User talk:Greenshed/Archive 3
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Lord Trenchard and Sir Christopher Bullock
hello - I saw that you undid my Trenchard edit. My research shows that the Trenchard/Bullock relationship was a vital one at a most critical time for the establishment of the permanent and independent RAF, without which the Battle of Britain would probably have been lost. Trenchard's comments on Bullock delivered by Lord Geoffrey-Lloyd confirm this and I have placed the relevant evidence in Commons.[1] I hope this helps you to see why the edit was made and is indeed of great historical significance. If you think there is a better way of recording the analysis, do let me know. (Hjwb500 (talk) 09:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC))
I note the crossreference is now there which completes the picture. Huguº 17:52, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Notes
Air Commanders of World War I
Hi there, thanks for pointing that out. I re-read the article and I obviously missed that. --Pare Mo (talk) 01:06, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)
The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of List of accidents and incidents involving military aircraft (1925–1949), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://doryoku.org/site/topic/1916575. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Good stuff! Pdfpdf (talk) 09:31, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hi again. The length of the picture of the Indian Air Marshal creates white space issues. On-the-other-hand, the extra length includes the medals & ribbons. (i.e. worth having.)
- I like the pictures on the right edge rather than in a gallery at the bottom.
- What do you think? Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:35, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)
The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:28, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Coordinator elections have opened!
Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Francis Fogarty
|
On April 3, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Francis Fogarty, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 18:04, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)
The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)
The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:26, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)
The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:09, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Alec Ogilvie (early aviator)
I noticed that you had added a red-link to Alec Ogilvie in the list of R.Ae.C. certificates in 1910. I have been looking for information about this Ogilvie but have drawn a blank. He could have come from a family of Welsh coal-mine owners (or owners of Welsh coal-mines) but I can find no proof of identity. Can you help with him? Thanks. --TraceyR (talk) 13:53, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:39, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Alec Ogilvie
| | On 19 June, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alec Ogilvie, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)
|
|
|
June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members |
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:04, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
1944 Cheshunt B 24 Bomber crash
Can you have a look at 1944 Cheshunt B 24 Bomber crash and leave an opinion/comment, I have been researching WWII bomber crashes in the UK and have been adding these to the wiki articles of the locality that they occur in, however I have found a template for aircrashes which suggested that these should have their own article, when starting the above article I have had nothing but trouble. This is also relevant to: LM616 (KO J) Bomber crash 1944 Offley. Thanks Pandaplodder (talk) 18:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
CDS
Well done! Pdfpdf (talk) 14:00, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)
|
|
|
July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy |
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:27, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Reply re St Endellion
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi Greenshed, my co-editor Zangar and I have been further discussing the images on the page on my talk page. Your comments are invited. Best wishes, Andy F (talk) 11:52, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the msg on my talkpage, Greenshed - I'm glad St Endellion is now sorted. Best wishes, Andy F (talk) 08:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Norman Walsh
An editor has raised some concerns at Template talk:Did you know. Just thought I'd give you a heads up. Cheers.4meter4 (talk) 17:52, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Norman Walsh
| | On 6 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Norman Walsh, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)
|
|
A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound |
Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants |
|
|
To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:16, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |
The Milhist election has started!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.
With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team, Roger Davies talk 19:04, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Musical groups established before 1900
Category:Musical groups established before 1900, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — ξxplicit 21:57, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
6*
Six-star rank is a term used to collectively describe the ranks superior to five-star ranks - citation needed. Fair comment. Have you any advice or suggestions on where to find a reliable reference on the definition of 6*? (To date, no-one has come up with anything better, or anything with a reliable supporting reference.) Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 14:05, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- My view is that the article ought to be re-named along the lines of "ranks senior to 5 star rank" because I doubt that there is a reliable source that than backs up the statement that "Six-star rank is a term used to collectively describe the ranks superior to five-star ranks". Greenshed (talk) 18:37, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Good idea! (Or at least, I think that is a good idea.)
- because I doubt that ... - Yes, I suspect / expect that you are right.
- So where do we go from here? Hmmm. Wrong question. I think the "where" is to rename the article. Or have I mis-understood you? If so, please clarify. If not, then I think a better question is:
- So how should we do that? Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 10:54, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- (You can reply here - you're on my watchlist, and I like to see both sides of the conversation in the one place. On the other hand, if you prefer to reply on my talk page, please do.)
Bold! (With luck, it might resolve something, but I suspect it will just be reverted. We shall see ... ) Pdfpdf (talk) 10:14, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)
|
The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals |
|
|
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:26, 21 October 2010 (UTC) | |
I've been WP:BOLD! If I've been too bold, please modify my changes to something you think is more reasonable. Thanks in advance. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 13:30, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Greenshed, as a note for the future, when you post an error on Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors, could you please provide a link to the discussion that you cite? The errors page is a separate page to Talk:Main Page so when you said see below, I was befuddled for a moment. Just a little note about it, thanks, Woody (talk) 00:17, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Royal weddings template
Would you have time to look at what I've said at Template talk:British Royal Weddings? Carcharoth (talk) 21:16, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:46, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Arthur Kellam Tylee
Thanks for contributing to the Arthur Kellam Tylee article. Do you know what happened to Tylee after he ceased to command the Canadian Air Force? I have been trying to find out without success. Greenshed (talk) 20:58, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hi. Coincidentally, I was curious about this as well and I just finished doing a thorough search in my personal references, and online and found nothing. The next time I'm at the local military museum library, I'll check. The only information I have is that he was an officer with the old CAF before 1924. I found no evidence he was with the RCAF - hence my category removal. You wouldn't happen to have any more info about the Canadian Air Force (1920–1924)? I started the article and it could use some expansion. There is some info on the DND site that could be used, but more/better detail would help. I do have some more of my own information but there are some discrepancies with my sources. BC talk to me 21:51, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:29, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Merry, merry
Deletion proposal
- see Category:Aerial battles of World War II re proposal to delete/merge. And a happy new year to you. Hugo999 (talk) 01:27, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Wedding of Prince George, Duke of York, and Princess Mary of Teck
Hi Greenshed. I'm developing a new article, Wedding of Prince George, Duke of York, and Princess Mary of Teck. Would you be interested in helping out? I see you've worked on others like it. Thanks, Ruby2010 talk 23:37, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010
| |||
The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 15:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Category sorting
Just a reminder that DEFAULTSORT uses a colon, for example {{DEFAULTSORT:Rossmanith, Richard}}, not {{DEFAULTSORT|Rossmanith, Richard}}. —Paul A (talk) 02:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:48, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Template:Military ranks
I'm interested in your POV. If the template is not going to contain every sub-rank of Admiral/General/Air marshal, then to me it seems inconsistent to include LtCol, LCdr, Sub-Lt and 2Lt. Your thoughts? Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 01:26, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- To be honest I am not totally against expanding out the star officer ranks but I am happy to go with the consensus which appears to have been against it. The reason why both Lt-Col/Col and Cdr/Lt-Cdr need to be expanded out is because otherwise the generic equivalences would not be clear. I.e. Col = Capt = Gp Capt but Lt-Col != Lt-Capt !=Lt-Gp Capt (fictional ranks used for illustration). It this were the case then the entire Lt-Col, Lt-Capt, Lt-Gp Capt row could be eliminated. Greenshed (talk) 13:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'm ambivalent about what's in and what's out, but I'm a little pedantic about consistency. Yes, I agree that an "entire Lt-Col, Lt-Capt, Lt-Gp Capt row could be eliminated". However, although Admiral & General are 4*, Air Marshal is 3*. I guess I should take it up on the talk page. But perhaps not - there are more interesting things to do! Cheers, and thanks for your time, Pdfpdf (talk) 00:36, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 01:51, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:32, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
|
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:38, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:02, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:09, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 17:58, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Greenshed/Archive 3! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:13, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Kamuzu.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kamuzu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
MILHIST Military Aviation Questionaire
Hi Greenshed! As your MILHIST Military Avation Task Force coordinator, I'd like to conduct a short questionaire to give me an idea of what you would the task force to achieve and the capabilities of yours that might contribute positively to the task force. The four questions of this questionaire are:
- What are your strengths on Wikipedia?
- Which four military aviation articles would you like to see be promoted to at least GA?
- What detailed resources (books, journals, etc) about military aviation do you have access to? Please provide the publications' authors, titles and ISSNs/ISBNs.
- Which three military aviation articles are you wiling to provide assistance? This can be expansion, copyediting, reference formatting, etc.
Please reply by copying and pasting the following at User talk:Sp33dyphil#MILHIST Military Aviation questionnaire and filling it out.
; ~~~ #My strengths #Articles I'd like to see the task force improve #: #: #: #: #Sources which I have #: #: #Articles I'm willing to provide assistance #:
Thank you for your assistance. Regards --Sp33dyphil © • © 09:25, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:12, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:RAF College Cranwell graduates
Category:RAF College Cranwell graduates, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 02:04, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Graduates of air force academies
Category:Graduates of air force academies, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 02:07, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:33, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
The article Orly Weinerman has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 00:35, 11 January 2012 (UTC)