User talk:Gogo Dodo/Archive 33

Archive 30

Archive 31

Archive 32

Archive 33

Archive 34

Archive 35

→

Archive 40

Socks

User:Robofmd is another in the longterm abuser list you are currently dealing with. Flat Out let's discuss it

That account is a different sockpuppet group than the one I just reverted, but I blocked them, too. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:05, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

A "sock puppet" is an account presented to be a different person when it is in fact the same person. I have never done anything like that. I have always identified myself in a totally consistent manner. This is in perfect conformity with the spirit of the Wikipedia rule about sock puppetry. Yet you chose to wield your hammer against me anyway. I am astounded to know that Wikipedia admins regularly treat well-intentioned contributers as though they were criminals.--Tdadamemd (talk) 06:58, 6 April 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.79.255.220 (talk)

Wikipedia has a clear policy on not using multiple accounts to edit. I suggest you go read the sockpuppetry policy for the actual policy instead of what you think the "spirit" of the policy is. But now you've been blocked for block evasion. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:06, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Incorrect data deletion (message back)

Hello, I would like to message you about the recent deletion of my change to the M1911. The M1911 is a Colt made .45 cal pistol, made in the year of 1911. I have changed it because you guys have it set so John Browning made it (when it is a Colt firearm). I have proof of this as of in this link http://www.colt.com/Catalog/ColtPistols/Colt1991®Series.aspx If you think my change is incorrect, please give me a correct reason, and real official proof that I am wrong by messaging me back. I have multiple friends who do in fact work for Colt manufacturing.

signed, M1911 Colt sidearm or Xavier — Preceding unsigned comment added by M1911 Colt sidearm (talk • contribs) 20:58, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:10, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, if so, why don't you give credit to colt firearms for manufacturing it. It doesn't say anywhere that it was manufactured by Colt Firearms. Also when someone talks about it, I always recall it being called the "Colt M1911. What I am saying is, I would like Colt to be credited for manufacturing this fine sidearm (in which I have 3 of). — Preceding unsigned comment added by M1911 Colt sidearm (talk • contribs) 21:18, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:29, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

I'm asking it to be listed in the side bar where most look at first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by M1911 Colt sidearm (talk • contribs) 21:32, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:48, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Tdadamemd

I see that you have blocked a few Tdadamemd accounts as sock puppets of ChrisfromHouston. There is at least one more. I couldn't find a sock puppet investigation, so I created one: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ChrisfromHouston. Not sure what the appropriate procedure is here. —Alex (ASHill | talk | contribs) 21:25, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Opening an SPI is fine. I blocked the new account. I suspect he will be back. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Antony Hickling

Hi there,

i am writing in reference to a deleted article (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Antony_Hickling&action=edit&redlink=1) by yourself. I think that since the deletion the article has now enough relevance enough to be reinstated

A few examples of its relevance. Since he has shoot two feature films. Little Gay Boy & One deep breath.

Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.198.65.119 (talk) 08:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

I only deleted the orphaned talk page. The article itself was deleted through the Articles for Deletion process at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antony Hickling. If you want to request the deleted article restored or be allowed to recreate the article, you will need to discuss the closure of the AfD with Henrik (talk · contribs), the admin who closed the AfD, or make a request at Wikipedia:Deletion review. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:09, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Turritopsis nutricula

It is unclear why you have removed edits Turritopsis nutricula — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leppyiv (talk • contribs) 19:48, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

I understand that T. dohrnii is also a form of the immortal jellyfish but I was referring to the species more commonly found in the Atlantic. This distinction is referenced in this article. Thank you. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maec.12035/full — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leppyiv (talk • contribs) 20:04, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:22, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Mova Nanova recreated

Mova Nanova, a page you once deleted, has been recreated. You may want to investigate if it has been expanded sufficiently. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:59, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:57, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

About Voguedrobe Article

Dear Admin,

I wrote an article about the web page which name is Voguedrobe. I think,I consider the all conditions wiki mentioned. There was no any advertisement content or something like that. Also I gave some external link about usage that site. Actually while I was writing my article, I checked the Facebook article and there was no any content much more than facebook article content. So,I could't understand why my article has been deleted? Could you give your feedback why my article has beeen deleted?

Best Regards,

Claire Miller — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clrmllr (talk • contribs) 08:50, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:27, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Spambots

Thanks for blocking them. I was just getting ready to leave work and didn't have time to finish up. I also got Humaali200 (talk · contribs). CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 06:35, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Replied on you talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:33, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Creation protection

Hello Gogo Dodo,

a few years back a creation protection was put on The Seventh Brother and the original title A hetedik testvér. I have created the article with the German name Bobo und die Hasenbande and would like to move/link it to these articles. Can you remove the creation protection ?

Regards Inwind (talk) 09:49, 11 May 2014 (UTC).

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:43, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Message from Robert5687

please delete this article as it is the wrong one anyway — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert5687 (talk • contribs) 04:28, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:24, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Is This Video is not related to the topic?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwZ1nvau8Bw — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuttMunda1 (talk • contribs) 23:56, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)We don't care if you think it's relevant, it's an advertisement, and Wikipedia is not an advertising platform. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:03, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

i have checked there are too many external links in that article, they are advertising their material, i just posted a video of youtube and you removed it, why not you did it with others? did they pay you for this? LOL — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuttMunda1 (talk • contribs) 00:10, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)Breast enlargement supplements has no external links. There are references to scientific journals, which are not advertisements. If you can't tell the difference, maybe you should try another website. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:14, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:15, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Deep wasnik

Can you please delete Talk:Deep wasnik? It might need to be salted if it gets reproduced again. Thanks. James^x12345 08:36, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 14:07, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Non-block

From this edit it seems that you intended to block User:SujeetKumarPrajapati, but you didn't. I have now blocked the account: [1]. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:31, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

D'oh! Thanks for cleaning after up after me. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:21, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Locked U-KISS Page

I don't mind being locked out. Kids are changing the memberlist so they can take a screen shot and add it to their personal tumblr page for self promotion. I'm just so tired of the disrespect and selfishness. Please lock this page for as long as you can!

Thank you. -a tired U-KISS fan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silverhoneycat (talk • contribs) 05:48, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:54, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Block notices

When you posted this, apparently something went wrong with the block settings, because the account there actually wasn't blocked - I stumbled over it via UAA a bit later, so it's blocked now. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:21, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

D'oh! Thanks for cleaning up after me. I could have swore I applied the block, but it must have gotten lost somewhere between deleting the user page and leaving the talk page message. =\ -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:31, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Source of vandalism

FYI, 4chan has a thread on /b/ that's for picking wiki pages to vandalize. I assume you know what 4chan is like, but if not, beware the content is not for the faint of heart. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:43, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:01, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Message from 68.238.63.208

im glad your on the front lines of wikipedia to stop people from editing it. you must have many friends. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.238.63.208 (talk) 03:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Message from TheTardisAndTheImpala67

Thank you! I've been removing false info on that page for hours. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheTardisAndTheImpala67 (talk • contribs) 07:09, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:12, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Also Is it necessary to report the multiple accounts and IP addresses putting the same false info on that page? I suspect it might be the same person though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheTardisAndTheImpala67 (talk • contribs) 07:18, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:24, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

I know. I'm a Supernatural fan too. Those aren't Supernatural fans, they're fans of a fantasy that's not gonna happen on the show. It seriously gets annoying, you have no idea. Again thank you so much. I'm think I might get hate for this but I don't care. --TheTardisAndTheImpala67 (talk) 07:30, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:36, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

You're awesome. It's ok I'm fine and I'll stick around. Basically (I don't know why I'm telling you this) It's a tumblr thing where you want two characters from a show to get together. On Supernatural the characters are straight. The fantasy I was talking about is them wanting Dean Winchester (the guy that keeps coming up on that page)and castiel to get together. It doesn't make any sense because the characters are straight and are like brothers. I'm fine with this fantasy of theirs but It can get annoying like today and it's not going to happen on the show. It's a pretty cool show, you should watch it :). So sorry to tell you all this I don't know why I did. I guess to let you know that if this fantasy shows up on any article relating to this show is false info. --TheTardisAndTheImpala67 (talk) 07:51, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:55, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

LOL I wasn't too sure if you knew the term. So I explained it. Alright well that's that. Thank you so much again. If you get hate from them, let me know and I'll be more than happy to back you up. --TheTardisAndTheImpala67 (talk) 07:59, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:05, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Definitely will do. Stay gold bro!--TheTardisAndTheImpala67 (talk) 08:09, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Kalol (disambiguation)

I think I may have made a mistake nominating this disambiguation page. Could you restore it? Or should I or the original author simply recreate it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polyglot (talk • contribs) 17:09, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:13, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, my memory plays tricks on me :-) I got a bit confused, apparently there are effectively 2 cities/towns named Kalol in the same country, but the articles seemed so much alike that I thought it was a joke or vandalism attempt. Thanks for clearing it up. --Polyglot (talk) 17:23, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

This page has either been recreated or not yet deleted but it appears the author has requested its deletion I have recreated the talk page to link the diff as evidence of this Amortias (T)(C) 20:42, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Columbus Municipal School District

Dear Gogo Dodo, Why did you take down the district personnel? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anton Barry (talk • contribs) 04:55, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Left you a note on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:58, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Dear Mr. Dodo, the reason I included the names of every district employee, was because the district's website does not accurately list the school's faculty and staff. This is the closest to a website for them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anton Barry (talk • contribs) 05:03, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:06, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Question regarding editing the Justin Moore page

Can you please help me add information about Justin Moore's height without violating the neutrality of this article? One of the most noticeable features of Justin More is his height. It has been listed at several measures, but many people have taken pictures with him and found his height to be exaggerated in most listings. I want to be neutral, but height Is not opinion and I care that truth be honored on Wikipedia. Can you help me?

Truerthanfiction (talk) 18:39, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:56, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Saying I am "obviously" maligning someone by stating truth really gives undue weight to your biased opinion. Its too bad your maligned judgment has so much weight on a site like this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truerthanfiction (talk • contribs) 05:07, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Sandra Guzek

I create the page for an internationally recognized salsa dancer named Sandra Guzek and you wrongfully deleted it. How can we get it back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chimichichi (talk • contribs) 06:19, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:15, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your help. 舎利弗 (talk) 02:29, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Socks

Hey, it looks like the sockmaster of all of the accounts surrounding Zachary Laoutides is actually User:Ignitepictures. They'd been blocked initially for disruptive editing and I indef'd them as a promotional username. They have the earliest edits as a whole. Do you think we should do an SPI just to make sure? It'd make it slightly easier to delete at least one of the articles and it'd probably uncover any sleepers they may have created. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 00:38, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

• I went ahead and opened one at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ignitepictures. It'd be nice to have confirmation and I have a feeling that we'll probably have a few more accounts popping up before AfD is done. I figure as long as it doesn't get as bad as the SEFPRODUCTIONS sockpuppetry cases it won't be too bad, but I do think we'll have at least 1-2 more so an SPI will likely be inevitable. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 00:51, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:32, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Lord Laitinen

• I need your help to rename a file I uploaded. I recently found out that the file named "Lord Laitinen's Relatives, August 2012.jpg" was actually taken by me in June 2013, and I need an administrator/file mover to rename the file as such. Please reply on my talk page. Thanks. Lord Laitinen (talk) 02:07, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:41, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

• Thanks. Lord Laitinen (talk) 04:42, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Message from Fandomgirl

Hi, So i say that you deleted my article and I say what was wrong and I changed it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fandomgirl (talk • contribs) 18:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:34, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, do you think you can help me create an article on her? I'm not her fan, but I have seen how she has helped people and stood up for religious freedom and such, and I really think she deserves it. Thanks for giving me the link to the notability guideline! :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fandomgirl (talk • contribs) 22:08, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:26, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

About the essay of Heilind Asia Pacific

Dear Gogo Dodo,

i am writing to explaining the reason of creating the Heilind Asia Pacific page. We are a company in-charging the the focus on the business in Asia district which generated by Heilind Electronic. By the consideration of some people will search for the introduction of our company, we know that wikipedia is the most famous platform for them when they need to search the information. Thus, we decided to create a wiki page.

Please kindly let me know how should i edit the page to ensure that it no longer be deleted.You may also contact me by email: ivan.lai@heilind.com . Thank you.

Yours sincerely,

Ivan Lai Marcom & PR Officer Heilind Asia Pacific (Hong Kong) Limited Room 1110, 11/F., Delta House, 3 On Yiu Street, Shatin, N.T. T  : +852 26119939 F  : +852 26119626 M  : +852 98487647 | www.heilindasia.com

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Answer truthfully

How do I know everything isn't just a lie how do I know that everything that I'm reading is true — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.218.60.239 (talk • contribs)

Because there is no spoon. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:04, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

List of poker variants

Not exactly sure why you deleted my Poker Game, "Spade and Hand" I read the common reasons, still not sure which part is wrong. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delven1966 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Dez Bryant

its true look it up — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buddhaboy23 (talk • contribs) 04:23, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello Sir, Plz Dont Delete My Article.

You Just Check That Article.. plz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gnets (talk • contribs) 06:33, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for cleaning my mess

I tried to help out a user who made their userpage in the mainspace, but gave it a double 'user:' prefix. You very promptly cleaned up my mess. Good job. Piguy101 (talk) 21:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:57, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

User:Ravishyam Bangalore

Hi there. I noticed you removed the addition of this user at Permanent account number and he has reverted you calling it disruptive. He does the same on Aadhaar and Unique Identification Authority of India. I have reverted all the promotional edits that he has added, but he still keeps reverting them. Can you take a look? Thanks, — LeoFrank  ^Talk 04:05, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

@LeoFrank: I was reverting some spam from a different editor, though on closer inspection, the Permanent account number has far too many external inline links which I will be removing shortly. It appears that Ravishyam Bangalore has ownership issues with the articles that they edit, blindly reverting any edits, and edit warring to get back to their preferred version. Should they return, I recommend reporting them to WP:ANI or WP:ANEW as appropriate. WP:ANI would probably be a better place since the issue seems to be long running and probably needs a longer explanation than a straight 3RR violation. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:36, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Time for a range block?

Pls see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oglesruins -- Moxy (talk) 00:49, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:37, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Edits just a moment ago on Jonathan Wilkes

The most recent diffs weren't showing up for me for some reason, so thank you for fixing the problem (I was still seeing the vandalism). I was trying to undo the vandalism. Sorry. Dustin (talk) 22:13, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:18, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Okay, thanks again. Dustin (talk) 22:24, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

sepp blatter

I prefer my version. What are your reasons for taking out the fact that both havelnage and blatter are widely discredited for their financial mismanagement? Is it that you don't know that to be the case? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimbobsky (talk • contribs) 04:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:48, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Can you show me where these rules are?

Are there rules for my User Page? If so can you show me them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhD Tomorrow (talk • contribs) 19:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Could you explain the end of this note?

This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference.

02:22, 24 May 2014 Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs) deleted page User:Akabluey (Mass deletion of pages added by .wog-wog: Vandalism)

Who is .wog-wog: Vandalism ?

Akabluey (talk) 04:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Akabluey (talk) 04:58, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Your deletion of "Metropolis Rugby Club" Article

Sorry, this is a continuation of my last post...

Being that Metropolis plays at the same National Level as OMBAC...Why would our article be deleted and OMBACs be accepted?

Notability Guidelines state....An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. All content must be verifiable. If no independent, third-party, reliable sources can be found on a topic, then Wikipedia should not have an article on it.

So how was OMBACs sources verified? thank you. Akabluey (talk) 04:52, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Thnx...I just presented the same question to another editor, Anne, using 2 rugby clubs...read below about the inconsistencies of your Copyright Rules.

Deletion of Metropolis Rugby Club Article?

Hi Anne, I'm trying to grasp why the Metropolis Rugby Club Article was deleted for Copyright infringements and Notability Guidelines. So yes, I'm going to pick on one of Metropolis's foes, OMBAC, or Old Mission Beach Athletic Club to help me understand the differences. If I correctly understand the Notability Guidelines, an organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. All content must be verifiable. If no independent, third-party, reliable sources can be found on a topic, then Wikipedia should not have an article on it.

Well, OMBACs members had to have crafted and recorded their clubs history not unlike Metropolis, thru hand written journals provided by Old Boys or retired players. My question then is How is their non verifiable content accepted and ours then denied? As a matter of fact here is a bit of History, OMBAC was founded in 1966, and Metropolis thru the merger of 2 clubs, can trace its founding back before the 60s, BUT that would be added later when those Articles are written and then linked.

My second point involves copyright infringements, again I'm going to pick on OMBAC, If you go to OMBACs website and look at their History and compare it to their Wikipedia Articles History you have the same copy, word for word, and not one footnote or reference is noted on their article back to the website. So why are the same rules for copyright infringements applied differently in identical cases?

My point is that both teams have a very rich history in the formation and the modern growth of the sport of rugby here in the states, and both have to rely on present non-active club members such as myself, to record this history from hand written journals of the past... there are no third party sources, i.e. newspapers did not cover rugby back in the 60's, websites were not around until what the late 90's and references i.e. encyclopedias may cover what rugby is but they certainly do not cover the history of USA rugby clubs.

Hey, thank you for your time, have a great evening and I look forward to hearing what you have to say. Akabluey (talk) 06:17, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Alt account question

I want to make an alt account for my phone since whenever I log in on it, it seems to log me off on my laptop and vice versa. Is this considered a "legit" reason for an alt account? I asked Daniel Case and he said he didn't see a problem but suggested I get a second opinion. Ping me in reply. Cheers. EvergreenFir (talk) 03:31, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

@EvergreenFir: Sure, I see no problem with creating an account for that purpose. I do have a few suggestions: I would suggest is that as soon as you create the alternate account, that you use your primary account to acknowledge that the alternate account really is yours. For example, use your primary account to make the first edit of the alternate account's user page with whatever you like from Category:Alternative Wikipedia account templates. You might also want to acknowledge your alternate account on your primary account. If you immediately acknowledge the account then nobody has to be concerned that alternate account really is you or somebody trying to impersonate you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:15, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Okay! Will do! Thanks for the advice! EvergreenFir (talk) 04:17, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

User Smoestatebusinesstoday

Hello Sir, thanks for blocking Smoestatebusinesstoday. He/she were keep on adding spam links to Patta , here and there, didn't seem to get point after bundle of warnings. I friendly gave suggestion but user were keep on ignoring warnings. A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 08:20, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:26, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Saw your edit summary at AIV and wanted to drop this off. Many thanks for all your efforts here at WikiP. They are much appreciated!! MarnetteD|Talk 05:10, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Its Wahga :p

Hi, Sir I am Here To Tell You Its Not Wagha Its Wahga And I Have a Reason For That See How Its Written In Urdu :p According to it "h" must come b4 g. It MUST BE WRITTEN AS WAHGA

THANK YOU

HAVE A GOOD DAY — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moodywahga (talk • contribs) 06:03, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:08, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Andrewbf's IP address

IP address Special:Contributions/187.194.5.88 recently did same edits. User:Ponyo blocked him/her for 31 hours (has been expired). Can you re-block him/her for three months? 183.171.170.87 (talk) 07:52, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Callanecc has reblocked this address. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:06, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

User Habib construction

Hello Sir, do have a look at LAHORE RING ROAD, (PACKAGE-4)CONSTRUCTION OF INTERCHANGE AT SAGGIAN in which user Habib construction (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) just making patent nonsence in first edit, then another user Faisalriaz7714014 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) blanked that page page. Username Habib construction is also promotional who created that page. He then made edit here to promote his recently created article that you deleted. A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 07:14, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

AGBL Marketing

Dear Gogo,

My name is Saad. I would like to inform you that i am working in Alliance Global Dubai, Dubai media city (Marketing Department). Please be informed that you have misunderstood about our wikipedia usage. We have no intention to use wikipedia as marketing purpose or promoting our products. We know Wikipedia is a place where people can find original content with honest piece of information.

We wanted to add true information about Alliance Global Group.

We were testing with a temporary and as soon as you saw it, you blocked us.

here by i request you kindly to unblock us so that we will be able to add useful info about our company.

Yours Sincerely, Saad Rashed.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.200.109.2 (talk) 08:56, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Your user page was clearly meant to advertise your company. I recommend that you review again the message I left on your account and then follow the instructions. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 15:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Or the same instructions that I left on your new account. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:06, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

problem?

why u delete my stuff? --Growlith31 (talk) 15:57, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:01, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Message from Iameb1

Please don't make abusive change to EB page ... Those who r doing to Mb page are abusers... We gotta stop it pls ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iameb1 (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:08, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Reporting user. Thank you. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 22:22, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Message from Joeshadow09

WTF? Gogo Dodo! Why you delete my page? So immature! let me f***ing alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeshadow09 (talk • contribs) 23:26, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:36, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

COI Tag

Hi, thanks for your help. I get a COI and read as much as I could to amend anything might be wrong. This page was last edited in 2010 and things in MY company have change... but not that much. Everything written here is verifiable. JLFdez Embega— Preceding unsigned comment added by JLFdez (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:05, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Methodist Church Nigeria

While browsing Wikipedia aimlessly, I came across Methodist Church Nigeria which is a redirect despite having text on it. It seems to be a part of Wikiprojects so I'm not sure if I could/should disambiguate or if it needs to. I discovered this because Wikipedia's Random Button found this page, it sent me here instead. -WarthogDemon 20:57, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:45, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Message from Hypervenom890

Yeah, it's not biased. If you would care to look a football news you'd see that Robben was under scrunity for his antics against Mexico. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hypervenom890 (talk • contribs) 04:45, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)