World Magnetic Tour edit

Hi there. Can you please refrain from editing the tour dates section? As you can see, there are substantial breaks of two weeks or more in between some of the touring legs, which enable the band members to fly home to spend time with their respective families. Combining different legs together make the dates look consecutive, which is not the case. (Freak.scenery (talk) 21:44, 17 May 2010 (UTC))Reply

The general precedent I follow is that if there is a gap of two weeks or more between dates, the leg is split up into different parts, since it is apparent that they are not part of the same "leg". Touring legs within the same continent may be consecutive, but the dates as a whole are not. The large gap between the second and third Latin American legs is a good example of this.
I think when the tour dates were presented like this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=World_Magnetic_Tour&oldid=347699744, it was difficult to present the dates as different parts as it caused too many breaks in the script. Now, with the change in appearance I feel the listings flow better while making it easy to identify the longer breaks in the touring schedule. (Freak.scenery (talk) 12:12, 18 May 2010 (UTC))Reply
But there's a gap of more than two weeks in between the parts of the Oceania leg, unlike the AC/DC schedule, which is why it is split into two. It would be confusing to make other breaks in the schedule apparent while leave this one as it is. (Freak.scenery (talk) 12:26, 19 May 2010 (UTC))Reply
So you think that by splitting up the dates into two parts it somehow diminishes the triumphant leg from Metallica? I don't feel that's a valid reason to make the change. The band members actually leave the continent and return for the second part (leg) of Oceania dates. Yes, Metallica have implemented a very stop/start schedule to this tour; that's the reality of the situation.
The gap between the the fifth and sixth Europe legs is more than two weeks, so they are split up. (Freak.scenery (talk) 17:30, 20 May 2010 (UTC))Reply
You could start a discussion here to reach consensus on this: Talk:World Magnetic Tour. (Freak.scenery (talk) 22:02, 20 May 2010 (UTC))Reply
Please do not edit the article until consensus is reached on this. Thanks. (Freak.scenery (talk) 22:18, 20 May 2010 (UTC))Reply

Hmm... don't like the idea of putting months or years in headers as such info is already listed in the date column. By looking at the columns I think it will be apparent to the reader that the dates are divided into the "January leg" and "March leg" of 2010. (Freak.scenery (talk) 12:04, 22 May 2010 (UTC))Reply

I think it is best to keep both months and years out of the headers as they are already listed in the date column. (Freak.scenery (talk) 19:17, 23 May 2010 (UTC))Reply
No. I don't like it compared to how it was presented already. Looks very cramped, especially with flag icons, city and country names all in one column. (Freak.scenery (talk) 21:12, 25 May 2010 (UTC))Reply
You can do as you like, but I really don't see the point of using up your time for that; the way it is already presented flows much more clearly and is legible. (Freak.scenery (talk) 21:36, 25 May 2010 (UTC))Reply

World Magnetic Tour edit

Hi. The reason that I edit the legs together is because they are the same continent. In my opinion, it is unnecessary to divide the dates up even more. On the band's website, they clearly announce each new visit to continents as a tour. So I am actually re-editing the dates as the band puts them. Please write back your thoughts on this. We should make an agreement that we both accept. (talk)

At least keep Australia and New Zealand as one whole. Becuase as you could see, I didn't write them as "legs", I just wrote "Australia and New Zealand". The ACDC page for the "Black Ice World Tour" shows what I mean.

I'm actually from Melbourne, and I've been waiting for Metallica to return for 6 years. I think that me, along with other people here, enjoy seeing a triumphant leg of long shows from Metallica. I was trying to enforce that, because it really is a long tour here from Metallica, at least thats what I think they're intending. So if it could be a long leg, not divided in two, it would make me feel a lot happier.

Welcome! edit

Hello, Franticflare14! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Footwarrior (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

WP:NPA edit

I don't appreciate this. Try leaving an edit summary so that people know what's going on. Radiopathy •talk• 00:05, 20 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, 2011 Dates edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, 2011 Dates. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Metallica 2011 Tour. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Metallica 2011 Tour - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. First Light (talk) 16:55, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Metallica 2011 Tour edit

 

The article Metallica 2011 Tour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is not a tour. Playing four shows at three distinct festivals over a six month period is not a tour. As such the entire concept of "Metallica 2011 Tour" is made-up

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:19, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Foo Fighters tours and FooFightersLive.com edit

Hello, I would like to know why you have blatently copied all of the material from my website foofighterslive.com for the Foo Fighters tour pages you have created? It is clear you just copied everything since you have listed all of the shows I have (Many of which are not tour dates, but special appearances such as radio shows) and used the same venue titles. This may be public knowledge to an extent but you have still copied copyrighted content from my website without consent. I shall be reporting this to Wikipedia. 04:09, 3 February 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skilmore (talkcontribs)

Oh sure you got it from setlist.fm, that's why they were exactly the same as my pages, word for word, including mispelled venue names and spelling mistakes. The information on my site is copyrighted, it's not public domain information, it's personally researched information. I'm not copyrighting the performances themselves, but the information on them. If someone publishes a book on Foo Fighters the content is copyrighted even if other people might know it. Anyway it doesn't matter, Wikipedia agreed with me and removed the content. Skilmore (talk) 14:30, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Because I want people to visit my website for the information, not a copied and pasted version of it on Wikipedia. Most Foo Fighters fans are aware of my website, and they know it's as factually correct as possible. Why do you need the exact same information on wikipedia, which many people know can be edited by anyone and could be wrong? You're obviously young so maybe when you're older you'll understand this better, you can't just rip someone elses hard work off. It's nothing to do with being selfish. Skilmore (talk) 14:59, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

Your account has been blocked for one week after repeatedly adding copyright information in table form to Foo Fighters articles despite warnings over months to not do so. Should you continue to add copyright violations after your block expires, this account may be blocked permanently. Keegan (talk) 06:39, 18 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply