Et43

Et43, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Et43! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

I have reverted your edits to Rachel Yeoh and Michelle Yeoh (socialite) because they are contrary to the information provided in the sources. Please do not change or remove information without providing the proper sources. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 22:30, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

If you have done your research properly you would know that your facts are incorrect and you have removed additional information. No source has mentioned that they are socialites. Et43 (talk) 00:22, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Hostile behavior is not welcomed on Wikipedia, so I will disregard your tone. Anyway, / this source refers to them as socialites, and / this source refers to them as fashion influencers. Not to mention they are the first cousins of Ruth Yeoh and Rebekah Yeoh (as these two are daughters of Francis Yeoh, the brother of Michael Yeoh who is Michelle & Rachel's father). The Yeoh family is of Malaysian Chinese ancestry, hence the Chinese surname. All of these points, among others you have contradicted with your edits, have been clarified through sources already provided. Your information contradicts what the sources reflect, and on Wikipedia information should be sourced and cited. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 03:54, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Instead of continuously reverting edits that are based off sources, which is WP:Edit War behavior, you can start a discussion on the article's talk page and try to reach a consensus. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 03:59, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

I have recommended using the talk page to reach consensus and have informed you of edit warring behavior. Your edits are non-constructive because there is no reliable information to back them up. And removing sources is not helpful. If you continue to engage in this behavior, I will request that you be blocked from editing. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 18:23, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

I have reverted your edits because they have been constructed on opinion. Your 'sources' are opinions. If you google Malaysia Tatler March 2017 cover for instance you will see that they are on the cover. You keep changing that they walked as models for the Dolce & Gabbana fashion show. If they walked as models they are models. They have also modelled for many magazines and done many features. They are not socialites, that is so derogatory of you to suggest this. They have law degrees and are heavily involved in many charities and philanthropy work. The British Fashion Council is an example of this. If you search on Instagram, you would also know.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Et43 (talk • contribs)

My edits are not based off of opinions, but on the articles cited in the article which are credible sources. I have no opinions on either subject. If you check the two sources for the Tatler references, one is for Malaysia Tatler and the other is for Hong Kong Tatler. The sources shows that walked in a fashion show featuring celebrities, socialites, and members of European aristocracy. They are not professional models. Socialite is not a derogatory term. I suggest you look at the article for socialite. Yet again, I ask that you stop making edits and changing information in the article unless you can provide actual sources that show that the information provided is false, which is unlikely, as the information all came from credible sources. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 02:35, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

I suggest you click and read the sources cited under the reference section of the article, which will reflect the information I provided. Your edits are not reflective as to what is written about these two women in any of the sources. Your continued reversions to the article are deconstructive and falsely based. I wanted to let you know that I put in a request for you to be blocked from editing. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 02:46, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

I have reverted your edits as they are inaccurate and based on opinion. No where did I mention that they are professional models. They are models. With the rise of Instagram influencers, most are now considered models. If you search the March 2017 issue of Hong Kong Tatler you would know they are not on the cover. The cover for March 2017 HK Tatler features Larry Gagosian and Zeng Fanzhi. I suggest you check to ensure your sources and edits are accurate. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Et43 (talk • contribs)

I am moving this discussion to Talk:Michelle Yeoh (socialite). -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 12:29, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Edit War

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:36, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 03:23, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Vandalism

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Michelle Yeoh (socialite), you may be blocked from editing. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rachel Yeoh, you may be blocked from editing.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for Edit-warring at Rachel Yeoh and Michelle Yeoh (socialite). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:16, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Et43, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 00:12, 16 October 2018 (UTC)