Welcome!

Hello, Indusengineer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Khazar (talk) 16:25, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

PS I did need to restore the wikipedia tags you removed from Rasul Bux Palejo; as you'll see from the policies above, the article still needs proofreading, work on an encyclopedic tone, and inline citations so we can verify the information is from reliable sources. Please leave the tags in place until then, and just let me know if you have any questions-- Khazar (talk) 16:25, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Karachi neighborhoods edit

Disambiguation link notification edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Larkana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Shikarpur, Dadu and Khairpur
Tando Allahyar District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Balochi, Marwari and Punjabi
Thatta District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to British and Hyderabad
Faqir Abdul Raheem Garhori (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Persian
Nabi Bux Khan Baloch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hyderabad
Sanghar District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to British
Tando Muhammad Khan District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hyderabad
Ubaidullah Sindhi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Afghan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re: Karachi modification edit

 
Hello, Indusengineer. You have new messages at Smsarmad's talk page.
Message added 11:59, 24 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Punjabi/Sindhi order edit

Is there any specific reason why you are swapping the order of Punjabi and Sindhi when both terms appear in a sentence? You seem to be trying always to place Sindhi before Punjabi. It makes no sense to me at all. - Sitush (talk) 18:10, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sindh is a province of Pakistan, entire cities of Sindh are densely populated with Sindhis, Karachi is mixed, but if we get deep into historical background, Muhajirs are largest in population, and if you think Punjabi constitute provincial settlement in Sindhi then you are wrong, but if you say on some basis Punjabi should be second anyhow, then Pashtuns are second largest in population in Karachi. In-fact I think we should not all add these ethnics there. Check cities of Punjab, if you could find mention of ethnics like Pashtun, Muhajir etc. Please check and then reply me back. It has nothing to do with anything, Punjabis are my friends and I would also like the same for cities in Punjab, to put Punjabis at first, then Pashtuns. (Indusengineer (talk) 18:22, 25 January 2012 (UTC))Reply

None of that is a reason to move Sindhi in front of Punjabi. You have absolutely no way of verifying which ethnic group is more numerous than any other because there has been no such census since 1931. The easiest, fairest way to deal with such lists is to put them in alphabetical order. - Sitush (talk) 20:01, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Actually, sorry, I was in "India mode" above. You are referring to Pakistan. Can you show me some numbers, please. - Sitush (talk) 20:03, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Which numbers, brother? Please explain, so I may reply back (Indusengineer (talk) 20:12, 25 January 2012 (UTC))Reply
Ok got it, yeah alphabetical-order is good, but in-fact there should be no mention of ethnics at all, as there is no mention of ethnics in other biggest cities like Lahore, Faisalabad, Rawalpindi, Islamabad, Peshawar, Quetta, etc. Only cities in Sindh have been given such ethnics. I come from Sindh, I would love to show world accurate information and knowledge about my province, why would I try to malign beauty of my province, it is taken totally in negative way, by most of people down here. Thank you for pointing me out!

Not sure I follow edit

Hi there. I noticed you were editing articles about districts in Pakistan, and in general I assume you know what you were doing so I just left it, and was happy to remove pages from my watch list. However, I'm not really sure about edits like this one and since you are not supplying an edit summary I'm left in the dark. Why did you remove the year of establishment from the infobox? It seems to be in the article body with a source. I presume you removed the Nazim since Syed Muhammad Ali Shah Jamot is no longer the Nazim, but who is? Why not add the new one instead? As a side note, I think talukhas should not be capitalized. Thanks in advance for clarifying these matters. --Muhandes (talk) 09:10, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Thank you for pointing me out, and considering reviewing article recently edited by me. Brother, District Government was launched by former President Gen: Pervez Musharraf, he had appointed 'Nazim' (Mayor) on basis of establishing 'Local Government' system, Nazims were in charge of each district in Pakistan. This form of Local Government was abolished after elections of 2008, in which political parties, abolished country-wide Local-Government, and reverted back to Commissioner of District in charge of district-wise responsibilities. Please read this, Commissionerate System Restored in Sindh and this. Please update the section, Thanks! (Indusengineer (talk) 09:37, 26 January 2012 (UTC))Reply
As I said, I assumed you know what you were doing. I think such system wide action could have been discussed at WT:PAK first, but frankly, I don't care enough if you just do it and see if anyone cares. It would help if you added an edit summary, something in the form of "removing outdated information". Anyway, why did you remove the establishment date? --Muhandes (talk) 14:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
It was aimless to let 'establishment date' there, since previous form of government was restored, earlier than 2000, when Local-Body government was introduced/established. Thanks for asking me this. (Indusengineer (talk) 15:15, 26 January 2012 (UTC))Reply
Are you saying that the district no longer exists? If so, the article should reflect this with a proper reliable source, since my understanding was that districts still exist, they are just not locally governed. Am I understanding this corrrectly? Side note - why do you keep removing the section heading of the next section, thus mixing up the two discussions? --Muhandes (talk) 16:16, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
No brother, districts do exist, I was referring to the title of form of government that was introduced by former President Gen. Pervez Musharraf. He discontinued 'Commissionerate' form of government (the issues of district were handled by Commissioner of Police), thus he (Musharraf) introduced new system and called it 'Local Body Government', which was abolished by current government recently, and restored 'Commissionerate' (District Commissioner Officer). Thank you for discussing it with me, and expanding my information. Sorry for removing headings brother. (Indusengineer (talk) 18:57, 26 January 2012 (UTC))Reply
I think we have a misunderstanding. I was asking why you removed the date of establishment from the infobox at Matiari District, as it still seems valid, no matter what the current situation is. If you don't mind, I will simply remove it, and wish you well in continuing to improve Wikipedia. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 20:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thank you brother for informing me! (Indusengineer (talk) 20:08, 27 January 2012 (UTC))Reply

Copyright violations edit

Are you clear on this now? Besides the text, I also deleted the image you uploaded as it was copied from a web page. Dougweller (talk) 10:37, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Brother, please inform me more so I can best follow the rules, thank you for informing me, I also checked few times back. Thank you for your help, do reply back!
When you use sources, don't copy them, and make sure that what you write is clearly very different from the source. You can't just make a few changes. Don't upload images you find on the web unless it is stated that they are copyright free and then make sure that you add the appropriate tags to the image. Unless something says it is copyright free we assume it is within copyright in most cases. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 10:54, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much for your efforts, I try from now on to keep strong check-and-balance on source. Thank you brother for lookout! (Indusengineer (talk) 10:55, 26 January 2012 (UTC))Reply

Naudero edit

[1] - some good changes, some bad. Changing "Father of the Nuclear programme" to " founding-father of nuclear programe" is not good - getting rid of the caps was good, but taking an 'm' out of programme and removing the 'the', plus the hyphen in 'founding-father', not good. You've capitalised some proper names, good, but Guar canal wouldn't be Gaur-Canal, why the hyphen? As it appears the article uses British English, 'centre' was correct, not 'center'. 'head-quarter' was wrong, but it should be headquarters, not headquarter. Spelled and spelt are both correct but as the article uses British English spelt should have been left. Dougweller (talk) 15:18, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'm really sorry to trouble you brother, that was not my intent, I actually know about British and American spelling, but I thought Wikipedia was following U.S. English. Once again I really appreciate your time brother for keeping an eye on the movement. I should be careful, always appreciate your help brother. (Indusengineer (talk) 19:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC))Reply
It depends upon the articles, see WP:ENGVAR. Dougweller (talk) 19:38, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thank you brother for providing this informative article on English versions. I appreciate your help, thank you brother!! (Indusengineer (talk) 20:07, 26 January 2012 (UTC))Reply

Disambiguation link notification edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Tando Qaiser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Afghan and DCO
Lahore High Court (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Governor of Punjab
Moriro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Clifton
Teen Talwar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to PPP

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

May 2012 edit

Regarding Images of the Prophet edit

Welcome to Wikipedia! I have read your objection regarding images of the Prophet. I understand your objection and I, myself, do not like or agree with the misleading nature of such images, but for the purposes of this Encyclopedia they are something that is not going to be removed because of Islamic doctrine. Wikipedia has a strict neutrality policy, and is not censored, even on grounds of things that are offensive to religious or cultural sensitivities, and contains a content disclaimer on this very subject. Unless and until the policies on this are changed I would advise detachment from Wikipedia's image policy. If you have any further questions or concerns on this subject, please feel welcome to make a new section on my talk page. Peter Deer (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Also please read Talk:Muhammad/FAQ to understand why those images will not be removed. And you may also want to look at Depictions of Muhammad. The prohibition against images of Muhammad is not universal among Muslims (in fact, depictions are quite common in Iranian households). ~Amatulić (talk) 16:04, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Alright Peter Deer, thanks for reply. Indusengineer (talk) 11:43, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Amatulic, those depictions in Iran, are not of Holy Prophet Muhammad PBUH, but son-in-law of Holy Prophet, named Ali; because Iran is a Shia state, who are actually followers of Ali (remember, this is sensitive issue and it is universal among Muslims to not depict Holy Prophet PBUH, you may watch opening lines in famous film [[2]]. Anyways, thanks for reply Indusengineer (talk) 11:43, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Actually, I have seen several account of Iranian families having images of the Holy Prophet, not his son in law, in their homes. Such images are common among Shia (see this article on devotional images for example). I have also seen (and I wish I could find the reference) a Sunni interpretation that Muslims are forbidden to create such depictions but not forbidden to view them. Furthermore, please read depictions of Muhammad and you will find that the prohibition is not universal among Muslims. It is especially telling that scholars believe those ancient depictions currently in the Muhammad article were created by Muslims. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:52, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Iranians alone don't interpret entire Muslim Ummah. Plus, few families don't represent the entire Muslim Ummah. I cannot take for granted, what you have seen. But, I believe what you are trying to say, that Sunni are forbidden to create such depiction, but not forbidden to view them; however when Islam forbids to create images of Holy Prophet, it voluntarily, applies not to view them (this does not mean that Muslims are never to think about the Prophet Muhammad PBUH; as seeing Him in dreams, is considered blessings among Muslim Ummah; however it is all for the sake of not imagining a Holy personality, that Muslims regard so highest). It may not be universal, it can be based upon sects present in Islam, Wahhabi and Ahmadiyya sects have got such belief about Prophet Muhammad PBUH. Thank you brother for clearing it Indusengineer (talk) 20:20, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 7 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Rasul Bux Palejo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Bengali, Balochi, Siraiki, Persian and Punjabi
Ayaz Latif Palijo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Hyderabad and Seraiki
Awami Tahreek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sindhi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 14 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nabi Bux Khan Baloch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:36, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 21 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shazia Khushk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashmiri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello , I've noticed you're interested to attend Wikipedia meetup in Karachi but I'm sorry to inform you that this meetup to be held on 26th May is postponed due to some reasons. If you wish to attend a later one, which is soon organised, please join this mailing list to keep in touch with us.[3] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.110.236.89 (talk) 09:18, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 29 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hyderabad, Sindh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sindhi
Shikarpur District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Khairpur

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 4 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sind Province (1936–1955), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

June 2014 edit

  Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. 220 of Borg 10:00, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

November 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm TopGun. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. With reference to this. lTopGunl (talk) 17:14, 14 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your edit on List of oldest universities in continuous operation edit

Hello. I have reverted your addition of University of Sindh since the article isn't a list of all universities, only the oldest/older ones in each country, which since there are four universities in Pakistan that were founded during the 19th century means that the University of Sindh, founded in 1947, doesn't qualify for the list. Thomas.W talk 15:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

But there are other universities listed, which were founded in 1948, 1962, 1971 (such as University of Jordan founded in 1962) etc.? Any reason...?(SarfarazLarkanian 16:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC))
*also, Pakistan was founded in the year 1947 not in the 19th century that those universities can be fitted as the oldest for Pakistan. (SarfarazLarkanian 16:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC))

March 2016 edit

  It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you.

Invitation to Sindhi Wikipedia edit

Hi, Dear User:Indusengineer, you are cordially invited to the Sindhi Wikipedia here you may login with same current username and password on Sindhi Wikipedia...Thanks سائين محترم يوزر انڊس انجنيئر ، توهان کي سنڌي وڪيپيڊيا ۾ شامل ٿيڻ جي وينتي ٿي ڪجي.سنڌي وڪيپيڊيا تي يوزر تمام گهٽ ۽ نه هئڻ جي برابر آهن، ۽ مضمون پڻ صرف 5000 جي ويجهو پهتا آهن جڏهن ته اردو وڪيپيڊيا تي مضمونن جو تعداد هڪ لَک کان مٿي ٿي ويو آهي. اسانکي پڻ سنڌي وڪيپيڊيا لاءِ اهڙو ٽارگيٽ حاصل ڪرڻ لاءِ توهان ساٿين جي ضرورت آهي. سنڌي وڪيپيڊيا تي لکڻ لاءِ آن لائن سنڌي ڪي بورڊز جون هيٺ لنڪس ڏجن ٿيون.

http://keymanweb.com/?_ga=1.18878648.141653476.1459151521#snd,Keyboard_mbsindhi I mostly use keyman and I have also installed MB Sindhi on my computer so I can type on computer and anywhere i.e on Sindhi wikipedia through switch between Sindhi, English and Urdu keyboards.

here is Visual Editor http://wikimedia.github.io/VisualEditor/demos/ve/desktop-dist.html#!pages/simple.html

Other sites for Sindhi keybords


مهربانيون

اسد علي جوڳي منتظم سنڌي وڪيپيڊيا Jogi 007 (talk) 10:28, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Eid Mubarak! edit

  Eid Mubarak!
آپ کو اور آپ کے گھر والوں کو دل کی اتھاہ گہرائیوں سے عید کی خوشیاں بہت بہت مبارک۔

Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 05:18, 6 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

July 2016 edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Astronomy in the medieval Islamic world, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

You signed that, and other edits, with the name ManFromMohenjodaro rather than with your Wikipedia User Name. Since the purpose of signing your name is to facilitate communication among editors (it provides links to your user page and your talk page) using another form of signature does not help the editing process.--SteveMcCluskey (talk) 03:39, 17 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Indusengineer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Indusengineer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply