bot has randomly invited me to comment on an RFC that I started. It would be nice if the bot could detect this, but this is possibly to complex. —sroc 💬 04:40, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Heh. That's pretty bad luck if it managed to randomly select your own RfC out of all the open ones :P. I can put it on my todo list, but it wouldn't be very high priority unfortunately. Legoktm (talk) 04:43, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

No problem. I figured it was just one of those things you don't even think about happening, especially with so many names on the list now. Anyway, just letting you know. —sroc 💬 14:57, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Task 15?

Is task 15 (talk archive indexing) running? I tried to set up archive indexing for my user talk about a month ago and it never happened. I can't find any reference to archiving in Legobot's edit summaries for the past ~1500 or so contributions either. —Darkwind (talk) 20:16, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

There are several threads on this topic in User talk:Legobot/2013. --Redrose64 (talk) 00:09, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Bot not archiving all the way

The bot just archived my talk page but didn't remove the items it archived, there still on my talk page just thought I would let you know just in case this has happened elsewhere.--Dcheagle • talk • contribs 09:26, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Legobot RfC Anomaly?

Regarding https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sriracha_sauce&diff=next&oldid=583270697.

It appears that the bot assigned an RfC ID to the RfC template and then immediately removed the template from Talk:Sriracha sauce#Proposed merger without posting anything to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Unsorted. ???

--Kevjonesin (talk) 08:07, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

The first timestamp the bot sees ("16 July 2013 (UTC)") is when it thinks the RfC was opened. I recommend you create a new 3 level header like ===Discussion===, add a simple statement, and put the RfC header there. Legoktm (talk) 18:16, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Right on. Thanks for the feedback. --Kevjonesin (talk) 16:46, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

At WP:GAN this bot is stuck

This bot keeps naming Vedaranyam March as a new article with every edit summary.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:18, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Wonderful. Legoktm (talk) 04:25, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

I just did a manual run and there were no errors in the bot's output. This is weird. Legoktm (talk) 04:34, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Meh. So I'm going to leave the bot running since it doesn't actually seem to be causing any trouble and will examine the issue more in-depth when I have the time (tomorrow). Legoktm (talk) 04:49, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

[9] fixed it. Legoktm (talk) 19:31, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Updating Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot. Thank you. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 00:03, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

WP:DTTR. Legoktm (talk) 00:06, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Frustrating!

Hi,
I'm assigning categories to Wikipedia pages that are uncategorized and the Legobot keeps undoing them. That leaves the articles completely uncategorized which means it's unlikely that anyone will locate them unless they have the exact title of the page. Since these are pages regarding Wikipedia administration itself, it's important that they don't just disappear. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:06, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

You must have missed the pretty obvious editnotice on top of every page. I'm not sure why they need to be categorized, there's a good enough list at WP:RFC. Legoktm (talk) 20:09, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Irritating!

I have recently been trying to put a RFC template for a certain topic/discussion on the Sasanian Empire talk page and your bot keeps removing it. Your bot keeps saying that it is removing an expired template despite the fact that I put up the RFC template 3-4 hours before your bot removes it! Do you have anyway to fix this? This is getting really frustrating and extremely irritating! Keeby101 (talk) 06:14, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

The timestamp directly underneath the RfC template you're adding says "22:04, 26 August 2013 (UTC)". Hence, the bot thinks it's expired. Either put a more recent timestamp or start a new section. Legoktm (talk) 06:18, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

How do I put a more recent timestamp underneath the RfC template? Keeby101 (talk) 02:46, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Emulating MiszaBot III

Hi. Thank you for all the work you do on this project. Please fire off another special task of emulating MiszaBot III's archiving. Thank you again.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 05:14, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome, but why? Legoktm (talk) 05:18, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

I asked because no bot had archived my user talk page in 32 days. I think it should have been archived by MiszaBot III about five days ago, but MiszaBot III is still down.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 05:33, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the fix, I didn't realize that the MiszaBot ARCHIVAL CODE needed to be before the first section header. Hopefully, transcluded section headers don't count.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 06:40, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

The fix worked. Thank you again.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 06:28, 21 December 2013 (UTC)