Franklin90210
Welcome!
Hello, Franklin90210, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Comparison of development estimation software, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! The Bushranger One ping only 20:16, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
The article Comparison of development estimation software has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- WP:NOTDIRECTORY; unencyclopedic. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place to go to see which software would be best to buy for your company.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Bushranger One ping only 20:16, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
The article Comparison of development estimation software has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not need only three notable software items. See also link is sufficient.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mootros (talk) 21:52, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
The article ProjectCodeMeter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Does not meet the general notability guideline
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mootros (talk) 17:36, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
The article AFCAA REVIC has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Does not meet the general notability guideline
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mootros (talk) 17:36, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Help edit
{{helpme}} someone seems to be out on a mission to delete my articles... i'm a software consultant with over 13 years of experience in this field, and i see nothing incorrect with my articles, as there are many other similar articles on wikipedia. Would appreciate help... Thanks
- You also asked for help at one of the help desks, and you have received a reply there. See Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests#unfair_article_deletion. (I moved your question down to the bottom of the page; see the talk page guidelines) -- John of Reading (talk) 13:51, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Comparison of development estimation software for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison of development estimation software is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of development estimation software until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ArcAngel (talk) ) 03:27, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of ProjectCodeMeter for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ProjectCodeMeter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProjectCodeMeter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ArcAngel (talk) ) 03:52, 17 May 2011 (UTC)