User talk:Jokestress/2022
Deletionists now control Wikipedia edit
The majority of 2021 talk topics here were deletionists removing articles. 100% of talk page comments this year to date are from deletionists. For more on why Wikipedia peaked in 2007, see Watching Wikipedia's extinction event from a distance.
Nomination of Purple (company) for deletion edit
- (Note on how deletionism ruins this project: Page below was created as a disambiguation of a bar name, like Archie's Place or something. Some spammer moved the original to Purple (company). Now both pages are deleted, and it looks like I created the now-deleted Purple (company) instead of a helpful disambiguation.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purple (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
"Contratista" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Contratista and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 1#Contratista until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Paradoctor (talk) 11:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The article ABM Industries has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
ABM Industries has not been the subject of enough reliable secondary sources independent of the subject to warrant on article. Too many sources are primary, resulting in MOS:PUFFERY, and the only secondary sources provided offer trivial coverage under WP:CORPDEPTH.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cadenrock1 (talk) 13:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
"The Number" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Number and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 8#The Number until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TraderCharlotte (talk) 21:17, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Charles Shaw (singer) for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Shaw (singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mooonswimmer 01:26, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
The file File:Cantor-wp-add.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused Wikipedia-related screenshot. Out of scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:28, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi Jokestress. I was wondering if you have any recollection of why you created the redirect A Simple Heart? in 2011. I can't find any indication that the title of the story's ever been written with a question mark. As such, I was thinking of taking it to RfD. But it's a tricky thing to Google, so perhaps I've missed something? Cheers, – Arms & Hearts (talk) 14:00, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hello! I was clearing a bunch of quiz bowl packets from here. Some answers were styled as questions in Jeopardy! format. You are welcome to redirect it to A Simple Heart or delete it. Thanks! Jokestress (talk) 15:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for getting back to me. If you don't object to it being deleted, how would you feel about tagging it per CSD G7 as you're the sole contributor? – Arms & Hearts (talk) 18:50, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for asking, but someone else can delete it. Jokestress (talk) 00:43, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
"A Simple Heart?" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect A Simple Heart? and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 8#A Simple Heart? until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 15:22, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
"Monster Burger" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Monster Burger and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#Monster Burger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 16:10, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
The article James Laird (journalist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The article does not demonstrate how Laird is notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Schwede66 20:36, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Creating redirects from species to genus edit
Please refrain from creating any redirects from a species to a genus, as you did here. This discourages article creation and confuses the readers. If possible, ask for a speedy deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 13:18, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Your redirect is no longer relevant edit
Digital Equipment Corp. v. Intel redirects to the dec alpha article which contains nothing at all about intel now. ---- Jamplevia (talk) 19:09, 26 December 2022 (UTC)