Harishsubramanian

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
• Meet other new users
• Learn from others
• Play nice with others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay · Talk 13:09, July 14, 2005 (UTC)

Punctuation

PLEASE use a space after each comma and period. -- Jmabel | Talk 06:44, July 28, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the contributions to smarta. Because of the overwhelmingly predominance of Advaita among Smarta brahmins, I almost accepted that they were equivalent. But as a practical manner, probably 99% of smarta brahmins are raised in advaita. It's interesting you point out that the Iyers apply gopichanda. Kota Brahmins of Karnataka apply bhasma or ash.

Raj2004 00:53, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

Raj2004 00:53, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

India quick links

pamri 13:20, September 1, 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Bharatithirtha.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Bharatithirtha.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 18:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Vedic_students.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vedic_students.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:40, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Gayatri iyer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gayatri iyer.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Hetar 23:24, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Muralidhar_guruji.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Muralidhar_guruji.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:40, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Vedic students.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vedic students.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angr (t • c) 15:55, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Stubs

Hi. Thanks for adding a number of pages to wikipedia, however new pages are orphaned - that is to say, only you know their existence. Please try to add an appropriate stub to your new pages in order to allow users to find your articles and to help you expand them. Best wishes AA Milne 14:35, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

moves

Harishsubramanian, what do you think you are doing, copy-paste-moving Sarasvati to the misspelled title Saraswathi?? (1) please see Wikipedia:moves. (2) Saraswathi is a misspelling. Before you move around major articles, try to at least check your spelling, and maybe make a proposal on a talkpage. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. Also with regard to the bunch of warnings above because you seem to upload image after image without proper references, please make a little effort to respect Wikipedia's rules, thankyou. dab (ᛏ) 08:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Natyasastra

Nātyasāstra is the sastra of natya and i dont know whether you are aware of it or not, the exact title of the book writen by sage Bharata Muni is "Nātyasāstra". And widely all over the world Nātyasāstra refers to the work of Bharata. Sreekanthv 08:16, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Its better to keep the page Natyasastra as it is now. Now there wont be any confusion. I agree that the meaning of natyasastra is sastra of natya only, but as you know its commonly reffered to as Natyasatra of Bharata.

The most ancient drama tradition of world, Koodiyattam ( which is far far old- atleast 1500 years compared to Bharatanatyam )strictly followes Natyasastra of Bharata. The legendary guru Māni Mādhava Chākyār had an indepth knowledge on the subject. Anyway we will try to keep update the page.

Sreekanthv 08:18, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Bharata Muni

I undid your page move of Bharata Muni. All the guys called with that first name are listed at Bharata (including the king). If you disagree with that move, please write here, I will keep your talk page on my watchlist. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:19, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Iyer

An article that you have been involved in editing, Iyer has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments here . If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article.

Proposed deletion of Madhyahnikam

The article Madhyahnikam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find support for the content of this article, fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 01:17, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

"Jupiter(Mythology)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Jupiter(Mythology) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 24 § Jupiter(Mythology) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 18:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC)