User talk:Josh Parris/Archive 2

Latest comment: 14 years ago by IP69.226.103.13 in topic Abstractions


Melbourne railway stations edit

I'm sorry - the Essendon article isn't bad, but I'm not awfully fond of the format, and I'd rather not see it used across the network, for fear of having to do a cleanup round later on. Firstly, it's too short to have sections. Sections are useful for longer articles, but in standard articles of this size, they just make the thing look bad. Secondly, the language could do with a polish. Thirdly, the second image (and its associated caption) looks amateurish. I also don't think the quick facts box is really necessary - the content can fit fine into the lead section. In general, the content is fine, though - I just don't see why it can't fit into a standard article, as per the others. Ambi 11:21, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

re: whoops :-) edit

Hi - as I guess you noticed, I tend to answer questions on the page they are asked on - keeps the thread together. Anyway, yes copper (and other) mineral prospecting is done with multi-spectral imaging -see [1], [2], [3], [4] and[5] from a quick google on multi-spectral mapping copper. Could probably write a wiki article about this. -Vsmith 13:47, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Script (performing arts) edit

Hey, thanks for that fix. I guess that was the obvious thing to do, but I never thought about changing the redirect.

re: User talk:Harmil#Script; Yeah, I might get my copy of The Complete Book of Scriptwriting back from a friend and see if there's any insight into scripts for stage that Wikipedia doesn't already have under screenplays (he covers a bit about stage play scripts as well). What would you think of Script (performing arts) pulling in info from play and screenplay, to create a general sense of what a script is for, how it's written and why it's different from a book? It would have links to the other pages, of course. -Harmil 13:09, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
PS: Points on Camera diet well taken. I'll see what I can do.... hmmm... I may need a TODO page soon.

DabBot edit

You could try posting to [6] -- Russ Blau (talk) July 9, 2005 14:30 (UTC)

tfd edit

Feel free to re-vote on Wiktionarypar2, and now on Wiktionarypar3 also. This is a new vote, with an explanation as to why I tagged them for deletion. The vote now covers both templates. You may want to read Template talk:Wiktionary for an explanation of the issue behind this. In short, Wiktionary is now case-sensitive, so the entire scheme of these linking templates needs to be updated. Creating these two new ones just adds confusion and is not going to be part of the final solution. -- Netoholic @ 15:52, 13 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

What are you doing? edit

Why do you keep editing my User talk page? -- Walt Pohl 17:05, 14 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

I've been removing links to a disambiugation page; so that Special:Whatlinkshere/mercury isn't so polluted I can't figure out what's linking to it. Because I've been changing so many pages (I don't watch them otherwise I'd have thousands of pages being watched), I hadn't realised you'd changed it back, which is why the changes were made a second time. Do you have a burning desire to link a year old conversation directly to that disambiguation page rather than indirectly via an external link? Josh Parris 23:37, 14 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I just realized that you deleted the carefully compiled list of people named Moore from that disambiguation page. What on earth made you do that, and why, on top of that, did you hide it as a minor edit?

It seems you couldn't even be bothered to compare the two lists before embarking on your deletionist venture. If you had done so, you might have noticed that lots of names are missing from the list you are referring to, possibly orphaning quite a number of stubs. If you had carefully transferred all new pieces of information to the "List of people", we could have argued what the point of removing material from a disambiguation page might be. The way you acted, however, seems rather irresponsible.

Please be more careful in the future. All the best, <KF> 21:33, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

Disambiguation edit

Are you waiting for an opportune moment to jump in with the dab page revision, or are you waiting for me to do it? People keep making changes to the current page.—Wahoofive (talk) 20:25, 18 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! —Wahoofive (talk) 15:04, 19 July 2005 (UTC)Reply
>What is a Computer graphics interface?

CGI, Interfacing techniques for dialogues with graphical devices, see http://www.eos.org.eg/web_en/cat/items/d17450.html MH 20:36, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

"Yoink" edit

LOL! Good one. That Pbase/yalop guy is persistent, I've had to delete a few as well. Jayjg (talk) 04:29, 25 July 2005 (UTC)Reply


Agriculture in Australia edit

What are you asking?--nixie 08:16, 26 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Falls a bit short of a revert war, ;) --nixie 08:37, 26 July 2005 (UTC)Reply


From User talk:Pollinator

What are you doing? Josh Parris ✉ 08:13, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

-Trying to keep the boll weevils out of the cotton patch (ie. trying to keep a major catagory from being fragmented into a useless husk)...Pollinator 08:42, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

You and User talk:Petaholmes seem to have fallen into a revert war. Which I would understand if either of you were, I dunno, clueless newbies pushing a serious POV about some genocide somewhere. A revert war over categories!??!' You're both serious, experienced wikipedians! Talk it out, get mediation, take a break! Josh Parris ✉ 08:28, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, I find it sort of unbelievable myself...kinda feeling bulldozed...I know now what it means to be proof-texted into being the bad guy...being told to build consensus when every point I make is ignored...being told to be polite while being accused of being "pigheaded." Wow! You wanna mediate? Please! Pollinator 08:48, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

Fractionation edit

hi Josh, thanks for your input, i reworked fraction (disambiguation) hope it makes sense. V8rik 21:28, 27 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Sig edit

Are you talking about the link to blocking me? Nah, I added that as an easy shortcut for people, since there's often the urge to permanently ban me :)  BRIAN0918  12:48, 3 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Scottish TV edit

Hi Josh. I just noticed your edit to Scottish Television, but have to say that a link to independent station is inappropriate in a UK context - "Independent Television" is the name of the first national commercial TV network, founded in 1955. -- Arwel 05:01, 4 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I did the best I could with the context. I've added in ITV to the dab page. Josh Parris [#] 05:09, 4 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

DPT edit

Thanks for altering me to the ambiguity in User:Pmanderson/DPT, but I did not mean independent (mathematics); I meant a weak version of logically independent. I am sometimes tempted to hold that the rush to dab does more harm than good; after all, it's providing readers with a mere convience. Septentrionalis 21:19, 4 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

I'm pleased that I got part of the way there - Logical independence does appear on independent (mathematics). I agree that sometimes it is too easy to dab counter to the intention of the author; but if the author was clear on what they wanted to link to and in less of a rush to link then disambiguation wouldn't be necessary. Sometimes in my dab work I actually remove the link, because it seems that the wikifier has basically linked in search of a dicdef of the word - not helpful. Josh Parris [#] 23:29, 4 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Your sig edit

Might I suggest you change your signature to this:

[[User_talk:Josh Parris|Josh Parris]] <span class="plainlinks">[http://kohl.wikimedia.org/~kate/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=Josh+Parris&dbname=enwiki #]</span>

Which produces: Josh Parris #

-- BRIAN0918  03:32, 5 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

A bloody good idea. I've only just started fooling around with it. Josh Parris # 04:36, 5 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Have skimmed thru the concrete page - semms okidoki, esp correcting my misspellings. Oyvind 08:48, August 9, 2005 (UTC)

Hands Productions edit

Thanks for dab-ing the Hands Productions article, but now there's an extra "=" next to 'External Links'.

Fixed.Josh Parris # 08:27, 15 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Australia Post photo edit

Can you retag Image:Australia Post boxes.jpg as {{pd-self}} if you took it? Thanks, Alphax τεχ 05:17, 24 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Re: Accolade (disambiguation) edit

I found that in Accolade (disambiguation) you've linked to brace, but the brace listed there relating to music I don't think is the one you intended. Can you give me an explaination so I can create a differentiation between the existing one and the new one that needs to be created (I imagine going to have to modify the references to brace (music))? Josh Parris # 05:32, 21 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your note. I have no idea what that's referring to now. At a wild guess, I'd imagine I created the disambiguation page in order to facilitate linking, based on an article I edited; the most likely choice for this is my cleanup of Death and the Maiden (song) so checking there might be a start. Really all I did was rephrase the existing text, and clean it up a lot; I didn't fact-check it too much, so it might be that an accolade is not a brace between two staves (which is the usage I would have created the d'ab page in order to draw attention to) but I've no idea. Hope the link helps, at least. Rob Church Talk | Desk 12:38, 21 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

SAGE-AU edit

Hi Josh, I'm wondering how you discovered the SAGE-AU page? :-) Steven 11:59, 23 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

I monitor Special:Whatlinkshere/Victoria for links to Victoria, an ambiguous term. I do this as part of my contribution to wikiproject Melbourne. Josh Parris # 04:41, 28 September 2005 (UTC)Reply
I thought that there must have been a service like that. Very good. Steven 07:20, 28 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Lord Carter edit

It takes a certain ability to transform one's ignorance into a direct attack on the efforts of other users. Well done sir. In the future, if you could refrain from offensive comments such as this one [7], and either take the time to do it right or go find someone to do it for you, it would be much appreciated. Mackensen (talk) 02:49, 22 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Wha? I read the instructions, they made no sense, I resolved it as best I could and left a note. If you find the complicated nature of your peerage categorisation system offensive, so be it. Good day, sir. Josh Parris # 00:21, 24 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Staple edit

Staple looks better. Thanks. (RJP 10:25, 24 October 2005 (UTC))Reply

Braces edit

It's true that this is a plural, but "the braces" are normally considered as a whole - even if you're only moving one sail, which you generally don't, you still need to work with both of its braces. For this reason, "braces" as an article title sounds far more natural to me. PeteVerdon 23:41, 1 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Popups-assisted disambiguation edit

Since I recently started using popups, I would like to know what you mean by this edit summary. Just wondering... --Viriditas | Talk 11:26, 5 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I figured it out. This is so kewl. --Viriditas | Talk 10:25, 6 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Parishes edit

Don't follow you. Morwen - Talk 07:06, 7 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Yes. Still don't follow you. I'm not aware of any X (parish) links at all. The Victoria in question here is actually a Welsh community and would be at Victoria, Newport. Morwen - Talk 07:11, 7 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Scienceworks edit

I worked on the Scienceworks Museum page. You should check it out, tell me what you think. I tried to enlarge it, there is more information. --BeccaRose 21:26, 7 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism edit

No problem. For the cause, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel R. Jennings. Chick Bowen 02:57, 9 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Message to Josh Parris. edit

Hey there Josh Parris, got your message/invite.

What is this meet up?

By the way i live in melbourne victoria.

Pece Kocovski 02:03, 25 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Lets get to konw each other:

1.is Josh Parris your real name?

2.how did you find me?

3.what is your speciality?

Pece Kocovski 02:05, 25 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

umm, how old do you have to be to be at the meeting? i ain't exactly 20-30?

Pece Kocovski 06:10, 25 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hey Josh Parris, how was the meeting?

Pece Kocovski 06:13, 1 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Castlemaine edit

Thanks for your edits to John Perrot. Castlemaine is a place in Ireland - I guess the XXXX kind is more to your taste, as an Australian miner?--shtove 01:22, 27 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

re: COPYRIGHT infringement.. IPxpress edit

We are the agency of record (M/C/C) for CapRock Communications, if you have any questions, please contact Steve Plunkett, Dir. Internet Marketing (M/C/C) @ steve_plunkett@mccom.com or Erin Dyer @ CapRock Communications @ edyer@cprk.com and reference M/C/C. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.195.108.43 (talkcontribs)


Victoria/Australian Esperanto Association edit

Thanks for the fix-up, I intended to do that, but you beat me to it. Nice working with you. Sumthingweird 00:00, 1 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

WP:DAB deletion edit

Heh, I get it now. Sorry, Josh! Pinano 04:26, 1 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Sorry i couldn't be at the meeting edit

it just that, i doubt i would have been alowded to go, maybe next time, when i'm 15.

Anyway, tell me what the meeting was like, i;m sure it would have been great.

By the way, do you knoe some wikipedia users by the names of Sango123 and Pak21?

ps: if i happen to go next year, tell me where it is. Also, you seem like a nice guy, thanks.

Pece Kocovski 09:57, 1 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

homonazis and sodomofascist quotes. See talk (in couple of minutes) edit

Hi Josh, Can you explain why you removed the following. Could you put that explanation on the Sarfati talk page as requested.

he also referred to homosexuals who disagree with anti-homosexual interpretations of the Bible as homonazis, a term which is offensive to most homosexuals given their persecution by Nazis.

Thanks, Christianjb 05:23, 5 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Sarfati edit

Thanks, this isn't the first time I've misread the history page (see my talk page)! Let me make myself a coffee and take another look. I deeply apologize!

BTW, see my comments on the talk page for Sarfati. I am worried that the removal of criticism from the Sarfati page by anonymous editors is making the Sarfati page a vanity page. Please let me hear your comments if any (on that talk page). Christianjb 05:53, 5 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

POV? edit

Thanks again for the comments Josh. I have responded to them in some detail on the talk page. Let me know your responseChristianjb 06:32, 5 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

So sorry, another apology! edit

I added this text as a preface to my comment on the talk page.

(Let me point out here that in my comments below I obviously misread comments from Josh Parris! My apologies! It's late where I am. Christianjb 07:11, 5 December 2005 (UTC))Reply

Yeah, I'm tired and it's late. Don't ask me how- but I overlooked the beginning part where you said "How is this..", I only saw the POV bit after the quote. In any case I hope that I've made the situation clear on the talk page.

Thanks again for your response. Christianjb 07:11, 5 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Yup, well I got my sleep, and woke up to find another series of edits by an anonymous editor once again trying to alter the text on the Answers in Genesis page regarding these comments. I don't know. I think it's highly relevant to point out the reason why these neologisms could cause particular offense is because of the persecution of gays during the Holocaust. They will continually argue that even pointing this out is POV. I'm going to try and find a way tonight of reinserting this connection in the most NPOV way possible. I want people to know that behind the bluster of love-the-sinner-hate-the-sin, this organization is profoundly intolerant. There's also an ongoing fight about my pointing out that Answers in Genesis specifically links to the infamous Leviticus passage calling for homosexuals to be killed. Hell, I'm straight and this offends me- so I imagine it might be of some offense to the gay community.

In "good" news, I did manage to undisputably show that Answers in Genesis openly use discriminatory hiring practices for their creation museum (see the article). They haven't challenged that yet- and I don't see how they can.

Remember, this is a multi-million dollar organization who are anxious to create good PR. We're doing this part time and for no pay. This is a battle. Christianjb 00:07, 6 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Dear Josh, — Thanks for the correction to the Roman Modernism page. Regards. WikiSceptic 17:09, 6 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Tedernst about dab order edit

I notice you've reordered several dab pages. I can't find your rationale anywhere. Certainly MoS:DP guides us that the most common uses should be nearer the top than less common uses. I cannot determine if you're following this guideline or some other. You don't seem to be using alphabetical ordering. Could you please let me know how you determine order? The Fa page is just one example. I reordered to put redlinks at the bottom and you changed it back, or perhaps to a slightly new order. Thanks! Tedernst | talk 17:34, 6 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

See you at the FA talk page. :-) Tedernst | talk 07:51, 15 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

I copied your template edit

I copied your template to Template:MelbPremiumStation and used it in Gardenvale railway station, Melbourne, etc. . The problem is just that the ref to User: will cause the page otherwise shows up in Special:CrossNamespaceLinks Fplay 10:29, 12 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Tedernst about Wiktionary link placement edit

You cited Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) at flashing as the reason to put the wiktionary link at the top. I can't find any reference to this effect on that styple page. Could you please help me find it? Tedernst | talk 07:20, 15 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

If it was a snake it would've bit me. Thanks Tedernst | talk 07:50, 15 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

AFL edit

G'day mate, just wondering if you'd be interested in joining the WikiProject AFL. I've made the project and been creating stacks of articles solo, and I need to find others that can help me out with expanding everything. I've done a hell of a lot, I just need more participants and then this project will be cooking with oil. Cheers, Rogerthat 11:19, 17 December 2005 (UTC)Reply


Lime edit

I see you tagged lime for cleanup, but it looks pretty good to me. Could you please note on the talk page what you mean (or just do it yourself, of course)? Tedernst | talk 02:41, 21 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

thanks much edit

My first award! I really appreciate this. Like most editors here, I'm not seeking accolades, but am happy to see my work is making a difference. Tedernst | talk 14:55, 21 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Happy new year edit

Hey the josh, happy new year and a safe and joyous holiday, its been great chatiing with you.

Pece Kocovski 12:59, 1 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

questions edit

Hey there Josh, how have you been, i've been doing great. anyway might i ask you two things:

1.How do you get rid of the things you look up on a search engine or the bar on the top of the screen eg: when you type up w, then on the bar at the top, it list all the website you've been on starting with "w" etc?

2. first of all, i'm just asking out of curiousty, i'm not going to do it. You know that you can edit stuff on wiki. add of delete, even delete an entire article. if your loged on, it shows who done it. but what if an anonymus person, did it, but on the same computer, does the person get blamed for it?

ps: the second question was hypothetical(is that the right word), i'm just curious.

see you around Pece Kocovski 10:17, 2 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

im back! edit

Hey there josh how have you been, i've been doing great, i forgot to tell you i was on holiday to queensland since the 5 of january, so i wasn't on internet at all. but since i'm back, alot of stuff has changed.

What happened to that donation thing wikipedia needen?

sorry i couldn't answer your questions bedfore but i'll answere them now:

"You must be on school holidays. Are there any subjects that you're looking forward to doing next year? Do you have to read any books over the summer holiday"?

i looking forward to the subjects computers and graphic designs?

"Read books over the school holidays", are you kiding me(sorry if i sound angre at you, whuch i'm not)people so that?

So how was your time from the 5 of january to today?

Pece Kocovski 03:15, 17 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

we have something in common, i can't draw, but i hope top make images on computer rather then paper.

about the fund raiser: did it reach its goal or something, (320k as you said, is alot of money) or was it like "donate money until a certain date but no absolute amount needed" klinda thing, right?

Pece Kocovski 08:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

I guess your right about the practise thing,i will try at least, also do you know what this is: The two-week Arbitration Committee elections will continue until 23:59 UTC, January 22?

i found it on my watchlist.

and this Wikipedia:Gaming Collaboration of the week thing, is it like a thing where you nominate a game article that has no information, right?

Pece Kocovski 08:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image source edit

Are you the photographer of Image:Cement mixer (portable).JPG? If so, could you please say so explicitly? Also, you might want to replace {{PD}} with {{PD-self}}. Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 18:56, 24 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

hi edit

Shadin 15:50, 25 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

First (possible) article edit

Hey Josh Parris it's me Pece, how have you been, anyway i was thinking of making my own article. Its about a Xbox game called: Hunter: the Reckoning: Redeemer. Can you show me to a page on wiki which shows you have to make the design of the article like other games eg: Halo2?

See you around Pece Kocovski 23:32, 25 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

ps: what is a templante?

Pece Kocovski 06:24, 27 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

where are you?

Pece Kocovski 05:07, 2 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

thank you for the help, i just began working on my first article. sorry if i bug you a bit?

Pece Kocovski 02:55, 4 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

John Moore edit

Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. Note that Wikipedia may see print or DVD publication, so we want more content, not more web links. Thanks. Mrtea (talk) 00:46, 1 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

You give me more credit than is due. The links I added were an attempt a disambiguating the bazillion links to John Moore from the find-a-grave list, nothing more. I left the external links in because there was no article on those particular John Moores and the information needed to be preserved. And that was before the introduction of the guideline of putting external links for disambiguation pages onto the talk page. Josh Parris#: 00:05, 4 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Grinder edit

I noticed that the article Grinder (band) has been created and is now marked for speedy deletion, as you added the band to the disambig page Grinder you might wish to weigh in and mark it with {{hangon}} if you wish to prevent its deletion, but it may even be a different band than you were thinking about so not need attention. --Alf melmac 01:23, 4 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please check your WP:NA entry edit

Greetings, editor! Your name appears on Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct:

  1. If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
  2. If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
  3. Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.

Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BD2412 T 03:54, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Meetup in March edit

I see that you are listed as a participant in the WikiProject Melbourne. If you are a Melbourne resident I would appreciate your views on the suggested Meetup in March . Please give some indication of your interest, or otherwise, in the idea. Even a simple "No thanks" with your user name would be welcome and assist in assessing the level of support for a meetup. Thank you.. Cuddy Wifter 06:30, 28 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

help needed form pece edit

Hey there Josh Parris, how are you, listen sorry if i bug you, nut can you help:

i recently put on my user page some userboxes, but i just don't know how to make neat there kinda all over the place, can you help please?

Pece Kocovski 23:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

oops, i forgot to tell you, Yeltensic42 fixed it.

Pece Kocovski 10:59, 11 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Happy easter edit

Hello Josh, how are you. Happy easter (If you celebrate it?).

What have you been up to?

Pece Kocovski 02:04, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:Jackhammer.jpg edit

Did you take this picture? It's marked as PD, but no source is given. I'd like to move it to Commons, so it can be used in other Wikipedias, as well. Could you please update the PD tag? Thanks. --Matt314 11:20, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

User:Tari edit

I just looked at the page, "Inventions: The Strange And The Interesting", and noticed that you dabbed it. Thank you for dabbing it, Josh. :) I didn't realize I linked 'beetle' to an insect page or 'bug' to a page of various meanings. Tari 22:08, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

No worries. I'm here to help. Josh Parris#: 22:23, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:Christine Nixon (TV interview).jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Christine Nixon (TV interview).jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 13:49, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Category:Host Melbourne railway stations edit

hi, i just came across this category u created last year, i was wondering wat exactly it refers to? i would be more then happy to categorise it but really have no idea what goes in it =S. cheers mate --Dan027 15:40, 23 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've made a request of appropriately informed individuals. Josh Parris#: 05:26, 25 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
and what does that mean?--Dan027 10:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Melbourne/Railway stations Josh Parris#: 23:48, 25 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request edit

This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 21:32, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply


Dividers redirection edit

I am very sorry that I am new here and quite lost so please forgive me if I make any mistakes. I am quite confused while I try to learn the ropes here. This is in reference to your comment to me about the redirection of dividers. I do not know how to change redirections and I do not feel brave enough to do it anyway. You say Dividers was moved to the dictionary as it was just a short definition. I believe dividers deserves its own page and that any redirection should be avoided. I am willing to write a short article if someone would create the page which I do not know how to do. Or you can tell me where I can learn to do it and then I can do it myself once I have the text written. I hope you do not mind doing a bit of handholding while I learn. GS3 1 january 2007


How to categorise a page edit

Some weeks ago I created the page Nicolas_Estevanez and shortly after a notice was added "This article is uncategorized. Please help improve this article by adding it to one or more categories," I have looked around and I think I could add the code to the page but I do not know how to find the list of existing categories or on what basis I should choose. I would appreciate it if you would help me categorise that page (military men? Cuba? Canary Islands? History of Spain? Death penalty?...) so I can learn. Thanks GS3 1 january 2007

Dab on archived pages edit

I noticed that you have been editing some of the archives in /unusual measurements/. While the specific edit I noticed hasnt done any harm, I cant help being concerned that one day the bot(?) will change an archive in a critical way; it may be that it was very relevant to a particular discussion whether a person linked to an ambiguous page or not. I would seriously suggest that you skip any page noted as an archive when doing such disambiguation. Rhialto 06:03, 11 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Human. It was clear what the intended term was. I put a {{dn}} in if it's not clear; on talk pages I just grin and bear it. Josh Parris#: 06:06, 11 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why the revert? edit

Hi Josh I noticed you reverted the Melway article recently. Any reason why the new information wasn't valid? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hex77 (talkcontribs) 10:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC).Reply

Basically, who designed the cover of one edition of the Melway is trivia that does not warrant two weblinks to the design studio responsible; it smacked badly of spam. In fact, in my opinion, it is useless trivia even in the context of internal operations of Ausway, let alone an encyclopaedia article about their street directory. Josh Parris#: 23:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Trammel points edit

Thanks for disambiguating the rod to pole. I grappled with that word(rod). I was looking for threaded rod but only the description of the bolt was the most accurate. Was the explanation of how to use the Trammel points clear to you? --Johnalden 01:35, 12 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the feedback. A footnote was inserted in the introduction of Trammel points to clarify the point that you made about the wood beam. Machine screw is probably the best description on the pop up that you inserted. --Johnalden 01:01, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Definitely worth a note edit

I assume then that you are unaware that melway has had the same design look and feel for the last 40 years? The fact that the company is beginning to change their approach after 40 years might warrant a short note.

As for the links. I was not sure how to go about that. Perhaps a link in the external links area may have been sufficient.

Sorption => *Sorp ? edit

Dude, sorp, adsorp, absorp, desorp, are not words. Terminally, the "labial plosive" (like the b or p) becomes voiced (b only). Likewise before vocalics (like other voiced consonants or the vowels). It becomes unvoiced before unvoiced. The consonant at the beginning of "-tion" is unvoiced, so we use a 'p' there. The suffix "-ant" begins in a vowel (voiced by definition), so the end of the root becomes a 'b' (as in "adsorbant"). You can't use an unvoiced there (like "adsorpant") -- that's just not how it's done. Plus, everybody says "adsorb", and *nobody* says "adsorp". Just sounds weird. (Cuzza sandhi). --Dannown 13 jan 2007.

IP edit

Josh, I reverted your edit on IP. The term 'intraperitoneal' does not mean 'the peritoneum', it means 'in the peritoneum' - in fact, it means surrounded by peritoneum except at the mesentery for a viscus and inside the peritoneal cavity for, say, an injection.

The terms you linked to are in fact redirects to the places I already had them linked to. - Richardcavell 00:21, 18 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

ACC account creation interface access requested edit

Someone has requested that this account be given access to the ACC account creation interface access, but you have not made a confirmation edit on your talk page. Could you please let me know if you were indeed the person requesting access to the tool? Regards -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 11:50, 16 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I must have missed that part of the instructions. Yes, it was me. Josh Parris 12:55, 16 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
I didn't miss it. It's not in the instructions. Josh Parris 12:59, 16 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
It is effectively not in the user guide, but hidden away when you sign up to register. Thank you for pointing this out; I shall update the guide shortly to make it more prominent.
I have gone ahead and approved your request so welcome to the team. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on IRC where a bot informs us when new account requests come in as well as the mailing list.
Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day (a day being from 0:00 UTC to 23:59 UTC), although you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked "Account Creator Needed". However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at WP:PERM.
Please keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome! ---- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 14:09, 16 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


Jeremy Soul editing edit

Hey Josh, I was editing a new version of Jeremy Soul to reflect what the references actually reference, here it is. I had a look at the articles in Swedish and in Norwegian and with a rough translation they make very little mention of Soul, and definitely do not support what they assert they do. Anyway I saw you were editing it, so below are my thoughts (and I was being pretty generous!):


Jeremy Soul, or Soul is a British-born Asian dating coach for Love Systems.

Biography Jeremy Bonney was born in 1983 in London, United Kingdom, and gained a Bsc in Psychology from the University College of London.[citation needed] After taking an interest in the teachings of the seduction community, Jeremy Soul took part in a Love Systems workshop, a turning point in both his personal life and career.

Jeremy Soul began his career as a dating coach teaching at Love Systems. He was also voted the number one instructor at the 2008 Love Systems Super Conference.[1]

Recent media mentions include articles in Oslo’s Aftenposten[2], the Las Vegas Weekly[1], and Sweden’s Metro[3] and The Local.[4]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Lax, Rick (October 29, 2009). "Sympathy for the Skeezy". Las Vegas Weekly. Retrieved on November 12, 2009.
  2. ^ Dregelid, Solrun (October 5, 2009). "Seduction School". Aftenposten. Retrieved on November 12, 2009.
  3. ^ Hansson, Fredrik (October 7, 2009). "Så raggar du mitt på dan". Metro International. Retrieved on November 12, 2009.
  4. ^ Demsteader, Christine (October 8, 2009). "Seduction on the Streets of Stockholm". The Local. Retrieved on November 12, 2009.

DRosin (talk) 01:25, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Be bold. I've cited the residence thing, that was covered in the Swedish article. I'm glad someone's willing to trim it down to verifiable statements - the Adam Lyons article got a lot better when all the unverified statements were removed. Josh Parris 01:38, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Jeremy Soul edit

Hey Josh Parris, I remember you voted in an AfD of Adam Lyons, some seduction guy. There is a similar AfD going on with a guy called Jeremy Soul. Any input from you would be interesting as there is the usual meatpuppetry going on I think, so some fresh eyes would be useful regarding the notability and sources on it

Here it is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jeremy_Soul DRosin (talk) 19:58, 15 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Josh, I've had a look at the article, thanks for bringing it to my attention. I've had a go at improving it and put my 2 cents in on the AfD discussion. I think there's a real problem with a lack of coverage for this guy but would be interested to see if anyone else can turn up some more (and more useful) sources. Shockeroo (talk) 00:36, 18 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Research edit

You might want to add yourself to the list of active members at Wikipedia:WikiProject Research. You seem to be the most active non-member. :) --EpochFail(talk|work) 23:22, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Shavua Tov! edit

I'v got the inconvenient habit of addressing complete strangers by their hebrew names. so Yehoshua, thanks for the help. it's good to meet you.

happy 2nd half of Kislev.

looks like a good week so far.

I'm sort of a rehabilitated vandal. as in a vandal tribesperson, locked up, accused of being an untermensch, and released a while later. subsequently i've made several contributions, including fixing 200 extreme POV category template links, resulting in a warning about the moral impossibility of responsibly claiming that judea ever existed, and that the palestinians did in fact occupy land belonging to jewish terrorists before the common era. if this is a POV, then please ban me. i can't really tolerate extreme intolerance. this itself is a form of, in my POV, mild intolerance. intolerance of intolerance is an extremely ethnocentric POV, since tolerance relies on the absence of certainty and the

systematic erasure of inconvenient historiography.

thanks for chatting, adam/david/[1/4]/0.25/'|| User:%D7%91%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%94_%D7%AA%D7%A4%D7%90%D7%A8%D7%AA 04:52, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks :) edit

Thanks for your help with the image problem I was having. :) Greatly appreciated! –BMRR (talk) 04:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

It was a pleasure figuring that one out. Josh Parris 04:52, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Josh Parris. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MWOAPBot.
Message added 18:20, 30 December 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

MWOAP (talk) 18:20, 30 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

See... edit

Talk:MEMS SpinningSpark 16:56, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

I don't recall dabbing to anything other than the full name Microelectrical device, so at worst as things stand I bypassed a redirect. Nothing broken, thank the maker. Josh Parris 23:14, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re: R from incomplete dab edit

You are correct; for example, because "Tomorrow" is the title of more than one song, Tomorrow (song) should have this template. Maybe the template should be better phrased, go right ahead if this is so. Also, happy new year!   Lenoxus " * " 19:31, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Whoops, I indeed misread your original. I should have just linked to this conversation that apparently inspired the template's original creator, Piet Delport, to create it. You're basically right about what I meant — "Tomorrow (song)" could be its own dab, but isn't, to save hassle.  Lenoxus " * " 23:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Meh edit

I didn't realise. Tony Sidaway also did some archive as well... is this a big problem if I do this? Will it adversely effect the bot? - Tbsdy lives (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 09:40, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

No. Now that I know that a bot is handling this, I won't do it any more, I was more just curious whether it would cause any issues. Back when I originally started the admin noticeboard there was no such bot, and I haven't participated in Wikipedia in an administrative capacity in almost two years, so this was news to me! Thanks for letting me know though. - Tbsdy lives (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 09:50, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
I know! It's a change for the better, and one of the reasons I've decided to come back again out of retirement :-) Tbsdy lives (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 10:05, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Abstractions edit

Is there some reason you are discussing the bot about "incorrect name" instead of what the bot is doing? I have no idea if this is still about changing "American Broadcasting Corporation" or not. Is it? --IP69.226.103.13 | Talk about me. 05:50, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yep, because that particular problem is a specific case of a general problem. In the same way the problem with the American Broadcasting Corporation appearing on the main page was a specific case of the more general case of American Broadcasting Corporation being used on pages at all, and thus taken to RfD for resolution (rather than just fixing the main page featured article). Would you support me if I make a very specific application to change all of the instances from ABC->ABC, and then I generalize that for the generic {{R from incorrect name}} case, giving an immediate solution to this problem and a more general solution later? Josh Parris 06:03, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
The discussion was about the specific and it somehow got hijacked into the general. I'm only following the specific, and I don't want to read "grammars" written in that cumbersome combo-style on wikipedia, I just want to quickly look at what you plan to do. --IP69.226.103.13 | Talk about me. 18:36, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply