Futhark1988
Welcome!
|
February 2020 edit
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 07:00, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry edit
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Futhark1988. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:55, 15 February 2020 (UTC) |
Futhark1988 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Kbb2 does clearly not speak the Hungarian whereas I do therefore know for a fact that the Near-open front unrounded vowel does not exist in Hungarian. I tried to explain it to him, I even cited the Hungarian phonology pages, but he stubbornly refused to listen to reason. Therefore I got a bit mad, edited his page as a prank, for which I have even apologized to him, but he still reported me. As all books around the world Tamas Szende's has flaws and errors, but just because he wrote a book does not mean that he is 100% right. Kbb2 did not open a discussion about it where we could have an "adult" debate/conversation about the topic. And I did start a discussion because I know that I am write and I didn't want to cite books that Kbb2 would not purchase or accept. The books referenced on Hungarian phonology should have been more than enough to settle things once and for all. But now that I writing this "unblock reason" I just realized that it is true what they say: "If an idiot shout loud enough, he will get whatever his heart desires." I learned from my mistake so I humbly ask you to unblock me. But still, claiming that a 25-30 is absolutely right, no matter what other pages and actual natives (like myself) say, is just madness. I actually think that Wikipedians should only be allowed to edit pages in those languages that they speak. I know it's a "free" encyclopedia, but that doesn't mean that every contribution is helpful.
Decline reason:
You are blocked for violating WP:SOCK. This, and only this, is relevant to your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 12:48, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Yes, I did: [1].
- The WP:BURDEN to name the exact source that contradicts Szende and simultaneously meets the WP:RS criteria is on you. Using sockpuppets and harassing me will get you nowhere. You're wrong about the absence of [æ] in Hungarian, you're confusing cardinal vowels for actual vowels. The near-open front unrounded vowel doesn't have to be transcribed with ⟨æ⟩, both ⟨ɛ⟩ and ⟨a⟩ are also used. Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 12:04, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- I would add the references of the Hungarian phonology page, all of them if necessary, and every site that has to do with it, but you had me blocked without and actual discussion. If you want to discuss the matter face-to-face, I will gladly pay you a trip to Budapest.
Futhark1988 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did not know anything about sock puppetry up until now. I was actually trying to explain what has led to it. I apologize for all of it and promise to never do it again.
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Futhark1988 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did not know anything about sock puppetry up until now. I was actually trying to explain what has led to it. I apologize for all of it and promise to never do it again.
Decline reason:
Given that (and per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Futhark1988/Archive) you used the second account in an attempt to evade WP:3RR, I simply don't believe this. Nick-D (talk) 04:16, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I've fixed your unblock request for you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:55, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Futhark1988 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did not know anything about sock puppetry. I didn't even know the term, because I rarely make any edits, and I am not a butt-hurt beaurocrat, so I didn't read every single rule. Blocking me is actually a form of punishment, and of abuse of authority. I already apologized for all of it and if that is not enough than that means Wikipedia has become just as toxic as Reddit. I would like to settle the argument (which led to this) by involving a third person (Third Opinion).
Decline reason:
Calling people "butt-hurt beaurocrat" is not a valid use of your talk page. ST47 (talk) 19:33, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
UTRS edit
Futhark1988 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #29026 was submitted on 2020-02-17 22:13:25. This review is now closed.
UTRS appeal #45801 declined. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 01:49, 25 July 2021 (UTC)