Welcome edit

Hello, Gerry Michael! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Polly (Parrot) 20:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous


Image copyright problem with Image:Michael Rue de Buci.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Michael Rue de Buci.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:30, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Unhelpful, biased, POV edit edit

Your recent edit to the Van Morrison article was uncalled for. Hopefully you will consider your actions a little more carefully next time you make an edit or they could be labeled as vandalism. Agadant (talk) 20:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

POV content additions on Michael Smith (writer) edit

Please be aware the content you added (and then re-added after I removed it) is unacceptable, highly POV and promotional. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a website to promote somebody. I should point you in the direction of WP:NPOV, WP:AUTO and WP:BLP. To be honest I thought I was airing on the side of caution with the content that I removed, but if you insist on reinstating it again then it might just be worth me stripping the article right down until it complies with WP:BLP, because at the moment nothing is sourced (readings, performances, artwork etc. are all just stated without sources). Continual adding of content that is biased and POV is, as was pointed out to you above, likely to end up being identified as vandalism - and in that case will be dealt with accordingly. SFC9394 (talk) 13:38, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply