February 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Plenty on Twenty (slot machine)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 23:02, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Refuge Barmasse. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Refuge Barmasse was changed by Lakitu3222 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.927801 on 2017-02-01T23:02:56+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:02, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/FriyMan, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. J947 23:03, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Oliver Island (Antarctica). Non-Dropframe talk 23:04, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. J947 23:06, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:15, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply