Welcome edit

Hello, Funkariffic2! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 23:58, 19 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

This is Funkariffic2 edit

I am not Pumpie and not a sockpuppet, I am Funkariffic2, I am different, I have a high IQ, I am intelligent, smart and brilliant, my English is nearly good. Since I am not Pumpie, I am a different user. Could you unblock me since I am not Pumpie, I am Funkariffic 2.

I am different and not the same as Pumpie, I have a good editing record, not sloppy and messy. Since I had no other users to contact me, if I did, I could create a poll having users to vote for an unblock or a block. It does not affect Funkariffic2. My records are extremely different.

I have defended myself against claims: I have a good editing record. The Article on "Aitoliko Rail Station" was checked a day later (not necessary the same experienced user), it seemed it had approved. On my other articles, it seemed to be approved that the spelling is correct. I edit here and then when my spelling and translations have been checked, if it is correct and exercised, I go on to translate the next article (with correct spelling and grammar), some of the pages could wait for spelling approval in two or three days. My editing is like I shall not burn a fuse or snap off a cord. For Achaia, Ilia and Athens, it is one of my relative's hometown. Later I could create articles about some minor planets and name some of the minor planets, that if I want to edit about those, I have to visit a university and most of all, translations of information not in English (borrowing). I have not translated articles with poor spelling or copyrighted material from the Greek Wikipedia, I have avoided that. Funkariffic2 (talk) 19:28, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have made a promise that all articles that I have made correctly has to be proofread. I have a probability I could ask a proofreader to check a translation if it is not proofread within a day or over three or four days. After proofreading, I can go on to create the next article but not to mess up but with completely excellent translations. There is a possibility that my userpage will be added to Category:Available translators in Wikipedia/Greek. Funkariffic2 (talk) 19:46, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

I am working very hard to keep my editing skills perfect. My translations are about perfect. I am writing very hard to avoid incorrect grammar. Funkariffic2 (talk) 16:12, 28 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Atromitos Lappa edit

 

The article Atromitos Lappa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Local club which has never appeared in a national cup. Fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kosm1fent 14:20, 19 April 2012 (UTC)Reply