Heenapatill
 | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Bandagharka (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Commentary edit
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles nor are such pages a forum. Thank you.--Profitoftruth85 (talk) 02:46, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Vandalism on talk pages edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Profitoftruth85. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.[1]--Profitoftruth85 (talk) 03:56, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Diannaa (Talk) 06:44, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ram Rahim Singh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. Wholesale removal of large sections of referenced content is inappropriate. If you have an issue with the text, you need to discuss it on the talk page. Thanks. —Torchiest talkedits 17:55, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. See [2] [3] Materialscientist (talk) 13:10, 25 March 2011 (UTC)