WikiCup 2023 September newsletter edit

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

  •   Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
  •   Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
  •   Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.

Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
219   Celtis (talk) Add sources
92   North Sydney, New South Wales (talk) Add sources
174   Legal affairs of Donald Trump as president (talk) Add sources
50   Pymble, New South Wales (talk) Add sources
6   Potteric Carr (talk) Add sources
2,315   Papaya (talk) Add sources
1,097   Jesse Lee Peterson (talk) Cleanup
20   Margaritus of Brindisi (talk) Cleanup
4   Charles Wellbeloved (talk) Cleanup
71   History of New Brunswick (talk) Expand
10   Kama District (talk) Expand
554   Saint John, New Brunswick (talk) Expand
12,175   Formula One (talk) Unencyclopaedic
148   Lehava (talk) Unencyclopaedic
46   Maritime Union (talk) Unencyclopaedic
33,166   2024 Iran–Israel conflict (talk) Merge
311   Operation Barkhane (talk) Merge
103   Attacks on the MV Maersk Hangzhou (talk) Merge
35   Battle of Ifoghas (talk) Wikify
261   Sudetendeutsches Freikorps (talk) Wikify
8   Zarghun Ghar (talk) Wikify
5   Eduardo "Chile" Miranda (talk) Orphan
4   Ema Peter (talk) Orphan
2   América Sánchez (talk) Orphan
12   Mentzelia (talk) Stub
18   Wondabyne, New South Wales (talk) Stub
3   Mentzelia decapetala (talk) Stub
5   Najim Jihad (talk) Stub
6   Mentzelia albicaulis (talk) Stub
17   Gandamak (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2024 April newsletter edit

We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.

Our current top scorers are as follows:

Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Candy Mountain editing question regarding date formats edit

I noted you changed the date format in numerous references. Doesn't the global "Use xxx dates" control date format for entire article regardless of the explicit format in the citations, thus rendering your changes redundant? Just asking.Fb2002 (talk) 19:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • I don't think so. Those are instructions to editors and as far as I know do nothing to the display. See Template:Use dmy dates. Abductive (reasoning) 19:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Citation templates automagically format dates according to {{use xxx dates}}. See Template:Use_dmy_dates/doc#Auto-formatting_citation_template_dates 76.14.122.5 (talk) 17:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Calamophyton edit

Hi there Abductive.

I just wanted to confirm that you have accepted my partial reversion of your edit at the Calamophyton page. Normally I wouldn't bother, but because the article is headed to the main page in a day or two via the DYK project, it's important that any content disputes be resolved before it gets there.

Also, I should apologize for my overreaction to your edits - that was caused by anxiety over the pending DYK appearance.

With regard to the overquote tag, I still do not believe that is justified but haven't decided how to handle that yet - the options are to paraphrase Cr. Berry's quote, or ask for further opinions at WT:DYK. As an alternative, you are more than welcome to paraphrase Dr. Berry's comments yourself if you see fit. Thanks, Gatoclass (talk) 14:33, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2024 May newsletter edit

The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.

The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:

The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply