GiacomoValenti

Welcome GiacomoValenti!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 47,377,057 registered editors!

Hello, GiacomoValenti. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful: The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia A Primer for Newcomers Introduction to Wikipedia Wikipedia Training Modules Simplified Manual of Style Creating a new article via the Article Wizard

When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies: 1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly 2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources 3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources Brochures: Editing Wikipedia & Illustrating Wikipedia Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia Help

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 15:06, 12 April 2020 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)

April 2020

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 15:10, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Please cite reliable sources as stated above. Simply adding a ref tag doesn't add a reference - that is deceiving. It must be a link. Also insert the edit and the ref all in the same edit to avoid confusing other editors. Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 15:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 16:42, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Wiki markup cheat sheet

Hi GiacomoValenti, you may find Help:Cheatsheet helpful. Also, you can switch from "source code" editor to Visual Editor, which you may find easier. There is a pencil icon in the editing box with a drop down where you can switch back and forth. I also recommend the Wikipedia Adventure which is an interactive tutorial that teaches you basic editing, including how to add sources, etc. S0091 (talk) 15:26, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

What? GiacomoValenti (talk) 15:35, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

I was just trying to provide some useful information (follow blue links) but perhaps I have just confused you more. S0091 (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Can you stop, your not a Administrator so stop minimodding. GiacomoValenti (talk) 15:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

A page you created has been nominated for deletion because it is a biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and has unsourced content, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create articles about living people that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative, unreferenced biographies of living people, along with attack pages, are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing. Kleuske (talk) 15:33, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

You confused the fuck out of me but Johnny Ciancaglini is consigliere I got the info from a guy who has contacts in the philly mob GiacomoValenti (talk) 15:41, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

See WP:Original research. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 15:44, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

To add to the comments above, content must cite reliable published resources to establish verifiability. Since the the content you wrote, even just in your sandbox, regards a living person and possible criminal activity with no references, it had to be deleted per Wikipedia's biography of living people policy. S0091 (talk) 15:49, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 17:16, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Costanzo. Dirkbb (talk) 13:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 15:52, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:12, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 15:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Hello, I'm TheDeviantPro. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Shad Gaspard, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! TheDeviantPro (talk) 09:20, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of people from Leicester and Leicestershire, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Lard Almighty (talk) 06:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sam Giancana, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 13:07, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gennaro "Jerry" Di Gregorio, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

RedRiver660 talk 15:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

I’m sorry but I made the 2nd account for backup. GiacomoValenti (talk) 01:07, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, GiacomoValenti, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Gennaro "Jerry" Di Gregorio (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.

BRD

Your recent bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and it should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 16:34, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Just do the edit I don’t need a fucking letter saying why. Just say it on the reason for the edit GiacomoValenti (talk) 17:23, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 15:11, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Oh really. Look man you really need to stop pissing people off GiacomoValenti (talk) 16:14, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf^(talk) 16:23, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Hey Alexf, I would like to say sorry for that comment on this message board that was to be sent to someone else who keeps making my time on Wikipedia unbearable. What I mean is someone by the name of Vaselineeee keeps making reverting edits that I make to add to that article. And he’s been doing it for months and I’m fed up I was gonna ask if you could tell him to stop? GiacomoValenti (talk) 14:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

If your edits cite WP:Reliable sources, then you would find your experience here much more pleasant, but sine you continue to virtually never add sources, then you may continue to find yourself in these situations. Please familiarize yourself with the linked page and WP:ILC for how to cite. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 14:24, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nine Trey Gangsters. You have been repeatedly warned (and blocked) for adding unsourced information. This was edit was unsourced. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing again. Please note blocks typically become longer each time. Your last block was for one week. It's time to catch on: Do NOT add information to articles without citing a reliable source.

Additionally, your edit made unsourced controversial claims about living people -- saying that two people are members of a violent criminal gang. You have been previously warned about this as well. Controversial claims about living or recently deceased people MUST cite reliable sources directly confirming the claim. Please read WP:BLP. Do NOT add controversial claims about living people without citing a reliable source for the statement.

If you disagree or do not understand either of these issues, please discuss the issues here before continuing to edit. - SummerPhD^v2.0 20:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC) SummerPhD^v2.0 20:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Carlton Crew, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carl Williams. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:55, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 14:28, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Can you Vastola alone just watch the Morris Levy episode on Michael Franzese channel

GiacomoValenti (talk) 16:22, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Ariel Kiley moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ariel Kiley, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 05:50, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy, as you did at User:Alansohn.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 15:21, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GiacomoValenti. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:51, 11 December 2020 (UTC)