Labrang

Hi all,
Please feel free to leave any feedback or discussion on this wall.
I am doing my best to do everything in line with Wiki conventions and factuality. Let's help each other improve!
Thanks!

RfC on Georgia

I noticed you are a recently active member of WikiProject Georgia (country). There is ongoing Request for Comments (RfC) regarding content on the Georgia (country) article. You are cordially invited to join the discussion because as WikiProject Georgia member you may be able to offer valuable perspectives. Kind regards --LeontinaVarlamonva (talk) 10:08, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the invitation. Responded to both points within the RfC and added my thoughts. Labrang (talk) 18:16, 12 August 2021 (UTC).

Georgian Airways

Hi, I've replaced the logo on the Georgian Airways article. I'm not sure why it was removed in favour of an aircraft photo, as there is already imagery of the fleet later in the article to which you could append. Additionally, as it's a non-free image it will be permanently deleted if not in use. -- AtomCrusher 19:24, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

@AtomCrusher I think that was an erroneous edit of mine as I somehow thought it was this svg logo in wikimedia commons which is about to be deleted. Sorry for the misunderstanding and thanks for fixing it. Labrang (talk) 19:36, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Clarification

Thank you for this overdue clarification. I stumbled upon it because the topic had come up in a separate but somewhat related context.

If I were you, I would go even further. Instead of stressing how it is "identifying itself", better state how it is "geopolitically considered part of Europe." Placing emphasis on self-identification is somewhat misleading because it implies as though that's all that matters. The fact is that 27 states of Europe recently certified its belonging to the continent (in their eyes at least), so it appears that it's more than just a matter of self-identification but also that of fairly widespread acceptance. 2600:1700:20:1D80:C16D:866E:2BAA:DF9E (talk) 06:27, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks and you're right. I am currently more active on the Dutch wikipedia as it really lags behind on the Georgia pages. But I keep an eye on here, and I noticed the slight edit dispute which I didn't agree with. I didn't want to push it now, but my thinking is in line what you say. Labrang (talk) 07:00, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Looks like your changes were overwritten by User:Stuntneare without explanation and now the article again says "organizations across Europe and Asia", which as you said "feels constructed" to distance it from Europe. Also, the introduction was changed to say "South Caucasus" instead of "Caucasus" (it's noteworthy that part of Georgia is actually located in the North Caucasus, so Caucasus was factually more accurate and a better choice than a specific region within). On another page, this same user argued to exclude Tbilisi from cities in Europe, so I think you were absolutely right that all of this "feels constructed". Sadly I'm not able to correct...--104.5.61.212 (talk) 02:53, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Related topic

There's a discussion that relates to one of your recent edits so I thought you may be able to offer additional perspectives. 2600:1700:20:1D80:8C24:1D15:EC36:563C (talk) 04:38, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. The discussion is too long for me to fully read. But my take (I'll see tomorrow if I drop it in an appropriate place in the discussion): Since the list doesn't specify that the city must be located inside a certain (geographical, topographical) definition of Europe, one could interpret "European city" in a broader sense. As I tried to point out before on Georgia and Europe, Tbilisi is considered by hardly anyone an "Asian city". It breathes Europe. It is considered a European city, just like Georgia is considered a European country, as is proven by the fact it is included in ALL the European supra-national structures, including being welcome in the EU, and it is taking part in UEFA and so on and on and on. There is nothing Asian about the country and its relations, no matter how hard people try to fixate on an arbitrary definitional debate on the continental divide. To put it strongly: to hang it *only* on the strict geographic definition is narrow minded from people who can't look beyond their maps. Labrang (talk) 22:13, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Georgian identity

We discussed quite awhile ago now the need for better inclusion and sourcing of Georgian identity, in particular the European identity, on the Georgia page. I have (very belatedly) added a bit on that here. I've tried to keep it reasonably succinct given the already overbearing length of that article, mostly including ideas that were common throughout all the sources, but the sources added contain a lot that could be used to expand if needed. Best, CMD (talk) 14:33, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Apologies for my belated response, CMD, but this is certainly a good addition and gives the right handles to readers to contextualize the European self-identity. Thank you. Labrang (talk) 15:18, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

The Center Line: Fall 2023

Volume 10, Issue 1 • Fall 2023 • About the Newsletter

Features

• A New Future for Road Articles Online

Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi 1979 → on 19:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)